Review of Handbook Chapters Pat Cahill

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Aviation Administration Radiant Panel Updates 2014 June Materials Meeting Switzerland Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center June,
Advertisements

International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Results for Proposed Cargo.
Federal Aviation Administration Evacuation Slide Test Method: Round Robin 3 Results 0 Evacuation Slide Test Method: Comparison Test Results Federal Aviation.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Discussion on Format of New Test.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Jet-A Vaporization In an Experimental Tank Part II: Experimental Results at Atmospheric and Sub-Atmospheric Pressures Robert Ian Ochs Rutgers, The State.
CERAMIC FIBER RADIANT HEATERS Each panel is 1.5 ft. x 3.5 ft. in size covering about 5 ft 2 The panels can be arranged in any manner to achieve the heating.
Site Planning and Layout  In the design phase of a facility, fire protection requirements are considered in the site layout  Water supply, traffic and.
Introduction: Standard Test Method for Density (unit weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete –Apparatus –Sample –Procedure ACI Certification.
Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Tapes for Sales and Marketing Professionals Tape University Basics May 11, 2009 Testing.
Fire.
Seat Cushion Testing Methods Fire Test FAA Hand Book Regulation Lab A Lab F Lab B Lab G Lab C Lab D Lab E.
Manufacturing a Telescope. Input A telescope consists of an optical system (the lenses and/or mirrors) and hardware components to hold the optical system.
Federal Aviation Administration AVIATION HEAT FLUX CALIBRATION STANDARD 2013 Triennial International Fire & Cabin Safety Research Conference Philadelphia,
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS Updates 2010 March Materials Meeting Boeing Facility - Renton, WA Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA.
Results of Radiant Panel Testing Round Robin 8 Pat Cahill
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen,
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group, Atlantic City, NJ By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Heating Systems.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation C.E. Polymeropoulos Robert Ochs Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
Presented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group – Köln, Germany By: Robert Ian Ochs Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Wiring 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Bremen, Germany.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration In-Flight Burn- Through Tests Aluminum vs. composite materials Aircraft Systems Fire Working Grp.
Federal Aviation Administration Radiant Panel Test for Thermal/Acoustic Insulation 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire.
Engineering Analysis of NFPA 285 Tested Assemblies
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS Updates 2009 March Materials Meeting Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center March 4 th & 5 th,
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS March Materials Meeting Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center June 17 th & 18 th, 2008.
Presented to: IAMFTWG, Renton, WA By: Robert Ochs Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah, GA.
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND QUALITY WORK Principles of Architecture and Construction Copyright Texas Education Agency (TEA) 1.
Tim Marker Discussion of Burner Heat Flux Mapping for Proposed Insulation Burnthrough Test Standard FAA Technical Center.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Update Handbook Chapters IAMFT WG, Cologne,
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability November 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation Robert Ochs and C.E. Polymeropoulos Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
Federal Aviation Administration RTCA Update 0 RTCA Update Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Savannah,
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Special Conditions for Passenger Airplanes,
Results and Discussion of Seat Round Robin Pat Cahill.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Tim Marker Discussion of Burnthrough Test Method for Aircraft Thermal Acoustic Insulation Blankets FAA Technical Center.
Tim Marker FAA Technical Center Burnthrough Task Group Report.
MINISTÈRE DE LA DÉFENSE Hidden fire program :Evaluation of materials located in inaccessible areas with the radiant panel LISBONNE November.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS Updates 2008 October Materials Meeting Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center October 21 st &
Federal Aviation Administration Slide Evacuation Test Method TSO C69A 0 Slide Evacuation Test Method TSO C69A Federal Aviation Administration International.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS Updates 2010 June Materials Meeting Koeln, Germany Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center June.
Federal Aviation Administration OSU & NBS Updates 2009 October Materials Meeting Materials Working Group Michael Burns, FAA Tech Center October 21 st &
Overdriven Nails in Structural Sheathings Overview.
Tim Marker Laboratory & Full Scale Testing of Non Traditional Lightweight Aircraft Seats FAA Technical Center.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Cell Airflow Study For Cargo.
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Ducting 0 Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Atlantic City,
Advisory Circular Materials Pat Cahill
Use of Resilient Channel or Hat Channel to Meet the Lateral Restraint/Bracing Requirements of the Bottom Chords of MPCWT Floor Systems Overview Revised.
Overdriven Nails in Structural Sheathings
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Chapter 10 Sheet Metal Design
AIRCRAFT FIRE REGULATIONS
- Strictly Confidential -
Presentation transcript:

Review of Handbook Chapters Pat Cahill

Chapter 4: Aircraft Wire Test Recommendation: Include the need for a special tool to test fiber optics. Recommendation: Include the need for a special tool to test fiber optics. FAA Response: We will look in to this matter. We have not conducted any (flammability) testing of fire optic wire/cable at the Tech Center. FAA Response: We will look in to this matter. We have not conducted any (flammability) testing of fire optic wire/cable at the Tech Center.

Chapter 7: Seat Test ( ) Recommendation: Change pressure regulator tolerance from +/ liter/hour to +/ liter/hour. Recommendation: Change pressure regulator tolerance from +/ liter/hour to +/ liter/hour. FAA Response: Agree. FAA Response: Agree.

Chapter 7: Seat Test (7.7.3) Recommendation: Delete “or greater” in the third sentence. Recommendation: Delete “or greater” in the third sentence. FAA Response: Sentence is incorrect as written in the handbook. It should read, “10 BTU’s/ft 2 or greater.” This is based on response from labs and industry on the difficulty of achieving the specified flux even with a tolerance. FAA Response: Sentence is incorrect as written in the handbook. It should read, “10 BTU’s/ft 2 or greater.” This is based on response from labs and industry on the difficulty of achieving the specified flux even with a tolerance.

Chapter 7: Seat Test (7.7.4) Recommendation: Add tolerances to the 7 thermocouple temperatures. Recommendation: Add tolerances to the 7 thermocouple temperatures. FAA Response: Two thermocouples are allowed to be equal to 1750°F (954 °C) or greater. No benefit would be derived from adding tolerance to this temperature and this also applies to the 5 thermocouples required to be 1800°F (982 °C) or greater. It is permissible to have temperature variation on all thermocouples as long as they have reached the minimum temperature requirements. FAA Response: Two thermocouples are allowed to be equal to 1750°F (954 °C) or greater. No benefit would be derived from adding tolerance to this temperature and this also applies to the 5 thermocouples required to be 1800°F (982 °C) or greater. It is permissible to have temperature variation on all thermocouples as long as they have reached the minimum temperature requirements.

Chapter 7: Seat Test (7.7.4) Recommendation: Use up to 8 wires to secure leather seat components. Recommendation: Use up to 8 wires to secure leather seat components. FAA Response: From testing performed at the Tech Center on leather seat test samples, we agree that 1 wire is not adequate to restrain them. We are requesting input and guidance from industry on: FAA Response: From testing performed at the Tech Center on leather seat test samples, we agree that 1 wire is not adequate to restrain them. We are requesting input and guidance from industry on: What is commonly used? What is commonly used? Is the data compromised based on the number of restraining wires used other than 1 wire? Is the data compromised based on the number of restraining wires used other than 1 wire?

Chapter 7: Seat Test (7.6.2) Recommendation: Allow chamber air speed to be 60 feet/min (1 foot/sec) measured at any/all locations. This is a pre-test measurement. Recommendation: Allow chamber air speed to be 60 feet/min (1 foot/sec) measured at any/all locations. This is a pre-test measurement. FAA Response: Input from labs that have any experience with any differences in test outcome based on various air speeds would be greatly appreciated. We currently have no data evaluating this parameter. FAA Response: Input from labs that have any experience with any differences in test outcome based on various air speeds would be greatly appreciated. We currently have no data evaluating this parameter.

Chapter 7: Seat Test (7.8.5) Recommendation: Reduce the 2-minute warm up time due to excessive soot build up. Recommendation: Reduce the 2-minute warm up time due to excessive soot build up. FAA Response: Testing would be needed to verify that the test results would not be compromised. FAA Response: Testing would be needed to verify that the test results would not be compromised.

Round Robin 6 Pat Cahill

Round Robin 6 Results

Flame Propagation Test

Radiant Panel Angle Angle of panel with the horizontal - 30  with no tolerance specified Angle of panel with the horizontal - 30  with no tolerance specified ASTM E 648 Flooring Test calls out “nominal” angle of 30+/- 5  (25  to 35  ) ASTM E 648 Flooring Test calls out “nominal” angle of 30+/- 5  (25  to 35  ) Unacceptable tolerance for flame propagation test Unacceptable tolerance for flame propagation test

Internal Chimney Air/propane internal chimney width is 4-½ inches board-to-board and 4 inches metal-to-metal (frame) Air/propane internal chimney width is 4-½ inches board-to-board and 4 inches metal-to-metal (frame) Electric panel internal chimney width is 4 inches board- to- board and is 3 ¾ inch metal-to-metal Electric panel internal chimney width is 4 inches board- to- board and is 3 ¾ inch metal-to-metal Data from both the air/propane and electric radiant panel test chambers are similar. It does not appear that the ¼ inch difference in width has an effect Data from both the air/propane and electric radiant panel test chambers are similar. It does not appear that the ¼ inch difference in width has an effect The dimensions (with appropriate tolerances) will be amended in the appendix of the Handbook The dimensions (with appropriate tolerances) will be amended in the appendix of the Handbook

Construction Materials Metals, such as stainless steel used in the construction of the sliding platform (notably the top flange), and the retaining frame, should be painted black if the surface is shiny. High temperature paint, such as grill paint is acceptable.

Glass Viewing Window The high temperature glass-viewing window in the electric radiant panel test chamber is bigger than the viewing window in the air/propane test chamber. It consists of 2 pieces of glass opposed to the multiple rectangular pieces in the air/propane chamber. Based on testing in both chambers, the glass size does not appear to be a significant variable.

Thermocouple The thermocouple sheathing material is not specified in the Rule. Since it is not rigid, the thermocouple can be moved inadvertently. This will be addressed in the appendix of the Handbook.