Stakeholder Meeting February 13, 2008 Interaction between Scarcity Pricing and Demand Response Dongqing Holly Liu, Ph.D. Senior Market and Product Economist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

0 Michael Robinson Midwest ISO 3 June 2008 Midwest ISO Markets: Demand Response & Resource Adequacy.
1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
Pay for Performance Regulation Donald Tretheway Senior Market Design and Policy Specialist January 11, 2012.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Demand Response in the Reliability Pricing Model Chuck Whitlock.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
NV Energy Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Presentation to ISAS
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
SAWG Update to WMS February 4 th, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
1 WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY MARKET DESIGN AND STRUCTURE Massimo Parati Market Department Italian Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas Milan, March.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Convergence Bidding Issues Eric Hildebrandt, Ph.D. CAISO Department of Market Monitoring CPUC Convergence Bidding Workshop July 26, 2010.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Building the Energy Markets of Tomorrow... Today The Market Value of Demand Response Aaron Breidenbaugh Demand Response Program Coordinator New York Independent.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Requirement Documents November 7, 2006 Sai Moorty MMS Project.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Day Ahead Market Working Group March 31, Agenda Review minutes - March 24 Coral Proposal - Working Group Discussion Loads/LDCs and DAM.
1 Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets 09 February 2007.
EPSA REGULATORY AFFAIR CONFERENCE 2006 Washington, DC October 25, 2006 Garry Brown Vice President, External Affairs New York ISO.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 14, Agenda Discussion of SMD-style DAM review questions posed by the DAM WG and Coral regarding the SMD-
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Reliability Demand Response Product February 25, 2011
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 TPTF Update for TAC March 8, 2007 Trip Doggett.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
 Sharon Jacobs Harvard Law School. 1) Order 719 2) RICE Rules 3) Bigger-picture regulatory questions.
October 02, 2009 Austin, Texas Quick Start Task Force Meeting 1.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
Carrie Tucker Supervisor, Day-Ahead Market DAM data supporting MCWG/CWG credit parameters discussion February 29, 2012.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
©2003 PJM North American Markets Status APEx Seoul, Korea October 29-31, 2006 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Highlights of Midwest ISO: 2004 State of the Market Report and Day-2 Energy Markets Prepared by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Midwest.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
SAWG Update to WMS September 2 nd, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) Update April 24, 2014 TAC Meeting 1.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Affairs Demand Response and Local RA Criteria Discussion
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS4 - Approach 11/28/2007.
CAISO Market Design Initiatives Update Donald Tretheway Senior Market Design and Policy Specialist CPUC Storage Proceeding January 14, 2013.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
Nodal Program Update to Cops
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
Pay for Performance Regulation
Presentation transcript:

Stakeholder Meeting February 13, 2008 Interaction between Scarcity Pricing and Demand Response Dongqing Holly Liu, Ph.D. Senior Market and Product Economist

2 Types of Demand Response Programs Participating Load – Dispatchable Demand Response  Capable of Day-ahead & Real-time participation Non-Participating Load – Price Responsive Demand Response  Day-ahead only Emergency Triggered Interruptible Load  CAISO declared emergency or local transmission emergency

3 Participating Load – Dispatchable DR Fully dispatchable load acting as a resource bid at nodal level or Custom LAPs Market - DAM & RTM; Product - Energy, A/S, and RUC Able to set DA/RT nodal prices Can directly contribute to the relief of reserve shortage

4 Non-Participating Load – Price Responsive DR DA Energy only participation at Default LAPs Cannot bid into RT, but can adjust consumption at RT NPL can only set DA Default LAP energy prices Load reduction provided by both DA and Day-of NPL DR can indirectly contribute to the relief of reserve shortage by reducing the overall load on the system which may reduce A/S requirements in RT.

5 Emergency Triggered Interruptible Load 1700 MWs of Interruptible Load can be called upon only during a CAISO declared Stage 2 & 3 Emergency or for a local transmission emergency No direct participation in DA or RT energy and capacity markets If the existing Interruptible Load programs were modified to provide bids into the CAISO markets, then these resources could directly help reduce or avoid scarcity situations.

6 Summary

7 Comments Please submit written comments to using the template posted at