Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Artifacts 101: The Role of Artifacts in Educator Support and Evaluation Spring 2015 Webinar.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Standard V: Teacher.
The Quality Review A Reflection.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
HQS 2 School Leadership Glenna Heinlein and Kathy Hypes October 1, 2013.
Morristown Central School District Strategic Plan Board of Education Meeting February 13, 2008.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
School Improvement STRATEGIES Build Relationships Administrative TeamAdministrative Team (Faculty, Students, Parents)
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Integrated Media and Technology Program with an Emphasis on Student Achievement.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
The Use of Artifacts as Evidence in Educator Evaluation Fall 2015.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Supporting Beginning Teachers
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Educator Growth and Professional Development

Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator Growth and Development  Recognize and celebrate areas that exemplify this standard’s functions.  Complete the HQ Std 5 Rubric collectively and demonstrate proficiency in utilizing the tools necessary to analyze the results.  Utilize tools to conduct further needs analysis in specified areas based on their data.  Develop a plan for conducting the Rubric and specified needs analysis with the entire faculty when returning to school.  Have a data driven HQ Std 5 Plan that full aligns to the Strategic Plan

HQ Standard 5: Standard V – Educator Growth & Development In high quality schools, staff members participate in processes of self reflection, collaboration and evaluation that lead to professional growth and development in order to impact student learning. Function Category Function A – Professional Development  The staff engages in continuous learning opportunities for professional growth designed to improve school and classroom practice. Function B – Teacher Collaboration  The teachers participate in high functioning professional learning communities to collaborate on the improvement of students learning through the study of relevant data, problem analysis and the implementation of strategies that improve instructional practice. Function C – Evaluation, Feedback and Support  The staff participates in processes of evaluation that facilitate self-reflection and informs the process of professional growth.

Show and Share  5.A.1 The staff works with others to elevate the teaching profession by promoting and supporting continuous improvement efforts.  5.A.2 The staff supports instructional improvement through structured opportunities for ongoing discussions about instructional practices and the sharing of ideas.  5.A.3 The staff designs embedded professional development opportunities to support instructional improvement leading to increased student achievement and success.  5.A.4 The administration rewards accomplishments of the school, staff, and students.  5.B.1 Teachers participate in collaborative teams that work interdependently toward common student achievement goals.  5.B.2 Teachers collaboratively reflect on data and assessment as they work to plan instruction and assess student progress.  5.C.1 Principal observes instruction on a regular basis and provides feedback to support teachers in instructional improvement.  5.C.2 Principal develops and implements induction and orientation structures and processes to support success and retention of new faculty.

Rubric Rollout As a SLT collectively complete the HQ Std 5 Rubric Record your results Brainstorm how would you as a team roll out this Rubric in your school.

Developing a Plan Complete the HQ 5 Educator Growth and Development Plan Template Section “HQ Rubric”:  When and how will this be administered to the staff (paper-pencil; electronically, etc)?  When and how will the leadership team review the results?  When and how will the results be conveyed back to the teachers and staff?  When and how will the leadership team create a school-wide goal/goals?  When and how will the leadership team monitor and provide feedback on the goal progress?

HQ 5 Rubric: Analyzing the Results  Using the Multi-Voting tool to analyze the results and develop a list of potential professional development needs that are ranked and prioritized.  Write one goal and two objectives for your school based on the results. This goal should be a smart goal that is measureable.

Other Tools utilized to develop specified educator growth areas Based on the results from the HQ5 Educator Growth and Development Rubric there may need to be more investigation into particular areas of need:  Instructional Practices Inventory - Student Engagement  Reflective Teaching Practices - Teaching Practices  Co-Teaching Core Competencies - Co-teaching practices  Critical Issues for Team Consideration – Collaborative Teams Note these are sampling of the types of tools you may utilize, others are available based on your schools results.

Select a Specified Tool Each team member selects a tool they would like to further investigate.  Instructional Practices Inventory - Student Engagement  Reflective Teaching Practices - Teaching Practices  Co-Teaching Core Competencies - Co- teaching practices  Critical Issues for Team Consideration – Collaborative Teams

Specific Tools SLT Debrief Questions 1. Was this an effective tool to determine the need of this area? 2. How could this be used to determine staff professional development needs based on the results? 3. How could the SLT create a PD goal from the results? 4. How could we identify and celebrate quick-wins based on the data? 5. How could we utilize this tool to monitor effectiveness?

HQ5 Educator Growth and PD Plan Return to your School Leadership Educator Growth and Development Plan Template Section: “Specified Tools”:  Why was the specified tool selected based on our data?  Who will utilize this tool?  When and how often will this tool be administered?  When and how will the leadership team review the results?  When and how will the results be communicated? Individually and school wide?  When and how will the leadership team create a school-wide goal/goals?  When and how will the leadership team monitor and provide feedback on the goal progress?

Create your HQ5 Goal Utilizing your Educator Growth and Development Plan, create a goal that you will submit on the Strategic Plan. Remember it must be a SMART goal (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Timeframe).