Logical Fallacies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Advertisements

{ The Ad Hominem By: Zechariah J Taylor.  - the most common of all mistakes in reasoning. The fallacy rests on a confusion between the qualities of the.
Fallacies What are they?. Definition There are over 100 fallacies They are illogical statements that demonstrate erroneous reasoning (sometimes intended-manipulation/
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies AKA “How NOT to Win an Argument”
Critical Thinking (and Logical Fallacies) All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. All cadets wear uniforms. Thompson wears.
Basic punctuation Logical Fallacies. Basic Punctuation See handout.
When Claims Go Wrong Recognizing & Avoiding Logical Fallacies Kim Miller Davis.
Logic. Slippery Slope To greatly exaggerate the future consequences of an action by suggesting one small step will lead the way to a much bigger result.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Persuasive Strategies Copyright 2006 IRA/NCTE. All rights reserved. ReadWriteThink.org materials may be reproduced for educational purposes. Images ©2006.
What is Knowledge?.
What Are Essays? The Application of Reason. Define Rhetoric “Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. Its goal is to change people’s opinions and influence.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Argument Unit AP Language and Composition. Deductive Reasoning General Particular.
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
Fallacies (Errors in Logic). What is a Fallacy? A Fallacy is an argument that is flawed by its very nature or structure Be aware of your opponents using.
How to avoid errors in logic
The Method Argumentative or Persuasive writings act as an exchange between two or more parties (the Writer and Reader) where one side tries to convince.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
USING SOAPSTONE AND RHETORICAL APPEALS Persuasion and Argument.
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Argument and Persuasion Harrison High School. THE METHOD PERSUASION aims to influence readers’ actions, or their support for an action, by engaging their.
What is a logical fallacy?. Logical fallacies Do you know what a “fallacy” is? Look at the word – it has “falla” in it, which could mean “fault,” “flaw,”
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
Informal Reasoning. Fallacies The ten deadly fallacies Ad IgnorantiamClaiming something is true because it cannot be proved to be false Hasty generalizationGeneralizing.
Fallacies Of Thinking A fallacy is flawed logic or misguided thinking.
LOGICAL FALLACIES Informal Reasoning.  A fallacy is a failure in reasoning that leads to an argument being invalid.  They are like cracks in the foundation.
Recognizing Fallacies From Various Sources. Fallacy Illogical statements that may sound reasonable or true but are actually deceptive and dishonest.
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Logical Fallacies.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Fallacies of Argument AKA Logical Fallacies.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Reason Pt. 2. Inductive Reasoning Induction moves from the particular to the general. As a result, it involves generalizing: moving from observable facts.
Rhetorical Fallacies Purdue OWL.
LOGICAL FALLACIES. Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc “After this, therefore because of this.”
Be Reasonable! Recognize and Avoid Logical Fallacies.
EVALUATING ARGUMENTS AND BUILDING ARGUMENTS ENGL 121 Howard Community College.
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Logical Fallacies. Slippery Slope The argument that some event must inevitably follow from another without any rational claim. If we allow A to happen.
A Journey into the Mind Logic and Debate Unit. Week 2: May 23 through May 26 The Fallacies SWBAT: Identify the common fallacies in logic in order to be.
Logical Fallacies 13 Common Errors in Logic P in the book.
Introduction to Argument Writing. Introduction Argument: Argument: is persuasive is persuasive has a strong thesis has a strong thesis includes support.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Part 4 Reading Critically
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Lecture 10 - ARGUMENT.
College English Yichun Liu
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacies.
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
Logical Fallacies
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Errors in reasoning that lead to wrong conclusions
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Beginning to 3:27. Beginning to 3:27 What is a logical fallacy?
Chapter 14: Argumentation
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
Presentation transcript:

Logical Fallacies

1. Non Sequitur (Latin for “It does not follow”) Stating a conclusion that doesn’t follow from the first premise or premises. E.g. “I’ve lived in this town for a long time - why, my grandfather was the first mayor - so I’m against putting fluoride in the drinking water”

2. Oversimplification Supplying neat and easy explanations for large and complicated phenomena. E.g. “These scientists are always messing around with the mood and planets; that’s why the climate is changing nowadays.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Snpq G3h6pY8

3. Either/or Reasoning Assuming that a reality may be divided into only two parts or extremes; assuming that a given problem has only one of two possible solutions. E.g. “What do we do about these sheiks who keep jacking up oil prices? Either we kowtow to ‘em, or we bomb ‘em off the face of the earth, right?” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpPA BLW6F_A

4. Argument from Doubtful or Unidentified Authority E.g. “According to reliable sources, my opponent is lying.” OR, e.g. “Certainly we ought to castrate all sex offenders; Uncle Oswald says we should.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwA aHbmF5S4

5. Argumentation Ad Hominem In Latin this means, “argument to the man” Attacking a person’s views by attacking his or her character E.g. “Mayor Burns was seen with a prostitute on Taylor Street. How can we listen to his plea for a city nursing home?” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-EEETo3Sqo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qKps7uG6eM

6. Begging the Question Taking for granted from the start what you set out to demonstrate. When you reason in a logical way, you state that because something is true, then, as a result, some other truth follows. When you beg the question, however, you repeat that what is true is true. E.g. “I should go to college because that is the right thing to do. Going to college is the right thing to do because it is expected of me.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CVbku6nxh U

Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc In Latin this means, “after this, therefore because of this” Confusing cause and effect http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRJU vFG8gbE

8. Argument from Analogy Using an extended metaphor as though it offers evidence. E.g. Pierre Berton, a Canadian journalist, once wrote an article called, ‘Is There a Teacher in the House?’ satirizing opponents of public health care.