Northern Humboldt Union High School District Performance-Based Compensation William J. Slotnik Executive Director Community Training and Assistance Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships.
Education Commission of the States Working Together to Address a Common Need: Partnerships for Teacher Quality Bruce Vandal Director, Postsecondary Education.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Agenda Overview Problems of Practice – (same triads) – Break School Visits – Personal reflection – Partner share Research overview On PLCs and the connection.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Progress and Promise: Lessons from the Boston Pilot Schools Center for Collaborative Education January 2006.
By Laura Nicole Bramlett Watkins
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
An Administrator Evaluation System Curriculum Leaders Institute Cohort 5 Day 8.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ESD 112 March 12, 2015.
Addressing the Critical Shortage of Geriatric Health Care Leaders Eric A. Coleman, MD, MPH, AGSF, FACP Professor of Medicine Executive Director, Practice.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
 Center for Innovative Leadership Development  Leadership Group of the Carolinas  Leadership Conferences  Expanding Graduate Programs  Doctoral Cohorts.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
AIAA’s Publications Business Publications New Initiatives Subcommittee Wednesday, 9 January 2008 Rodger Williams.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Designing and Delivering Preparation in Response to Local Need: Challenges in Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by: Phoebe.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
RESEARCH BINGO!. Compared to teachers in a flexible block schedule, teachers in a traditional, fixed-period schedule are more likely to implement a variety.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Communication Access and Quality Education for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children The Report of the California Deaf and Hard of Hearing Education Advisory.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
The School Counseling Program
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ERNN Conference February 28, 2015.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Collaborating on School Reform: Creating Union- Management Partnerships to Improve Public School Systems.
Assessment, Accreditation, and Retention. “Thriving at the Liberal Arts College: Best Practices in Operations and Research” Dr. Claire Robinson, University.
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations July 30, 2015 CC BYCC BY Achieve 2015.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Nevada STEM Program Recognition Rubric K-12 Program Definitions Exploratory The Exploratory STEM program describes a school program that has intermittent.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Presentation transcript:

Northern Humboldt Union High School District Performance-Based Compensation William J. Slotnik Executive Director Community Training and Assistance Center Boston, Massachusetts © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Performance-Based Compensation: A 200 Year Journey  Previous Attempts in US and UK  Faulty premises  Weak implementation © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Six Cornerstones of Effective Performance-Based Compensation  Systemic reform  Collaboration  Organizational sustainability  Financial sustainability  Broad base of support  Benefit to students © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Cornerstone 1: Performance-based compensation is a systemic reform  Serves as a catalyst for reform  Involves significant changes in district systems  Depends on leadership, readiness and capacity © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Cornerstone 2: Compensation reform must be done with teachers, not to teachers  Understand the relationship to the contract  Enable teachers to inform and shape the reform  Build trust and implementation support © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Cornerstone 3: Compensation reform must be organizationally sustainable  Recognize: teacher effectiveness depends on management effectiveness  Align and improve quality of district support to classrooms  Emphasize capacity building: key to mid-course corrections and scaling up © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Cornerstone 4: Performance-based compensation must be financially sustainable  Address three types of costs: ▲ Transitioning ▲ Sustaining ▲ Reallocating  Understand: it costs more  Plan from the start for the long-term © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Cornerstone 5: A broad base of support is required in the district and community  Focus on constituency building  Increase awareness and support through community organizing  Value two-way communication within the district and community © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Cornerstone 6: Performance-based compensation must benefit students Understand the implications for:  Multiple measures of student achievement  Comprehensive study: base decisions on evidence © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

A Lesson of Institutional Change  Move past continuing misconceptions  Understand gaps between practice/policy and results  Integrate compensation reform and school improvement © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Key Features of Performance Based Compensation in Denver  A negotiated agreement between the Board of Education and the Teachers Association  A four-year, sixteen-school pilot to test the potential of linking teacher compensation to student achievement  Additional compensation based on meeting two teacher-developed and measured objectives  A commissioned independent study of pilot impact  Development of a new compensation plan for teachers © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Findings: Impact of Objectives & Student Achievement  Excellent objectives are positively associated with higher mean student achievement:  All years of the pilot  All three academic levels  Meeting two objectives makes a positive difference in mean student achievement  Objective setting is a critical initial step in the planning and delivery of instruction © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Quality of Objectives  Improvements over the course of the pilot, particularly in year four  Greater attention to learning content  Importance of staying the course Rubric Level Percent Percent Percent Percent 40.9%8.9%13.2%28.0% 324.1%22.6%34.1%44.2% Total # © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Organizational Alignment and System Quality  Making the system function systematically on behalf of students  Addressing the challenges of improving, reconfiguring and linking systems © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Organizational Challenges  Issues of alignment  The quality and appropriateness of assessments  Integrated student-teacher data capacity  Customizing professional development  Expanding leadership capacity  Addressing gaps in instructional support  Quality and consistency of teacher-principal interactions © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center

Key Finding on Institutional Change The focus on student achievement and a teacher’s contribution to such achievement can be a major trigger for change — if the initiative also addresses the district factors that shape the schools. Catalyst for Change © 2010 Community Training and Assistance Center