BP/DRIS TG Sergey Parinov, euroCRIS membership meeting, St. Andrews, November 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
©euroCRIS/Keith G JefferyOA Workshop May 2010 CNR Roma The euroCRIS view of the Rome OA Workshop Keith G Jeffery President, euroCRIS
Advertisements

Open repositories: value added services The Socionet example Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS and euroCRIS.
AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
Russian Research e-Infrastructure: focus on a quality of research assessments Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, SU-HSE Moscow, Russia.
IMPLEMENTING FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS FOR GOVERNMENT CHRISTIAN T. SOTTIE THE CONTROLLER AND ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL GHANA.
DRIS/BP Task Group Report, Madrid, Sergey Parinov, TG leader Barbara Ebert, deputy TG leader.
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.
CNRIS CNRIS 2.0 Challenges for a new generation of Research Information Systems.
Andrei Lopatenko. CERIF Task Group CERIF TG Report 2001-Marth 2002 results Plans for 2002.
CRIS/CERIF based model of research results granularity, circulation and usage in Socionet Sergey Parinov, Prof., Leading Researcher of Central Economics.
EuroCRIS Best Practice Task Group: a concept and workplan Sergey Parinov TG leader Best Practice.
University of St Andrews ©University of St Andrews/Anna Clements ©euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery ©Brigitte Jörg UKSG, Harrogate, April 2011 Anna Clements Data.
Natural Research Assessment: ability and new requirements for CRIS Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, Russia, Moscow.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Status Report External Communication Task Group Eric Zimmerman Antwerp, BE, 12 May 2004 This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which.
Using CERIF-based CRIS to support the academic and research community: emerging services in Greece Nikos Houssos National Documentation Centre / National.
EuroCRIS Best Practice Task Group: a concept and workplan Sergey Parinov TG leader Best Practice.
Dr. Nikos Houssos| National Documentation Centre / NHRF European Network of National Contact Points for Research Infrastructures moving forward The CERIF-based.
Dr. Jūratė Kuprienė Director for innovations and infrastructure development Workshop: Information services for research process , Rīga Research.
© euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery 1 Achievements & Experience of euroCRIS Achievements and Experience of the euroCRIS Organisation Keith G Jeffery President,
A CRIS driven by research community: benefits and perspectives Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia euroCRIS DRIS-BP Task Group Leader.
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
Getting Involved in the Research Data Alliance Stefanie Kethers
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Sept. 5, 2012 Kevin T. Gallagher and Linda C. Gundersen September 5, 2012 CDI Science.
March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.
BOARD MEETING: DRIS/BP TG Report Barbara Ebert and Sergey Parinov euroCRIS Meetings in Bath, UK, February 11th, 2012.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
DRIS-BP TG report Bologna, Sergey Parinov.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
CERIF Common European Research Information Format Jan Dvořák, Jiří Souček, Tomáš Chudlarský  Institute of Information Studies & Librarianship Faculty.
Eurocris Membership Meeting Lisbon 9-11 November 2005 Sérgio Tenreiro de Magalhães Luís Amaral University.
Design central EMODnet portal Objectives, Technical Proposal and Consultation Process.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Sergey Parinov, euroCRIS membership meeting, St. Andrews, November 2009 BP/DRIS TG.
DRIS/CERIF/SharePoint Sergey Parinov BP TG September 2009.
FITT Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer Communication & Collaboration Tools.
© euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery 1 Mutual enhancement of CERIF and project management systems euroCRIS Members Meeting Keith G Jeffery President
EU Project proposal. Andrei S. Lopatenko 1 EU Project Proposal CERIF-SW Andrei S. Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
©Keith G Jeffery/ Anne AssersonSupporting the Research Process with a CRIS CRIS Supporting the Research Process with a CRIS Keith G Jeffery Director.
EuroCRIS – Current Research Information Systems An overview.
Sergey Parinov, euroCRIS Board meeting, Antwerp, February 2010 BP/DRIS TG progress report.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
DRIS/BP Task Group Report, Madrid, Sergey Parinov, TG leader Barbara Ebert, deputy TG leader.
CRIS for the Russian Academy of Sciences status / project plan, budget, expected euroCRIS involvement Sergey Parinov.
© euroCRIS/Keith G Jeffery 1 euroCRIS and e-Infrastructure Keith G Jeffery President, euroCRIS Premium Members.
Keith G Jeffery Director, IT What does a CRIS add to Open Access Publications ?
Best Practice / DRIS Task Group meeting in Bonn Sergey Parinov.
Website that support online communities 1. Wikis 2. Blogs 3. Forums 4. Social networking sites.
DANS is an institute of KNAW and NWO Data Archiving and Networked Services Measurement of research impact in OpenAIRE 2020: via text mining or the CRISs?
euroCRIS-SEE cooperation Keith G Jeffery euroCRIS
DRIS–BP TG report, Brussels, Sergey Parinov.
PROGRESS REPORT Daphne Leger. Background Launched in Feb 2007 at Hanoi 3 rd MfDR Roundtable Two year workplan ratified by members at 1 st annual meeting.
EuroCRIS Web site Stockholm, 9 May 2007 Anne Asserson
Strategy / External Relations Anne Asserson Brussels, 28th January 2011.
Report 11th January 2013 TG Leader: Danica Zendulkova danica.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
Copyright ©2013 EuroGeographics “UNGGIM Europe one year´s work” EFGS European Forum for Geography and Statistics 2015 Conference Vienna, Austria,
ERIS Workshop CRIS Timetable § Purpose and structure § a. Content and policy (Harrie Lalieu) § b. Architecture (Brian.
Creating Global Information Commons for Science Presentation at the EUROCRIS meeting September 2006, Brussels by Jean-Jacques Royer CODATA Treasurer.
©Keith G Jeffery/ Anne AssersonCRIS: Central Relating Information System CRIS CRIS: Central Relating Information System Keith G Jeffery Director.
EuroCRIS Projects Task Group November 2005, Lisboa.
LEuroCRIS 31st October 2001 A list of CERIF 2000 problems Walter Niedermayer
Work Package 2 Eva Heckl 1/10/2014 Feasibility study on an internet-based e-platform for women entrepreneurs.
Business Process Review Academic Registry Student Systems and Administration Business Process Review Team Karen Williams February 2008.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Euro CRIS Current Research Information Systems An Introduction into euroCRIS CRIS Seminar Brussel, 18/09/03 Marga van Meel euroCRIS, Secretariat.
CERIF for research evaluation including REF Keith G Jeffery STFC / euroCRIS 20/04/20111Ready 4 Ref End of Project Workshop
Suggestions for Next Steps
COUNTER Update February 2006.
Presentation transcript:

BP/DRIS TG Sergey Parinov, euroCRIS membership meeting, St. Andrews, November 2009

Best Practice (BP)

Best Practice legacy Code of good practice, 1998: –it has been created to establish a framework for encouraging interoperation and harmonisation between European (and other) research institutions –its intention is to focus clearly on the reasons for having a CRIS and on the main components of the system –adoption of it will lead to: Increased usability of data and value of CRISs to the users (often with varied demands and requirements) Increased interoperability between CRISs Reduced operating cost for CRISs Reduced effort for information exchange

Best Practice legacy Code of the Best Practice, –the inter-relationships between CRISs, and between CRIS and other related information systems environments (e.g. digital libraries, scientific datasets) has become clearer

“Best Practice” definitions “… best-practice is considered by some as a business buzzword used to describe the process of developing and following a standard way of doing things …” (Wikipedia)buzzword “Best practices can also be defined as the most efficient (least amount of effort) and effective (best results) way of accomplishing a task, based on repeatable procedures that have proven themselves over time for large numbers of people.” (Wikipedia)

Ideas for Best Practice 2010 ? General view: –What are the current tasks of CRIS development according target users’ groups –Taking from a “large number of people” repeatable ways to solve the tasks –Publishing it as “standard ways for doing things”

Topics suggested by Keith 1.What data structure do I use for a CRIS 2.What questions can it answer 3.Can it produce researcher VCs? 4.Can it produce web pages describing a group or department? 5.Can it help in research proposals? 6.Can it store information on research outputs? 7.Will it interface to an existing OA IR? 8.Can it produce a publication list for a group or department or project? 9.Can I link it with other CRIS to get a continent or world view? 10.How do I reduce the manual input from researchers? 11.Will the CRIS interoperate with existing finance, HR, project systems? 12.How does it relate to patents databases? 13.Financial and business topics 14.Can it provide a breakdown of research funding by year, by source, by department, by group in my university?

Ideas from Max “it should be a nice looking publication downloadable as PDF and also printable” “it could be more efficient if we work on the individual chapters in a coordinated way and put it up for comments the moment we feel that the euroCRIS members will be willing to contribute”

Directory of Research Information Systems (DRIS)

DRIS legacy Current list: 1.ARAMIS, Swiss Information System on Research and Development 2.Austrian Science Fund project database 3.Bulgarian Current Research Information System 4.Dutch Research Database 5.Estonian Research Information System 6.Estonian Research Information System 7.FRIDA - national research documentation system 8.Inventory on Scientific and Technological Research in Flanders (IWETO) 9.ISTC Portal "Science and Technology in CIS" 10.Oasis database 11.Portuguese Science and Technology Platform 12.Slovak R&D Information System 13.Slovenian Current Research Information System

Example of a record cfName: Inventory on Scientific and Technological Research in Flanders (IWETO) Acronym: IWETO cfURI: cfResProdId: IWETO cfDescription: IWETO supplies information about Flemish research teams and projects, specifically the most important research themes, priorities and current research projects.

Ideas for DRIS from Keith 1.“My personal view is that DRIS is a component of Best practice and acts as an index to exemplars of best practice in CRIS” 2.“The DRIS system itself should be CERIF compatible since we are moving towards the whole euroCRIS website being CERIF- driven. As a CERIF-compatible database DRIS itself forms an example of best practice” 3.“…each system indexed by DRIS is a product related to organisations, persons and probably there are associated publications, events....”

DRIS+BP

DRIS+BP is a CRIS of a community of euroCRIS members “…each system indexed by DRIS is a product related to organisations, persons and probably there are associated publications, events....” Keith Jeffery, president euroCRIS DRIS+BP information system should serve euroCRIS community and create strong benefits for the community A platform for DRIS+BP current implementation is SharePoint 2007, we looking for better platform, e.g. integrated with future euroCRIS web site

DRIS+BP technical details Pilot version - with public ‘read’ access to all DRIS+BP materials, surveys and additional services: –free registration to get ‘participant’ permissions (for euroCRIS members only) –DRIS wiki with technical requirements, specifications and other details –DRIS forum for discussions about further development –Help Desk for DRIS+BP users

DRIS+BP main functionality live demonstration, it starts from

Motivations and benefits for DRIS+BP users Create/update your complex professional portrait by presenting your data as a set of cross linked objects {CRIS – Pers – OrgUnit - BP_articles} Present your professional achievements at annual “nice looking publication downloadable as PDF and also printable” under euroCRIS logo Participate in a DRIS+BP development as a professional ‘social network’ to make stronger benefits from to be a part of euroCRIS community (see e.g. a 'Facebook for Scientists‘, Funds-From/8568/)

DRIS+BP annual report Idea: to list the best of current year achievements, hot problems and new future trends as euroCRIS community opinion Procedure: online nomination of CRISs, Pers, Orgunits, articles (using DRIS+BP forms), discussing (online forum) and voting (online survey) during a year Title: Annual report of euroCRIS community Structure of the report: –achievements (articles+CRISs+pers+orgunits) –the most popular, hot professional problems –the most challengeable future trends, expectations

Surveys of euroCRIS community As first steps to better understanding of possible benefits from euroCRIS “community of practice”, the online surveys can be useful, e.g.: –Who are we? –What were done by us (a registry of professional results/achievements)? –What common/specific professional problems are we solving? –What future are we building/expecting?

Professional impact index A registry of professional results and achievements (within DRIS+BP) as information objects: – “results”+”pers”+”orgunit”+”BP_articles” A tool for semantic linking of info_objects A service for monitoring changes in DRIS+BP and linkages, accumulating statistics A service for statistics processing to build a set of professional impact indexes

Conclusion