Tiered Licensure & Developmental Continuums August 9, 2011 CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Crosswalk Between College and Career Ready Standards and Educator Evaluation Systems 2012 ESEA Title II, Part A - National Meetings March 5-7, 2012.
Advertisements

SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
A Deeper Dive into the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards SCEE Webinar May 10, 2011.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Connect and Collaborate: A Career Continuum Approach Utah Mentor Academy Sydnee Dickson Director, Teaching and Learning USOE.
Certification, Teacher Education, and Professional Development Marcia Harmon Rosenbusch National K-12 Foreign Language Resource Center Iowa State University.
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation Lisa Hood, LINC Project Director Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University Presentation.
Council of Chief State School Officers February 24, 2015 Communicating Effectively about Teacher Equity.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
District Insight on What We Are Learning SCEE webinar, June 12, 2012 Principal Effectiveness.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
October 3, 2012 SPECIAL SCEE WEBINAR The Principal’s Role in Evaluating Teachers.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
National Summit Facilitator Orientation Circe Stumbo and Deb Hansen, SCEE Consultants April 14, 2010 CCSSO’s State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness.
AN INITIATIVE OF FOUNDATIONS FOR A BETTER OREGON Corvallis School District Creative Leadership Achieves Student Success October 18, 2012.
Special SCEE Webinar Districts and States Work to Develop and Support an Effective Principal Pipeline 1.
National Summit Facilitator Orientation #2 Circe Stumbo and Deb Hansen, SCEE Consultants April 18, 2010 CCSSO’s State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness.
Beginning Teacher Support Program (BTSP) Jed Stus; Executive Director of Professional Development & Support What Mentors Need to Know and Do to Start the.
Agenda Pedagogy Presentations Break INTASC standards.
College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.
Teacher & Administrator Standards October 21, 2011.
Looking at Teaching through the Lens of Standards Irv Richardson A Presentation to the 600s Sub-Committee July 22,2010 9:00 – 11:00.
National Conference on Student Assessment
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
December 13, 2011 Teacher and Leader Evaluation Systems Legal Defensibility 1.
The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) March 20, 2012 International Summit on the Teaching Profession:
CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness May 15, 2012 Toward the Summit of Educator Effectiveness: Which way from here?
April 10, Webinar Logistics  Everyone is muted  Use the chat function to make a comment or ask a question  You may chat privately with individuals.
Team Lead Webinar March 22, 2011 CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)
Continuing the Conversation About Educator Evaluation: Next Steps After the SCEE Topical Meeting November 1, 2011.
Continuing the Conversation Leveraging Professional Learning Systems to Increase Principal Effectiveness 1.
Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.
September 13, 2011 CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) Going Deeper into the Preparation of Teachers.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Evaluating Teacher Preparation Programs Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Monthly Webinar December 10,
Contemporary Issues September 12, NJEA Today.
Contemporary Issues September 8, Adjunct Professor Kristin P. O’Neil Office Hours: Scheduled on an individual.
Team Lead Workshop: Prepping for the National Summit April 19, 2010 CCSSO’s State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)
Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Webinar May 14, 2013 Theory to Practice: How One SEA Uses Implementation.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Adoption Teacher & Administrator Standards December 1, 2011.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
August 14, 2012 Using Classroom Assessments to Measure Student Performance in Non-Tested Grades and Subjects (NTGS)
September 11, 2012 What’s Next with Common Core Implementation 1.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
EdLeader Denver, CO A Professional Learning Community of Leaders Promoting 21st century skills By special invitation only - Brown Deer is one of.
July 9, 2013 Partnerships for Transforming Educator Preparation CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Monthly Webinar.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Menus of Best Practices and Strategies
Developing 21st Century Classrooms: Connecting the Dots IV
Collaborative Leadership
District Improvement plan
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Presentation transcript:

Tiered Licensure & Developmental Continuums August 9, 2011 CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)

Logistics  Everyone is muted  Use the chat function to make a comment or ask a question  You may chat privately with individuals on your team  If you have problems, you may send Tina Zhao a message via chat or at 2

Using The Model Core Teaching Standards To Make A Difference For Teachers And Their Students Peter Winograd  Director, University of New Mexico Center For Education Policy Research Kathleen Paliokas  Program Director, Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC), Council of Chief State School Officers

Poll

Who is joining us today? How many people are watching the webinar with you? 1.Just me 2.Me and 1 other 3.Me and 2-5 others 4.Me and more than 5 others 5

Presentation  The Challenges We Face  Brief Background  Why This Effort Is Important  Today’s Conversation  The Panel  Next Steps 6

InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards: A Resource For State Dialogue  In April, 2011, CCSSO released these standards. The purpose of this document “is to serve as a resource for states, districts, professional organizations, teacher education programs, teachers, and others as they develop policies and programs to prepare, license, support, evaluate, and reward today’s teachers. As noted above, a systemic approach and supportive infrastructure are essential to successful implementation of these standards.” (p.5, InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards, CCSSO, 2011) 7

The Challenges We Face  We believe that a systemic approach and a supportive infrastructure are essential to successful implementation of the InTASC Standards.  State licensure is, arguably, the most important policy infrastructure related to teaching and teaching standards.  The challenges we face are how to embed the Model Core Teaching Standards into the wide variety of state licensure systems facing challenges of their own. 8

Brief Background  April 28-30, 2011 SCEE National Summit on Educator Effectiveness: Transforming State Systems For The Future  June 14, 2011 SCEE Webinar - Summit Strands: Where Do We Go From Here? 9

Lessons Learned  There is no clear definition of what a tiered licensure system looks like or how it is implemented across different states  Relationships between licensure, compensation, and educator evaluation are extremely complex  Teacher evaluation should inform decisions about professional development, tenure, dismissal, renewal and promotion at the local level, but it should not determine the revocation of a teacher’s license 10

Ideas For Next Steps  Develop rubrics for the InTASC Standards across the developmental continuum that can be contained in tiered licensure systems  Develop communication strategies and partnerships that help states implement or strengthen tiered licensure systems that embed the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards in state policy 11

Next Steps  Develop a usable source of information about the status of state tiered licensure systems, how they can be implemented or strengthened, related state policies, potential problems and how they can be avoided, research on their impact on student learning and other important outcomes. 12

Why Is This Effort Important?

InTASC Standards – A New Vision of Teaching  Developmental Continuum  A Focus on 21st Century Knowledge and Skills  Personalized Learning for Diverse Learners  Increased Emphasis on Assessment Literacy  A Collaborative Professional Culture  New Leadership Roles for Teachers and Administrators

InTASC Standards – The Implications For Licensure  Licensure systems should:  Provide a coherent framework for assessments across teachers’ developmental career from initial licensure to renewal  Ensure that teacher candidates are well prepared to teach

Licensure systems should:  Support teacher growth over time  Provide incentives to encourage teachers to accept new roles and responsibilities  Encourage teachers to seek out continued training to gain the knowledge and skills they need 16

Teacher Licensure Systems Vary Widely Across The Country 17 Source: NASDTEC Knowledgebase, Retrieved www.nasdtec.info

What are some of the components of licensure systems?  Assessments – (pedagogy, content, performance, new approaches to teacher evaluation)  Links to teacher preparation (standards, alternative pathways, qualifications and requirements)  Induction support – (mentoring, coaching)  Structure of licenses, certificates (tiers, renewal requirements, K-12, subjects, special education, leadership)  Links to compensation  Links to hiring/firing/tenure/ethics

State Licensure Systems are Facing Challenges of Their Own  New approaches to teacher evaluation  The implementation of common core state standards  SEA budget cuts and staff reductions  SEA missions are changing  Alternative pathways into teaching  LEA budget cuts and staff reductions  Fewer opportunities for professional development  Others?

If the goal is to use the Model Core Teaching Standards to strengthen teaching, AND if professional learning is developmental across a continuum, AND if state licensure systems are facing many challenges, THEN what does this mean for how we strengthen our licensure systems?

What needs to change in each component of licensure? How can SCEE be of help?

Panel Members  Linda Alder, Coordinator, Educator Effectiveness, Utah State Office of Education  Jean Satterfield, Assistant Superintendent, Certification & Accreditation, Maryland State Department of Education  Phillip Rogers, Executive Director, Education Professional Standards Board, Kentucky 22

Questions for Panel 1) Requests for rubrics and a developmental continuum aligned to the InTASC standards:  How would you use such a continuum and what are the implications of one for how to design a tiered licensure system? 2) A tiered licensure system presumes a continuum of assessments:  Where do you see licensure assessment trending?  How does the idea of including measures of student growth and/or teacher evaluation results in licensure decisions fit in? 23

Today’s Conversation  Panel Conversation  Next Steps 24

Poll

Is your state currently working on changes to licensure? If no, you may skip. If yes, which elements are being changed? a)Assessments b)Links To Teacher Preparation c)Induction d)Licensure Structure e)Links To Compensation f)Links To Hiring/Firing/Tenure/Ethics g)Other? 26

Upcoming Webinars  Each date is a Tuesday; all times are 2:00 pm ET  Preparation: September 13  Leader Evaluation: October 4  Teacher Evaluation: Postponed, Date TBA  Regular SCEE Webinar TBA: October 11 27

SCEE’s Second Year  Upcoming Topical Meetings: Tentatively Oct , TBA  InTASC Meeting  Resources on the Collaboration Site  Ongoing Webinars and more  It is time to renew SCEE membership. Please contact  Let your team lead or deputy know about how SCEE supports your work! 28

30 Minutes Q and A  The audio portion of the webinar has concluded.  Experts will be available for 30 minutes to respond to your questions  Enter your questions in the Chat space  We will post the Q&A on the webinars page at the conclusion of this event. arshttp://scee.groupsite.com/page/webin ars 29

Thank you!