 What does 21 st century assessment look like?  How does 21 st century assessment encourage learning?  How do effective teachers use assessment?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Advertisements

Providing High-Quality Written Feedback to Educators
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
How to Grade for Learning by Using 15 Fixes for Broken Grades – and PowerSchool Part 2 Chapel Hill, NC November 14-15, 2013 Presented by Ken O ’ Connor.
Comprehensive Models of Formative Assessment. A theory of formative assessment.
21 st Century Assessment Peg Henson and Laura Snow SD Department of Education
Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition People generally attribute success on any given task to one of four causes: A. Ability/Intelligence B. Effort.
We accept learning as the fundamental purpose of our school and therefore are willing to examine all practices in light of the impact on learning.. - DuFour,
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Assessment OF Learning (Summative) vs
Making Collaboration Work Module VII: Assessment and Grading
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
Professional Association of Georgia Educators 2010 PAGE Conference Crowne Plaza ® Atlanta-Ravinia June , 2010 Standards-Based Classroom: What It.
Assessing Student Learning. What is assessment? What was learned and how well was it learned Specific performance must be assessed Variety of forms.
Formative Assessments
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Session Materials  Wiki
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
DSD Curriculum & Instruction Department
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
Day 3: Rubrics as an Assessment Tool. "There are only two good reasons to ask questions in class: to cause thinking and to provide information for the.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Pre-Conference Workshop – June 2007 BUILDING A NATIONAL TEAM: Theatre Education Assessment Models Robert A. Southworth, Jr., Ed.D. TCG Assessment Models.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Standards and Objectives Cluster 5
Formative Assessments for 21 st Century Skills Nancy White, 21 st Century Learning & Innovation Specialist Academy School District 20 Academy School District.
RUBRICS: A REFRESHER COURSE PRINCESS ANNE MIDDLE SCHOOL STAFF WEEK TRAINING, AUGUST 2014.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Professional Development Topics that help students demonstrate Proficiency in State Standards on the CST.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Threshold Concepts & Assessment Ahmed Alwan, American University of Sharjah Threshold Concepts For Information Literacy: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.
Student Assessment Workshop #5 CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Providing Effective Descriptive Feedback: Designing Rubrics, Part 2 --Are you assessing what you think you’re assessing? Princess Anne Middle School Instructional.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Second session of the NEPBE I in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 22, 2013.
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Assessment Whittney Smith, Ed.D.. “Physical vs. Autopsy” Formative: Ongoing, varied assessment used as a tool for learning and diagnosing Summative:
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Session 4 Performance-Based Assessment
What do they really know, and what can they really do? Standards-Based Formative Assessment ©This document is the property of the Quakertown Community.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
The Value in Formative Assessment Prepared By: Jen Ramos.
Learning Goals and Learning Scales
Criterion-Referenced Testing and Curriculum-Based Assessment EDPI 344.
THREE DIMENSIONS OF A HIGH-QUALITY RUBRIC Created by Shauna Denson “Classroom Assessment for Student Learning”(J. Chappuis)
Day 8 Induction – Year 2 Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel Staff Developer.
Reinforcing Effort and Providing Recognition
Chapter 2 Designing and Planning Technology Enhanced Instruction By Tracy Theriault and Erika Davis.
MASTERY BASED GRADING DVD Back to School Night 2014.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Lesson Plans the UWG way Block One. Components of a Lesson Lesson Title : Main Idea or focus of the lesson Content Standard : What standard(s) are most.
Dr. Antar Abdellah. To enable you as an EFL teacher to: 1. Develop and articulate instructional objectives adequately and clearly. 2. Create, construct,
AEMP Grade Level Collaborative Module 8 Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch Academic English Mastery Program.
Jessica Babbes EDU 650: Teaching Learning and Leading in the 21st Century Kimberly A. Smith March 10, 2014.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Providing High-Quality Written Feedback to Educators
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Presentation transcript:

 What does 21 st century assessment look like?  How does 21 st century assessment encourage learning?  How do effective teachers use assessment?

What do you want this student to… look like be able to do accomplish demonstrate show proficiency in master at the end of your lesson or unit?

Standards-Based Assessment vs. Traditional Grading What does research say about grading… Behavior Attendance Work Completion Effort… Grade separately!

 Know how your students learn - a key  Interest inventories  Multiple intelligences  Utilize the key to open the doors  Differentiated Instruction  Assessment Formative Summative

“An effective teacher enhances student learning more than any other aspect of schooling that can be controlled.” Marzano

Frequent formative assessments, with sound feedback, significantly improve learning.

 Show that low scores do not imply failure  Show that effort results in high scores

1. Unpack standards 2. Identify essential content 3. Organize content into categories (topics) 1. Limit topics per subject/grade level 4. Organize categories or topics into targets 5. Develop assessments

UNPACKED CONTENT STANDARDS TARGETS ASSESSMENTS TOPICS

What target/s will this student be aiming at?

How will you know the students are hitting the target where you want them to hit it?

 Reflections  Rubrics  Portfolios

 Some things I did well on my personal project/assignment are…  Some things I did not do well…  Some things I would do differently are…  About myself, I learned that…  Next time I will…

 Senteos  Achievement Series  Slide shows  Interactive white boards  Brainpop.com  Formative assessment activities

 Most students do not understand the relationship between their effort and their achievement  Classroom Instruction that Works – page 49

Handouts 5-12  Effort logs  Effort/Achievement Rubrics  Effort/Achievement Comparison Graphs  Effort Honor Rolls Effort Handouts 5-13

TIMESCHEDULE ACTIVITY ONON & OFF OFF

4 I worked on the task until it was completed. I pushed myself to continue working on the task even when difficulties arose or a solution was not immediately evident. I viewed difficulties that arose as opportunities to strengthen my understanding. 3 I worked on the task until it was completed. I pushed myself to continue working on the task even when difficulties arose or a solution was not immediately evident. 2 I put some effort into the task, but I stopped working when difficulties arose. 1 I put very little effort into the task.

4 I exceeded the objectives of the task or lesson. 3 I met the objectives of the task or lesson. 2 I met a few of the objectives of the task or lesson, but did not meet others. 1 I did not meet the objectives of the task or lesson.

Quality Levels Advanced (4) Yes and more! Proficient (3) Yes! Nearing Proficient (2) Yes but… Needs Improvement (1) No! Criterion 1 Quality Descriptors Criterion 2 Criterion 3 Criterion 4

 Use and even number of quality levels  4 or 6 is ideal – stay away from odd numbers because you may have a tendency to hoover around the middle.  Use language and numbers that are understandable by the users.

 Choose clear, specific, and essential areas that will be assessed.  Focus on areas for instruction.  Choose a limited number of criteria.  3 to 5 criteria seem to be most manageable  Equal steps along the scale  The difference between 4 and 3 should be equivalent to the difference between 3-2 and 2-1

 Use clear, observable language.  Use demonstrative verbs  Keep to observable behaviors  Avoid negatives  “begins without preparation” vs. “does not prepare”  Use language that paints a picture of quality.  Use student friendly language.  Use precise terms  Instead of “many errors” you may want to specify “six or more errors”  At the same time, be sure the rubric is generally qualitative in nature rather than quantitative  Provide examples of strong and weak work for learners.

 Use the rubrics we’ve provided and evaluate the quality of each

 Begin with the end in mind – what is the student going to “look like” in the end?  Write the Quality Level 3 first  Think of level 3 as being at the proficient level, the level you expect all student to achieve at  Build the rubric from that point forward and backward

Cookie Rubric Create a rubric with one criteria for a cookie 1.suggestions: texture, taste, richness, flavor 2.Test your rubric

 Field test or pilot rubrics before use  Discuss rubrics with students to create an understanding of expectations  Check for accuracy, bias and consistency  Could several teachers use the rubric and score student work within the same range?  Teach students how to create rubrics

 Keep track of strengths and weaknesses of rubric as you use it to assess student work.  Ask yourself, “What did or didn’t I make clear instructionally?”  Ask for feedback from your students.  Revise accordingly.