April 15, 2008. BOEs Theory of Action Managed Performance Empowerment Theory of Action Adopted Feb. 06 Acknowledges success of Managed Instruction Retains.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.
Advertisements

Building Our Future: One Community, One School, One Child at a Time Goals of the Special Administrative Board St. Louis Public Schools October 14, 2008.
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
Act 51, Amended by Act 221 Reinventing Education Act for the Children of Hawaii, REACH Our Goal…Our Children…Our Future.
Presentation on the Department of Education Response to the 2006 Committee on Weights Recommendation for SY Board of Education Committee on Budget.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
1 Multi-Year Research Program Plan Development Ronald E. Hynes Deputy Associate Administrator for Research Demonstration and Innovation May 15, 2008.
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
North Carolina Educational Technology Plan. GS115C Original legislation passed in 1994, with projected funding of $365M over 5 years Created the.
QEP BASICS.
The Metro Schools Learning Community LB 641. Learning Community/Timeline 1.September 2007 – Commissioner of Education certifies Learning Community (LC)
Goal Preparation and Alignment Review of Superintendent, District and Board Goals for
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
State of New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services Division of Personnel Workforce Development Strategic Plan.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
The Future of State Technology Support for Instructional Improvement Kentucky Department of Education.
College of Human Medicine Executive Committee & Department Administrators Group Presentation May 2006.
April 11, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Effective Principals in Our Schools Takes Commitment and Focus American Association of School Administrators Ann Clark, Deputy Superintendent March 29,
Fulton Charter System Overview. Fall 2010 Winter Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring – Summer 2012 Conversion to Fulton Charter System 2 Board voted to.
Strategic Planning Retreat for UWF Boards and Leadership Teams June 12, 2013 Charting the Future: Pursuing Our Vision.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Worthington City School District Third Grade Guarantee Update Curriculum Liaison Council Jamie Lusher, ELA Coordinator.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
IDAHO STATE TEACHER ADVANCEMENT AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM.
DISTRICT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ACADEMIC RETURN ON INVESTMENT (A-ROI)
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2013 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
Resource Allocation & School Planning Councils in Your District Presenter: Sterling Olson.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Mindset for Student Growth So You Have A Strategic Plan – What Comes Next? Roxane McKay – Wallingford Board of Education Chairperson Dr. Salvatore Menzo.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Oregon’s Future Starts Here Superintendents’ vision for turning our good schools into great schools.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
Page 1 University of Washington Office of Planning and Budgeting April, 2010 University of Washington Activity Based Budgeting at the University of Washington.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
You can replace this text with art Goal Setting Process for the Verona Public Schools Board of Education Facilitated by: Charlene Peterson, NJSBA Field.
Taking the Compliance Out of Improvement Planning David Cook, Cheri Meadows, & Erin McGee KDE.
Community Budget Forum FY 2015 Budget Development Dr. Patrick K. Murphy, Superintendent Deirdra McLaughlin, Assistant Superintendent, Finance & Management.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Finance in Education Chapter 12.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Proposed Budget and Superintendent’s Message FY Presented to the Board of Education April 14,
New BC Framework for Enhancing Learning Rocky Mountain District Framework for Enhancing Learning.
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
District Improvement Plan June 26, 2017
WTPS Annual Goals Westampton Township Public Schools
Operating Budget Overview
Implementing Race to the Top
Presentation transcript:

April 15, 2008

BOEs Theory of Action Managed Performance Empowerment Theory of Action Adopted Feb. 06 Acknowledges success of Managed Instruction Retains certain components Recognizes need for more flexibility Mandates balance between accountability and empowerment Requires decentralization

CMS Strategic Plan 2010 Global competitiveness Presented December 2006 Outlines seven major goals Goal V incorporates Theory of Actions key components –Develop a district-wide accountability system –Reorganize and decentralize central administration –Empower schools with more freedom and flexibility to increase student achievement

Summer 2007: Reorganized and decentralized school district Fall 2007: Presented initial version of accountability system to Board of Education Spring 2008: Currently refining the accountability system Spring 2008: Granting Phase 1 of Freedom & Flexibility Goal V Implementation Strategy Timeline

Freedom & Flexibility Phase 1 Key Components Who gets it? How were they selected? What is the duration? What freedoms are granted? Accountability for results Budget and resources

Who gets it? Principals All principals will receive some Freedom & Flexibility (F&F) Selected principals will receive more Freedom & Flexibility Long-term goal: All principals will have Freedom & Flexibility First group of 48 principals includes 15 FOCUS schools

How were they selected? Selection goals – Phase I –Use objective criteria –Sought critical mass Selection criteria – Phase I –More than 2 years experience principal –Average growth during the last two years, when available –Not on action plan/performance review Superintendent discretion and final selections

What is the duration? Three years, but not longer than employment contract Subject to annual review Principals keep Freedom & Flexibility if they transfer Schools can keep initiatives if approved by area superintendent

What freedoms are granted? Phase I – focus on core business of teaching and learning All principals will receive F&F on discipline plans and class size Most requirements will be optional for F&F principals F&F initiatives will be part of School Improvement Plans

Accountability for Results Unleash innovation which will increase student achievement Success measured by schools progress in reaching goals Less than average expected growth over 3 years = less Freedom & Flexibility

Budget and Resources Phase I focus is on instructional management No additional funding or resources provided More flexibility with use of existing resources Requires approval of area superintendent

Phase II Considerations Evaluate opportunities for Freedom & Flexibility within operational management areas Will involve first group of F&F principals in this process First group of F&F principals will share what they learn so everyone benefits from Phase I

Questions & Answers