NEET Workgroup #3 - Residential Subgroup Snohomish County PUD November 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Financing Energy Efficiency: Credit Enhancements and Leveraging Strategies Matthew H. Brown ConoverBrown LLC
Advertisements

Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
The new LIFE Programme INFO Day Brussels 12/5/2014 Antongiulio Marin Policy officer – DG CLIMA.
Jim Pauley, P.E. Vice President, Industry and Government Relations – Schneider Electric Chair, NEMA High Performance Building Council Building Star An.
California HVAC Program Strategy IOU Program Overview CPUC HVAC Workshop June 24, 2009.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Strategy 2022: A Holistic View Tony Hayes International President ISACA © 2012, ISACA. All rights reserved.
Investing in our Community Using Stimulus Funds to Develop a Home Energy Retrofit Program May 2009.
The Green Deal Finance Company - a collaborative company to enable and underpin the Green Deal The Green Deal in Scotland July 2012.
1 Measuring What Matters – Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed? NEET Workgroup #1 Report Co-Chairs: Massoud Jourabch and Mary Smith Executive.
IT Governance: Simultaneously Empowers and Controls Source: IT Governance, Chapter 1.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Strategic Banking Corporation of Ireland Dublin Chamber of Commerce May 1st 2015.
Increasing Energy Efficiency Through ENERGY STAR® Promotion Rebecca E. Leintz April 2004.
Tax Credits & Financing for Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Projects Presented by: The Morgantown Green Team.
Developing the market for low carbon cars Sustainable Energy in Irish Transport 23 rd November 2005 Greg Archer Director Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership.
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
May 3-4, 2006 PPSI Meeting - Sarasota FL1 Education Workgroup Team Members Heidi Sanborn, R3 Consulting/PSI – Facilitator Scott Cassel, PSI Alison Keane,
ENTREPRENEURSHIP, NEW VENTURES, AND BUSINESS OWNERSHIP
1 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energyeere.energy.gov Kathleen Hogan Deputy Assistant Secretary for EE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Measuring What Matters November 7 th Agenda Review and update of tasks and timeline Review and update of tasks and timeline Role of RTF Role of.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N California Energy Policy: Zero Net Energy Homes in 2020 Martha Brook, P.E. High Performance Buildings.
© OECD/IEA – 2011 Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS Efficient Power Generation 2011 Roundtable 4: Efficient use of energy in the.
[Organization Name] [Date] In consultation with:.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
Institutional Development for Improved Water Quality | November 2010 Operation and Maintenance for Safe Drinking Water – Institutional development to achieve.
Effective Strategies for Climate Risk Mitigation Tom Kerr US EPA.
E NERGY S TAR ® Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machine Industry Meeting Rachel Schmeltz, US EPA Georgia World Congress Center October 22, 2002.
1 Northwest Energy Efficiency Taskforce Workgroup # 1 Measuring What Matters Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed?
Advanced Metering Implementation Team Update Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas October 2008.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
 Identify current issues in both IL and AL  Review benefits of IL and AL and interaction with home support/care services  Recommend actions to support,
Workgroup #3 High Impact Energy Efficiency Initiatives John Savage Stan Price.
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
Development Key Issue #4: “Why do less developed countries face obstacles to development?”
Energy in a Megacity Future: Role of Financing Dr. Mark Bernstein Managing Director USC Energy Institute University of Southern California.
New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) – NGA Center for Best Practices April 29, 2004 Bob Callender Vice President for Programs NYSERDA.
Tapping the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Loan Program | For Utilities.
Michael O’Doherty Assistant Director of Housing, MCC Retrofitting for the future..
Enabling Results: Monitoring and Evaluation in the U.S. ENERGY STAR Program September 28, 2012Ashley M. King Environment Officer.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
Residential and Retail Energy Conservation Products and Services CEO: Mark W Jago CrystalRenewablePower.com.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Behavior Based Energy Efficiency (BBEE) October 2011.
Demand Response
Welcome to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Workshop on Energy Saving Opportunities in Cleanrooms March 15, 1999 Environmental Energy Technologies.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
1 DRAFT DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Resource Study Discussion Only NPC Demand Task Force – Residential and Commercial Findings & Recommendations January.
1 Energy Efficiency Opportunities Bubble Chart Background.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Allegheny Power EmPOWER MD General Awareness Campaign Summary General Awareness Campaign Workgroup Meeting March 11, 2009.
EmPOWER Maryland Utility Program Enhancements Meeting Review of BGE’s Filed Multifamily, Custom and Re-Commissioning Programs Discussion on Future Enhancements.
ENERGY STAR OVERVIEW November Overview What is ENERGY STAR? History Accomplishments Key Strategies –Labeling –Superior Energy Management Building.
Chapter 8 Strategy in the Global Environment
Overall Objectives of NAMA
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Budget Overview
Market Operations Engagement Group EVSE Working Group – Principles
April 4, 2014 Sustainable Growth Committee Briefing Communications & Marketing Committee Meeting Rick Murphy Managing Director – Sustainable Growth American.
Sixth Power Plan Setting Conservation Targets and Implementation Strategies Jill Steiner, Snohomish Public Utility District Northwest Power and Conservation.
Chapter 8 Strategy in the Global Environment
NH Energy Efficiency Resource Standard
Comprehensive Housing Strategy (CHS)
Sustainable buildings
Development Key Issue #4: “Why do less developed countries face obstacles to development?”
Chapter 8 Strategy in the global Environment
New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable
Presentation transcript:

NEET Workgroup #3 - Residential Subgroup Snohomish County PUD November 2008

Residential Energy Consumption in the Region – Annual Load

Residential Energy Consumption in the Region – End-Use 2008

Residential Energy Consumption in the Region – End-Use 2020

Residential Energy Consumption in the Region – 2008 – 2020 Growth by End-Use

High Priority Program Concepts  Plug Load Program  Energy Efficiency Financing  Education and Behavioral Modification

Plug Load Program: Program Concept  Encourage efficiency of plug loads through:  Increased manufacturing standards  Improved product labeling  Targeted incentives  Intelligent load control  Consumer education

Plug Load Program: Value Add  What is the value added to the region? Why is it important?  Plug loads are one of the fastest growing residential end-use loads in the region – electronics alone are expected to increase from ~ 800 aMW in 2008 to 1600 aMW in 2020  Regional coordination is necessary to influence manufacturers and standard bodies

Plug Load Program: Not Occurring but Should  What is not occurring now that we should be doing?  Little information is available about the performance of electronic goods  ENERGY STAR standards do not capture all efficiency potential  Consumers make purchase decisions without considering energy implications  Use of equipment is not optimized

Plug Load Program: Efficient Delivery  Is there a way to do things more efficiently than we are doing today?  Coordinated efforts to influence manufacturers and standards groups (e.g., DOE, EPA) would be more effective  More consistent messaging to consumers about the energy consumption characteristics of electronic equipment is needed  Control technologies, such as occupancy sensor power strips, need more testing and validation

Plug Load Program: Implementation  How would you suggest the recommendation be implemented?  Assign responsibility of negotiating with manufacturers, standards and labeling groups to a regional entity to make more efficient electronic equipment available in the region  Explore establishment of higher standards for the region  Develop regional educational effort to inform consumers about energy consumption of electronics equipment  Test control technologies  Develop regional strategy for adoption of incentives for efficient equipment and controls by local utilities  Partner with California??

Plug Load Program: Workgroup Support  Is there strong support within the workgroup for the recommendation?  Yes

Energy Efficiency Financing: Program Concept  Develop financing options for energy efficiency projects  Encourage more comprehensive investments in energy efficiency  Address barriers faced by low and medium income residents  Develop methods for measuring performance of efficiency investments that create cash flow to service debt  Reduce institutional barriers faced by potential lenders: utilities, agencies, private lenders

Energy Efficiency Financing: Value Add  What is the value added to the region? Why is it important?  Expanded availability of financing would address a significant barrier to comprehensive investment in efficiency ● Point-of-sale or retrofit  Availability of financing could allow for rapid deployment of key efficiency technologies  Allows us to address the major residential uses of energy – 5000 aMW for residential space and water heating in 2020

Energy Efficiency Financing: Not Occurring but Should  What is not occurring now that we should be doing?  Financing programs are few and far between  Some customers are unable to secure funding for efficiency investments  Lenders and other related stakeholders do not recognize unique value of efficiency assets

Energy Efficiency Financing: Efficient Delivery  Is there a way to do things more efficiently than we are doing today?  Develop indices to describe performance of efficiency investments  Create revolving loan fund to support rapid deployment of specific technologies

Energy Efficiency Financing: Implementation  How would you suggest the recommendation be implemented?  Establish policies at the state or utility level to facilitate financing  Educate lenders and other stakeholders  Develop project performance metrics to inform purchase or lending decisions ● Energy Performance Standard or HERS Index or other tool to give residents a “MPG” for their home  Educate consumers to look for seek home performance information when buying new or existing homes  Develop policies or program offerings to encourage comprehensive efficiency improvements ● Encourage adoption of efficiency or savings targets when pursuing retrofits ● Provide lower interest rate or other financing benefits for greater percentage energy reduction

Energy Efficiency Financing: Workgroup Support  Is there strong support within the workgroup for the recommendation?  Moderate support – recognition of significant risks, failure of previous attempts

Education and Behavior Change: Program Concept  Create greater awareness and knowledge about energy consumption and savings opportunity through:  Effective messaging  Early education  Communication tools that inform customers on the level and timing of energy consumption  Benchmarking tools that measure the opportunity and effectiveness of behavioral changes in reducing energy consumption

Education and Behavior Change: Value Add  What is the value added to the region? Why is it important?  Technology based energy efficiency provides only a finite amount of efficiency potential  Additional potential can be realized through changes in behavior supported by improved knowledge and information availability

Education and Behavior Change: Not Occurring but Should  What is not occurring now that we should be doing?  Consistent messaging  Recognition of behavior change as efficiency potential and effective measurement of its effects over time – methods need to be developed at the regional level

Education and Behavior Change: Efficient Delivery  Is there a way to do things more efficiently than we are doing today?

Education and Behavior Change: Implementation  How would you suggest the recommendation be implemented?  Develop regional educational messages ● Consumer level ● Curriculum development  Develop methods for recognizing efficiency potential and measuring effects  Investigate and test technologies and best practices program design to encourage and ensure persistence of behavioral changes

Education and Behavior Change: Workgroup Support  Is there strong support within the workgroup for the recommendation?  Yes, need coordination with Workgroup #4 – Marketing and Communications

questions?