Observations of the White Light Corona from Solar Orbiter and Solar Probe Plus RA Howard 1, AF Thernisien 2, A Vourlidas 1, SP Plunkett 1, CM Korendyke.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Advertisements

Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Measuring the height of Lunar Mountains using data from the Liverpool Telescope.
The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Lecture 15. Guiding Questions 1.What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
Inner Source Pickup Ions Pran Mukherjee. Outline Introduction Current theories and work Addition of new velocity components Summary Questions.
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
PHEBUS Probing of Hermean Exosphere By Ultraviolet Spectroscopy PHEBUS Science Performance International Mercury Watch GroupObservatoire de Paris 5-6 April.
Deep Impact Projectsmfa - 1 Deep Impact Projects (2) Mike A’Hearn.
Max P. Katz, Wayne G. Roberge, & Glenn E. Ciolek Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Department of Physics, Applied Physics and Astronomy.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
1 Determination of 3D CME Trajectories using Stereoscopy Paulett Liewer, Jeff Hall, Eric DeJong, JPL Vahab Pournaghsband, UCB Arnaud Thernisien and Russ.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
J.P. Halain – Centre Spatial de Liège
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
EISCAT Tromsø. Progress in Interplanetary Scintillation Bill Coles, University of California at San Diego A. The Solar Wind: B. Radio Scattering: C. Observations:
What stellar properties can be learnt from planetary transits Adriana Válio Roque da Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie.
Solar Probe: Mission to the Sun Donald M. Hassler/David J. McComas Southwest Research Institute.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
1 Interpreting SECCHI White Light Images: FOV Sensitivity & Stereo Viewing Paulett Liewer, JPL; Russ Howard & Dennis Socker, NRL SECCHI Consortium Meeting.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
3D Heliospheric Reconstructions from the SECCHI White Light Coronagraphs Onboard STEREO: Overview of the NRL Approach J. Newmark, J. Cook, P. Reiser, P.
Computer Simulations in Solar System Physics Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) Forskarskolan i rymdteknik Göteborg 12 September 2005.
1 C. “Nick” Arge Space Vehicles Directorate/Air Force Research Laboratory SHINE Workshop Aug. 2, 2007 Comparing the Observed and Modeled Global Heliospheric.
1 Mirror Mode Storms in Solar Wind and ULF Waves in the Solar Wind C.T. Russell, L.K. Jian, X. Blanco-Cano and J.G. Luhmann 18 th STEREO Science Working.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Assessing Predictions of CME Time- of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE
Solar System Missions Division Solar Orbiter Next major Solar and Heliospheric mission ESA ILWS flagship Now with the Inner Heliospheric Sentinels.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using COR Stereoscopy + Analysis of HI1 CME Tracks P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; N. Sheeley,
The Influence of the Return Current and the Electron Beam on the X-Ray Flare Spectra Elena Dzifčáková, Marian Karlický Astronomical Institute of the Academy.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
195 Å image – behind 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – ahead SECCHI Extreme.
Using potential field extrapolations of active region magnetic fields, observed by SOHO/MDI, as a representation of a real active region, we apply hydrostatic.
SATELLITE METEOROLOGY BASICS satellite orbits EM spectrum
Analysing Lunar Craters using data from the Liverpool Telescope.
The Solar Wind.
Solar Orbiter Mission (ESA) - The near-Sun phase  approach the Sun as close as 48 solar radii (~0.22 AU). At these distances, the angular speed of a spacecraft.
Solar System Physics Group IPS Using EISCAT and MERLIN: Extremely-Long Baseline Observations at Multiple Frequencies R.A.Fallows, A.R.Breen, M.M.Bisi,
Optical properties Satellite observation ? T,H 2 O… From dust microphysical properties to dust hyperspectral infrared remote sensing Clémence Pierangelo.
1 PHY Lecture 5 Interaction of solar radiation and the atmosphere.
1 Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Enhancements as seen by STEREO C.T. Russell, L.K. Jian and J.G. Luhmann 18 th STEREO Science Working Group April Meudon,
SECCHI 3D Reconstruction Efforts at NRL Angelos Vourlidas Naval Research Laboratory With inputs from: R. Howard, J. Newmark, J. Cook, P. Reiser.
Interplanetary Shocks in the Inner Solar System: Observations with STEREO and MESSENGER During the Deep Solar Minimum of 2008 H.R. Lai, C.T. Russell, L.K.
Simulations of Radio Imaging in the Earth’s Magnetosphere J. L. Green, S. Boardsen, W. W. L. Taylor, S. F. Fung, R. F. Benson, B. Reinisch, and D. L. Gallagher.
ESMP-14 Dublin Li Feng, Bernd Inhester, Yuming Wang, Fang Shen, Chenglong Shen, Weiqun Gan 1. Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany 2.
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
Chemistry XXI Unit 2 How do we determine structure? The central goal of this unit is to help you develop ways of thinking that can be used to predict the.
Aerosol distribution and physical properties in the Titan atmosphere D. E. Shemansky 1, X. Zhang 2, M-C. Liang 3, and Y. L. Yung 2 1 SET/PSSD, California,
Measurements of White-Light Images of Cometary Plasma as a Proxy for Solar Wind Speed J.M. Clover, M.M. Bisi, A. Buffington, B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick Center.
CASS/UCSD ILWS 2009 SMEI 3D reconstructions of density behind shocks B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover, S. Hamilton Center.
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
Study of the April 20, 2007 CME-Comet interaction event with an MHD model Y. D. Jia 1, C. T. Russell 1, W. B. Manchester 2, K. C. Hansen 2, A. Vourlidas.
Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Night OH in the Mesosphere of Venus and Earth Christopher Parkinson Dept. Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences University of Michigan F. Mills, M.
Three-Dimensional Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections From LASCO Polarization Measurements K. P. Dere, D. Wang and R. Howard ApJL, 620; L119-L
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
U.A. Dyudina, A.P. Ingersoll, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, Objectives We study lightning on Jupiter using spatially resolved.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations Verónica Ontiveros National University of Mexico, MEXICO George Mason University,USA Angelos Vourlidas Naval.
Motions of the Moon, Phases and Eclipses (Ch 3)
B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington,
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
ATST Scattered Light Issues
OSIRIS coma dust phase function
Solar Probe Plus – SWG September 2, 2016
Diagnosing kappa distribution in the solar corona with the polarized microwave gyroresonance radiation Alexey A. Kuznetsov1, Gregory D. Fleishman2 1Institute.
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
Presentation transcript:

Observations of the White Light Corona from Solar Orbiter and Solar Probe Plus RA Howard 1, AF Thernisien 2, A Vourlidas 1, SP Plunkett 1, CM Korendyke 1, NR Sheeley 1, JS Morrill 1, DG Socker 1, MG Linton 1, PC Liewer 3, EM DeJong 3, M Velli 3, Z Mikic 4, V Bothmer 5, P Lamy 6, P Rochus 7 1. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 2. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 3. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 4. Predictive Sciences Incorporated, San Diego, CA, 5. University of Gottingen, Gottingen, GERMANY, 6. Laboratoire d’Astrophysique Marseille, Marseille, France, 7. Centre Spatiale de Liege, Liege, BELGIUM

Outline Solar Orbiter/SoloHI and Solar Probe Plus/WISPR Mie Scattering Modeling of F-Corona View from WISPR View from Solar Orbiter Summary

MOTIVATION The Solar Orbiter and Solar Probe Plus Missions will sample regions of the inner heliosphere that have never been sampled before. An auxiliary measurement that will be made is that of the near-Sun dust environment – i.e. the F-corona. As dust particles get close to the Sun they will evaporate and then not contribute to the scattering. The radial distance of this evaporation depends on the chemical composition of the material. A dust free zone at about 4-5 Rsun has been postulated (Russell, 1929), but has never been observed. QUESTIONS: What will the background F-Corona look like from these vantage points? Can the dust-free zone be seen in the observations? What inferences might we be able to make about the near-sun dust environment.

SoloHI and WISPR Solar Orbiter/SoloHI and Solar Probe Plus/ WISPR are white light imagers evolved from the STEREO/SECCHI heliospheric imagers. SoloHI – FOV: 40°, Inner limit: 5° from Sun Center WISPR – 2 Tels, with radial coverage 13° to 108° –FOV: 40°, Inner limit: 13° from Sun Center –FOV: 58°, Inner limit: 50° from Sun Center SOLAR ORBITER SOLAR PROBE PLUS

Outline Solar Orbiter/SoloHI and Solar Probe Plus/WISPR Mie Scattering Modeling of F-Corona View from WISPR View from Solar Orbiter Summary

Dust Scattering Geometry (Mann et al, 2004)

Dust Scattering Equations Volume Scattering Function Scattering Cross Section F-corona/Zodiacal Light Intensity Simplified Scattering Phase Function

Comparison with Helios Observations Hoyle and Wickramasinghe (1984) We have added a Mie scattering capability into our forward modeling program for Thomson scattering, and compared it to the Helios observations and the calculations of Hoyle & Wickramasinghe (1984) Our Results

Mie Scattering Phase Function and Volume Scattering Function Mie phase functions for a spherical particle of a = 15 μm radius, and index m = 1.6 – 0.1i, at 540 nm wavelength, (as used in Hoyle & Wickramasinghe.) Volume Scattering Function (VSF) of Lamy & Perrin (1986). The VSF incorporates distributions of particle size and indices of refraction. We use this VSF in the subsequent calculations. Scattering Angle [deg]

LOS Brightness Contribution with Observer at 1 AU Note the large range of heliocentric distances contributing to the F-coronal signal. At least half is arising AU from the Sun.

Outline Solar Orbiter/SoloHI and Solar Probe Plus/WISPR Mie Scattering Modeling of F-Corona View from WISPR (Perihelion at 9.5 R sun ) View from Solar Orbiter (Perihelion at 0.28 AU) Summary

K+F Corona From WISPR at 9.5 R s The black sold lines show the elongation from 14°-104° The F-corona is simulated using Mie scattering with a particle size of 15µm radius, and an index of refraction n= i (Hoyle & Wickramasinghe, 1984) The particle density varies as r -1 exp(-2.6|sinβ π | 1.3 ) with β π the angle between a point of the corona and the plane of symmetry taken to be the ecliptic plane (Leinert, 1976) No Dust Free ZoneDust Free Zone Below 5R s

F-Coronal Profiles With Various Dust Density Decreases Dust density is decreased from the “nominal” 1/r density model, in increments of 10% to a full 100% decrease. The profiles are taken in the ecliptic plane. The elongation range corresponds to the WISPR field of view (14-104°). K-corona “nominal” F-corona

Onion Layers Dust Free Zone, WISPR FOV, from 9.5 R sun Top left: WISPR image of the K+F coronae, viewed from 9.5 R sun Bottom left: dust density attenuation function that simulates different dust species evaporating and not scattering. Top right: K and F coronae profiles. Since the spacecraft is at a height of 9.5 R sun, it is within the onion layers and we only see the steps below 9.5 R sun. Moreover, since there is a lower density of particles near the spacecraft, the brightness is slightly below the no dust free zone F corona at elongations above 70°.

Outline Solar Orbiter/SoloHI and Solar Probe Plus/WISPR Mie Scattering Modeling of F-Corona View from WISPR (Perihelion at 9.5 R sun ) View from Solar Orbiter (Perihelion at 0.28 AU) Summary

Onion Layers Dust Free Model, SoloHI FOV, from 0.28 AU In the Ecliptic Plane35⁰ Above the Ecliptic Plane K+F Corona The “onion layers dust free model”

Onion Layers Dust Free Model, SoloHI FOV, from 0.28 AU K and F coronal profiles Derivative of the Total Brightness Curve Spacecraft Location In the Ecliptic Plane 35⁰ Above the Ecliptic Plane

Summary We have successfully added Mie scattering and the Volume Scattering Function to our forward modeling program to study the accumulation along the line of sight. The region where the dust starts to vaporize will be observable from both Solar Orbiter and SPP, and the dust-free zone will be observable from SPP. We expect to detect inflections/discontinuities in the slope of the F-Corona –as individual species of dust vaporize and no longer scatter or as reflections from dust grain facets overtake small angle scattering. Modeling efforts will greatly enhance the interpretation of the types and sizes of dust grains in the near-sun environment. Both SO & SP+ are very exciting missions for understanding the dust – electron corona interactions in the inner heliosphere. This work was performed under the NASA Solar Orbiter and Solar Probe Plus Programs.

BACKUP

Abstract The SoloHI instrument on Solar Orbiter and the WISPR instrument on Solar Probe+ will make white light coronagraphic images of the corona as the two spacecraft orbit the Sun. The minimum perihelia for Solar Orbiter is about 60 Rsun and for SP+ is 9.5 Rsun. The wide field of view of the WISPR instrument (about 105 degrees radially) corresponds to viewing the corona from 2.2 Rsun to 20 Rsun. Thus the entire Thomson hemisphere is contained within the telescope’s field and we need to think of the instrument as being a traditional remote sensing instrument and then transitioning to a local in-situ instrument. The local behavior derives from the fact that the maximum Thomson scattering will favor the electron plasma close to the spacecraft exactly what the in-situ instruments will be sampling. SoloHI and WISPR will also observe scattered light from dust in the inner heliosphere, which will be an entirely new spatial regime for dust observations from a coronagraph, which we assume to arise from dust in the general neighborhood of about half way between the observer and the Sun. As the dust grains approach the Sun, they evaporate and do not contribute to the scattering. A dust free zone has been postulated to exist somewhere inside of 5 Rsun where all dust is evaporated, but this has never been observed. The radial position where the evaporation occurs will depend on the precise molecular composition of the individual grains. The orbital plane of Solar Orbiter will gradually increase up to about 35 degrees, enabling a very different view through the zodiacal dust cloud to test the models generated from in- ecliptic observations. In this paper we will explore some of the issues associated with the observation of the dust and will present a simple model to explore the sensitivity of the instrument to observe such evaporations.

There are several “coronas” originating from different emission processes K- corona: A reflection (Thomson scattering) of the photospheric light by coronal electrons F-corona: A reflection of the photospheric light by dust particles. E-corona: True coronal emission in spectral lines (EUV, UV, X-rays & Visible) T- corona: Infrared emission from dust particles.

Current Understanding of F-Corona Most of our knowledge about the F-corona comes from coronagraph and eclipse observations from Earth and from in-situ and photometric observations from the Helios mission (Leinert et al. 1998). Raw C3 Image –The F-coronal brightness results from the line-of-sight integral of the scattering from μm dust particles. –These particles undergo efficient forward-scattering at small angles. The details of the scattering at all angles are still not well understood. –Hence dust located in the region about half-way between the Sun and the observer generates most of the F-coronal brightness at small elongations. –The F-corona observed by LASCO has been extremely stable throughout the year and from year to year. The F-corona brightness curves observed by LASCO at 1 AU agree with the curves established by Helios from 0.3 AU to 1 AU, implying that the radial distribution is quite stable from 0.3 to 1 AU

SoloHI and WISPR Opens Up New Observational Possibilities for Dust Studies A dust-free zone near the Sun has been predicted (Russell, 1929), but no observations have confirmed or rejected its existence. Small angle scattering (Mie) is the most common model for dust, but as the path length decreases, reflections from facets could become dominant. As the distance to the Sun decreases, there may be more variation in the dust density as functions of radial distance and longitude as sun- grazing comets deposit their dust grains along their orbital plane. SoloHI and WISPR observe the integral of the scattering along the line of sight, so that modeling must be invoked to deconvolve the contribution along the LOS. We have added Mie Scattering to the Thomson Scattering program, Raytrace, that we have used to analyze CMEs and streamers (e.g. Thernisien et al, 2006, 2009)

Vulcanoids A dynamically stable region interior to Mercury’s orbit is predicted to contain a population of small, asteroid like bodies called Vulcanoids from the early solar system and may be the source of impacts onto Mercury. Searches for the existence of Vulcanoids have been unsuccessful. Durda et al. (2000), Stern et al. (2007), Merline et al. (2008) and Steffl et al. (2009) have used LASCO, Messenger and SECCHI observations to search for Vulcanoid objects and have put upper limits on the number of objects above certain sizes. While asteroids have been detected within the Vulcanoid region ( AU), none were Vulcanoids. Using WISPR, SPP will extend these searches to fainter objects and place new constraints on the formation and evolution of objects in this region.

Sublimation Zones For Different Materials

Dusty Plasma Ragot & Kahler (2003) speculated on the possibility of CMEs interacting with dust in the 3-5 Rsun regime and changing the structure of a CME. –A change in the F-corona as a result of CMEs has never been observed. In fact the F-corona is quite constant. –However the volume of space in which the CME is observed is different from the volume of space in which the dust is observed. –SPP will bring these two regimes closer A CME (and/or shock) has been observed to modify the comet tail by LASCO, STEREO, and SMEI at distances from 15 Rsun to 1 AU. SoloHI and WISPR will make the first reliable measurements of the dust environment close to the Sun and will be able to determine whether there is an interaction between the electron and dust coronae.

VSF Derived by Leinert et al. (1976)

Comparison to Lamy-Perrin VSF Scattering Angle [deg] Backward Scattering Forward Scattering VSF [sr -1. cm -1 ]

Sanity Check of the Mie Scattering Computation Mie phase function i1 and i2 are computed with DU algorithm (2004), for a particle of index m=1.33, and size parameter x=10, where x=2π a/λ, with a the radius of the particle, assumed spherical, and λ the wavelength of light. Same Mie phase functions i1 and i2 for the same particle index and size, as published by van de Hulst (1981).

Extrapolation of the LP VSF below 10° Elongation using Leinert et al. VSF

Brightness Contribution Calculated by Misconi and Rusk using Lamy-Perrin VSF Left Panel: brightness contribution using Lamy-Perrin VSF and computed by Misconi and Rusk (1987) Right Panel: same brightness contribution using Lamy-Perrin VSF but computed with our ray-tracing program.

Contributions along the Line of Sight

LOS Brightness Contribution with Observer at 0.28 AU

Onion Layers Dust Free Zone, WISPR FOV, from 9.5 R sun Left panel: K and F coronae profiles. Since the spacecraft is at a height of 9.5 R sun, it is within the onion layers and we only see the steps below 9.5 R sun. Moreover, since there is a lower density of particles near the spacecraft, the brightness is slightly below the no dust free zone F corona at elongations above 70°. Right panel: derivative of the F corona with the onion dust free zone. The oscillations below 20° elongation are artifacts due to the LOS integration.

LOS Brightness Contribution with Observer at AU

LOS Brightness Contribution with Observer at 1 AU

LOS Brightness Contribution with Observer at 0.28 AU

LOS Brightness Contribution with Observer at AU

Onion Layers Dust Free Zone, SoloHI FOV, from 0.28 AU Spacecraft 35° above the Ecliptic Plane Left panel: K and F coronae profiles. 15 R sun, the beginning of the dust free zone, corresponds to an elongation of 14.3° from 0.28 AU. Right panel: derivative of the F corona with the onion dust free zone.

Depth Contribution for WISPR at Perihelion K and F corona depth contribution. Left panel: no dust free zone. Right panel: onion layer dust free zone starting at 15 R sun.

Depth Contribution for SoloHI at Perihelion K and F corona depth contribution. Left panel: no dust free zone. Right panel: onion layer dust free zone starting at 15 R sun.

Variational Studies Particle Radius 1 micron 15 micron 100 micron Index of Refraction Real part Imaginary Part Blue lines are the Helios observations Fit of Hoyle et al (1984)

F-Corona From WISPR at 9.5 R s The black sold lines show the elongation from 14°-104° The F-corona is simulated using Mie scattering with a particle size of 15µm radius, and an index of refraction n= i (Hoyle &Wickramasinghe, 1984) The particle density varies as r -1 exp(-2.6|sinβ π | 1.3 ) with β π the angle between a point of the corona and the plane of symmetry taken to be the ecliptic plane (Leinert, 1976)

K+F Corona From WISPR at 9.5R s Same simulation as on the previous slide, but with the addition of a K-corona model (Saito et al, 1977). Note that the dust-free zone is still quite visible.

F-Coronal Profiles With Various Dust Density Decreases Same calculation as previous slide, but now zoomed in to show the profiles.

Onion Layers Dust Free Zone, SoloHI FOV, from 0.28 AU Spacecraft in the Ecliptic Plane Top left: SoloHI image of the K+F coronae, viewed from 60.2 R sun (0.28 AU). Bottom left: dust density attenuation function that simulates the different dust type free zones. Top right: K and F coronae profiles. The dust-free zone begins at 15 R sun, which corresponds to an elongation of 14.3° from 0.28 AU.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011 Onion Layers Dust Free Zone, SoloHI FOV, from 0.28 AU Spacecraft 35° Above the Ecliptic Plane Top left: SoloHI image of the K+F coronae, viewed from 60.2 R sun (0.28 AU). Bottom left: dust density attenuation function that simulates the dust density decreases due to evaporation. Top right: K and F coronae profiles. 15 R sun is the beginning of the dust free zone and corresponds to an elongation of 14.3° from 0.28 AU.