UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Advertisements

GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.
February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
Chapter 10 The Urban World
General Plan Amendment 2008 (960) General Plan Advisory Committee January 20, 2009.
DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable March 30, 2012.
Austin Troy, PhD, And Brian Voigt, University of Vermont Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources.
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
February 29,  Convergence  Reduced Cost  Increased Revenue  Productive vs. New Revenues  A “Plan”  Land Use / Finance / Services.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
Single Family Development in City of Austin Since Passage of Watershed Regulations Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department April, 2008.
The Urban Environment 9. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Overview of Chapter 9  Population and Urbanization  Characteristics of.
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
GEOG 442 Day 7: Commercial and Industrial Users (with a bit on Institutional)
Measuring Spatial Characteristics of Urban Sprawl John Hasse Rowan University.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Analysis Modules Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and the.
Fourth Meeting June 26, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
Third Meeting May 22, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
Muhammad Salman Arshad.  A large proportion of the land surface of the world (about one-third to one-half) has been changed by human activity.  Most.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Why Do Suburbs Have Distinctive Problems?
Updating Our Comprehensive Plan Tonight's focus: Economic Development Public Facilities & Services.
National Transportation || || 1 Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director,
Mike McCoy Information Center for the Environment U.C. Davis Modeling 101 Fall
Regional Development, Population Trend, and Technology Change Impacts on Future Air Pollution Emissions in the San Joaquin Valley Michael Kleeman Deb Niemeier.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
SPRAWL & GROWTH MANAGEMENT. TOPICS Historical Overview Land use tools & techniques Economics of GM: Benefits & Costs Growth Management (GM) process How.
Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out Analysis Nov 5, 2007 New techniques - for an old friend.
Land Use Scenarios Status. Encompass 2040 Scenarios Scenario 1: Continues similar development patterns of the past with no new zoning initiatives Scenario.
Greater Washington 2050 Planning Tools Task Force May 29 th 2009 Harriet Tregoning and Alan Imhoff Regional Targets & Indicators.
Data Development Common Issues for UPLAN and I-PLACE3S.
FLORIDA 2060 A Research Project of 1000 Friends of Florida.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
Projecting Energy and GHGs for General Plans and Regional Transportation Plans Robert A. Johnston Mike McCoy Information Center for the Environment University.
Application LU-MIN Small-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Twenty Fingers Property May 2007 PLDRB.
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
Measuring the Effects of Light Rail Plans in Portland: A Trilogy Gerrit Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth University of Maryland.
Scenario S: Preferred Alternative. Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation.
Smart Growth in the Central Valley Steve Pinkerton – City Manager City of Manteca CALAFCO Annual Conference October 30, 2009.
EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.
Municipal Finance and Governance: Tools to Affect Land Use Decisions Enid Slack Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance University of Toronto Presentation.
DRAFT Clark County Land Use Categories – Urban Areas 10/8/2015 – Draft, for discussion1.
Land Planning Quiz Prep. What is hazardous waste?
The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.
Russell Provost Urban and Regional Planning Principal Investigator: Ruth Steiner.
EM 4103: Urban Planning II Lecture 8: Employment Analysis in Planning.
GREEN COMMUNITIES 2.  Sustainability  Smart Growth In This Chapter 2-1.
Land Needs Simulator: Overview and Recommended Assumptions Presented to: RPS Policy Committee Presented by: ECONorthwest January 9, 2007.
13 th – 15 March, 2006 New Perspectives in Real Estate Development In Port of Spain Welcome.
Land, Public and Private Chapter 10. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Land Chapter 14, section 1&2 How We Use Land. Background California, (8 yrs), nearly 210,000 acres of rural land had been converted into urban.
Bellwork: February 25, )This fishing technique involves nets that are set in a straight line, tangling the fish in the net by their gills. In 1992,
URBAN SPRAWL AND ENERGY INDEPENDENCE by Shauna L. Fleming Energy Law Spring 2007.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Metro Data Resource Center Portland Metro: MetroScope 2002 – 2008 A Tool for Regional Decision Making Presentation to the New York Metropolitan Transportation.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
Chapter 10 The Urban World
2040 Comprehensive Plan Open House
9 The Urban Environment.
Land Use Assumptions Public Hearing - 5/31/18
Fire Protection Impact Fee
9 The Urban Environment.
Why Do Suburbs Have Distinctive Problems?
Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan
Michele Norton, Planner City of North Port
Presentation transcript:

UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California, Davis CalACT Conference Olympic Valley Olympic Valley4/22/2008

Why do we model? ► 1. They allow us to test a wide variety of policy, planning and investment alternatives ► 2. They create a consistent set of rules and criteria to test the alternatives. ► 3. They respond to a wide variety of statutes requiring more accurate forecasts than in the past.

What do we get from our models? ► Spatial Output  Where is the growth? ► Tabular Output  How much? ► Analysis  What are the likely impacts?

UPlan ► Simple  Relatively simple data  Generally accessible demographic inputs  Simple algorithm/rules ► Rule based  The “rules” govern the system ► Urban Growth  A simple inexpensive model with rapid run times and fast data development

Households People Acres People/HH Acreage/HH

Households People People/HH Employees/HH Employees Acres SF/Employee Building SF FAR

Combined Effect Urban Edge AmenityMajor Arterial Ramp Proximity Combine Attractors

RRRR RCR CCRC RRII C General Plan Allocation Net Attraction We need 5 Residential, 3 Commercial, 2 Industrial RR RCR C RII C 5 Highest Residential Attractions 3 Highest Commercial Attractions 2 All Industrial Selected

Data Types ► Land Uses ► Demographics  Residential  Employment ► “General Plans” ► Masks ► Attractors ► Discouragers

Land Uses ► Customizable  As of UPlan 2.6x ► Aggregate  Land uses across 536 city and county general plans ► Developed Land Use Types  Not Agriculture or Timber ► Residential Types  Density Classes ► Employment Types  Square Feet per Employee  Floor Area Ratio

Residential Demographics ► Population Growth  Starting population  Ending population ► Average Household Size (PPHH) ► Housing Proportions by Density Class  Percentage of new units entering each residential type  Average gross “footprint” per household

Employment Demographics ► Average number of employed people per household ► Percentage of employees entering each employment type ► Average square footage per employee in buildings for each employment type ► Floor Area Ratio for each employment type

“General Plans” ► Adopted General Plans  Test existing general plans ► Speculative General Plans  What if?... ► Provide the Structure for the Region’s Development  Guide development to appropriate general locations

Masks ► Prevent any growth at all..... ► Examples  Water Bodies  Public Land  Existing Development (no redevelopment)  Slopes/Geology

Attractors ► Features that encourage development ► Pseudoeconomic ► Hedonic ► The Data Represents  Effects of Policy  Physical Features

Attractors ► Roads and transportation infrastructure ► Urban services:  Water and wastewater  Safety... police, fire  Transit  Amenities.... parks, entertainment, cultural events ► Past or Planned Growth ► Regulatory boundaries  City Limits  Spheres of Influence

Discouragers ► Features that discourage development ► Represent  Policy effects  Physical features

Discouragers ► Physical  Steep or unstable slopes  Floodplains ► Environmental  Natural resource protections... wetlands, species, agriculture, mineral resources  Hazards... Mining, soils ► Administrative  Fees and exactions ► Infrastructure Limits  Transportation  Water

What can be done with UPlan ► Types of Scenarios  Recent trends (aka Status Quo, Base Case, Business as Usual)  General Plan Buildout  Change Scenarios ► Sprawl ► Compact ► Resource protection ► New Cities ► Resource limitations

Analysis ► Transportation  Export to Transportation Modeling ► Air Quality  Based on Transportation Modeling output ► Greenhouse Gasses  Building type, location, service provider ► Resource Consumption  Discouragement impacts  Other summarization ► Population Distribution ► Accessibility/Economic Activity  Using accessibility/travel times to core areas

Reports ► Generated in MS Excel ► Metadata ► Land Consumption  Demand: Acres and Cells  Allocated: Acres and Cells  Underallocation: Acres and Cells ► Discouragement Impacts  Acres of each discouragement consumed by land use type

Reports

Zonal Summary ► How much development is happening where? ► New population centers ► New Employment centers

Zonal Summaries ► Calculate by Zone:  # Acres of each land use  # of HH in each residential type  # of residents in each residential type  # of employees in each employment type  # of square feet in building space for each employment type

Greenhouse Gas ► Climate Zone  Determines Demand for Energy ► Service Provider  Determines Type of Energy  Energy Mix  CO2E generation ► No embodied CO2 calculations ► Calculations by land use type, climate zone, service provider, subarea

Acknowledgements California Department of Transportation US Department of Agriculture Federal Highway Administration

Questions? Nathaniel Roth GIS Programmer/Analyst Information Center for the Environment University of California, Davis or (530)