Interactive Feedback. center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SE Name SE Title Blackboard Training: Approaches and Opportunities.
Advertisements

Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Interactive Feedback.  Feedback as a form of instruction  Feedback as an element of dialogue, critical to deep learning  Feedback as an element of.
Using the ETS Criterion Online Writing System to Enhance and Assess Learner-Centered Writing Proficiency Robert Ussery, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Academic.
Indiana Commission for Higher Education Public Square February 13, 2014 Cathrael Kazin, JD, PhD Chief Academic Officer 0.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
BUILDING STRONG TEACHERS FOR TEXAS STUDENTS Welcome to TAP Connect.
Annie Downey, University of North Texas Gayla Byerly, University of North Texas Society for Research into Higher Education Annual Conference December 2007.
By Laura Nicole Bramlett Watkins
Lee Rogers, Instructional Designer Presentation Date: July 30, 2012 Client Organization: ABC English School Project Management Plan For ABC English School.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
New Faculty Orientation Needs Assessment Report
E-Learning: Education Anytime, Anywhere Randy Rodgers Walden University.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
© Loyalist Certification Services, 2009 Certified Process Design Engineer (CPDE) ®
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Samantha Reid Part-Time Instructor - 8 th Floor Technology Integration Specialist Tulsa Public Schools.
College and Career Ready Standards (a.k.a. Common Core Standards) and Educator Effectiveness Systems Kutztown University College of Education Faculty Retreat.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Interactive Feedback. center.
Question 1 Why did a majority of students perceive the innovative web-enhanced Japanese language courses favorably and participate in additional online.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Bridging the Gap PREPARING SPORTS THERAPY STUDENTS FOR THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSION THROUGH REFLECTIVE PRACTICE BY DOMINIC GORE SENIOR E-LEARNING OFFICER.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
by Noverene Taylor EDD 9100-OL8 Leadership Seminar Nova Southeastern University October 19, 2006 Dr. Ron Parlett.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
ELearning and Embedded Librarians Gretchen Keer Mary Beth Parkinson Peter Scheponik.
Wandra Coffield EdS Educational Technology EDUC 7101 ~ Fall 2009 Walden University Innovation and Diffusion of E-portfolios in K12 Schools.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Pedagogical Standards and Sustainable Distance Education Programming Karen Gersten Associate Provost for Academic Programs and Faculty Development Laura.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
© 2012 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY T WENTY YEARS OF ENHANCING ONLINE STUDENT S UCCESS Amy Buechler-Steubing & Siri Sorensen Capella University – Learning Assistance.
ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE E- LEARNING STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION AT WALTER SISULU UNIVERSITY Presenter: T. Mayisela E-learning Specialist Mthatha Campus;
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Using Performance Criteria to Assess Student Outcomes Teaching & Learning Symposium May 20, 2009.
Promote a diverse, inclusive learning environment by recruiting and retaining students, faculty and staff who reflect the demographic changes in our society.
LOM Learning Outcome Manager Created by Brian Arnold, Ai Past Dean Presented by Sarah Duff, Academic Technologies.
Wandra Coffield EdS Educational Technology EDUC 7101 ~ Fall 2009 Walden University Innovation and Diffusion of E-portfolios in K12 Schools.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
By: Frank J. Ball Sr. – James Sheridon Ochoa – Jason Oxley – Justin Hefner.
High Point Elementary’s Strategic Plan and the International Baccalaureate Programme How do they fit together?
Instructor Satisfaction with E-Learning David Dietrich, Ph.D. The University of Tennessee at Martin.
Universal Design for Learning Creating Curb Cuts Creating Curb Cuts.
Aaron Panych eLearning & Instructional Designer Identify key elements of an well-designed online course Describe my process of developing an online course.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
E VALUATION PLAN FOR COURSE DESIGN Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Module.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
D El Ed Implementation at DIET Jorhat – An Evolving Innovation
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Melissa Zantello, Executive Director of Program Development
Measuring Course Quality: Development of a Micro-Analysis Tool
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
Navigating Institutional Improvement and Accreditation
Quality Matters Overview
Presentation transcript:

Interactive Feedback

center

 Feedback as a form of instruction word2003.html et.edu/hawks.html

 Feedback as an element of retention service-book-power-of.html

 Feedback as an element of dialogue, an element of presencing, both critical to deep learning in the U Process

 Expectations  Grading

Consistency occurs when all faculty use the same grading rubric

 Online environment where technology abounds

Improve ease of providing  Feedback  Measurement  Consistency e_11_07/quick_evaluate_11_07.html

 Assessment for accreditation  Writing Across the Curriculum initiatives  Defining curriculum and outcomes, and streamlining the grading process, in 100% online programs  Feedback and competency-based assessment in Nursing programs  Waypoint can even provide assessment management services to help your institution gather data efficiently.

In 2003, McCann founded Waypoint Outcomes to commercialize software he developed to dramatically improve feedback to learners while developing data on their achievement. An expert in rubric and assessment design, McCann counsels K-12 and higher education clients on accreditation, e-learning and assessment activities to achieve excellence.

Waypoint originated with two challenges shared by all educators:  Creating the personalized, timely feedback that learners need, and  Measuring student progress in subjective (and important) areas like written communication, critical thinking, presentation skills, and information literacy. Development

Innovated around the basic idea of the RUBRIC, the criteria-based assessment tool used by educators around the  A powerful platform that can be easily integrated with leading Learning Management Systems.  Waypoint has helped thousands of educators create ◦ Better feedback ◦ More efficiently ◦ Develop data Development

Innovative tools to help deepen the dialog amongst educators, learners, and stakeholders. Development

Our assessment software is used by diverse K12 and Higher Education institutions around the world. t-us Development

 Since 2004, when we started with two clients, educators have been passionate about Waypoint®.  Now, institutions in the US, Canada, and Europe use Waypoint to create better feedback for tens of thousands of students, to manage course evaluations, and to generate rich data on learning outcomes.  Much of our growth is due to word of mouth, although our clients frequently present at academic conferences and we exhibit at eLearning and accreditation conferences across the US.

Milestones include: 2004 Inaugural clients Lead article in IEEE, an association dedicated to advancing innovation and technological excellence for the benefit of humanity, is the world’s largest technical professional society Partners with 4tearcher.org and integrates with Rubistar Blackboard building block 2007 Moodle integration Released WP Outcomes, data analysis engine 2008 Texas A&M University launches Waypoint institution-wide via its Writing Across the Curriculum program Inside Higher Education highlights Drexel's English Alive program, the first client for WP Outcomes 2010 Begins Fellows Program Seton Hall uses WP in NCATE accreditation process iPad integration University of North Carolina uses WP in redesigning curriculum to improve writing instruction Present at Educause Since 2004, Waypoint has gained considerable prominence and recognition as an interactive rubric and data gathering tool.

 Technology focused ◦ Eager faculty ◦ Instructional technology team (support)

 Feedback focused ◦ Faculty dedicated to adult learning best practices ◦ Faculty interested in engaging in a dialogue supportive of deep learning ◦ Office of Student Success  Associate Dean  Advisors l / /Adult-Learning-Theory

 Measurement of strategic goals focused ◦ VP of Institutional Assessment and Planning ◦ Office of Academic Affairs =home.viewPage&page_id=889D6F8B- E7D BE1F862A5AF4D8

 Reticent faculty ◦ Traditional background ◦ Content with current feedback/grading process ◦ Unwilling to give up control of grading to a rubric life/facilities/detail.dot?id=95152&buildingId= ent/ html

 Strategy for adoption ◦ Focus on relative advantage: As a cutting-edge, state online school, Waypoint provides us relative advantage over our peer institutions. news-world-report

 In my organization, I believe the interactive rubric, Waypoint, meets the needs of our need for relative advantage, compatibility, low complexity, and observability (Rogers, 2003).  As a cutting-edge, state online school, Waypoint provides us the ability to link learning objectives to course objectives to program objectives as well as improve feedback and facilitate dialogue between the faculty and students. This provides us relative advantage over our peer institutions, which have no technology to support either of these important tasks.  Not only is Waypoint in alignment with our organization’s goal of consistent, rubric-based, data driven institutional strategy, it’s also integrated with our Blackboard learning management system. These elements make Waypoint compatible with institutional objectives and faculty and student ease of use.  Although the Waypoint interface is fairly free of complexity, as with all new technologies, it does require training and ongoing support. Once familiar with its use, the tool is easily adoptable by end-users.  The use of Waypoint has an instant effect on the need for faculty to conduct consistent, rubric- based grading with detailed feedback. Faculty and students immediately see the feedback and graded rubric in the Blackboard grade center. Being able to observe the benefits of this innovation improves its ability for diffusion.