-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
Advertisements

Compensation 101 Today’s lesson plan: Compensation How To Use Market Data To Support Your Compensation Philosophy.
COMPENSATION STRATEGIES FOR NONPROFITS October 30, 2008 Bay Area Nonprofit HR Network San Francisco, CA.
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
A Roundtable Discussion: Market Based Pay Structures for “Reality Based” Pay July 2005.
MGMT Managing Employee Reward Systems Salary Structures Purpose and Goals –establish series of grades to classify jobs according to similar worth.
Compensation Deborah Marsh November Total Rewards Total Rewards definition Total Rewards definition Why Total Rewards? Why Total Rewards? Elements.
OS 352 3/25/08 I. Compensation Systems (chapter 11) A. Types of pay B. Job evaluation and job structure. C. Market pricing. D. The big picture II. Syllabus.
O RGANIZATION S TRUCTURE : S TRATEGIC AND T ACTICAL C OMPENSATION I SSUES Jayendra Rimal.
1 Surveying Market Pay Just as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions have been used to differentiate rates of pay among major job groupings,
A Pay Structure melding of internal & external equity © Nancy Brown Johnson, 2000.
Total Rewards and Compensation
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
What is the Global Grading Project
Pay Structure Decisions
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Chapter 11 Learning Objectives
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
Cash, Bonuses, Insurance,
Compensation System Development
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Jayendra Rimal.  This type of compensation policy should be developed to fit in with the competitive advantage of a company.  It has a role in attracting.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MIHE Mashal Institute of Higher Education.
Compensation:  Compensation is the methods and practices of maintaining balance between interests of operating the company within the fiscal budget and.
Direct Financial Compensation
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
Collecting Market Data Presented to NPELRA April 15, 2002 Bruce G. Lawson, CCP Fox Lawson & Associates LLC (602)
Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 7-1 Compensating Employees 7.
Compensating Employees Definition Objective Bases Types Determining Reward Job Evaluation Compensation Structure.
Reward Systems By H.V.Kothari. Total Compensation System MonetaryNonmonetary OrganizationMembership Individual or Team Attributes Job or Position Mandatory.
Chapter Eleven Compensation System Development. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 11–2 Chapter Outline Employee Satisfaction.
Topic 6 - A Designing the Compensation Program. 9. Centralization Vs. Decentralization of Pay Decisions 8. Open Vs. Secret Pay 7. Monetary Vs. Non-monetary.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
Texas A& M University Central Texas Staff Salary Study Process February 25, 2014.
Chapter 11 Establishing a Pay Structure. MGMT Chapter2 Decisions About Pay Job Structure –Relative pay for different jobs within the organization.
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Human Resource Management Lecture 16 MGT 350. Last Lecture Factors that can Distort Appraisals – Leniency error – Halo error – Similarity error – Low.
Lecture 11: Compensation. Strategic Issues and Compensation  Why do dome employers pay more than other employers?  Why are different jobs within the.
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT - IES MCRC, Bandra.. Compensation Plans- Perquisites & Bonus - Lecture 5A.
Compensation Management. Compensation Employee compensation – refers to extrinsic and intangible rewards. – refers to all forms of pay or rewards going.
JOB EVALUATION A Tool for Measuring Internal Equity September 2009.
Compensation Strategy & Structure Strategic role of compensation What determines pay Reward system objectives External & internal considerations.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Budgets and Administration Chapter 18.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Management: Making it Work Chapter 18.
11-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
PART FOUR Compensation Chapters Chapter 11 Pay and Incentive Systems McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
Welcome to the Winner’s Circle! Trends in Healthcare Compensation Arkansas Healthcare Human Resources Association April 1, 2016.
Jayendra Rimal. Introduction: Compensation Compensation refers to all forms of financial returns and tangible benefits that employees receive as part.
Building Market- Competitive Compensation Systems MGT 4543 Compensation Management Chapter 7.
BUS 434 ASSIST Peer Educator/ bus434assist.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
COMPENSATION 101 CREATING & ADMINISTERING YOUR BASE PAY STRATEGY Consulting Inc.
FURMAN UNIVERSITY Compensation Structure. INTRODUCTION  Compensation Study  Salary Grades  Cost of Living/Merit Increases.
Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE
Chapter 10: Compensation
Compensation 101 A Primer for HR Professionals
LUHR Compensation Program.
Presentation transcript:

-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation Philosophy: A statement that is intended to provide a foundation for the design and administration of compensation programs. It defines what you compensate for and why, and should be aligned with the business strategy. It should be written in general terms to provide a lasting basis for future compensation design and administration decisions  Compensation Program Objectives: Each organization must prioritize these objectives and decide which are the most important. It is essential to design a program that not only meets the compensation objectives, but also supports the organization’s business strategy.  Internally equitable  Externally competitive  Affordable  Understandable  Legal / defensible  Efficient to administer  Capable of being reshaped for the future  Appropriate for the organization  Attract, retain and motivate employees  Create alignment of employee efforts and business objectives

-09/06/13, - Page 2 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Market-based Pay Structure: The technique of creating a pay structure based on the market competitive salary for benchmark jobs (i.e. jobs readily found in the external market) inside an organization as determined by the relevant labor market  Market pricing: External salary survey data is analyzed to establish the worth of benchmark jobs  Market pricing has become the most common method of valuing jobs, with more than 80% of companies using market pricing as their primary job evaluation method (according to many surveys)*  Jobs are matched to survey jobs based on descriptions  The information in external market surveys is broken down into different “scopes”, or cuts of data, such as revenue size, company size, geography, teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals, etc. These scope cuts allow us to get the most specific market data possible, and the scopes used should reflect the target hiring pool as much as possible.  These surveys have high reliability and confidentiality due to the methods used to collect and analyze the data *Source: WorldatWork

-09/06/13, - Page 3 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Salary Range/Grade Structure: The structure is composed of grade or ranges which group together jobs of similar work. They typically consist of a maximum and minimum value which set the relative top and bottom value the market will bear for assigned jobs. There is also a midpoint of the range which represents the competitive market value for the assigned jobs. These midpoints are established based on the percentile of the market at which the organization chooses to base it’s pay policy.  Once a market-based pay structure is created, jobs will be placed into a grade based on the market value of a job (i.e. the job will be placed into the pay grade that most closely resembles the market value of the job)  Employees placement in the pay range depends on the following factors:  Qualifications (relevant education, experience, certifications/licensure)  Performance (in a pay for performance organization, high performers will accelerate more quickly through the pay range than lower performers)