FACET Collimator Systems for Longitudinal Bunch Shaping Joel England FACET Users Meeting Tues Oct 9, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Two-dimensional Effects on the CSR Interaction Forces for an Energy-Chirped Bunch Rui Li, J. Bisognano, R. Legg, and R. Bosch.
Advertisements

Plasma Wakefield Accelerator
Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results CSR Workshop.
Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Wakefield Acceleration in Dielectric Structures J.B. Rosenzweig UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy The Physics and Applications of High Brightness Electron.
Plasma wakefields in the quasi- nonlinear regime J.B. Rosenzweig a, G. Andonian a, S. Barber a, M. Ferrario b, P. Muggli c, B. O’Shea a, Y. Sakai a, A.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
UCLA Experiments with short single e-bunch using preformed and beam ionized plasma Retain ability to run short single bunch with pre-ionized plasma Ken.
Hollow Channel Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Spencer Gessner 5 th SAREC Review September 15 th, 2014.
Modeling narrow trailing beams and ion motion in PWFA Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009.
Chengkun Huang | Compass meeting 2008 Chengkun Huang, I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas,
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
FACET Status ESTB 2011 Workshop Christine Clarke March 17 th 2011.
Erik Adli CLIC Workshop 2015, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
Lecture 3: Laser Wake Field Acceleration (LWFA)
E. Bong, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Overview E. Bong LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
UCLA Neptune Ramped Bunch Experiment R. Joel England UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy Particle Beam Physics Laboratory May 19, 2004.
Beam Shaping and Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Focusing with Applications to the Plasma Wakefield Accelerator R. Joel England J. B. Rosenzweig, G. Travish,
UCLA Evidence for beam loading by distributed injection of electrons in a Plasma Wakefield Accelerator. Presented by Navid Vafaei-Najafabadi Advisor: Chan.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
FACET and beam-driven e-/e+ collider concepts Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009 LA-UR.
Dielectric Wakefield Accelerator for an X-ray FEL User Facility
Recent Results on the Plasma Wakefield Acceleration at FACET E 200 Collaboration 1)Beam loading due to distributed injection of charge in the wake reduces.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
FACET Update ARD Status Meeting Christine Clarke April 14 th 2011.
Muon cooling with Li lenses and high field solenoids V. Balbekov, MAP Winter Meeting 02/28-03/04, 2011 OUTLINE  Introduction: why the combination of Li.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Consideration for a plasma stage in a PWFA linear collider Erik Adli University of Oslo, Norway FACET-II Science Workshop, SLAC Oct 14,
R&D opportunities for photoinjectors Renkai Li 10/12/2015 FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshops October, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
ICFA Workshop on Novel Concepts for Linear Accelerators and Colliders. SLAC, July Euclid Techlabs LLC DIELECTRIC BASED HG STRUCTURES: POWER EXTRACTION,
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
Beam-Plasma Working Group Summary Barnes, Bruhwiler, DavidTech-X Clayton,
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
Transverse Gradient Undulator and its applications to Plasma-Accelerator Based FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) Introduction TGU concept, theory, technology Soft.
Beam Manipulation by Self-Wakefields John Power Argonne Wakefield Accelerator Facility Sergey Antipov, Alexei Kanareykin Euclid Techlabs LLC.
Dielectric Wakefield Accelerators at FACET (II) Brendan O’Shea October 15 th, 2015.
A. Zholents (ANL) and M. Zolotorev (LBNL)
Prospects for generating high brightness and low energy spread electron beams through self-injection schemes Xinlu Xu*, Fei Li, Peicheng Yu, Wei Lu, Warren.
Ultra-short electron bunches by Velocity Bunching as required for Plasma Wave Acceleration Alberto Bacci (Sparc Group, infn Milano) EAAC2013, 3-7 June,
Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
HG 2016 Workshop Design of Metallic Subwavelength Structures for Wakefield Acceleration Xueying Lu, Michael Shapiro, Richard Temkin Plasma Science and.
High Gradient Dielectric Wakefield Experiments Brendan O’Shea, Oliver Williams, Gerard Andonian, Jere Harrison, Kristin Fitzmorris, James Rosenzweig, Mark.
Bunch Shaping for Future Dielectric Wakefield Accelerators W. Gai Mini-Workshop on Deflecting/Crabbing RF Cavity Research and application in Accelerators.
Matching free space propagation to plasma focusing S. Barber UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy FACET II Workshop October 15, 2015.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
Laboratoire d’Optique Appliquée
Stefano Romeo on behalf of SPARC_LAB collaboration
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Test of Notch Collimator - December 2005
Few Slides from RF Deflector Developments and Applications at SLAC
E-164 E-162 Collaboration: and E-164+X:
G. Marcus, Y. Ding, J. Qiang 02/06/2017
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
Presentation transcript:

FACET Collimator Systems for Longitudinal Bunch Shaping Joel England FACET Users Meeting Tues Oct 9, 2012

Collimation for Bunch Shaping Muggli, P., et al. PRL 101, (2008). Initial beam"notch" mask"jaw" mask Collimators have recently been installed in Sector 20 to provide adjustable masks of two types:  "notch" collimator: movable tantalum blade for two-beam (drive/witness) operation - could potentially be modified for other mask designs if desired  "jaw" collimator": pair of transverse scrapers for ramped bunch (high tr. ratio) operation - can also be used to remove high or low-energy "tails"

Collimator Locations June 11-15, W-chicane lattice (cartoon) collimators for 2-bunch generation E-collimation, ramped bunches

Collimator Location chicane lattice (cartoon) collimators collimator location

Collimator Location collimators R56 = -10mm (2-bunch config) R56 = 0mm (ramped bunch config) recently installed March 3, 2012

3 FACET Configurations Collimator End of W-Chicane "A" "B" location "A"  location "B"  R 56 = 4mmR 56 = 10mmR 56 = 0 mm full compressionovercompressedundercompressed W-chicane compression factor  high-current single bunch drive/witness configuration ramped bunch notch jaws

Notch Collimator recently installed March 3, 2012 beam axis notch collimator insertable blade schematic of notch collimator notch collimator jaw collimator

FACET: 2-bunch case 8 8 x ∝ Δ E/E ∝ t Disperse the beam in energy Adjust final compression...selectively collimate x [mm] dp/p [%] z [mm] Exploit Position-Time Correlation on e - bunch to create separate drive and witness bunch Modeled using similar analytic framework (CSR) as LCLS as well as tracking/shower codes Modeled using similar analytic framework (CSR) as LCLS as well as tracking/shower codes 130 µm courtesy M. Hogan

Measurement of 2-Bunch Scenario Slide courtesy of M. Litos

Jaw Collimator e-beam axis  y x y x adjustable momentum slit separately moveable titanium blocks Note: beam dimensions are exaggerated for illustrative purposes z x

Ramped Bunch at FACET Due to upstream compression, need R56 = 0 in chicane Collimators can remove low-E tail. Ramped bunch has L = 200 µm ; Ipeak = 4 kA ; n b /n 0 = 17 k p L/2 = 10 for plasma n 0 = 3x10 17 cm -3 However, to avoid hosing instability, require R ≤ 5 W chicane

Ramped Bunch: PWFA 1. Particle phase space generated with ELEGANT simulation of beamline. 2. Focusing of beam at plasma transition (plasma lensing) modeled in Mathematica. 3. Beam parameters used in QUICKPIC to model propagation in 1.2e17 cm -3 plasma. 4. Resultant transformer ratio from longitudinal E-field is R ~ 6. R = E + /E - = 6 orange: beam, blue: plasma beam direction W. An PIC simulation courtesy W. An

Ramped Bunch: DWA ACE3P (Cho Ng) Axial beam current with 200µm ramped bunch 1.2 nC beam charge Transformer R ~ 1.5 (vs. 1.2 for back of envelope calc) E+ = 540 MV/m (vs. 780 MV/m for back of envelope) vbvb ID: 200 µm; OD: 330 µm; glass tube (smallest of E-201 tubes currently in use)

DWA Gradient 14 Dispersion relation for TM/TE modes at speed-of-light: A.M. Cook, PhD Dissertation, solutions where curve crosses x-axis for fiber diameter a = 30µm, b = 300µm TM01 excitation occurs for k -1 = 16 µm For expected FACET ramped bunch length of L =160 µm This gives TR ~ k L / 2 = 5 Note: FACET IP spot size ~ 20 µm

Summary 1. Collimators have been installed at FACET for generation of 2- bunch and ramped bunches. 2. High-transformer ratio PWFA studies require a pre-ionized plasma. 3. Possibility of doing nearer-term DWA studies using existing structures from E-201 program. 4. Optimal excitation of the fundamental DWA mode requires smaller tubes (limited by e-beam bunch size) or longer ramps. 5. Difficult to further reduce R56, but may get longer bunches by re-phasing. 6. Initial studies indicate possibility of interesting wake amplitudes and transformer ratios.

Thank You! SLAC Mark Hogan Mike Litos Joel Frederico Spencer Gessner Erik Adli Selina Li Dieter Walz Christine Clarke C-K. Ng UCLA Gerard Andonian Warren Mori Chan Joshi Weiming An Tsinghua Univ. Wei Lu Max Planck Institute Patric Muggli

Application for DWA 17 [Cook, et al., PAC 2009]

Transformer Ratio 18 For a triangular bunch of length L, the wake function is given by Transformer ratio is obtained by extremizing the top and bottom lines and dividing: This solution is valid for all kL (in linear 1D). For kL > 1, it can be approximated by R ~ k L / 2

DWA Structures for E k -1 (µm) k L/ Tube diameters appear large for high-TR with the current nominal ramped bunch parameters. cutoff wavenumbers for speed-of-light solution to TM dispersion relation Assume nominal L = 200 µm Tube geometries for E-201 Experiment at FACET, courtesy of G. Andonian

Gradient Estimate 20 For smallest diameter tube (fused silica). Variation in L corresponds to linac phase variation for R56 = 0 Assumes 3nC initial bunch + collimation loss of ~ 50% Retarding field (inside bunch) Accelerating field (behind bunch) TR ~ 3 for longer bunches