Case studies Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant Training workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence, Kiev
Case study 1 Characteristics of drug X half-life, conventional preparations: 4-6 h half-life from modified release preparations: hours food decreases absorption of the drug innovator’s SPC: steady state concentrations are reached by the fourth day of the treatment
Case study 1 Modified release tablet The applicant has performed single dose, randomised, 2-period, cross-over study in fed state multiple dose, randomised, 2-period, cross-over study in fed state –first treatment period 4 days –second treatment period 3 days
Case study 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fed state TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test186 ± ± ± 3.9 Reference187 ± ± ± 4.1 Ratio (90 % CI) 96.8 ( ) 92.3 ( ) 97.2 ( )
Case study 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters, multiple dose, fed state Treat- ment AUC 0-τ (ng*h/ml) C min (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Fluctua -tion Test189 ± ± ± ± 48 Referenc e 190 ± ± ± ± 42 Ratio (90 % CI) 91.7 ( ) 80.1 ( ) ( ) ( )
Case study 1 Weaknesses of the documentation study in fasting state is missing the second treatment period is too short according to the originators SPC steady state is achieved by the fourth treatment day
Case study 2 Characteristics of drug Y active metabolite R- & S-enantiomers linear pharmacokinetics multiple strengths (0.5, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg) antipsychotic agent
Case study 2 Immediate release capsule The applicant has performed one single dose study with 1 mg capsule
Case study 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fasting state, parent drug TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test4630± ± ±340 Reference4670± ± ± 350 Ratio (90 % CI) 0.93 ( ) 0.93 ( ) 0.89 ( )
Case study 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fasting state, metabolite TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test1461± ± ±240 Reference1560± ± ± 250 Ratio (90 % CI) 0.94 ( ) 0.94 ( ) 0.89 ( )
Case study 2 for safety reasons single dose study with 1 mg is accepted since linear pharmacokinetics, enantiospecific methods are not needed
Case study 3 Characteristics of drug Z bioavailability % linear pharmacokinetics at doses mg multiple strengths (1 mg and 2 mg)
Case study 3 Enteric coated capsule single dose study with 2 mg capsule performed in fasting state
Case study 3 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fasting state TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test 3490± ± ±460 Reference 3670± ± ±480 Ratio (90 % CI) ( ) ( ) ( )
Case study 3 Weaknesses of the documentation study in fed state is missing