FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
NAESB Strawman January 24-25, Problem Statement Enough generators must have fuel to meet peak load New England Cold Snap crisis heightened interest.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
1 ISO/RTO Council Wholesale Demand Response Projects & OpenADR David Forfia.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Getting ready for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Paper by : Rajesh Nimare Presented by : Prashant Sharma.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
BRINGING DYNAMIC PRICING TO THE MASS MARKET Ahmad Faruqui, Ph. D. NARUC Winter Meetings Washington, D.C. February 19, 2007.
GDS Associates, Inc. 1 Virginia Energy Efficiency and Conservation Savings Potential Presented by Richard F. Spellman Vice President GDS Associates, Inc.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Demand Resources: Challenges and New Initiatives for ISO New England Henry Yoshimura, ISO New England NEW DEMAND RESPONSE PRODUCTS IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS.
SPP.org 1. SPP: Demand Response and Advanced Metering in Arkansas.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Small Generator Interconnection Workshop Goals and Potential Midwest Interconnection Strategy Carmel, Indiana June 15, 2006 Presented by Brad Johnson ACN.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
Demand Response: The Other Side of the Market Assessing the Potential for Demand Response Programs Springfield,IL May 12, 2006 Richard E. (“Rick”) Morgan.
George A. Godding, Jr. Director, Management and Communications Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Comments are the speakers and do not necessarily.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
67th NECPUC ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM Whiz Bang New Stuff June 17 th, 2014.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
FCC Field Hearing on Energy and the Environment Monday November 30, 2009 MIT Stratton Student Center, Twenty Chimneys Peter Brandien, Vice President System.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Role Of The Market Monitor: ISO New England Dr. Hung-po Chao Director, Market Monitoring FERC Open Meeting Washington,
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Jeroen de Joode (ECN/Delft University of Technology) Michiel van Werven (ECN) An analysis of potential bottlenecks Optimal Design of Future Electricity.
April 8, 2011Page 1 April 8, 2011 The University of Texas Interdisciplinary Energy Conference Overcoming Barriers to Smart Grid & New Energy Services Panel.
2008 Demand Response and Advanced Metering Report and Survey David Kathan FERC NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative February 17, 2008.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
An update on the Market Development Program Phil Bishop New Zealand Electricity Commission Presentation to the EPOC Winter Workshop 3 September 2009.
FERC Perspective on Demand Response David Kathan FERC Midwest Demand Response Initiative Chicago, IL February 9, 2007 The author’s views do not necessarily.
Interoperability Standards and Next Generation Interconnectivity Pankaj Batra Chief (Engineering) CERC.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
Role of the Commission and Recent Policy Actions Interconnection Workshop Carol Revelt Utah Public Service Commission December 4, 2007.
Chelan County PUD PURPA Hearing Fuel diversity Fossil fuel efficiency Chelan County PUD November 19, 2007.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Measurement & Verification at the Wholesale Market Level David Kathan FERC NAESB DSM/EE Business Practices Washington, DC April 11, 2007 The author’s views.
Market Participant Experiences with Demand Side Bidding and Future Direction Linda Roberts, EA Technology Richard Formby, EA Technology.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
Grid Reliability Metrics by Jim Dyer Electric Power Group, LLC January 29, 2004 Washington, DC Transmission Reliability Research Review.
Craig Williams Market Interface Manager August 21, 2014 ISAS, Portland, OR.
Demand Response
Smart Grid Schneider Electric Javier Orellana
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Overview of Energy Policy Act of 2005 A Review of Implementation issues in New Hampshire.
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development for Demand Side Management / Energy Efficiency September 14, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project.
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Presentation transcript:

FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005

Definition of Demand Response Demand response in electricity is defined as load response called for by others and price response managed by end-use customers. – Load response includes: Direct load control Partial or curtailable load reductions Complete load interruptions. – Price response includes: Time-based rates (e.g., time-of-use rates, critical peak pricing) Demand bidding or economic programs.

Benefits of Demand Response Key tool for handling: – Supplier market power – Inefficient reserve procurement – Power price volatility – Reliability issues Additional Benefits – Creates opportunities for risk management – Potential environmental improvements – Increased customer service and choice

ISO/RTO Demand Response Programs

ISO/RTO Experience with DR ISO/RTO operators value demand response programs highly – Considered as key reliability resources Reserves Capacity resources Helped during restoration from August 2003 blackout Fills short-term needs (e.g., southwest Connecticut) – Assists market efficiency Check against exercise of market power Can reduce severity of price spikes Introduces scarcity pricing into energy market

Time-Based Rates Types of time-based rates – Real-Time Pricing (RTP) Electricity prices that vary by hour. Direct pass-through of wholesale market price Variants include two-part RTP – Time of Use Rates Electricity prices that vary by time of day Have been in existence for years – Critical Peak Pricing Requires advanced meters Two-way communication helpful Time-based rates are typically subject to retail regulation

Advanced Metering Necessary enabling technologies for demand response are advanced meters and communication systems – i.e., Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) AMI provides additional benefits to utilities, e.g., tamper and outage detection, remote turn-on/turn- off, improved customer support and billing, etc. Can also support development of a “smart grid” FERC does not have jurisdiction over end-use metering

FERC’s Demand Response Objective Objective 2.2 (Establish Clear Market Rules to Govern Electric Markets) of FERC’s Strategic Plan states that FERC will – “Promote development of policies that accommodate effective demand response programs.”

FERC Demand Response Activity Approval and support of ISO/RTO demand response programs Direction for ISO/RTO economic and reliability planning processes to incorporate demand response Adoption of Small Generator interconnection rule Support for regional demand response efforts (e.g., New England Demand Response Initiative, Mid- Atlantic Distributed Resources Initiative) Support of International Energy Agency demand response resources task

EPAct Demand Response Policy Section 1252(e)(1): IN GENERAL.—It is the policy of the United States to encourage States to coordinate, on a regional basis, State energy policies to provide reliable and affordable demand response services to the public. Section 1252(f): FEDERAL ENCOURAGEMENT OF DEMAND RESPONSE DEVICES.— It is the policy of the United States that time-based pricing and other forms of demand response, whereby electricity customers are provided with electricity price signals and the ability to benefit by responding to them, shall be encouraged, the deployment of such technology and devices that enable electricity customers to participate in such pricing and demand response systems shall be facilitated, and unnecessary barriers to demand response participation in energy, capacity and ancillary service markets shall be eliminated. It is further the policy of the United States that the benefits of such demand response that accrue to those not deploying such technology and devices, but who are part of the same regional electricity entity, shall be recognized.

EPAct Section 1252(e)(3) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Commission shall prepare and publish an annual report, by appropriate region, that assesses demand response resources, including those available from all consumer classes, and which identifies and reviews— (A)saturation and penetration rates of advanced meters and communications technologies, devices and systems; (B)existing demand response programs and time-based rate programs; (C)the annual resource contribution of demand resources; (D)the potential for demand response as a quantifiable, reliable resource for regional planning purposes; (E) steps taken to ensure that, in regional transmission planning and operations, demand resources are provided equitable treatment as a quantifiable, reliable resource relative to the resource obligations of any load-serving entity, transmission provider, or transmitting party; and (F)regulatory barriers to improved customer participation in demand response, peak reduction and critical period pricing programs.

FERC Docket AD06-2 A docket has been created for the EPAct report Notice of survey and technical conference released November 3 Notice contains – Procedures and timelines for comments – Technical conference issues – Draft advanced metering and demand response program survey – Copy of notice can be found at

Timeline for Comments Comments on Technical Conference Issues – December 19 Technical Conference – Late January 2006

Timeline for Survey Currently under OMB review Contingent upon OMB approval, final survey released January 2006 Responses due by March 2006

Questions  Contact Information: David Kathan FERC 888 First St., NE Washington, DC (202)