Senegal Change Assessment Ugo Leonardi GLCN Land Cover/Remote Rensing Expert

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling Dept. of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, NTU Satellite Remote Sensing for Land-Use/Land-Cover.
Advertisements

Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Land Cover Mapping of Iceland and Southern Greenland Global Land Cover 2000 S. Bartalev (JRC EC), V. Egorov (IKI RAN) and E. Bartholomé (JRC EC)
Toward Near Real Time Forest Fire Monitoring in Thailand Honda Kiyoshi and Veerachai Tanpipat Space Technology Applications and Research, School of Advanced.
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 Land Cover Classification.
Use of Remote Sensing and GIS in Agriculture and Related Disciplines
VALIDATION OF REMOTE SENSING CLASSIFICATIONS: a case of Balans classification Markus Törmä.
Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit 1 Towards a global Land Cover 2000 product: the preliminary version of the global product and how it can be improved.
The use of Remote Sensing in Land Cover Mapping and Change Detection in Somalia Simon Mumuli Oduori, Ronald Vargas Rojas, Ambrose Oroda and Christian Omuto.
GLC 2000 First Result Workshop March 2002 Spectral separability of Land cover classes in Southern Africa. An application of LCCS. Ana Cabral 1, Maria.
Overview Minimum required classifiers for mapping vegetation cover at global scale using the FAO-LCCS tool GLC LEGEND hjs/30-Apr-01.
Has EO found its customers? 1 Space Applications Institute Directorate General Joint Research Centre European Commission Ispra (VA), Italy
Definition Land cover is the observed (bio)physical cover on the earth’s surface on the earth’s surface. It includes vegetation and man-made features as.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
1 SWALIM Workshop June, Nairobi Monitoring Land Cover Dynamics in sub-Saharan Africa H.D. Eva, A. Brink and D. Simonetti.
Dichotomous Phase The initial Dichotomous Phase of LCCS Classification Module Click one option of each pair of buttons. Or immediately identify to which.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
LAND COVER MAPPING AND LAND COVER CHANGES Project financed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) carried out by FAO Food and Agriculture Organization.
Geography Challenge #3 (10 Minutes)
Pollution Delhi, India “Red Fort” covered by smog 2009.
LAND COVER CHANGE ASSESSMENT GLCN methodological approach Antonio Di Gregorio.
F.A.O. Land Cover/Remote Sensing Specialist
Analyzing Spectral Signatures in Imagine D. Meyer E. Wood
A Forest Fragmentation Index to Quantify the Rate of Forest Change James D. Hurd, Emily H. Wilson, Daniel L. Civco Center for Land Use Education and Research.
Exercise #5: Supervised Classification. Step 1. Delineating Training Sites and Generating Signatures An individual training site is delineated as an “area.
Forest Degradation Assessment in Sri Lanka Raushan Kumar, Forestry Officer, FAO Sri Lanka Nishantha Edirisinghe, Deputy Conservator of Forest Sharat Kulatunga,
Hiroshi Sasakawa Ph. D. Japan Forest Technology Association Remote sensing expert JICA Project in Gabon International Symposium on Land Cover Mapping for.
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
PREFER 1 st Annual Review Meeting, 5-6 Dec 2013, Milano-Italy PREFER WP 3.2 Information support to Recovery/Reconstruction Task 7 Damage Severity Map PREFER.
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Has EO found its customers? Results of GLC2000 Legend Workshop November 2000 JRC / Ispra.
Change Detection in the Metro Area Michelle Cummings Laura Cossette.
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis Team: Kelly Blanton, Erica Tice, William Weldon, and Paul Starkel.
PREFER 1 st Annual Review Meeting, 5-6 Dec 2013, Milano-Italy PREFER WP 3.2, Task 7.
IMPROVEMENT OF EWS BY LAND COVER DATA – Giancarlo Pini – IBIMET-CNR Giancarlo Pini Institute of BioMeteorology (IBIMET) - National Research Council (CNR)
What is an image? What is an image and which image bands are “best” for visual interpretation?
A Forest Cover Change Study Gone Bad Lessons Learned(?) Measuring Changes in Forest Cover in Madagascar Ned Horning Center for Biodiversity and Conservation.
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Introduction to Spatial Calculation Estimation of Areas Susceptible to Flood and Soil Loss.
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion
EEA 2006 Accounts Update Tables. PART 1 Table 1.1: Classifying land cover and land cover change for land accounting.
TREES AND FORESTS IN DRYLANDS: THE FIRST GLOBAL ASSESSMENT UNCCD COP 12 Advances in Tree Cover Mapping and Monitoring for Restoration October 2015,
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Background: The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) together with the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) and the.
Module 2.2 Monitoring activity data for forests remaining forests (incl. forest degradation) REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University,
Remote sensing survey Distribution of forests Trend statistics.
GLC 2000 Workshop March 2003 Land cover map of southern hemisphere Africa using SPOT-4 VEGETATION data Ana Cabral 1, Maria J.P. de Vasconcelos 1,2,
Case Study 1: The North- Eastern Fringes of Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, Lampung, Sumatra Background The site is mountainous with an elevation.
CHANGE DETECTION ANALYSIS USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES Change in Urban area from 1992 to 2001 in COIMBATORE, INDIA. FNRM 5262 FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATION.
The Regional Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) Workshop for Southeast Asia Bangkok, Thailand 27 – 30 April 2009.
GAEZ Data Portal Background AEZ methodology and tools GAEZ Data Portal Features Next Steps Content.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Gofamodimo Mashame*,a, Felicia Akinyemia
Problems of Desertification and Degradation
Quantifying Urbanization with Landsat Imagery in Rochester, Minnesota
  Assessing the impact of land use and land cover change on streamflow response: case study of Dinder and Rahad, Ethiopia/Sudan Khalid E. A. Hassaballah,
PROBA scenes acquired over our study sites
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
GLC-2000-Continental Southeast Asia
Take Notes as you view the slides
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis
The Pagami Creek Wildfire
Land Use Modelling Group, Sustainability Assessment Unit (DG JRC)
Interpreting Arial Photos
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Presentation of Jordan Case Study First Management Board Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Senegal Change Assessment Ugo Leonardi GLCN Land Cover/Remote Rensing Expert

Within the F.A.O. LADA (Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands) framework ( an analysis of land cover changes in Senegal from 1990 to 2005 was performed between October 2007 and March The analysis covered all the classes present in the Senegal 2005 Land Cover legend, but particular attention was given to the more sensitive areas such as Forest, Agricultural land and Urban areas. Land cover changes can be driven by anthropogenic and natural alterations as:  climate-related change (long- and short term)  burning / fire activities  cutting and clearing of forests (deforestation)  grazing activities (intensification of rangelands)  agricultural encroachments (farming activities)  fuel wood consumption  urban expansions (urbanization)  natural successional processes and regeneration

CHANGE DETECTION STEPS: 1.Creation of a Radex Mosaic with the 1990 Landsat TM images 2.Visual analysis of the 1990 images with the 2005 Landsat ETM images using the GeoVis “multiple window” tool 3.Assess if the change occurred in a determined area is due to seasonal factors or not. 4.Define the change, drawing a polygon of the changed area on the 1990 image. 5.Classify the polygon representing a land cover change labelling it with the correspondent land cover type in 1990 (for the encoding of the 1990 change was used the 2005 Senegal legend). 6.When the comparative analysis of 1990 images with 2005 was concluded, the polygons representing a change in 1990 have been intersected with the 2005 land cover interpretation, creating a unique shapefile of changes. 7.Aggregation of land cover classes for the data analysis. 8.Data Analysis

The Dataset Landsat TM and ETM are the images used to assess the changes of Senegal land cover. In the figure below, in red are shown the acquisition dates of the 90’s historical images; in blue are the dates of the 2005 images to be compared with the 90’s.

Examples of change detection analysis using the GeoVis multiple window tool. The majority of changes occur in Natural Vegetation, which is usually replaced by Agriculture

Other example of changes occuring in Natural Vegetation areas. On the following pictures are shown two examples where natural vegetation is replaced, in 2005, by agricultural areas. Notice also (blue circle) that also the reverse sometimes occurs. This is due to the shifting cultivation practice, but most of the time the change from natural vegetation to agriculture is permanent.

In this case bare areas in 1990, have been replaced by natural vegetation (mangroves) in Notice the black strips in the 2005 Landsat 7 image, due to a permanent problem of the sensor. These strips, sometimes made the assessment of the changes impossible.

Urban area is another sensitive land cover feature which has been taken into consideration for the Change Assessment of Senegal. On the following pictures are given two examples where both natural vegetation and agricultural areas are replaced, in 2005, by urban areas. Urban areas strongly increased from 1990 to 2005

Final shapefile containing polygons with change. The figure below shows in blue color the distribution of the areas where changes occurred in Senegal

The Thematic Aggregation The land cover change analysis was carried out considering all the land cover classes of the Senegal database. When the visual detection of changes was completed, the Senegal Land Cover legend (version 8.1), used for the labelling, was aggregated on the base of its thematic content. The result is a legend with 10 broader classes, which allows to show up Senegal main features affected by changes. The 10 aggregated classes are: 1. Agriculture in terrestrial and aquatic/regularly flooded land (AG) 2. Forest plantation (TP) 3. Trees closed to open (100-40%) in terrestrial and aquatic/regularly flooded land (NV_TCO) 4. Trees very open (40-15%) in terrestrial and aquatic/regularly flooded land (NV_TVO) 5. Shrubs closed to open (100-40%) in terrestrial and aquatic/regularly flooded land (NV_SCO) 6. Shrubs very open (40-15%) in terrestrial and aquatic/regularly flooded land (NV_SVO) 7. Herbaceous closed to open (100-40%) in terrestrial and aquatic/regularly flooded land (NV_HER) 8. Urban areas (UB) 9. Bare areas (BS) 10. Seasonal/perennial, natural/artificial Water bodies and tidal areas (WAT)

THE DATABASE STRUCTURE The shapefile Sen_change_90-05 contains all the Senegal Change Assessment data. It is in UTM projection (Zone 28 – Datum: WGS 84) and its database is composed by 19 fields, described as follow: Auto_id = a unique identification number for each polygon Code_2005 = the 2005 LCCS code Sen_2005 = the 2005 User Label (A in case of single units; A/B in case of mixed units) Code1_05 = the 2005 User Label present as first term of the code (A) Code2_05 = the 2005 User Label present as second term of the code (B), in case on mixed units Agg_1_05 = the 2005 Aggregated code present as first term Agg_2_05 = the 2005 Aggregated code present as second term, in case on mixed units Perc_05 = the Percentage to be considered during the area calculation process. It represents the percentage of cover due to each term composing the code for the 2005 classes. Code_1990 = the 1990 LCCS code Sen_1990 = the 1990 User Label (A in case of single units; A/B in case of mixed units) Code1_90 = the 1990 User Label present as first term of the code (A) Code2_90 = the 1990 User Label present as second term of the code (B), in case on mixed units Agg_1_90 = the 1990 Aggregated code present as first term Agg_2_90 = the 1990 Aggregated code present as second term, in case on mixed units Perc_90 = the Percentage to be considered during the area calculation process. It represents the percentage of cover due to each term composing the code for the 1990 classes. Region = the name of the Senegal Region to which the polygons belong Hectares = the area calculated in hectares. Agr_05 = the percentage of agriculture present in the polygon in 2005 Agr_90 = the percentage of agriculture present in the polygon in 1990

AREA CALCULATION The area calculation is a very sensitive issue since on this data is made the estimation of land cover changes. In order to give an exact estimation of the aggregated classes coverage, the area was calculated considering both terms of the mixed units, and giving them a different weight according to their original code. Fields “Perc_90 “ and “Perc_05” show, for each polygon, the percentage considered for the area calculation, representing the percentage of cover due to each term composing the polygon code. In single units, 100% of polygon coverage was attributed to the aggregated land cover class, whichever it was. In mixed units, the aggregated class area was calculated attributing 60% of polygon coverage to the first term, and 40% of polygon coverage to the second term of the mixed unit. The only exception in area calculation occurs in mixed units where Scattered Isolated agricultural classes are present (always as second term), representing less than 15% of the polygon cover. In this case 85% of polygon coverage was attributed to the first term, and 15% of polygon coverage was attributed to the second term of the mixed unit.

Summary of Changes in Senegal

Change areas – Results – Proportional symbols map

The database updating In May 2009 the shapefile of the Senegal changes was updated with the final land cover legend.

After the updating, the shapefile containing the changes was intersected with the land cover shapefile, in order to run the MadCat standard reports for the statistical analysis of changes. MadCat standard “Changes Basic Report”

MadCat standard “Changes Extended Report”

Thank You