Main Linac Integration Work Packages Chris Adolphsen Dec 11, 2007 High Priority Items in Red.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

Q20: The X-band collider has much tighter requirements for the alignment of the beam orbit with the structure axis, yet the basic instrumental precision.
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac revised K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV,
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
SLAC ILC Accelerator: Luminosity Production Peter Tenenbaum HEP Program Review June 15, 2005.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
Alignment and Beam Stability
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
DESY GDE Meeting Global Design Effort 1 / 12 Status of RTML Design and Tuning Studies PT SLAC.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
Dynamic Tuning Selected Highlights Freddy Poirier (DESY) ILC accelerator physics group meeting 28 th January 2008.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
December Ground Motion Group Global Design Effort 1 LET Status report, December 06 Paul Lebrun Fermilab CD/AMR.
ML Planning for ILC08 First Pass Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Main Linac Chris Adolphsen. KOM/GDE Topics ■ RDR Lessons ■ What we will (or will not) learn by 2011 from ■ ILC facilities ■ XFEL ■ ACD Down-Select Criteria.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
1 DFS Studies on the Main Linac with Rnd-walk-like motion LET Beam Dynamics Workshop 12 th December 2007 Freddy Poirier.
DMS steering with BPM scale error - Trial of a New Optics - Kiyoshi Kubo
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
8 th February 2006 Freddy Poirier ILC-LET workshop 1 Freddy Poirier DESY ILC-LET Workshop Dispersion Free Steering in the ILC using MERLIN.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
3.1 Main linac layout and parameters 3 SCRF Main Linacs50Yamomoto 31 Main linac layout and parameters5Adolphsen 31.1 Main Linac layout for flat site 31.2.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
ILC BDS Alignment, Tuning and Feedback Studies
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Emittance Dilution and Preservation in the ILC RTML
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Summary of Beam Dynamics Working Group
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Muon Acceleration in a Neutrino Factory
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Crab crossing plan Optimize the crabbing system for best beam stability and minimum emittance impact Study and specify tolerances on cavity multipole components.
Main Linac Beam Optics and Tolerances
Presentation transcript:

Main Linac Integration Work Packages Chris Adolphsen Dec 11, 2007 High Priority Items in Red

WP1.1: Quad Package Design a)Determine the cost/performance optimal quad/bpm aperture considering beam dynamics, cryo heat loads and beam interception issues. b)Describe likely backgrounds (Halo, SR, MP, dark currents) and the means of dealing with them and minimizing beam interception damage. c)Based on the linac optics and magnet field requirements (from other WPs), work with magnet experts to design a set of SC quads and correctors. d)Based on the linac bpm requirements (from other WPs), work with instrumentation experts to design the bpms and signal processing system. e)Based on above results and the HOM absorber requirements (from other WPs), work with cryomodule group to define layout of the quad package that achieves the required performance.

WP1.2: Quad Package Prototypes a)Build prototype quads and correctors (combined and separate) to verify quad center stability and basic field requirements can be met b)Build prototype bpms to verify required resolution and stability in a ‘cleanable’ design c)Using prototype quads and bpms in a beamline, show that quad shunting will provide a stable, micron-level measure of the quad magnetic center d)Build prototype HOM absorbers to verify HOM attenuation in bench tests and in beam operation in one or more of the test facilities

WP2: General ML BD a)Do analytical estimates of the various emittance growth mechanisms in the linac to establish the relative sizes and scalings with energy and lattice strength. b)Use this info to optimize the linac lattice and identify the critical alignment, resolution and magnetic field requirements. c)Compare simulations to analytic results - understand any significant deviations and ‘cross-term’ effects. d)Identify those mechanisms that ultimately limit further emittance reductions and suggest possible mitigations.

WP3: Initial Alignment a)Develop realistic models of both short and long range spatial misalignments for the beamline components based on the likely methods of installation and global alignment b)Incorporate these models into the beam simulation programs to determine if the misalignments will cause unacceptable emittance growth after beam-based steering c)Work with the installation/alignment groups to establish specs for the initial alignment of the components that can be easily interpreted by those who will do this work

WP4: Energy Errors a)Develop realistic models of how the bunch energy and energy spread may vary from ideal along the linac and along each bunch train. b)Incorporate these models into the beam simulation programs to determine the allowed energy errors. c)Work with the LLRF group to translate these errors to specs on their system to regulate the rf gradients and phases in each rf unit.

WP5: Static Tuning a)Evaluate the various proposed linac alignment methods, including quad shunting, in terms of performance, impact on operation, sensitivity to lattice errors and requirements on beam position resolution, accuracy and offset stability. b)Briefly describe how the tuning will be done in other parts of the machine c)Describe how various tuning bumps could be used to further reduce the emittance growth

WP6: Dynamic Tuning a)Specify acceptable fast and slow quad motion in terms of amplitudes and correlations. For the latter, determine the implications for the ‘static’ tuning system. b)Specify a fast FB system to stabilize the beam orbits, including the requirements on the magnet response times. c)Specify methods for measuring the bunch/beam energy profile, matching the quad lattice and regulating the bunch energy at the end of the linacs. Work with Controls and LLRF to have these implemented d)Specify system and procedures to monitor the bunch/beam emittance including the instrumentation requirements. Work with the Instrumentation group to design bunch size monitors.

WP7: Wakefield and Cavity Topics a)Compute wake offsets due to FPC/HOM antennae intrusions and propose methods to reduce it b)Specify short and long range wakefields and cross (x-y) coupling effects c)Evaluate the effectiveness of the HOM absorber to remove the wake energy before it is absorbed in the 2K cryo system d)Simulate multi-cavity trapped modes to look for significant wakefield build up e)Develop cavity distortion model to match first/second band dipole mode properties f)Analyze dipole mode signals to provide info on cavity properties g)Evaluate multipacting in power and HOM couplers See results from these studies at …

Where all of your wake questions will be answered Well…at least they will be acknowledged Anyway… the talks will be posted