Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Advertisements

Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
TXDOT Asset Maintenance
SCDOT Needs, Funding Challenges, and Economic Development or “Getting to Good” Robert St. Onge, SCDOT 16 July 2012.
Michigan’s Road Commissions January 25, 2006 Legacy And Mission Michigan Townships Association.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
December 10, 2014 Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs WSDOT Can Provide Reliable Long-Term Pavement Estimates, but Accuracy of Bridge Estimates.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Local Highway Technical Assistance Council Joint Senate and House Transportation Committees January
House Bill 2 and P3 Update Aubrey Layne Secretary of Transportation December 17, 2014.
Steve Varnedoe Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System North Carolina Department of Transportation Report to the Joint.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
1 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program ( ) Kit Baker, Chair ( Citizen’s Transportation Advisory Committee ) Desiree’ Winkler, P.E. ( Transportation.
Joe Turner, PE Disaster Recovery Engineer. DIVISIONS AND DISTRICTS.
PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS: TRANSPORTATION Steve Hansen, PE Director of Public Works – Liberty, MO APWA PW Institute April 8, 2014.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Transportation’s Relation to Growth Management `.
City Transportation Funding Overview House Transportation Committee January 13, 2004 Ashley Probart AWC Transportation Coordinator.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Mississippi DOT Roadsides, Drainage & Vegetation Management Standards.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Mission Statement Plan, Design, Construct, Operate and Maintain the roadway system under the jurisdiction of Lee County.
Moving Toward a Performance- based Federal-aid Highway Program Integrating Maintenance AASHTO Subcommittee on Maintenance July 18, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 3, 2013.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AN ALDOT PERSPECTIVE December 3, 2014.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link Rural Transportation Summit January 16, 2014 ADOT Vision and Long-Range Plan Planning to Programming.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
LAKE COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW AND PROGRAM PRIORITIES Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public.
Patrick Weidemann Ryan Wilson, P.E., AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference March 5, 2013.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Hearing the Silence : Putting Maintenance First (A semiosis)
Designing the Future of NMDOT NM Section ITE September 3, 2015 Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
2009 ACEC/ODOT CONFERENCE ODOT’S 1R PROGRAM Liz Hunt, P.E. ODOT Pavement Services Engineer.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
Session 2 Introduction to Pavement Preventive Maintenance Concepts.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Iowa in Motion  Iowa’s Plan Process  Phased Approach Part  -current conditions -issues -elements.
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Tim G. Schulte, P.E. Richland County Engineer.
2009 ROADWAY CONFERENCE 1R PROGRAM Cathy Nelson Steven Lindland.
AT THE CROSSROADS Building for the Next Generation Council of State Governments May 30, 2008 Lexington, Kentucky.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Transportation Asset Management PM Peer Exchange Section 3 Overview: Additional Asset Management Classes Connie Sorrell Chief of System Operations.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Lakes Region Transportation Workshop November 15, 2013.
Module 2-1 The Foundation For Road Safety Management Policy History and Institutional Structures of Road Safety Management Think about it …
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
1 Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicles (GARVEE) Bond Presented to the California Transportation Commission July 25, 2007.
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM.
MoDOT: Year In Review Ed Hassinger Deputy Director/Chief Engineer.
Presentation transcript:

Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12, 2006 Lacy D. Love, PE

Condition Assessment & Funding Needs For North Carolina’s Highway System Reporting Requirements Overview of the Highway System Assessment Methodologies Current Conditions Maintenance Benefits of SB 1005 & NCMA Funding Needs Maintenance Operational Improvements Performance Based Management Initiative

Biennial Report on Maintenance Requirements. G.S The annual cost of routine maintenance The cost of eliminating maintenance backlog Annual resurfacing cost based on a 12-year cycle for primary roads and a 15-year cycle for other systems The cost of eliminating any resurfacing backlog

Since the Highway Trust Fund was enacted: ,808 road miles 127,809 paved lane miles 16,104 miles of unpaved roads 16,900 structures 61.1 M sf bridge deck area ,808 road miles 127,809 paved lane miles 16,104 miles of unpaved roads 16,900 structures 61.1 M sf bridge deck area ,009 road miles 160,609 paved lane miles 5,536 miles of unpaved roads 17,848 structures 79.8 M sf bridge deck area ,009 road miles 160,609 paved lane miles 5,536 miles of unpaved roads 17,848 structures 79.8 M sf bridge deck area North Carolina State Highway System

Highway System Growth (Paved Lane Miles) System Growth

Bridge System Growth (Square Feet of Bridge Deck) Deck Area Growth

Highway System Usage (Vehicle Miles Traveled) Growth

History of Routine Maintenance Funding Millions $ M $ 71.4 M

History of Resurfacing Funding Millions $ M $ 73.8 M

Rating the Condition of the Highway System Pavement Condition Survey Bridge Condition Survey Maintenance Condition Survey

Bridge Condition Survey

Bridges 4Railings 4Decks 4Expansion Joints 4Superstructure  Substructure

Pavement Condition Survey

Pavements 4Asphalt 4Concrete

Maintenance Condition Survey

Roadway 4Shoulders 4Ditches Drainage 4Pipes 4Curb & Gutter 4Catch Basin

Maintenance Condition Survey

Environmental 4Turf Condition 4Misc. Vegetation Management Roadside 4Mowing 4Litter & Debris 4Slope 4Guardrail

Maintenance Condition Survey

Traffic Control Devices 4Traffic Signs 4Pavement Striping 4Pavement Markers

Level of Service A

Level of Service B

Level of Service C

Level of Service D

Level of Service F

Roadway Level of Service InterstatePrimarySecondary F D C B A (Target) (2004 Results) (2006 Results) (Shortfall)

Roadway Performance Measures (Interstate) Element Pavement Shoulders/Ditches Roadside Drainage Traffic Control Devices Environmental Total Target Scale

Performance Measure Trends (Roadway)

Bridge Performance Measures (Statewide) Element Decks Rails Expansion Joints Superstructure Substructure Total Target Scale

Performance Measure Trends (Bridge)

Contract Resurfacing ResurfacingCycles Per G.S Primary System12 yrs All Other Systems15 yrs Total Cost $ million ResurfacingCycles Per G.S Primary System12 yrs All Other Systems15 yrs Total Cost $ million

Authorized use of Highway Trust Fund cash balances (2001) $515 Million –$45 Million for signal improvements –$470 Million for pavement improvements –up to 10% for economic development Benefits include: –Targeted major primary system corridors –Resurfaced & rehabilitated 5,500 lane miles of NC and US Routes –Helped slow the increase of resurfacing backlog & pavement needs –Improved highway safety Senate Bill 1005

$630 Million *Revised Delivery Schedule –$400 Million by end of 2005 –$230 Million from –Budget adjustments impact only delivery time, not number of projects Benefits include: –Reduces resurfacing backlog –Reduces patching costs and shoulder maintenance –Improves pavement markings and markers –Replaces bridges with high maintenance costs –Improves traffic flow and enhances safety NC Moving Ahead!

Primary Pavement Condition Years Percent

Secondary Pavement Condition Years Percent

System Preservation New line item in maintenance budget $ 78.6 M Preserve the highway system by extending the life of pavement, bridge, and traffic features –pavement seals –bridge painting –pavement marking $1 spent today saves $5 tomorrow New line item in maintenance budget $ 78.6 M Preserve the highway system by extending the life of pavement, bridge, and traffic features –pavement seals –bridge painting –pavement marking $1 spent today saves $5 tomorrow

Alternate Funding TIP Funds –Signal Preventive Maintenance Program (8,800 Traffic Signals Statewide) –Intelligent Transportation System/Incident Response Program –Positive guidance HB 1825 –Allows SR Construction funds to be used on paved SRs –Improves functionality, safety, and condition

Supplemental Maintenance Funds (Millions) '03-'04 '04-'05 '05-'06 '06-'07 '07-'08 TIP Funds$ 33.1 $ 38.1 $ 44.6 $ 48.0 $ 43.5 SR Funds $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 50.0 SB 1005$150.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 NCMA$100.0 $110.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 $ 0.0 Total $ $ $ 44.6 $ 48.0 $ 93.5

Maintenance Funding Needs (Millions) FY ‘07-’08 Needs Routine Maintenance (Roads & Bridges)$ Backlog ($437.2 Million)$ 48.1 Contract Resurfacing$ Backlog ($687.5 Million)$ 68.8 Disasters + $ 30.0 Total Maintenance Funding Need $ 1,174.6 Supplemental Maintenance Funds - $ 93.5 Adjusted Maintenance Funding Needs $ 1,081.0

Statewide Annual Maintenance Funding Plan

Maintenance Operational Improvements LED replacement for signal bulbs Signal preventive maintenance ITS (IMAP) initiatives Incentive pay programs DOC litter pickup program Winter anti-icing operations

Goals –Move from reactive to strategic/outcome based –Clearly define mission & expectations for operations –Develop strategies resulting in improved efficiency, performance, & preservation consistent with the Statewide Long Range Plan –Develop management tools/systems to measure outcomes & performance –Management flexibility with accountability Performance Based Management Initiative

Statewide Transportation Plan Purpose –Offers policy guidance & strategic direction for NCDOT –Federally mandated –Inventory of 25-year transportation needs for all modes –Forecast of available revenues –Opportunity to solicit public & stakeholder interest –Outlines long-term transportation investment priorities

Statewide Tier - Facilities such as Interstates and major Primary Highways which serve long-distance trips, connect major population centers, have the highest usage and primarily provide a mobility function. Regional Tier - Minor US and NC designated highways which connect regional centers and typically serve high levels of demand for short distance like commuter travel. Subregional Tier - Minor NC routes and Secondary Roads which serve localized, short distance movements, have low demand, and provide land access to homes and businesses. Highway System Definition (Tiered Approach)

Performance Based Management Uses data/statistical evidence to determine progress toward established goals/outcomes Measures efficiency, effectiveness of organization’s programs and operations (condition, quality, timeliness, reliability, etc.) Simple, understandable, logical, repeatable Shows a trend over time

Measuring Highway System Performance

Performance Based Management Results, Benefits and Expectations Uniformly constructed, maintained & operated Highway System Data drives decision making Shift to Outcome Based approach with clear goals –Move from a reactive to a planned approach –Increased focus on preventive maintenance –Target LOS by tier –Emphasis on planning & scheduling Highest & best use of resources Clearly defined performance expectations for operations Increased accountability and flexibility Challenging and rewarding workplace

Questions?