University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida Hybrid Rocket Team’s Mile High Club
Advertisements

University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
1 Preliminary Design Review Presentation Tarleton State University NASA USLI
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Preliminary Design review
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Final Readiness Review
LESSON LD02 The Model Rocket
Plantation High SL team 1
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Design Overview Total Length: inches Total Mass: 76 lbs Target Altitude: 10,000 ft

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Airframes Rolled with 6 oz E-class Fiberglass 7 wraps; approximately 0.07 in wall thickness 5 airframes: Upper, UEB, Middle, Lower Extension, Lower

Upper Airframe Houses the piston and main parachute 32.5 inches long Separation occurs above it, at nosecone

Upper Electronics Bay L-shaped bay to maximize space Hatch allows easy access Aluminum bulkheads for precision Bay Length: 19.8 inches Airframe Length: inches

Middle Airframe Houses the baffles and drogue parachute Separation occurs below it Length: 20 inches Location of upper launch lug

Lower Airframe Lower extension connects to coupler and lower airframe Internal components assemble as one piece Lower extension length: 24 inches Lower Airframe length: 32 inches

Motor Centering and Thrust Transfer

Fins Tapered swept Height: 6 inches Root chord: 11 inches Tip chord: 3.5 inches G10 fiberglass Same attachment method as subscale

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Motor Choice Cesaroni N2600-SK-P Specifications Total Impulse (lbf*s)2489 Average Thrust (lbf)584 Max Thrust (lbf)668 Burn Time (s)4.26 Launch Mass (lb)25.3 Empty Mass (lb)10.4

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Future Work

Stability Characteristics Rail Exit Velocity = 72.5 ft/sec Thrust to Weight Ratio = 7.6

Altitude versus Time Maximum altitude of 10,842 feet Drogue parachute deployment at 25 seconds (apogee) Main parachute deployment at 237 seconds, 700 feet of altitude

Velocity and Acceleration versus Time Peak velocity of 955 ft/s at 4 seconds Shows drogue and main parachute deployment at 25 and 237 seconds respectively Peak acceleration of 269 ft/s 2 at 1.5 seconds Shows acceleration from drag and gravity up to apogee at 25 seconds Constant velocity under drogue, zero acceleration

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Recovery Objectives Reusable without repairs Kinetic Energy each piece is less than 75 ft-lbf Main and drogue parachute manufactured by team GPS tracking device Crosswind drift less than 5,000ft

Recovery System Drogue Deployment at apogee 60 inches in diameter Semi-ellipsoid canopy shape Charge baffle ejection system Descent velocity: 45.4 ft/s Main Deployment at 700ft 168 inches in diameter Semi-ellipsoid canopy shape Piston ejection system Descent velocity: 12.5ft/s

Attachment Scheme

Parachute Manufacturing Ripstop nylon Gore design Nylon upholstery thread Nylon shroud lines

Parachute Testing

Charge Baffle Two discs with non overlapping circular patters of holes Cools gasses from ejection charges and removes particulates Used to protect drogue parachute

Kinetic Energy ComponentDescent Rate (ft/s)Mass (slugs)Kinetic Energy (ft-lbf) Nosecone Piston Upper Airframe Lower Airframe

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Ground Scanning System Ground Scanning System to detect hazards in the landing area Take an image of landing area Scan for potential hazards in real-time Send scanned image to Ground Station in real-time

Camera Module

Camera Integration

Electronics Mapping

Centering RingsBulk Head Motor Tube Strain Gages Temperature Compensation Strain Gages Boost System Analysis

Von Mises Strain

URES Strain

Triboelectric Effect Analysis Payload Triboelectric Effect Capacitive Sensing Technique Experimental Setup Payload Objectives

Triboelectric Effect The triboelectric effect (also known as triboelectric charging) is a type of contact electrification in which certain materials become electrically charged after they come into contact with another different material through friction.

Capacitive Sensing Technique Theory C = Q/V σ = Q/A Voltage measurement circuit

Experimental Setup Placement of capacitive sensors Data collection and recovery Precision Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) with 8051 Microcontroller and Flash Memory Texas Instruments - MSC1210Y5PAGT

Payload Objective Obtain nose cone map of voltage vs. time Calculate charge buildup Relate to friction models from computational fluid dynamics simulation data

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Electronics Power Inputs Communications and data processing Recovery Lower Bay Image processing Boost systems analysis

Power Provides power to entire Upper Electronics Bay

Inputs

Communications and Data Processing ODROID Communications board

Recovery

Lower Bay Handles image processing Midway point for Boost Systems Analysis

Image Processing

Boost Systems Analysis

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Testing Recovery Testing  Parachute Testing Complete Structural Testing  Compression and Shear Stress Testing Complete  Subscale Testing Complete Electronics Testing Motor Testing Payload Testing

Subscale Results Design  Length: in.  Max. Diameter: 3.2 in.  Weight: 15.4 lbs.  Stability Margin: 1.36  Predicted Apogee: 1675 ft. Results  Actual Apogee: 1865 ft.  Drogue Deployment: Successful  Main Deployment: Failure

Status of Requirements Verification Completed  11 Requirements  Project Plan  Safety Requirements  Component Testing In Progress  18 Requirements  Design Analysis Complete  Inspection and Testing In Progress Not Started  25 Requirements

Outline Overview Vehicle Design Motor Choice Flight Dynamics and Simulations Recovery Payloads Electronics Component Testing Future Work

Manufacture full scale Update mass estimates Acquire travel funding Full scale Launch, April 5th