ERA and Outputs Presentation for School of Music Lorna Robertson Manager, Research Assessment Unit 23 November 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Excellence in Research for Australia
Advertisements

Tüzin BAYCAN-LEVENT ERC Advanced Grant Evaluation.
Updating Researcher Profiles for ERA 2015 Andrew Heath & Mary-Anne Marrington.
2013 Research Publications Collection Classification Information Session.
VU Elements – New Publications System (ERA, MORA, RAI, Research Repository) Dr Lyle Winton, Office for Research Cora Ng, Office for Research Julie Gardner,
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Research Administrators Seminar NCGP update Dr Laura Dan Chief Program Officer 25 November 2013.
Excellence in Research for Australia ERA at UWA Presentation to the UMG, 19 November 2009 Lorna Robertson, Manager Research Assessment Unit, Research Services.
Excellence in Research for Australia 2015 Update Ms Leanne Harvey Executive General Manager.
Monash's Mock RQF − Lessons learnt David Groenewegen ARROW Project Manager.
Applying for OLT Grants Possibilities, Process and Practicalities Renae Acton TLD Workshop, 7 Feb 2014.
Guidance on submissions Chris Taylor, Deputy REF Manager Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.
Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director Presentation to University of Canberra Policy Roundtable 9 February 2015.
Presenting your track record for ARC proposals Mariella Herberstein: Mary Spongberg:
Research Quality Framework Presentation to APSR - ARROW The Adaptable Repository 3 May 2007 Dr Alexander Cooke Department of Education Science and Training.
ADVANCING RESEARCH IN THE ERA AGE AND THE ROLE OF HEADS OF SCHOOLS Presentation to Heads of Schools Gail Crossley September 2009.
Research at York Presentation to Council Alastair Fitter Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Research.
RQF Trials and the Newcastle Experience Barney Glover.
HSC: All My Own Work Copyright.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J ResearchMaster Support February 2009 Janne Lawson, System Support Officer Office of Research.
Month, XX YEAR (Arial 10) Understanding Adjunct Faculty Promotion.
Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director Presentation to UQ Political Science and International Relations November 2014.
Excellence in Research for Australia
1 Using metrics to your advantage Fei Yu and Martin Cvelbar.
Research Impact Alexandra Byrnes, Research Publication Officer Rio
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R Office of Research Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J ERA Update January 2009.
Bibliometrics in Computer Science MyRI project team.
Research Impact 19 November 2012 Dr Fiona Cameron Executive Director Australian Research Council.
Understanding Research Performance The Evolution of UWA’s Research Management Tool, Socrates N.G. Mast, D.G. Glance & R.A. Owens University of western.
Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration Strategies By: Dakota Tucker, Derrick Haney, Demi Ford, and Kent Elmore Chapter 7.
The Research Excellence Framework. Purpose of REF The REF replaces the RAE as the UK-wide framework for assessing research in all disciplines. Its purpose.
Selecting journals for digitisation Piecing together the puzzle to create a European model Dr Hazel Woodward Cranfield University, UK
REF Information Session August Research Excellence Framework (REF)
Portfolio based assessment - options for the new CGEA.
Electronic Portfolios Business Information Management 2.
PLANNING YOUR RESEARCH CAREER CULTURAL RESEARCH NETWORK ECR WORKSHOP University of South Australia June 2006 Vera Mackie, University of Melbourne.
The UK Experience of Quality Assurance in Research and Doctoral Education Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities.
1 Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Q & A Session Research Administrators’ Seminar 3 December 2014.
The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011.
InAHQ Annual Education Meeting Indianapolis, Indiana April 29, 2010
Building An Academic Career
Gaining and Maintaining Supported Researcher Status Knowing the Rules of the Game June 2007.
Alternative Dissemination: how should we share our research? Dr Sandy O’Sullivan.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Peter Emanuel, M.D. Laura Lamps, M.D.
Research Quality Framework Presentation to APSR - ARROW - Repository Market Day 4 May 2007 Sandra Fox Department of Education Science and Training.
Understanding ARC Future Fellowships ANU College of Medicine, Biology and the Environment and ANU College of Physical Sciences 20 th October
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style Partnership engagement grants If you are developing an ARC Linkage proposal and looking.
THE IMPACT OF RAE ON SERIAL PUBLICATION Professor Judith Elkin UK Serials Group March 2004.
The REF assessment framework (updated 23 May 2011)
Publications Dr Sarah Wendt. Context PhD conferred Oct 2005, fulltime lecturer in 2006 at UniSA (40/40/20). Promoted to Senior Lecturer (2010). Social.
Journal ranking as a measure of research excellence in Australia “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.”
Building and keeping a revalidation portfolio
HSC: All My Own Work What is copyright and what does it protect? How does it relate to me?
2013 Research Publications Collection Classification Information Session.
Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA 2015) RMIT Presentation 18 January 2016 Ms Leanne Harvey Executive General Manager Australian Research Council.
ACADEMIC PROMOTIONS Promotions Criteria Please note, these slides only contain a summary of the promotions information – full details can be found.
ERA - you know you love it! Using ‘ERA’ Ranked Journals by universities Esteem Measures – COI review underway Benefits Realisation Review Volume data –
Measuring Research Impact Using Bibliometrics Constance Wiebrands Manager, Library Services.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
2016 Academic Staff Promotion Round Briefing Session Professor Debra Henly Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic)
Excellence in Research for Australia 2015 Update Dr Tim Cahill Director Research Evaluation 1.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Bibliometrics toolkit: Thomson Reuters products
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Research metrics for Academic Promotion
Promotion to Senior Lecturer
NRF Evaluation & Rating
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Dr John Corbett USP-CAPES International Fellow
Presentation transcript:

ERA and Outputs Presentation for School of Music Lorna Robertson Manager, Research Assessment Unit 23 November 2010

Presentation ERA outline Outputs, especially creative works Suggestions for School of Music

ERA purpose ERA is designed to inform the Government and community about the quality of the research being funded by the Australian tax-payers ERA assesses research at the discipline level, by 2-digit and 4-digit Field of Research (FoR) codes, not by organisational unit Results from ERA 2010 will significantly affect reputation and drive funding to universities from 2011 onwards Results at institutional level will be published nationally in early 2011 ERA 2012 has been announced, likely census date 31 March 2011

ERA 2010 Data required for outputs/publications, grant income, applied indicators (patents, registered designs, commercial income), specified esteem, and staff Outputs are from ERA eligible researchers, published in the period 2003 – 2008 All other indicator data for 2006 – 2008 Creative outputs were included, eg poetry, music compositions and performances, visual arts and exhibitions; where selected for peer review, research statements and evidence for these had to be submitted Background statements for each 2-digit FoR area were written to describe the context and nature of the work

ERA – Researcher Eligibility Complex definitions for ERA 2010 Essentially, eligible researchers were T&R and RO staff employed at UWA full-time or fractional full-time (regardless of publication byline) on 31 March 2009 Some non-salaried honorary, adjunct, emeritus, or seconded researchers were also eligible, provided they showed UWA affiliation in their publication/output byline (or equivalent in the case of creative works) If ERA12 definitions are similar, eligibility will be based on researchers affiliated with UWA on 31 March 2011

ERA 2010 continued All data had to be submitted according to 4-digit Field of Research codes There is no 1-1 correspondence between FoRs and schools Schools contribute to lots of FoRs; many FoRs have data from lots of schools 1904 (Performing Arts & Creative Writing) is the FoR for Music and also Creative Writing in SCS

ERA 2010 continued Outputs the core indicator Ranked C1 journal articles is a quality indicator for all disciplines, using ARC’s ranked journal list For sciences, citation data from Elsevier’s Scopus is a key measure to indicate performance against Australian and World average performance For non-sciences, key assessment is by peer review of 20% sample of outputs by FoR ERA Evaluation Committees have a ‘dashboard’ with information for each FoR by university on outputs, staff profiles, grant income, applied indicators and esteem

ERA 2010 Rating Scale RatingDescriptor 5 The Unit of Evaluation profile is characterised by evidence of outstanding performance well above world standard presented by the suite of indicators used for evaluation. 4 The Unit of Evaluation profile is characterised by evidence of performance above world standard presented by the suite of indicators used for evaluation. 3 The Unit of Evaluation profile is characterised by evidence of average performance at world standard presented by the suite of indicators used for evaluation. 2 The Unit of Evaluation profile is characterised by evidence of performance below world standard presented by the suite of indicators used for evaluation. 1 The Unit of Evaluation profile is characterised by evidence of performance well below world standard presented by the suite of indicators used for evaluation. NA Not assessed due to low volume. The number of research outputs does not meet the volume threshold standard for evaluation in ERA.

ERA 2010 – Income and Applied Indicators Eligible research income was that received by UWA in and reported by UWA for HERDC, affiliated with UWA, not with eligible researchers Eligible applied measures were specific ARC-listed measures affiliated with UWA – except for NEGs, which were affiliated with the researcher: –Plant breeders' rights –Patents –Registered designs –Research commercialisation income –NHMRC-endorsed guidelines

ERA 2010 – Esteem Esteem had specific ARC-defined categories: Editor of a prestigious work of reference (specified list) – only HCA and SBE cluster Fellowship of a Learned Academy and Membership of AIATSIS Recipient of a Nationally-Competitive Research Fellowship (specified list) Membership of a Statutory Committee – only PAH cluster Recipient of Australia Council Grant or Fellowship – only HCA FoR19

ERA 2010 – Outputs Had to include at least one eligible researcher as author Had to be published in Specific eligible output types only: –Traditional output types as for HERDC: Research books (A1) Research book chapters (B1) Refereed journal articles (C1) but only in ARC ranked journal list Refereed conference publications (E1) –Non-traditional research outputs also in some disciplines: Original creative works (J1-J5) Live performance of creative works (J6) Recorded/rendered creative works (J7) Curated/produced substantial public exhibitions/events (J8)

ERA 2010 – Creative Outputs 1 All creative works must include a research element. Original creative works (J1-J5) include novels, short stories, musical compositions, artworks and designs. Live performance of creative works (J6) includes musical or dramatic performances or productions, where the research and creativity is in the performance. The performance must be of a new work or a demonstrably new or innovative interpretation or production of an existing work. –Documentation to substantiate the performance is required, such as a recording of the performance, reviews, performance programs, etc. –At least one of the performers must be an eligible researcher affiliated with UWA. –For non-salaried researchers (eg honorary), UWA affiliation must be demonstrated in relation to the work.

ERA 2010 – Creative Outputs 2 Recorded/rendered creative works (J7) includes works where the research component is contained within the recording/rendering, not the performance. Examples include films, digital games, creative 3D models. Curated/produced substantial public exhibitions/events (J8) includes works where the eligible researcher is the curator, not the creator. Examples include: –Exhibition: The curation and/or production of a collection of creative works exhibited together for the first time, in that particular arrangement, in a recognised gallery, museum, or event. This should be accompanied by a well researched publication that includes the date and location of the exhibition. –Festival: The curation of a festival bringing together innovative work or existing works in an innovative format or through a theme that provides new perspectives and/or experiences.

ERA 2010 – Creative Outputs 3 Creative works for peer review in ERA required submission of the output and/or documentation substantiating its existence, plus a short Research Statement (approx 250 words) including: 1. Research Background Field Context Research Question 2. Research Contribution Innovation New Knowledge 3. Research Significance Evidence of Excellence A good test of whether a creative output meets the criteria is if a research statement could be written

ERA 2010 – Creative Outputs 4 Significant work done for Music outputs for ERA Trial 2009 and ERA10 by my office with School of Music: Collection of information on outputs meeting existing UWA criteria (J1-J2) – lots missing Collection of information on outputs meeting new ERA criteria (J6-J8) – some available in OPVA files but records very incomplete Audit of new outputs Preparation of research statements and evidence portfolios for 20% sample A BIG job under pressure!

ERA 2012 – Creative Outputs ARC say ERA12 will use the same methodology as ERA10. UWA will continue to collect creative outputs for audit, using the ERA criteria. Details of outputs meeting the ERA criteria should be entered in UWA’s publications database each year. Schools must retain records of all outputs for the past 7 years for ERA including: –Scores of new compositions –Recordings –Programs –Reviews –Any other evidence of the performance, exhibition or festival Full records are needed for UWA audit and ERA submission.

Suggested action now Be aware of likely ERA12 census date 31 March 2011 in relation to staff appointments, including honorary and short term appointments. Work on publishing research in high quality outlets (journals, publishers, venues) Ensure all research outputs meeting the stated criteria are entered in UWA’s publications database. Definitions for creative works categories are being updated for clarification and consistency. Ensure full records of all creative works are gathered and retained by School of Music. Work done for ERA 2009 Trial and ERA 2010 should be continued. Electronic and hard copies recommended. Looking at ERA10 research statements and evidence portfolios for outputs selected for peer review may be helpful.

Further Information ARC ERA website UWA ERA website ERA Submission Guidelines Research Assessment Unit: –Lorna –Lizzy