The MAGIC Metadata Triage Training Workshop Circuit - Winter / Spring, 2007-8 Establishing your minimum requirements… Mark Duewell MAGIC Project Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Intermediate Course Module 3: Metadata Catalogs and Geospatial One.
Advertisements

Training Structure Agenda Metadata Creation Considerations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Metadata Lecture 7 October 5, Value of Documents Two very similar paintings of circus performers by Picasso from 1904 are put on the auction block;
Geospatial One-Stop A Federal Gateway to Federal, State & Local Geographic Data
Metadata Workshop Frank Roberts, Coeur d’Alene Tribe GIS Bruce Godfrey, U of I, Inside Idaho Project (Funded by FGDC)
Spatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts and Components Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 6, 2006.
FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR.
Creating Geospatial Metadata for the Long-term Lynda Wayne Federal Geographic Data Committee Geospatial One-Stop GeoMaxim.
Alternate Software Development Methodologies
Dr Gordon Russell, Napier University Unit Data Dictionary 1 Data Dictionary Unit 5.3.
Harvesting Metadata for Use by the geodata.gov Portal Doug Nebert FGDC Secretariat Geospatial One-Stop Team.
Oregon Spatial Data Library Partnership Metadata Training OU Knight Library Eugene, Oregon December 3, 2009 Kuuipo Walsh Institute for Natural Resources.
EDEN 2007 Naples, Italy LIFELONG LEARNING TEACHERS’ NEEDS IN VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Josep Maria Boneu 1, Maria Galofré 2, Julià Minguillón 2 1 Centre.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Caro-COOPS Data Management: Metadata. Cast-Net addresses the need for improved connectivity among coastal observing systems by creating a regional framework.
Geospatial standards Beyond FGDC Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 3, 2006.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS National Hydrography Dataset Stewardship in West Virginia George Heleine USGS NHD POC Region.
Implementing ISO Aleta Vienneau and David Danko ESRI.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Databases
Status of US Implementation of ISO Metadata October 2005 Lynda Wayne US Federal Geographic Data Committee / GeoMaxim Sharon Shin US Federal Geographic.
Employing e-Portfolios in Instructional and Co-Curricular Settings Jennifer Matthews, Senior Consultant Blackboard Inc April 13, 2005.
Digitization at the National Archives and Records Administration Doris Hamburg Director, Preservation Programs James Hastings Director, Access Programs.
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
Scaling Up Teaching and Learning Services Maggie McVay Lynch, Ed.D. Oregon Health & Science University.
Introduction to Databases and Database Languages
XML, DITA and Content Repurposing By France Baril.
Geospatial Metadata Overview WV AGP GIS Conference, June 2008 Presented by: Eric Hopkins, GIS Analyst West Virginia GIS Technical.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Geographic Metadata North American Profile Development for ISO Geographic Metadata.
The Role of Metadata in the SDI Lynda Wayne GeoMaxim / FGDC Metadata Education Coordinator Spatial Data Infrastructures Workshop Denver June 2002.
Spatially enabling Northern Ireland Dr Suzanne McLaughlin DFP Land & Property Services GIS Ireland Conference 11 th October 2012.
Why We Create Metadata and How it is Useful Bruce Godfrey University of Idaho Library INSIDE Idaho
Coastal GeoTools Charleston SC January 2003 Making Metadata Work for You Lynda Wayne FGDC Metadata Education Coordinator / GeoMaxim.
Administrative Software Chapter 7 Teaching and Learning with Technology.
Architecture for a Database System
Generating Metadata Through ArcCatalog. Metadata Entry Tools There are many different metadata entry tools There are many different metadata entry tools.
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Introduction Module 2: FGDC CSDGM Metadata Compliancy.
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
The Value of Geospatial Metadata Metadata has tremendous value to Individuals within your organization, as well as to individuals outside of your organization.
GIS Metadata Training & Outreach Assistance MIAMI-DADE COUNTY & NSDI 2015.
1 Integrated Services Program The Virginia Metadata Training Workshop Summer, 2006 Lyle Hornbaker Integrated Services Program
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Value of Metadata Introduction to Metadata An overview of the value of metadata to.
FGDC and GOS Metadata: Foundations to Build the NSDI Sharon Shin FGDC Secretariat / Geospatial One-Stop.
Metadata Data about data. Useful links... html html
NSGIC Metadata Cadre’ who’s in, what’s up NSGIC 2002 Annual Conference Lynda Wayne GeoMaxim/ FGDC Metadata Education Coordinator.
5 - 1 Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Intermediate Course Module 1: Introduction and Standards Overview.
1 EPA’s Geospatial Metadata Framework An Overview FGDC Coordination Group Meeting February 12, 2008.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program (CAP) Introduction to the Cooperative Agreements.
Why Standardize Metadata?. Why Have a Standard? Think for a moment how hard it would be to… … bake a cake without standard units of measurement. … put.
CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) Tools Software that is used to support software process activities. Provides software process support by:- –
Chapter 4 Automated Tools for Systems Development Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition 4.1.
WVGISTC, 425 White Hall, PO Box 6300, Morgantown, WV Introduction to Geospatial Metadata A Half-Day Workshop, 15 May 2006 Presented by: Eric Hopkins,
Objectives Understand Corrective, Perfective and Preventive maintenance Discuss the general concepts of software configuration management.
Establishing and Maintaining Effective Safety Committees.
ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 Introducing ArcCatalog: Tools for Metadata and Data Management.
Merging Metadata Standards: FGDC CSDGM and ISO and Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Metadata Coordinator
L EARNING M ANAGEMENT S YSTEM Submitted by, Srilekshmi.M AM.EN.P2ELT14006.
Creating Metadata in Support of Geospatial One-Stop and the NSDI Lynda Wayne Federal Geographic Data Committee Geospatial One-Stop GeoMaxim.
2004 National Spatial Data Infrastructure Cooperative Agreements Program (CAP) Category 1 - Metadata Implementation Assistance (13) Category 2 – Metadata.
Introduction to Metadata March 2016 What is Metadata?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved.1 | Assessment & Information 1 Online Testing Administrator Training.
Geog. 377: Introduction to GIS - Lecture 16 Overheads 1 5. Metadata 6. Summary of Database Creation 7. Data Standards 8. NSDI Topics Lecture 16: GIS Database.
Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation 5-1 At the conclusion of this module the participant will be able to List the seven.
Contextual Layers – existing and near-term Boundaries  Country – host  State – host  County – host  MSA – access Bureau of Census TIGER WMS  Tribal.
Content Management Systems
NORTH CAROLINA state and local government METADATA PROFILE
Creating Geospatial Metadata for the Long-term
2004 National Spatial Data Infrastructure
Presentation transcript:

The MAGIC Metadata Triage Training Workshop Circuit - Winter / Spring, Establishing your minimum requirements… Mark Duewell MAGIC Project Coordinator (573)

Tell us what’s important to your success! TEAMWORK

Agenda 1.Emphasize the reasons to maintain metadata. 2.Discuss establishing your minimum metadata requirements. 3.Helping you create a metadata program. 4.Helping us create state repositories. 5.Conclusion

Reasons to Maintain Metadata Metadata helps people who use geospatial data find the data they need and determine how best to use it. Metadata supports producers in locating and using their own data resources and data consumers in locating and using data resources produced by others.

Reasons to Maintain Metadata As personnel change in an organization, institutional knowledge leaves the organization. Undocumented data can lose their value. Subsequent workers may have little understanding of the uses for a data base and may find they can't trust results generated. Lack of knowledge about other organizations' data can lead to duplication of effort. It may seem burdensome to add the cost of generating metadata to the cost of data collection, but in the long run metadata are worth it.

Reasons to Maintain Metadata Metadata also supports Data Management requirements to: –preserve the data history so that it can be re-used or adapted, –assess the age and character of data holdings to determine which data should be maintained, updated, or deleted, –instill data accountability by requiring you to state what you know about the data and realizing what you don’t, but should, know about your data –limit data liability by explicitly designating the effective and administrative limits of use of the data.

Reasons to Maintain Metadata Metadata also supports Project Management requirements to: –plan and document the data types and content needed to support the project –monitor data development by regular review of the process steps completed and recorded within the metadata –provide all project participants a common language of attributes and process methods and a place to record and share their progress –access the lineage and content of outsourced data production by requiring robust metadata as a contract deliverable.

Status of Metadata in the MAGIC region… The quality of metadata varies greatly across the region. Shareable data requires satisfactory metadata maintenance. Although most producers are willing to share what they have. –Facilities to share metadata vary –There is some duplication of efforts

MAGIC’s interests and role… Coordinate GIS efforts in the region. –Develop data and standards where there are significant economies of scale and regional interest. –Encourage cooperation between data producers and users. Promulgate standards to support data sharing. –MAGIC encourages the operation and maintenance of state metadata repositories. Provide assistance in developing local level data. –Through education and outreach in the form of workshops and symposiums.

FGDC Standard –“Standards facilitate the development, sharing, and use of geospatial data. The FGDC develops geospatial data standards for implementing the NSDI, in consultation and cooperation with State, local, and tribal governments, the private sector and academic community, and, to the extent feasible, the international community.” –This results in a standard that can be used by everyone. Promulgate standards to support sharing

FGDC Standard – Minimum requirements… Adoption of a Subset –The standard does not require that all fields be completed. –Every FGDC field is defined as either: Mandatory - These elements must be provided. Mandatory if applicable - These elements must be provided if the data set exhibits the characteristic defined by the element. Optional - These elements provided at the discretion of the data set producer. States in the MAGIC region may have different requirements – but all utilize the FGDC Content Standard as a basic building block – their required metadata contains all of the “Mandatory” and may contain some of the other fields Any state standard should be viewed is a minimum standard. You may have reason to maintain other fields. Promulgate standards to support sharing

Implementing a Metadata Program Get support and “buy-in” from your supervisors and policy makers. Decide on your own processes, standards, and minimums. –No data set complete until metadata written. –Adopt it as policy –Make it a formal duty of a position Give every user the proper training. –Hold occasional refresher courses Use the proper tools. Provide assistance in developing metadata

Choosing tools for your shop… ESRI ArcCatalog contains functions to maintain the metadata for our ESRI format data. There are a variety of free (ex. XMLInput) and commercial software tools available to support metadata development. These tools offer a range of features and capabilities. Provide assistance in developing metadata

Choosing Tools for Your Shop When evaluating the right tool consider the following: Does your GIS software provide an internal data/metadata management utility that captures properties like extent, projection, attribute labels, etc.? Do you need a tool that supports one or more CSDGM Profiles or Extensions? Do you need to document data resource beyond those managed within your GIS? Do you need a tool that is easily distributed to partners? What features are most important to you? –auto-capture of information –bundling of metadata with data –creation and use of templates –easy to use interface –robust help systems and tutorials Provide assistance in developing metadata

Three options for tools to manage metadata in your shop… Use ESRI based tools Custom Programs Use both

ESRI Based (ArcCatalog) Advantages –The Metadata tab in ArcCatalog allows users to complete FGDC compliant metadata and can harvest metadata elements directly from spatial datasets. –By default, when you try to view an item's metadata, ArcCatalog will create it for you automatically if it doesn’t already exist. –It will add many of the item's properties to the metadata. –Metadata becomes part of the item itself. It is automatically moved, copied, and deleted along with the item. Disadvantages –It requires ESRI ArcCatalog. –It is difficult to use for data that is not maintained in ArcCatalog. –The sharing of metadata is easy if used against an ArcIMS site but more difficult for other sources of metadata.

Custom Program Advantages –It doesn’t require ESRI ArcCatalog. –It can easily be used for data that is not maintained in ArcCatalog. –The sharing of metadata would use standard file formats (xml/html) and be easy to share. –Could accommodate ESRI metadata also via a manual import/export process. –Would not preclude the use of ArcCatalog. Disadvantages –Will require a manual import/export process to interface with ESRI systems. –Will require more manual procedures to share data. –Metadata must be maintained separately from the item itself. Developing minimum requirements…

What tool will provide for the best maintenance of your data? ESRI or custom program? Or both? Questions for discussion. –What software do you use to create/edit/maintain spatial data? –Does the technical expertise exist to manually maintain metadata? –Do you support other offices who might want to present metadata (i.e. registrars, assessors, etc.) –Would you want an online tool to maintain metadata? –Cost shouldn’t be a factor – but staff time almost always is – which is easiest/ most time effective? Developing minimum requirements…

Tell us what’s important to your success! TEAMWORK