Summary of IMM Function and Monthly Report for September 2008 Presented to: Organization of Midwest ISO States Annual Meeting David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Advertisements

Highlights of the 2003 New York ISO State of the Market Report David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor April 14, 2004.
Regulatory Proposal December We provide distribution services to 1.4 million residential and business customers We deliver electricity to.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Discussion of Inter-RTO Seams Issues Presented by: Midwest ISO and NYISO Independent Market Monitor David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics October 7,
Convergence Bidding Overview Margaret Miller Manager, Market Design & Regulatory Policy CPUC Convergence Bidding Workshop August 26, 2010.
Highlights of the 2004 State of the Market Report New York Electricity Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor May.
1 Highlights of the 2012 Annual Report on the ISO New England Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics External Market Monitor June 12, 2013.
Robert G. Ethier, Ph.D. Director, Market Monitoring May 5, 2004 ISO New England State of the Market Report 2003.
0 Independent Market Monitoring for the Midwest ISO Presented by: Organization of MISO States David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor January.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Duke Energy Carolinas Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services September 12, 2008.
1 Presentation to the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) T. Graham Edwards President & CEO August 9, 2007.
Regional Transmission Organizations: The Future of Transmission? Dave Edwards 4/17/2004.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Robert G. Ethier, Ph.D. Director, Market Monitoring May 4, 2005 ISO New England State of the Market Report 2004.
A Primer on Electric Utilities, Deregulation, and Restructuring of U.S. Electricity Markets W.M. Warwick July 2000 Revised May 2002.
Presentation to WECC Market Interface Committee March 24, 2015
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Convergence Bidding Issues Eric Hildebrandt, Ph.D. CAISO Department of Market Monitoring CPUC Convergence Bidding Workshop July 26, 2010.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Seams Issues Raymond DePillo Vice-President – Power Operations and Asset Management PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC October 7, OPSI Annual.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
George A. Godding, Jr. Director, Management and Communications Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Comments are the speakers and do not necessarily.
Update - RTOs and Capacity January 28, Purpose of Presentation Update the Commission on issues related to – (1) Ameren Missouri – potential Local.
1 Independent Market Monitoring in the Midwest ISO Presented to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor.
1 The Costs of Participating in Restructured Wholesale Markets American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 William M. Bateman Robert C. Smith.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Role Of The Market Monitor: ISO New England Dr. Hung-po Chao Director, Market Monitoring FERC Open Meeting Washington,
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
©2004 PJMwww.pjm.com 1 PJM's Perspective on Reliability – Summer 2004 and Beyond Karl Pfirrmann President -- PJM Western Region FERC Summer Reliability.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
Analysis of ERCOT Regulation Service Deployments during 2011 David Maggio Market Enhancement Task Force Meeting 3/29/
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
MISO Wisconsin Relationship Public Service Commission Randel Pilo, Assistant Administrator August 7, 2008.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Southern California Edison Company’s Proposal to Participate in Convergence Bidding August 23, 2010.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting September 16, 2008 Austin, TX.
Role of Investor Owned Utility in Development of Wind Energy in Iowa from an Engineers perspective Jeff Bales June 2011.
ISO New England State of the Markets Report May April 2002 Robert Ethier, Ph.D. Manager, Market Monitoring and Mitigation ISO New England June 26,
2003 State of the Market Report ERCOT Wholesale Electricity Markets.
Market Monitoring: The Role of OMOI and MMUs Presented to: Energy Markets at the Crossroads Springfield, Illinois December 12, 2002 By: Lisa L. Carter.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
Highlights of Midwest ISO: 2004 State of the Market Report and Day-2 Energy Markets Prepared by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Midwest.
Market Working Group Update Presentation to CAWG March 29, 2011 Jim Sanderson, KCC.
DATA COLLECTION William McCarty Chairman Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission September 9-10 Riga, Latvia.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Shir Consultants Regulation and Market Monitoring in Electricity Markets Dariush Shirmohammadi Shir.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
IMM Report on MISO South Integration Presented by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Presented to: Entergy Regional State Committee April.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Wind Management at MISO
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
Market Design in New England
Summer Peak Energy Pricing in New England: The ISO-NE Response
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

Summary of IMM Function and Monthly Report for September 2008 Presented to: Organization of Midwest ISO States Annual Meeting David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor October 14, 2008

The Role of Market Monitoring Deregulation is premised on the benefits of replacing price regulation with competitive forces to guide generation and transmission usage in the short- term and investment decisions in the long-term.Deregulation is premised on the benefits of replacing price regulation with competitive forces to guide generation and transmission usage in the short- term and investment decisions in the long-term. To help ensure that these benefits are realized, market monitoring is designed to identify:To help ensure that these benefits are realized, market monitoring is designed to identify: Flaws in market rules that create inefficient incentives or gaming opportunities; Flaws in market rules that create inefficient incentives or gaming opportunities; Potential efficiency improvements in the operation of the market; Potential efficiency improvements in the operation of the market; Market power; Market power; The monitoring function includes:The monitoring function includes: Real-time screening and analysis to identify circumstances that require further investigation. Real-time screening and analysis to identify circumstances that require further investigation. Investigations of market operations or conduct identified through the daily screening or complaint processes. Investigations of market operations or conduct identified through the daily screening or complaint processes. Periodic analysis and reporting; Periodic analysis and reporting; - 2 -

- 3 - Real-Time Market Monitoring Effective real-time monitoring requires a highly automated software system to continuously receive data and screen the market results for:Effective real-time monitoring requires a highly automated software system to continuously receive data and screen the market results for: Attempts to exercise market power by withholding resources; Attempts to exercise market power by withholding resources; Running a generator uneconomically and causing a transmission line to become overloaded; Running a generator uneconomically and causing a transmission line to become overloaded; Other inefficient conduct that may indicate potential market design flaws; Other inefficient conduct that may indicate potential market design flaws; Operator actions or actions of control area operators that may undermine the efficiency of the market; Operator actions or actions of control area operators that may undermine the efficiency of the market; The market monitoring system generates automated alerts sent to the beepers and s of IMM staff to ensure real-time monitoring is effective on a 24-7 basis.The market monitoring system generates automated alerts sent to the beepers and s of IMM staff to ensure real-time monitoring is effective on a 24-7 basis. The real-time market monitoring also includes the implementation of prospective mitigation of economic withholding.The real-time market monitoring also includes the implementation of prospective mitigation of economic withholding

- 4 - Investigations and Complaints Investigations are most often triggered by the real-time monitoring, but can be initiated in response to requests from the States, FERC, market participants, or the MISO staff or Board of Directors.Investigations are most often triggered by the real-time monitoring, but can be initiated in response to requests from the States, FERC, market participants, or the MISO staff or Board of Directors. Investigations are often necessary to evaluate certain conduct that may or may not be anticompetitive.Investigations are often necessary to evaluate certain conduct that may or may not be anticompetitive. For example, we conduct physical audits of certain generator or transmission outages to identify physical withholding; For example, we conduct physical audits of certain generator or transmission outages to identify physical withholding; Although we consult with participants to gather information, we do not attempt to compel participants to change their conduct. Although we consult with participants to gather information, we do not attempt to compel participants to change their conduct. Investigations that indicate anticompetitive conduct or gaming will result in referrals to FERC under a) the sanction provisions of the MISO tariff or b) enforcement provisions of the Energy Policy Act.Investigations that indicate anticompetitive conduct or gaming will result in referrals to FERC under a) the sanction provisions of the MISO tariff or b) enforcement provisions of the Energy Policy Act

- 5 - Periodic Reporting on Market Performance The primary product of the periodic reporting is an annual State of the Market report that contains:The primary product of the periodic reporting is an annual State of the Market report that contains: An assessment of the overall performance of the RTO markets; An assessment of the overall performance of the RTO markets; Recommendations for changes in the market rules or other provisions to improve the efficiency of the market; and Recommendations for changes in the market rules or other provisions to improve the efficiency of the market; and An evaluation of the conduct of market participants and recommendations regarding changes to the mitigation measures. An evaluation of the conduct of market participants and recommendations regarding changes to the mitigation measures. We also report on the performance of the market to:We also report on the performance of the market to: To FERC staff in regular weekly and monthly meetings; To FERC staff in regular weekly and monthly meetings; The States on a quarterly basis and on specific topics as needed; The States on a quarterly basis and on specific topics as needed; The MISO Board on a monthly basis; and The MISO Board on a monthly basis; and Market participant committees as requested; Market participant committees as requested; - 5 -

- 6 - Real-Time Mitigation Software We have developed mitigation software that runs as part of the MISO’s real-time production system.We have developed mitigation software that runs as part of the MISO’s real-time production system. The mitigation software automatically performs the conduct and impact tests that determine when mitigation will be imposed. The mitigation software automatically performs the conduct and impact tests that determine when mitigation will be imposed. This system ensures that mitigation to limit economic withholding is imposed within 10 minutes of the conduct and impact tests being satisfied. This system ensures that mitigation to limit economic withholding is imposed within 10 minutes of the conduct and impact tests being satisfied. On a daily basis, we compute the competitive reference levels against which suppliers’ offers are compared.On a daily basis, we compute the competitive reference levels against which suppliers’ offers are compared. The impact test utilizes the real-time energy market software, run in parallel to determine the price effects of conduct that fails the economic withholding tests.The impact test utilizes the real-time energy market software, run in parallel to determine the price effects of conduct that fails the economic withholding tests

- 7 - Independence of Market Monitoring In the Midwest, States and participants designed the market monitoring function to be independent of the ISO – performed by an independent entity (i.e., the independent market monitor or IMM).In the Midwest, States and participants designed the market monitoring function to be independent of the ISO – performed by an independent entity (i.e., the independent market monitor or IMM). Independence of the Market Monitor from the RTO is important due to its role in monitoring the RTO’s rules, procedures, and operations.Independence of the Market Monitor from the RTO is important due to its role in monitoring the RTO’s rules, procedures, and operations. The actions of a market operator generally have a larger impact on the market outcomes than any single participant. The actions of a market operator generally have a larger impact on the market outcomes than any single participant. Manual actions taken to maintain reliability can distort the market outcomes -- the rules and operating procedures can often be modified to improve the consistency of the market and reliability requirements. Manual actions taken to maintain reliability can distort the market outcomes -- the rules and operating procedures can often be modified to improve the consistency of the market and reliability requirements. The IMM is also required to be independent of any Market Participant by adhering to conflict of interest restrictions that prevent the IMM from having any relationships with an MP.The IMM is also required to be independent of any Market Participant by adhering to conflict of interest restrictions that prevent the IMM from having any relationships with an MP.

- 8 - Market Monitoring Resources The market monitoring function requires an interdisciplinary team of experts, including:The market monitoring function requires an interdisciplinary team of experts, including: Economists, Economists, Power system engineers; Power system engineers; Generation engineers; Generation engineers; Software developers; and Software developers; and Other professionals with math and statistics. Other professionals with math and statistics. Potomac Economics currently has 20 staff to perform market monitoring.Potomac Economics currently has 20 staff to perform market monitoring. The market monitoring function also requires an extensive market monitoring software system and data interfaces with the ISO.The market monitoring function also requires an extensive market monitoring software system and data interfaces with the ISO

Monthly Report for September 2008

Midwest ISO Energy Prices Peak loads continued to be very low in September due to mild weather.Peak loads continued to be very low in September due to mild weather. Average load in September was 10 percent lower than in August 2008 and 4.7 percent lower than September Average load in September was 10 percent lower than in August 2008 and 4.7 percent lower than September Load exceeded 90 GWs in only 5 hours on one day and 80 GWs in 25 hours. Load exceeded 90 GWs in only 5 hours on one day and 80 GWs in 25 hours. In addition to the mild load, continued reductions in fuel prices contributed to a significant reduction in energy prices.In addition to the mild load, continued reductions in fuel prices contributed to a significant reduction in energy prices. Average energy prices in September at Cinergy, Minnesota and WUMS decreased roughly 20 percent from August. Average energy prices in September at Cinergy, Minnesota and WUMS decreased roughly 20 percent from August. Tropical Depression Ike had significant operational impacts on MISO.Tropical Depression Ike had significant operational impacts on MISO. Over a million customers were without power at its peak, as well as a significant number of transmission and unit outages and deratings. Over a million customers were without power at its peak, as well as a significant number of transmission and unit outages and deratings. There were two minimum generation events in the early mornings of September 1 st and 21 st.There were two minimum generation events in the early mornings of September 1 st and 21 st. There were 5 ARC events caused by a combination of generation deviations, outages, load volatility and NSI changes.There were 5 ARC events caused by a combination of generation deviations, outages, load volatility and NSI changes.

Real-Time Midwest ISO Energy Prices September 2008

Day-Ahead Midwest ISO Energy Prices September 2008

Day-Ahead to Real-Time Price Differences The next figure shows the day-ahead to real-time price convergence at the Cinergy Hub (the table shows other locations).The next figure shows the day-ahead to real-time price convergence at the Cinergy Hub (the table shows other locations). September continued to generally show the usual day-ahead price premium at most of the hubs.September continued to generally show the usual day-ahead price premium at most of the hubs. In general, the market has tended to exhibit day-ahead price premiums due to the lower price volatility in the day-ahead market and the higher RSG allocations to real-time purchases. In general, the market has tended to exhibit day-ahead price premiums due to the lower price volatility in the day-ahead market and the higher RSG allocations to real-time purchases. The average day-ahead premiums were slightly lower in September than in August, although price volatility was somewhat higher in September. The average day-ahead premiums were slightly lower in September than in August, although price volatility was somewhat higher in September. –The increase in price volatility relative to August and July were generally due to unusually low load (contributing minimum generation issues) and the storm conditions affected MISO for several days. –Volatility remained much lower than experienced in June.

Day-Ahead and Real-Time Price Convergence Average Absolute

Midwest ISO Fuel Prices The next figure shows coal, natural gas, and oil prices from January 2007 through September 2008.The next figure shows coal, natural gas, and oil prices from January 2007 through September Natural gas prices in continued the decline that began in July, which ended an 18 month period of steady increases.Natural gas prices in continued the decline that began in July, which ended an 18 month period of steady increases. Gas prices averaged $6.81 per MMBTU in September compared to $8.20 in August. Gas prices averaged $6.81 per MMBTU in September compared to $8.20 in August. Prices have generally continued a downward trend into October, trading around $6.50. Prices have generally continued a downward trend into October, trading around $6.50. Illinois basin coal prices, which had risen substantially in 2008, decreased roughly 10 percent in September.Illinois basin coal prices, which had risen substantially in 2008, decreased roughly 10 percent in September. Oil prices decreased modestly during the month.Oil prices decreased modestly during the month. Despite the decline in gas prices in September, fuel prices overall remain substantially higher then the same period last summer.Despite the decline in gas prices in September, fuel prices overall remain substantially higher then the same period last summer.

Midwest ISO Fuel Prices Midwest ISO Fuel Prices

Net Load Scheduled in the Day-Ahead Market The following figures show variation of the net load scheduling metric during the daily peak hour.The following figures show variation of the net load scheduling metric during the daily peak hour. The net load scheduled day ahead is a key driver of RSG because low levels can compel MISO to commit peaking resources to satisfy the increased load in real-time. The net load scheduled day ahead is a key driver of RSG because low levels can compel MISO to commit peaking resources to satisfy the increased load in real-time. The figure shows that over the past 12 months, the net day-ahead load scheduling levels in peak hours have remained steady between 95 and 98 percent.The figure shows that over the past 12 months, the net day-ahead load scheduling levels in peak hours have remained steady between 95 and 98 percent. Net load scheduling in September in the peak hours continued to be reasonably high at 96.3 percent.Net load scheduling in September in the peak hours continued to be reasonably high at 96.3 percent. This significantly reduces the need to commit peaking resources in the real time to satisfy the peak load. This significantly reduces the need to commit peaking resources in the real time to satisfy the peak load. This high level of net load scheduling during peak hours contributed to continued very low RSG levels in September. This high level of net load scheduling during peak hours contributed to continued very low RSG levels in September. Average load scheduling in all hours was 97.4 percent. Average load scheduling in all hours was 97.4 percent.

Net Load Scheduled in the Day-Ahead Market

Net Load Scheduled in the Day-Ahead Market Peak Daily Hour, September 2008

Real-Time Dispatch of Peaking Resources The following figure shows the real-time dispatch of peaking resources, separately indicating the share of these peaking resources that were out-of-merit (offer price higher than the LMP).The following figure shows the real-time dispatch of peaking resources, separately indicating the share of these peaking resources that were out-of-merit (offer price higher than the LMP). Dispatch of peaking resources in September was lower than August 2008 and substantially lower than in September 2007.Dispatch of peaking resources in September was lower than August 2008 and substantially lower than in September The decrease in utilization of peaking resources was largely due to the decrease in peak load levels and modest congestion. The decrease in utilization of peaking resources was largely due to the decrease in peak load levels and modest congestion. High load-scheduling in the peak hours also contributed to the moderate dispatch levels for the peaking resources. High load-scheduling in the peak hours also contributed to the moderate dispatch levels for the peaking resources. 48 percent of peaking resources dispatched were in-merit, which is relatively typical for moderate load conditions. 48 percent of peaking resources dispatched were in-merit, which is relatively typical for moderate load conditions.

Peaking Unit Real-Time Merit Status

Real-Time RSG Payments The next two figures show RSG payments made to peaking units and other units on a nominal basis, and adjusted for changes in fuel prices.The next two figures show RSG payments made to peaking units and other units on a nominal basis, and adjusted for changes in fuel prices. The first figure shows RSG payments in the real-time market.The first figure shows RSG payments in the real-time market. RSG payments in September were among the lowest for any month since market start and slightly lower than August on a fuel-adjusted basis. RSG payments in September were among the lowest for any month since market start and slightly lower than August on a fuel-adjusted basis. In September, the share of real-time RSG paid to peaking resources was very high, which is consistent with historical patterns. In September, the share of real-time RSG paid to peaking resources was very high, which is consistent with historical patterns. The second figure shows day-ahead RSG levels for September, which continued to be much lower than in the real-time market.The second figure shows day-ahead RSG levels for September, which continued to be much lower than in the real-time market. The third figure shows daily real-time RSG costs incurred by region.The third figure shows daily real-time RSG costs incurred by region. Compared to prior months, RSG payments in WUMS and the West regions were modest. This reflects continued modest congestion into those areas in September. Compared to prior months, RSG payments in WUMS and the West regions were modest. This reflects continued modest congestion into those areas in September. There were no significant periods with reliability issues resulting in large RSG payments in any region during September. There were no significant periods with reliability issues resulting in large RSG payments in any region during September.

Monthly Real-Time RSG Payments

Monthly Day-Ahead RSG Payments

Regional Daily Real-Time RSG Payments September 2008

Potential Economic Withholding: Output Gap The next two figures show the output gap levels used to screen for economic withholding.The next two figures show the output gap levels used to screen for economic withholding. The first figure shows the output gap under two thresholds (mitigation threshold, one-half of mitigation threshold).The first figure shows the output gap under two thresholds (mitigation threshold, one-half of mitigation threshold). The output gap levels in September increased slightly at the lower threshold, and were nearly unchanged at the higher threshold compared to August. The output gap levels in September increased slightly at the lower threshold, and were nearly unchanged at the higher threshold compared to August. The increase in output gap levels compared to 2006 is primarily due to the introduction of the Minnesota NCA in early 2007 and the reduction in NCA thresholds in February 2008 The increase in output gap levels compared to 2006 is primarily due to the introduction of the Minnesota NCA in early 2007 and the reduction in NCA thresholds in February 2008 –Lower mitigation thresholds cause more resources to fail the output gap screen. No significant changes in participant offer conduct has occurred in recent months. No significant changes in participant offer conduct has occurred in recent months. The second figure shows output gap by day. While there is a steady baseline level, some days show elevated levels that we routinely investigate.The second figure shows output gap by day. While there is a steady baseline level, some days show elevated levels that we routinely investigate. Our monitoring of the output gap levels on an hourly basis has not raised significant competitive concerns.Our monitoring of the output gap levels on an hourly basis has not raised significant competitive concerns.

Monthly Output Gap

Peak Hour Output Gap September 2008

Submittals to External Entities and Other Issues Submittals to External Entities Responded to FERC data request related to our referral regarding transaction scheduling around Lake Erie and participated in additional teleconferences with FERC staff regarding these issues.Responded to FERC data request related to our referral regarding transaction scheduling around Lake Erie and participated in additional teleconferences with FERC staff regarding these issues. Met with both the OMS staff and the state Commissioners regarding market monitoring issues in early to mid-October.Met with both the OMS staff and the state Commissioners regarding market monitoring issues in early to mid-October. Other Issues We have continued to work with MISO in reviewing results of the operations testing of the ASM software and evaluating the ramp rate modeling assumptions.We have continued to work with MISO in reviewing results of the operations testing of the ASM software and evaluating the ramp rate modeling assumptions.