2014 School Performance Framework Overview for CSC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
High School School Performance Framework (SPF)
11 th Grade Parent Meeting – ACT Plus Writing and ACT WorkKeys Wausau East High School October 8, 2014.
Achievement of Hmong Students in Saint Paul Public Schools Hmong Youth Educational Services Banquet – June 2006 Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
Welcome to our Wyatt Academy Parent Meeting Wednesday, October 8, 2014.
School Performance Framework (SPF). Purpose of SPF The School Performance Framework (SPF) is a comprehensive system to help schools focus on strengths.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.
Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
English Mastery: Nevada English Language Learner (ELL) Program September 6, 2013 For NNELI Program Overview – Background and Demographics – WIDA – World.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
2012 Traditional SPF Background & Measures September 17, 2012.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
Denver Public Schools Career and Technical Education Supporting Data & The Case for Growth February 2014.
September 2015 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.
1 Strategic Plan Baseline Data September 2004 Prince William County School Board October 6, 2004.
Academic Progress Plan Results. Two Topics to be Covered ASD DCAS results relative to other Delaware school districts SY Performance.
Data-Driven Dialogue Predicting, Exploring, and Explaining Data
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
We are a Title I school What does this mean?. We are Title I because… Our school has a high number of students who are eligible for Free and Reduced Price.
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Academic Growth in Math High Poverty Students – WASL and MAP Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
BROMWELL COMMUNITY MEETING November 17, SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF)
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
KCAA Data Snapshot Part 1 Prepared by Cori Herbst-Loehr Creative Arts Academy at Kunsmiller.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Bennett County School District
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
WIFI ACCESS COW-GUEST-WIRELESS No Login Needed
District Performance Framework
New Statewide Accountability System
School & District Performance Frameworks
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
State Accountability Results September 18, 2018
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
Data Overview Shiver Elementary School Faculty and Staff July 21, 2013
Understanding Your School and District Performance Frameworks
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

2014 School Performance Framework Overview for CSC

Disclaimers The SPF has been reviewed/approved by the school district, Pathways Network leaders, and me. The information in it is certified as correct. This information will be presented again at a parent/community meeting on September 29.

Overview of SPF School Performance Framework:  Document that details overall school accreditation rating;  Public document that is shared publicly and addresses school performance, growth, academic growth gaps, and post-secondary/workforce readiness;  Denver Online is now being evaluated using the DPS Alternative SPF; Unified Improvement Plan (UIP)  Information from the SPF will populate the UIP;  The SPF will be the starting point in developing/modifying data analysis, priority performance challenges, and major improvement strategies in the UIP;

Results Denver Online High School is accredited with a Performance rating. This is to be celebrated! Congratulations to staff and students! The school has significantly improved over the past three years, especially in the area of academic achievement. Major improvements are also noted in the area of Post- Secondary and Workforce Readiness (PSWR).

Academic Achievement Overall, the school is exceeding district and state expectations in this area. 9 of 9 possible points! TCAP Performance  Reading – 68% - Exceeds  Writing – 45.40% - Exceeds  Math – 20.60% - Exceeds

Academic Growth - TCAP approaching Overall, Denver Online is approaching district and state expectations in this area. 14 of 36 possible points TCAP MGP is expected to fall between (one year’s growth in one year’s time). TCAP Growth – Median Growth Percentile (MGP) 46  Reading  Writing  Math - 37

Academic Growth - MAP approaching Denver Online is approaching district expectations in this area. This is measured by the percentage of students making expected growth over three test administrations. MAP Growth - % of students making expected growth:  Reading – 66.15% 44.26%  Language Usage – 44.26% 42.42%  Math – 42.42%

Academic Growth Gaps - TCAP ELL v. Non-ELL Reading Proficiency – 50%/74% FRL v. Non-FRL Reading Proficiency – 59%/77% SpEd v. School Reading Proficiency – 40%/70% (Non-Sped – 77%) Exited ELL v. School Reading Proficiency – 33%/70% ELL v. Non-ELL Writing Proficiency – 0%/57% FRL v. Non-FRL Writing Proficiency – 41%/57% SpEd v. School Writing Proficiency – 20%/53% (Non-SpEd – 57%) Exited ELL v. School Writing Proficiency – 33%/53% White students are outperforming school population in Math – 47% vs. 23% Black students v. School Math Proficiency – 13%/23% Hispanic students v. School Math Proficiency – 8%/23% Exited ELL v. School Math Proficiency – 0%/23% SpEd v. School Math Proficiency – 0%/23% (Non-SpEd – 26%)

Academic Growth Gaps - MAP Participation is a major issue – 41% No scores (24% Reading, 48% Language Usage, 52% Math) 64% Growth in Reading, 12% No Growth or Negative Growth 36% Growth in Language Usage, 16% No Growth 83% of Hispanic students did not show growth last year in Reading, 37% in Writing, but 56% made growth in Math 48% of ELA services opt-out students did not make growth in Reading, 36% did not make growth in Math 28% of G/T students did not make growth in Reading, 33% in Writing, and 33% in Math last year

Post-Secondary Readiness Denver Online is exceeding expectations in this area. 22 of 27 points! COACT Proficiency  Composite Score –  Reading – 21.5  Math –  English –  Science – 20.19

Post-Secondary Readiness Still working on this analysis. Completion Rate – 78% Completion Rate Change – (2.04%) Dropout Rate – 7.11% 4.17% Dropout Rate Change – 4.17% Dropout Recovery – 2 Dropout Recovery Growth – % Adequate Yearly Credits – 45.28%

Student Engagement & Satisfaction Denver Online is meeting expectations in this area. Attendance Improvement – Exceeds Attendance Rate – Exceeds Approaching Student Satisfaction – Approaching Truancy – Exceeds Parent Satisfaction – Meets Parent Satisfaction Response – Meets Parent Satisfaction Response - Meets

Celebrations and Questions