TECH581 Analyze Presentation Fall 2008 Date: 11/11/08 Team Members: xxxxx xxxxx Sound Removed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Semonti Basu PBS Technical Assistance Facilitator Grace Martino-Brewster PBS Specialist Austin Independent School District Connecting Data Dots Using data-based.
Advertisements

TECH Project Healthcare IT Asset Management Analyze Phase Date: 11/13/2013 Team members: Angela Hutson.
Computer Engineering 203 R Smith Project Tracking 12/ Project Tracking Why do we want to track a project? What is the projects MOV? – Why is tracking.
TECH A Look at Software Development Analyze Phase Date: 11/13/2013 Team members: Travis W. Gillison.
TECH Project Title Payroll Fund Analysis Phase Date:12 Nov, 2013 Team members: Matt Unger.
Project Storyboard Template
Root Cause Analysis Procedure (IMSP525) Training
Project Planning Dr. Jane Dong Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Estimates Uncertainties Unknown  Project development costs  Project development schedules  Team size  Amount of software to be developed  Hardware.
SE is not like other projects. l The project is intangible. l There is no standardized solution process. l New projects may have little or no relationship.
Nu Project Management Office A web based tool to Manage Projects.
Fact-Finding Fact-Finding Overview
Project Management and MS Project. The project management triangle: Time Resources Scope.
TECH Project Title: Customer service management in automotive industries Analyze Phase Date: 11/19/2014 Team member: Ponnappa Bheemaiah.
TECH581 Fall 2013 Measure Presentation November 11, 2013 Alex Garcia.
TECH Project Title : Customer service management in automotive industries Measure Phase Date:29/10/2014 Team member: Ponnappa Bheemaiah.
TECH Project Design and Manufacturing Control Process for Formula SAE Analyze Phase Date: 11/19/2014 Team members: Chris Lawrence.
TECH581 Improve/Control Presentation Fall 2008 Date: 12/09/08 Team Members: xxxxx xxxxx Sound Removed.
TECH Project Change Management Process Improvement Analyze Phase Date:11/7/2014 Team members: Matt Kirchhoff.
Planning. SDLC Planning Analysis Design Implementation.
TECH Project Title:Customer Service management in automotive industries Improve Phase Date: Team member: Ponnappa Bheemaiah.
Mastering, Improving and Managing of the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Implementations Date: November 19, 2014 Team members: Joe Jones TECH
 Why is it desirable  Cars Cars  Cars 2 Cars 2  What does quality mean in your organisation?
1 Software Quality Engineering CS410 Class 5 Seven Basic Quality Tools.
Copyright BSPIN Agile Practices Benchmarking Case Study by Cosmonet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Chart Your Course to Business Success On Target Business Intensive: Session 6 May 1, 2012 Advisors On Target 1.
TECH Project Bank Card Procurement Process Analyze Phase Date: 11/19/2014 Dave Shoffner.
MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS II 7. Business Intelligence.
This material is approved for public release. Distribution is limited by the Software Engineering Institute to attendees. Sponsored by the U.S. Department.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Engineering Science Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
TECH581 Fall 2008 Measure Presentation Date: 10/24/08 Team members: xxxxx Sound Removed.
Lecture 4 Software Metrics
Improving Patient Bed Wait time in Healthcare DATE: 19 NOVEMBER 2014 TEAM MEMBERS: PRIYANKA PRIYANKA. AHMAD ALMATROOD. TECH Analyze Phase.
Systems Analysis and Design 8 th Edition Chapter 2 Analyzing the Business Case.
1 Presentation Template: Instructor Comments u The following template presents a guideline for preparing a Six Sigma presentation. An effective presentation.
Intake and Output Charts
SE is not like other projects. l The project is intangible. l There is no standardized solution process. l New projects may have little or no relationship.
Class Diagram. Description of the Problem ABC is an advertising agency. it deals with other companies that it calls clients. A record is kept for each.
Designing a Research Project
1 MPA Tampa Bay Enterprise Project Management and Reporting Victor M Rivera MS Project Server Administrator, Enterprise Reporting and Project Manager.
ICALT 2001 How students learn to program: Observations of practical tasks completed Dr. Pete Thomas & Carina Paine Centre for Informatics Education Research.
MS Project 2000 / 2003 Luke E. Reese Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering September 17, 2009.
Project Time Management
Evaluation and Assessment of Instructional Design Module #4 Designing Effective Instructional Design Research Tools Part 2: Data-Collection Techniques.
Title of presentation Name(s) of author / presenter / co-authors
LEAN SIX SIGMA PROJECT TEMPLATE
Data Architecture World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
SFHN Quality Academy 2017: Title
OPS/571 Operations Management
[ March 9, 2017] [ Bill Bowles, Audit Supervisor]
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Analyze Fishbone Diagram
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Value Stream Mapping (VSM) Training
LEAN SIX SIGMA PROJECT TEMPLATE
LEAN SIX SIGMA PROJECT TEMPLATE
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Student name Student ID Degree program Area of specialization
Student name Student ID Degree program Area of specialization
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Student name Student ID Degree program
Stratified Sampling Objective:
The roles and the process
Student name Student ID Degree program Area of specialization
Employee Task Management Software
Student name Student ID Degree program Area of specialization
Student name Student ID Degree program Area of specialization
Presentation transcript:

TECH581 Analyze Presentation Fall 2008 Date: 11/11/08 Team Members: xxxxx xxxxx Sound Removed

Brief Review of Project Charter Information Technology Department of major Insurance Company attempting to collect metrics on business requirements changes throughout application project lifecycle. If collected, measure is taken at the end of the project, amounting to 8 hours of work for a project manager. Tracking and recording the changes throughout the lifecycle of a project and the associated process that can be implemented across the organization can be a significant improvement to a maximum of 1 hour total for each project. The process of requirements counts/metrics can be used to further analyze and estimate future projects. Goal: To understand current processes for requirements metrics gathering to identify and eliminate non value add steps. Identify value added steps performed inefficiently and implement improvements.

CTQ Tree(s)

Data Collection Summarized Random sample of historical projects. PMs estimated time it took to measure requirements changes over time Random sample of new projects that were initiated soon before and/or after start of class project. Stratified by tool used for requirements collection and tier (size in forecasted dollars).

Data Collection Chart – Historical Data Estimate average hours to count requirements changes over time at the end of the project

Pivot Tables - Historical Data Data by stratification factors Historically, Tier 2 projects took longer to count requirements changes at the end of the project lifecycle. Historically, requirements kept in MS Word took longer to count changes at the end of the project lifecycle.

Data Collection – Current and Ongoing Projects Counting requirements changes during the project lifecycle averages to 1.10 hours of time to collect.

Fishbone Diagram

Chart by Project Size Tier 2 included a project with Word as the requirements tool.

Chart by Requirements Complexity

Chart by PM Experience (Grade)

Chart by PM Awareness

Chart by Awareness and Tool Tier 4 and low complexity Higher complexity and size (tier)

Chart by Requirement Tracking Tool

Chart by Tool and Project Size

Conclusions Total hours to count requirements changes over the project lifecycle at the end of the project averages 7.6 hours based on historical information. Average hours to count requirement changes over the lifecycle of the project during the project lifecycle averages 1.1 hours based on sample of projects studied.

Conclusions based on sample of projects studied: Requirements took longer to count when using MS Word as the requirements tracking tool. Projects with high complexity requirements took longer to count. No correlation found between awareness of the priority of the task and the effort to report requirements counts. No correlation found between PM experience (grade) and the effort to report requirements counts.