Preparing a User Test Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
©2011 1www.id-book.com Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings Chapter 14.
Advertisements

Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
The Usability Test Process: Steps, tips, and more! Dr. Jennifer L. Bowie For Digital Rhetoric.
Testing through user observations User Observation: Guidelines for Apple Developers, Kathleen Gomoll & Anne Nicol, January 1990 Notes based on:
What is Usability Testing? Usability testing is a technique for ensuring that the intended users of a system can carry out the intended tasks efficiently,
RND Usability testing plan for BelleGames School of Business and Information Management Oulu University of Applied Sciences.
Running a User Study Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Web E’s goal is for you to understand how to create an initial interaction design and how to evaluate that design by studying a sample. Web F’s goal is.
Each individual person is working on a GUI subset. The goal is for you to create screens for three specific tasks your user will do from your GUI Project.
SEVEN FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT USABILITY TESTING Usability Testing 101.
Deciding How to Measure Usability How to conduct successful user requirements activity?
Analyzing and Presenting Results Establishing a User Orientation Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept.
Customer: Rosalva Gallardo Team members: Susan Lin Buda Chiou Jim Milewski Marcos Mercado November 23, 2010.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. Usability Testing Emphasizes the property of being usable Key Components –User Pre-Test –User Test –User.
CS CS 5150 Software Engineering Lecture 12 Usability 2.
Administrivia  Review Deliverable 2 –Overview (audience) –Excellent additions  User Goals  Usability Goals  User Group (who are you designing for?)
Project Sharing  Team discussions –Share results of heuristic evaluations –Discuss your choice of methods and results  Class-level discussion –Each spokesperson.
Testing and Modeling Users Kristina Winbladh & Ramzi Nasr.
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Field Studies (Ethnographic Studies) Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Running User Experiments Humeyra Topcu-Altintas David Girsault Feyi Agagu.
Damian Gordon.  Summary and Relevance of topic paper  Definition of Usability Testing ◦ Formal vs. Informal methods of testing  Testing Basics ◦ Five.
Preparing a User Test Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Evaluation IMD07101: Introduction to Human Computer Interaction Brian Davison 2010/11.
Wanderlust Pilot Field Study Presented by Brandon Bond.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Sandra Martinez, Ph.D. Apply Texas Team Student Information Systems University of Texas at Austin.
Usability Testing Teppo Räisänen
Evaluation Framework Prevention vs. Intervention CHONG POH WAN 21 JUNE 2011.
1 SWE 513: Software Engineering Usability II. 2 Usability and Cost Good usability may be expensive in hardware or special software development User interface.
Chapter 11: An Evaluation Framework Group 4: Tony Masi, Sam Esswein, Brian Rood, & Chris Troisi.
Dobrin / Keller / Weisser : Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century. © 2008 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved.
Online, Remote Usability Testing  Use web to carry out usability evaluations  Two main approaches agent-based evaluation (e.g., WebCritera)  model automatically.
Ch 14. Testing & modeling users
Part 1-Intro; Part 2- Req; Part 3- Design  Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of user interface designs?  Chapter 21 Deciding on what you need to.
This slide presentation is Confidential and Proprietary to ProtoTest LLC.
Human Computer Interaction
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley The Resonant Interface HCI Foundations for Interaction Design First Edition.
Usability testing. Goals & questions focus on how well users perform tasks with the product. – typical users – doing typical tasks. Comparison of products.
What is Usability? Usability Is a measure of how easy it is to use something: –How easy will the use of the software be for a typical user to understand,
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley The Resonant Interface HCI Foundations for Interaction Design First Edition.
Usability testing: A reality check for Plain Talk A brief overview October 7, 2008 Dana Howard Botka Manager, Customer Communications, L&I Plain Talk Coordinator,
Chapter 13. Reviewing, Evaluating, and Testing © 2010 by Bedford/St. Martin's1 Usability relates to five factors of use: ease of learning efficiency of.
Usability Testing Chris North cs3724: HCI. Presentations karen molye, steve kovalak Vote: UI Hall of Fame/Shame?
Usability Testing 2 Planning and Reporting From:. rnusa/testplan.html
Preparing and Running User Experiments By Mei Li, Pearl Ho, and Deepika Gandhi.
Running a User Study Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
Usability Evaluation, part 2. REVIEW: A Test Plan Checklist, 1 Goal of the test? Specific questions you want to answer? Who will be the experimenter?
Dobrin / Weisser / Keller: Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century. © 2010 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved.
AVI/Psych 358/IE 340: Human Factors Evaluation October 31, 2008.
June 5, 2007Mohamad Eid Usability Testing Chapter 8.
Ethnographic Interviews: Interviewing and Observing Users Project: Investigating Sakai 3 Capabilities to Support Learning Activities Jacqueline Mai 10/20/09.
Field Studies (Ethnographic Studies) Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.
William H. Bowers – Requirements Torres 9.
Steps in Planning a Usability Test Determine Who We Want To Test Determine What We Want to Test Determine Our Test Metrics Write or Choose our Scenario.
Evaluation / Usability. ImplementDesignAnalysisEvaluateDevelop ADDIE.
Day 8 Usability testing.
Usability Evaluation, part 2
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine
SY DE 542 User Testing March 7, 2005 R. Chow
From Controlled to Natural Settings
RACIAL VIOLENCE ARCHIVE
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine
Chapter 23 Deciding how to collect data
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine
Chapter 24 Final preparations for the evaluation
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Presentation transcript:

Preparing a User Test Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine

Selecting Tasks One cannot test every possible user task. Rather, usability tests have to focus on representative and/or important tasks. Tasks should be selected that may be fraught with usability problems, as suggested from concerns and experience; will be frequently carried out by users; are mission-critical; are performed under pressure; and are new or have been modified in comparison with previous version or competitive program

Creating Scenarios Scenarios are created to contextualize user experiments (which in general yields more representative test results) Scenario descriptions should be - short - formulated in the words of the user / task domain - unambiguous - contain enough information for test subjects to carry out tasks - directly linked to tasks and concerns ☛ User should read scenario descriptions (and experimenters should possibly read them aloud at the same time) ☛ Scenario descriptions should be tested (in the pilot test or even earlier)

Deciding how to measure usability Performance measures -time needed to carry out a task -Error rate -Time spent on “unproductive” activities (navigation, looking up help, recovery after an error) -Frequency of “unproductive” activities -Counting keystrokes / mouse clicks -Etc. (see Dumais & Reddish) Measures of satisfaction User-provided: Observed: frustration / confusion / surprise / satisfaction -User ratings -Comparisons with previous version / competitors’ software / current way of doing it -Behavioral intentions -Free comments

Preparing the Test Materials Legal documents Informed consent form Non-disclosure form Waiver of liability form Permissions form (e.g., for video-recorded material) Instruction and training related materials Software / Powerpoint slides / video to be shown Description of software functionality Write-up of oral instruction (Guided) training tasks Task-related materials Scenario description Task descriptions ( ☛ put only one task on each page) Pre-test and post-test questionnaires Experiment-related materials Experimental time sheet / log book To-do list for all experimenters

Preparing the testing environment Hardware equipment ☛ cater to users’ normal equipment; remove all potentially distracting programs Sample data ☛ make it look real Voice recording ☛ take care of ambient noise (also exceptional), direction of microphone,… Screen recording ☛ mind a possible slowdown of tested program Video recording ☛ take care of video angle, blocked view, glare, different sunlight over the day,… Time taking ☛ avoid races (between participants, or participants against stop watch) Lab layout ☛ participants should not influence each other

Setting up a test team Typical roles Greeter Briefer Instructor / trainer Narrator Test administrator Note taker Video operator Backup technician for emergencies (Help desk operator) Many of these roles can be combined in a single person No role-switching during an experiment The number of team members depends on the number of parallel / overlapping subjects and the experimental design Teams of three are typical Tests are typically carried out by UI design team, and/or outside usability specialists. Developers, managers, user representatives should be able to watch