Transmit beam-pattern synthesis Waveform design for active sensing Chapters 13 – 14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints S. Race MA591R.
Advertisements

A Subspace Method for MIMO Radar Space-Time Adaptive Processing
Air Force Technical Applications Center 1 Subspace Based Three- Component Array Processing Gregory Wagner Nuclear Treaty Monitoring Geophysics Division.
Component Analysis (Review)
Principal Component Analysis Based on L1-Norm Maximization Nojun Kwak IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2008.
Beamforming Issues in Modern MIMO Radars with Doppler
Minimum Redundancy MIMO Radar Chun-Yang Chen and P. P. Vaidyanathan California Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering/DSP Lab ISCAS 2008.
NEWCOM – SWP2 MEETING 1 Impact of the CSI on the Design of a Multi-Antenna Transmitter with ML Detection Antonio Pascual Iserte Dpt.
Data mining and statistical learning - lecture 6
Error Measurement and Iterative Methods
December 5, 2013Computer Vision Lecture 20: Hidden Markov Models/Depth 1 Stereo Vision Due to the limited resolution of images, increasing the baseline.
Compressed Sensing in MIMO Radar Chun-Yang Chen and P. P. Vaidyanathan California Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering/DSP Lab Asilomar 2008.
Principal Component Analysis CMPUT 466/551 Nilanjan Ray.
Joint MIMO Radar Waveform and Receiving Filter Optimization Chun-Yang Chen and P. P. Vaidyanathan California Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering/DSP.
1/44 1. ZAHRA NAGHSH JULY 2009 BEAM-FORMING 2/44 2.
IERG 4100 Wireless Communications
Prénom Nom Document Analysis: Linear Discrimination Prof. Rolf Ingold, University of Fribourg Master course, spring semester 2008.
Coherent MIMO Radar: High Resolution Applications
COST 289 Etienne Auger, Carlo Mutti, Marc Kuhn and Armin Wittneben
APPLICATION OF SPACE-TIME CODING TECHNIQUES IN THIRD GENERATION SYSTEMS - A. G. BURR ADAPTIVE SPACE-TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CODING – A. G. BURR.
Camera Calibration CS485/685 Computer Vision Prof. Bebis.
A Design Method for MIMO Radar Frequency Hopping Codes Chun-Yang Chen and P. P. Vaidyanathan California Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering/DSP.
Dept. E.E./ESAT-STADIUS, KU Leuven homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~moonen/
Profilers. Wind profilers are phased array radars that measure the wind as a function of height above a fixed location. Characteristics: Wavelength: 33.
Sarah Middleton Supervised by: Anton van Wyk, Jacques Cilliers, Pascale Jardin and Florence Nadal 3 December 2010.
Data Selection In Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks Olawoye Oyeyele 11/24/2003.
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
Effect of Mutual Coupling on the Performance of Uniformly and Non-
Machine Learning CUNY Graduate Center Lecture 3: Linear Regression.
1 Waveform Design For Active Sensing Systems – A Computational Approach.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Introduction SNR Gain Patterns Beam Steering Shading Resources: Wiki:
July, 2005 Doc: IEEE a Qi, Li, Hara, Kohno (NICT) SlideTG4a1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Eigenstructure Methods for Noise Covariance Estimation Olawoye Oyeyele AICIP Group Presentation April 29th, 2003.
Aris Moustakas, University of Athens CROWN Kickoff NKUA Power Control in Random Networks with N. Bambos, P. Mertikopoulos, L. Lampiris.
INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF TEXTURES based on the article R.Manduchi, J. Portilla, ICA of Textures, The Proc. of the 7 th IEEE Int. Conf. On Comp.
Wireless Communication Technologies 1 Outline Introduction OFDM Basics Performance sensitivity for imperfect circuit Timing and.
Network Computing Laboratory Radio Interferometric Geolocation Miklos Maroti, Peter Volgesi, Sebestyen Dora Branislav Kusy, Gyorgy Balogh, Andras Nadas.
Speckle Correlation Analysis1 Adaptive Imaging Preliminary: Speckle Correlation Analysis.
CMPS 1371 Introduction to Computing for Engineers MATRICES.
December 4, 2014Computer Vision Lecture 22: Depth 1 Stereo Vision Comparing the similar triangles PMC l and p l LC l, we get: Similarly, for PNC r and.
Chapter 21 R(x) Algorithm a) Anomaly Detection b) Matched Filter.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Signal and Noise Models SNIR Maximization Least-Squares Minimization MMSE.
Review of Ultrasonic Imaging
Signal Processing Algorithms for MIMO Radar
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition LECTURE 10: HETEROSCEDASTIC LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS Objectives: Generalization of.
Efficient Beam Selection for Hybrid Beamforming
Lec 22: Stereo CS4670 / 5670: Computer Vision Kavita Bala.
BY Siyandiswa Juanitta Bangani Supervisor: Dr R.Van Zyl
D. M. J. Tax and R. P. W. Duin. Presented by Mihajlo Grbovic Support Vector Data Description.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition LECTURE 08: DIMENSIONALITY, PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS Objectives: Data Considerations Computational Complexity Overfitting.
A Semi-Blind Technique for MIMO Channel Matrix Estimation Aditya Jagannatham and Bhaskar D. Rao The proposed algorithm performs well compared to its training.
Stopband constraint case and the ambiguity function Daniel Jansson.
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
Elements of Pattern Recognition CNS/EE Lecture 5 M. Weber P. Perona.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Normal Equations The Orthogonality Principle Solution of the Normal Equations.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Single Correlator Based UWB Receiver Implementation through Channel Shortening Equalizer By Syed Imtiaz Husain and Jinho Choi School of Electrical Engineering.
Chance Constrained Robust Energy Efficiency in Cognitive Radio Networks with Channel Uncertainty Yongjun Xu and Xiaohui Zhao College of Communication Engineering,
Performance Issues in Doppler Ultrasound 1. 2 Fundamental Tradeoffs In pulsed modes (PW and color), maximum velocity without aliasing is In pulsed modes,
- A Maximum Likelihood Approach Vinod Kumar Ramachandran ID:
Lecture 4.1 Ambiguity Function
LECTURE 09: BAYESIAN ESTIMATION (Cont.)
Adaptive Beamforming for Target Tracking in Cognitive MIMO Sonar
Waveform design course Chapters 7 & 8 from Waveform Design for Active Sensing Systems A computational approach.
Transverse and Energy Jitters By Beam Position Monitors
Master Thesis Presentation
OVERVIEW OF LINEAR MODELS
Feature Selection in BCIs (section 5 and 6 of Review paper)
Outline Sparse Reconstruction RIP Condition
Presentation transcript:

Transmit beam-pattern synthesis Waveform design for active sensing Chapters 13 – 14

Introduction Problem Receive beampattern === transmitt beampattern (technical issues !! ) MIMO radar

Beam-pattern to covariance Signal at target: Power at a specific.

The transmit beampattern can be designed by chosing R. The power constraint ( Individual radiator) ( Total Power )

Goals: 1. Match a transmit beam pattern. 2.Minimize cross correlation between probing signals. 3.Minimize sidelobe level. 4.Achieve a required main-bem bandwidth. For a MIMO radar with K targets. A correlated scattered signal will create ambiguities!!

How to design the signal x knowing R ? When the covariance matrix of w is the identity matrix. Optimal Design Assume targets of interest

If there is no information on the target locations Optimize for J With solution is: The MIMO radar creates a spacially white signal.

Optimal Design for known target locations An estimate of is available. The problem becomes: However : is the left eigenvector of

Problems with previous design: Element power uncontrolled. Power reaching each target uncontrolled. No controll in Cross-correlation Any design with phase shifted array will have coherent target scattering. Advantage : The same approach maximizes SINR. ( different B)

Beam pattern matching design & cross-correlation minimization Assume a desired beam pattern A L-targets located at Are weigths to the cost function. Allows matching a scaled version of the beampattern.

Previous problem is a SQP Having r the vector of R mm and R mp This can be solved using SQP solvers !

How to obtain ? Use: 1.A spatially white signal. 2.Use the Generalized likelyhood ratio test (GLRT) and/or CAPON. GLRT, has good features for target detection, jammer avoidance, and trade- off betwen robustness and resolution.

Minimun sidelobe beampattern design Interestingly a relaxation seems to produce better solution than the strict !

Phase array beampattern All the radiators contain the same scaled version of the signal x. Problem becomes non-convex = > hard!! An approach is to use the same solution as MINO (relaxed version) followed by a Newton-like algorithm. Introduce a constraint

Numerical example 3 targets: 0 o, -40 o and 40 o. o Strong jammer at 25 o

CAPON technique

Using = 1 = 0.

Beampattern design (robust phase)

Using phase shifted array

Reducing the cross-correlation

Effect of sample covariance matrix Having R a design of x ? The sample covariance of w has to be identity….. Error 1000 Monte-Carlo

Minimun sidelobe level design MIMO array

Phase array

Relax the individual energy constraint from 80% to 120% c/M while the total energy is still fixed.

Covariance to Matrix Wavefrom The uni-modular constraint can be replaced by a low PAR. This with a energy constraint will produce:

Assume: Sample covariance Result of unconstraint minimization We need to include good correlation properties:

With this notation the goal is: Using the idea of decomposing X into two matrix multyiplication then we can solve:

Thus : For unimodular signal design === MultiCAO replaced For low PAR constraint  CA algorithm

Constraining the PAR becomes the independent minimization problems With the ”p-th” element of z as:

Numerical Results M=10 P=1 N = 256

M=10 P=10 N = 256

M=10 P=1 N = 256

M=10 P=10 N = 256