Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton 18-29 Apr 02 1 Discussion on Less-than Best-Effort Services T.Ferrari.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
Advertisements

Nicolas Simar – DANTE : Premium IP and LBE transparency on GEANT QoS on GÉANT Premium IP and Less than Best Effort.
Author: Bill Buchanan. PoTs and IP Network Author: Bill Buchanan Base rate.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.QoS v2.2—5-1 Congestion Management Configuring LAN Congestion Management.
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Thirteen Optimizing Your Network Design Copyright 2010 Cisco Press & Priscilla Oppenheimer.
Tiziana Ferrari Differentiated Services Test: Report1 Differentiated Service Test REPORT TF-TANT Tiziana Ferrari Frankfurt, 1 Oct.
Tiziana Ferrari Diffserv testing in the wide area (TF-TANT task force)1 Diffserv testing in the wide area TF-TANT task force Tiziana Ferrari Italian National.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model Lesson 4.10: Deploying End-to-End QoS.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model.
Tiziana FerrariWP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up 1 WP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up DRAFT,
Tiziana FerrariWP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up 1 WP2.3 Advance Reservation Demonstration: Description and set-up DRAFT,
Nicolas Simar – DANTE - TF-NGN Berlin: Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GEANT Premium IP update and LBE tranparency on GÉANT TF-NGN meeting – BERLIN.
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
CS 268: Lecture 11 (Differentiated Services) Ion Stoica March 6, 2001.
10th Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems 1 A Comparative Evaluation of Internet Pricing Schemes: Smart Market and Dynamic Capacity Contracting.
Modelli di differenziazione delle prestazioni per il supporto del traffico LHC1 Modelli di differenziazione delle prestazioni per il supporto del traffico.
02 nd April 03Networkshop Managed Bandwidth Next Generation F. Saka UCL NETSYS (NETwork SYStems centre of excellence)
Understanding QoS Fundamentals. The basic overview for QoS is “Who goes 1 st? ” from an exit perspective on a switch or router. ‘Evil Villains’ in the.
INDIANAUNIVERSITYINDIANAUNIVERSITY TransPAC QBSS “Scavenger Service” Chris Robb Indiana University TransPAC Network Engineer
Tiziana FerrariQuality of Service for Remote Control in the High Energy Physics Experiments CHEP, 07 Feb Quality of Service for Remote Control in.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1 SEEREN2 Summer School Heraklion, Sept 25 th Routing Issues: QoS/CoS Jean-Marc Uzé Liaison Research.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model Lesson 4.5: Configuring CBWFQ and LLQ.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. QOS Lecture 4 - Introducing QOS.
May 2001GRNET GRNET2 Designing The Optical Internet of Greece: A case study Magda Chatzaki Dimitrios K. Kalogeras Nassos Papakostas Stelios Sartzetakis.
3.4: Using MQC for Implementing QoS
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model.
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems. MPLS-QoS Jay Kumarasamy
LBE/Scavenger TF-NGN 8 Berlin, July 1 st Overview LBE deliverable D9.9 for GEANT due Aug 31 Need to decide how to press ahead with workplan; had.
TERENA Networking Conference 2002, Limerick, Ireland, June SEQUIN: Results on QoS Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and Technology Network (GRNET)
CHAPTER 8 Quality of Service. Integrated services (IntServ) Ensure that a specific flow of traffic is going to receive the appropriate level of bandwidth.
Tiziana Ferrari Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks1 Quality of Service Support in Packet Networks Tiziana Ferrari Italian.
QOS مظفر بگ محمدی دانشگاه ایلام. 2 Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient –Some applications need more assurances from the network.
LBE TF-NGN Budapest October Agenda GÉANT D9.9 deliverable summary Test reports for LBE on GÉANT (Nicolas) Tests for LBE at the edge Limerick.
Tiziana Ferrari Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing1 Diffserv deployment in the wide area: network design and testing Tiziana.
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Thirteen Optimizing Your Network Design Oppenheimer.
Example Applications needing Advanced Services Campus Focused Workshop on Advanced Networks Atlanta, GA.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Identifying Application Impacts on Network Design Designing and Supporting.
Beyond Best-Effort Service Advanced Multimedia University of Palestine University of Palestine Eng. Wisam Zaqoot Eng. Wisam Zaqoot November 2010 November.
Juniper qos JNCIA.
QoS on GÉANT - Aristote Seminar -- Nicolas Simar QoS on GÉANT Aristote Seminar, Paris (France), Nicolas Simar,
QoS monitoring -- Nicolas Simar Monitoring Infrastructure SEQUIN workshop, Amsterdam, 1 February 2002 Nicolas Simar DANTE.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
Scavenger performance Cern External Network Division - Caltech Datagrid WP January, 2002.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
Less than Best Effort -- Nicolas Simar Less than Best Effort QoS IP 2003, Milan (Italy), Nicolas Simar, Network Engineer.
Analysis of QoS Arjuna Mithra Sreenivasan. Objectives Explain the different queuing techniques. Describe factors affecting network voice quality. Analyse.
QoS provisioning for large, high-rate file transfers Zhenzhen Yan, Malathi Veeraraghavan, Chris Tracy, and Chin Guok University of Virginia and ESnet Apr.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 5: Implement Cisco AutoQoS.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
Mr. Mark Welton.  Quality of Service is deployed to prevent data from saturating a link to the point that other data cannot gain access to it  QoS allows.
MB - NG MB-NG Meeting UCL 17 Jan 02 R. Hughes-Jones Manchester 1 Discussion of Methodology for MPLS QoS & High Performance High throughput Investigations.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model.
Differentiated Services IntServ is too complex –More focus on services than deployment –Functionality similar to ATM, but at the IP layer –Per flow QoS.
Queue Scheduling Disciplines
Chapter 6. Configuring Queuing to Manage Traffic.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model Lesson 4.6: Congestion Avoidance.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.2: Implementing QoS.
Lecture 8 -Traffic Management
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
Providing QoS in IP Networks
QoS Experience on European Backbone - TNC Nicolas Simar QoS Experience on European Backbone TNC 2003, Zabgreb (Croatia),
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: Quality of Service
QoS & Queuing Theory CS352.
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Thirteen Optimizing Your Network Design Copyright 2010 Cisco Press & Priscilla Oppenheimer.
Implementing Quality of Service (QoS)
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 6: Quality of Service Connecting Networks.
Quality of Service What is QoS? When is it needed?
EE 122: Differentiated Services
Juniper Class of Service
Presentation transcript:

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 1 Discussion on Less-than Best-Effort Services T.Ferrari

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 2 Overview The phylosophy behind LBE LBE for which applications? Implementation and configuration examples Deployment scenarios Work programme

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 3 The phylosophy behind LBE A very small percentage of network capacity is allocated to LBE so that under congestion best-effort traffic and any higher-priority traffic class is protected from LBE traffic, in other words, the large amount of remaining network capacity can be allocated to non-LBE traffic Result 1: LBE is more penalized than best-effort under congestion Result 2: performance of best-effort and higher classes should be better under congestion in comparison with the performance experienced with a flat service model QBone Scavenger Service: based on the LBE phylosophy

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 4 LBE for which applications? LBE is suitable for applications tolerant of large –Packet loss –High delay –Jitter Not suitable for high-performance TCP-based applications (even if QBSS was succesfully tested at SC2001 with HEP high-performance TCP applications) Could be very helpful to protect production traffic from test bulk traffic (DataGRID project) For applications based on non-TCP compliant stack implementations (debatable application case) The community of potential users has to be clear

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 5 Implementation QBSS codepoint: WRR and WFQ schedulers can be used to control the amount of link capacity assigned to LBE traffic Independent queue dedicated to LBE if possible deployment of WRED for differentiation between best- effort and LBE not sufficient, for example for its impact on delay and IPDV of best-effort packets No policing and scheduling issues Marking: performed by the end-system

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 6 Examples of LBE configuration (from QBSS) CISCO (WRR, DRR, WFQ): class-map match-all qbss match ip dscp 8 ! policy-map qos-policy class qbss random-detect queue-limit bandwidth percent 1 class class-default random-detect

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 7 Examples of LBE configuration (from QBSS) - cont JUNIPER (WRR): class-of-service { input { precedence-map qbss { bits 000 queue 1; bits 001 queue 0; bits 010 queue 1; bits 011 queue 1; bits 100 queue 1; bits 101 queue 1; bits 110 queue 3; bits 111 queue 3; } fpc 1 { precedence-map qbss; } interfaces { ge-1/0/0 { inet-precedence-map; } output { interfaces { so-1/0/0 { weighted-round-robin { output-queue 0 weight 1; output-queue 1 weight 94; output-queue 2 weight 0; output-queue 3 weight 5; }

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 8 Deployment scenarios (1): customer-based Customer Network NRN GEANT scheduling marking Transparent transport of DSCP

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr 02 9 Deployment scenarios (2): customer and NRN/GEANT-based Customer Network NRN GEANT Scheduling at any potential Congestion poin marking Transparent transport of DSCP (non-LBE domain) LBE domains

Tiziana Ferrari Discussion on Less-Than Best-Effort services (LBE), TF-NFN Southampton Apr Work programme Identification of interested NRNs and end-users Phase 0: service specification Phase 1: baseline testing of implementation, study of LBE implementation feasibility (in GEANT and NRNs) Phase 2: performance analysis in user-based scenario (test cases to be identified, DataGRID testbed sites?) supported by the production network Phase 3: implementation of user and GEANT/NRN-based scenario, on production network if possible, preliminary lab tests where needed Experiments with USA partners (QBSS)