1 BeamBeam3D: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crab crossing and crab waist at super KEKB K. Ohmi (KEK) Super B workshop at SLAC 15-17, June 2006 Thanks, M. Biagini, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Ohnishi, K.Oide,
Advertisements

Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
1 Crossing Angle I.Koop UK SuperB meeting April 26-27, 2006 I.A.Koop, E.A.Perevedentsev, D.N.Shatilov, D.B.Shwartz for the UK SuperB meeting, April 26-27,
Beam-Beam Collision Studies for DA  NE with Crabbed Waist Crabbed Waist Advantages Results for SIDDHARTA IR P.Raimondi, D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov INFN.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Long-range beam-beam compensation at HL-LHC Tatiana Rijoff, Frank Zimmermann ColUSM # /03/2013.
ELIC Beam-Beam Simulation Studies Yuhong Zhang, Rui Li, JLab Ji Qiang, LBNL EIC Hampton08.
10 36 ??? 20 Apr K. Oide Super B Workshop.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Simulations that Explain and Predict Beam-Beam Effects in the Tevatron Alexander Valishev Fermilab, Batavia, IL LARP Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Compensation.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Crab-Crossing and Luminosity Simulations J.W. Flanagan, KEK
Beam-Beam Optimization for Fcc-ee at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) at High Energies (120, 175 GeV) Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk 11 December 2014, CERN.
Application of BeamBeam3D to ELIC Studies Yuhong Zhang, JLab Ji Qiang, LBNL ICAP09, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, San Francisco, 2009.
Beam-beam Observations in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders, March.
CERN F. Ruggiero Univ. “La Sapienza”, Rome, 20–24 March 2006 Measurements, ideas, curiosities fundamental limitations to the ultimate performance of high-luminosity.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Beam-Beam Simulations for RHIC and LHC J. Qiang, LBNL Mini-Workshop on Beam-Beam Compensation July 2-4, 2007, SLAC, Menlo Park, California.
RHIC Accelerator Capability: Present and Future Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. BNL.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Recent Upgrades to BBSIM Code V. H. Ranjbar † † Tech-X Corporation We have made several improvements to BBSIM, a parallel beam dynamics simulation code.
Beam-beam studies in the LHC and new projects T. Pieloni for the LHC and HL-LHC Beam-Beam Teams ICFA mini-workshop on "Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders”
ELIC Beam-Beam Simulation Studies Yuhong Zhang, JLab Ji Qiang, LBNL Common ENC/EIC Workshop at GSI, May 28-30, 2009.
Beam-Beam and e-Cloud in RHIC Oct. 6, 2015 Haixin Huang, Xiaofeng Gu, Yun Luo.
T. Pieloni Laboratory of Particle Accelerators Physics EPFL Lausanne and CERN - AB - ABP Beam-Beam Tune Spectra in RHIC and LHC In collaboration with:
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Polarized proton projections Wolfram Fischer 11 May 2012 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting BNL.
Page 1 Review 09/2010 Beam-Beam Simulations at MEIC Balša Terzić, Yuhong Zhang, Matthew Kramer, Colin Jarvis, Rui Li Jefferson Lab Ji Qiang LBNL.
Status of Head-on Beam-Beam Compensation BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program A. Valishev, FNAL 09 April 2009 LARP CM12.
Can PD/8 GeV Linac Help Tevatron ? Can PD/8 GeV Linac Help Tevatron ? Vladimir Shiltsev AD/Tevatron.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Beam-Beam head-on Limit J. Barranco, X. Buffat, T. Pieloni, C. Tambasco, J. Qiang, K. Ohmi, M. Crouch for the Beam-Beam team BI BSRT Team George and Enrico.
Six-dimensional weak-strong simulations of head-on compensation in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam.
IBS and luminosity evolution with higher harmonic RF Tom Mertens (former Technical Student now doing PhD in Quantum Field Theory in Brussels) Some changes.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
F HCP 2007 Performance and Future of the Tevatron Ron Moore Fermilab - Tevatron Dept. Tevatron overview and performance Antiproton source + Recycler overview.
1 IMPACT: Benchmarking Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Space-Charge Collaboration Meeting, May 20-21, 2014.
Polarized Proton at RHIC: Status and Future Plan Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. BNL A Special Beam Physics Symposium in Honor of Yaroslav Derbenev's.
Principle of Wire Compensation Theory and Simulations Simulations and Experiments The Tevatron operates with 36 proton bunches and 36 anti-proton bunches.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
Beam-Beam simulation and experiments in RHIC By Vahid Ranjbar and Tanaji Sen FNAL.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Overview of Wire Compensation for the LHC Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CARE-HHH Meeting on beam-beam effects and beam-beam compensation CERN 08/28/2008.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
BNL trip  Goal of the BNL-FERMILAB- CERN collaboration  The codes  BB tune foot-prints  DA studies.
Paul Görgen TEMF / GSI. Overview 1.Introduction to Beam-Beam 2.The code used and simulation of BTF 3.Demonstration of different beam beam simulations.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Beam dynamics in crab collision K. Ohmi (KEK) IR2005, 3-4, Oct FNAL Thanks to K. Akai, K. Hosoyama, K. Oide, T. Sen, F. Zimmermann.
Electron lens studies in support of RHIC / LHC Wolfram Fischer 28 July 2010 Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee Meeting.
Beam-Beam Simulations at MEIC Balša Terzić, Yuhong Zhang, Matthew Kramer, Colin Jarvis, Rui Li Jefferson Lab Ji Qiang LBNL EIC Collaboration Meeting, Catholic.
1 Strong-Strong Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 3 rd JLEIC Collaboration Meeting March 31 st, Jlab 2016.
Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.
Collision with a crossing angle Large Piwinski angle
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
Beam-beam Studies, Tool Development and Tests
Presentation transcript:

1 BeamBeam3D: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration meeting, UCLA, Los Angeles, Dec 2, 2008

2 BeamBeam3D: Parallel Strong-Strong / Strong-Weak Simulation Multiple physics models: –strong-strong (S-S); weak-strong (W-S) Multiple-slice model for finite bunch length effects New algorithm -- shifted Green function -- efficiently models long-range parasitic collisions Parallel particle-based decomposition to achieve perfect load balance Lorentz boost to handle crossing angle collisions Arbitrary closed-orbit separation (static or time-dep) Independent beam parameters for the 2 beams Multiple bunches, multiple collision points Linear transfer matrix + one turn chromaticity

3 BeamBeam3D: Code Improvement Defects fixing Single-precision in linear transfer map Longitudinal synchrotron map Luminosity output frequency Multiple ID list Time measurement for restart Thin lens sextupole model Quiet start for initial particle sampling Sampling particle trajectory diagnostic Beam transfer function diagnostic Conducting wire compensation model Distributed long-range soft-Gaussian beam-beam model Crab cavity compensation model Footprint diagnostic (in progress)

4 B.Erdelyi and T.Sen, “Compensation of beam-beam effects in the Tevatron with wires,” (FNAL-TM-2268, 2004). Model of Conducting Wire Compensation (x p0,y p0 ) test particle

5 Thin Lens Approximation for Crab Cavity Deflection

6 BeamBeam3D Applications to RHIC

7 Beam energy (GeV) 100 RHIC Physical Parameters for the Tune Scan Simulations Protons per bunch 20e10  * (m) 0.8 Rms spot size (mm) 0.14 Betatron tunes (blue) (0.695,0.685) Rms bunch length (m) 0.8 Synchrotron tune 5.5e-4 Momentum spread 0.7e-3 Beam-Beam Parameter Chromaticity (2.0, 2.0)

8 beams go into collisions intensities luminosity  Q bb,tot tunes split to avoid coherent modes measurements simulation Emittances (0.695,0.685) (0.685,0.695) Intensity (experiment) and Emittance (simulation) Evolution of Blue and Yellow Proton Beams at RHIC (from W. Fischer, et al.)

9 Averaged Emittance Growth vs. Tunes (near half integer, above diagonal)

10 Averaged Emittance Growth vs. Tunes (near half integer, below diagonal)

11 Averaged Emittance Growth vs. Tunes (below integer, below diagonal)

12 Averaged Emittance Growth vs. Tunes (above integer, below diagonal)

13 Simulated and Measured BTF Signal at RHIC without Compensation Wire

14 Simulated and Measured BTF Signal at RHIC with 50 A Compensation Wire and 30 mm Separation

15 Tune Shift vs. Separation from Simulated BTF Signal and Analytical Model with 50 A Compensation Wire B.Erdelyi and T.Sen, “Compensation of beam-beam effects in the Tevatron with wires,” (FNAL-TM-2268, 2004).

16 IP1 IP5 Strong-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation LHC Wire Compensation (2 Head-On + 64 Long Range) J. Qiang, LBNL

17 Emittance Growth Evolution w/o Wire Compensation

18 Emittance Growth Evolution with Reduced Separation

19 Emittance Growth Evolution w/o Machine Chromaticity

20 Luminosity Evolution with Reduced Separation

21 Emittance Growth Evolution with Current Fluctuation

22 IP5 CAB 21 A Schematic Plot of LHC Collision at 1 IP and Crab Cavities IP

23 One Turn Transfer Map with Beam-Beam and Crab Cavity M = Ma M1 Mb M1 -1 M M2 -1 Mc M2 Ma: transfer map from head-on crossing angle beam-beam collision Mb,c: transfer maps from crab cavity deflection M1-2: transfer maps between crab cavity and collision point M: one turn transfer map of machine

24 IP Lab frame Moving frame: c cos(  ) 2  Head-on Beam-Beam Collision with Crossing Angle

25 Beam energy (TeV) 7 Protons per bunch 10.5e10  */  crab (m) 0.5/4000 Rms spot size (mm) Betatron tunes (0.31,0.32) Rms bunch length (m) Synchrotron tune Momentum spread 0.111e-3 Crab cavity RF frequency MHz LHC Physical Parameters for Testing Crab Cavity

26 Luminoisty Evolution with 0.15 mrad Half Crossing Angle with/without Crab Cavity turn

27 RMS Size Square with 0.15 mrad Half Crossing Angle with/without Crab Cavity turn

28 Luminoisty Evolution without/with 0.85 um and 1.7 um Horizontal Offset Noise turn

29 RMS Size Square Evolution without/with 0.85 um and 1.7 um Horizontal Offset Noise turn

30 IP1 IP5 AB CDE F A Schematic Plot of LHC Collision with 2 IPs and Crab Cavities IP

31 Luminoisty Evolution with 0.15 mrad Half Crossing Angle with/without Crab Cavity for LHC Upgrade turn

32 Luminosity vs. Beta* for LHC Crab Cavity Compensation