Objectives  To review the roles of the government research institutes (GRIs) as facilitator of industrial technology adaptation  To evaluate the performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lim Sei cK.  SME stands for Small to Medium Enterprise.  Different countries define SMEs differently.  SMALL-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
Advertisements

Instituto de Economia IE Manufacturing Development in Brazil: recent trends and challenges for the industrial policy Célio Hiratuka IE-UNICAMP
The Virtual State Business, Government & Society Spring 2000.
IDB: Transformation: Skills for Productivity Economic Development and TVET in South Korea Lima Peru, June 12, 2014 Jisun Chung Korea Research Institute.
Industrial transition model Case Slovakia Jaroslav Vokoun Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia – Comparison of industrial transition models Sofia,
Presented By:- Dharm Jeeta Singh
Results of the ESTER project in Slovakia Juraj Poledna Salamanca June 23, 2005.
2 External Analysis: The Identification of Industry Opportunities and Threats.
Country Study: South Korea. Overview Until 20 th century, Korea existed as an independent country. In 1910, it became a colony of Japan After WWII, Republic.
Materials Research & Development in Korea November, 2003 Kyung-mox Cho R&D Program Director Materials and Chemistry Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and.
East and South East Asian NICs: class 3. Advantages of Export- Oriented Industrialization q Forces country to capitalize on its comparative advantage.
How to improve the appeal of research career to university graduates? Eero Vuorio University of Turku Finland.
Workshop ”InDeCS-H: Development of Healthcare Biotechnology SMEs“ 10th September 2009 Budapest Strategy for Hungarian pharmaceutical and biotechnology.
Comparison of South Korea & Taiwan NIE development model reconsidered.
Economic Development and the Skills Shortage in British Columbia Skills Challenge 2020.
© economiesuisse,, Challenges for Switzerland‘s Foreign Trade Policy Gerold Bührer, Chairman 36th Annual General Meeting 2010 ARAB-SWISS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
Amber Huber.  Government intervention to give economic opportunities to production sectors that wouldn’t have occurred without said intervention.  Three.
Sunil Sinha Technical Director Emerging Market Economics December 2006
Professor Song CHEN, Ph.D. Deputy Dean, School of Economics & Management Tongji University Oct. 7, 2013 The Changing National.
Contents Globalization and open innovation
Salvatore Zecchini Chairman OECD WP SMEE. Most governments are trying to promote entrepreneurship and SMEs The MENA region is no exception In Saudi Arabia.
1 Prof. Dr. Necdet GEREN (Mech Eng.) Center Director Participant: TUBITAK-ADANA UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY JOINT RESEARCH CENTER TURKEY Participant Role: Contractor.
Emerging Market Global Players: Institutions, Governance and Strategy: The Case of Qatar Emerging Market Global Players: Institutions, Governance and Strategy:
The Emerging High Tech Competitors from Asia, Contrasts between the national systems of innovation and its performance of China and India Professor Sunil.
The Economic System By Dr. Frank Elwell. The Economic System The way that a society is organized to produce and distribute goods and services is the crucial.
Globalization The world economic globalization process
1 Directorate of Industry Relations, Analysis and Policy (DIRAP) Paul Herring, Director “CASE FOR CANADIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL POLICY” 27 February 2012.
The Dynamism of SMEs in Developed and Developing Countries Shuji Uchikawa, IDE-JETRO.
T2S Conference 2006 Policy and Networking: an RIS in Korea Yu Jin Jung School of Public Policy George Mason University.
Opportunities Available Upcoming Workshops and The Exporters Club
Trade Liberalisation. Micro Reform – Trade Liberalisation Trade liberalisation is about removing the barriers that are designed to restrict international.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
Chapter 16. Global Production, Outsourcing, and Logistics
Lecture 7 - Session 9 Political Context. Purpose of Lecture What is government’s role in the Canadian Economy? How has that role been changing and why?
The Role of the Fiscal Policy in Poverty Reduction Youngsun Koh Korea Development Institute.
1 Innovation and innovation policies in developing countries in the framework of PaceNet+ Ludovico Alcorta Director. Research, Statistics and Industrial.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
BACKGROUND AND COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES  Armenia as a regional center for ICT  Comparative advantages of Armenia:  qualified and experienced labor force.
S&T and Innovation Policy in the Republic of Armenia Innovation Programs Division, SCS RA “Development of Coherent Innovation Policy in South Caucasian.
Innovation and Competence Building systems in Russia Brics-workshop, Aalborg, February 12–15, 2006.
Internal Operating Macro  For any business to succeed, it must be able to respond quickly to changes or pressures that come from it internal, operating.
JULY, 09-10, 2007 ISTANBUL KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION NEDRET UGUR YAVUZ KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION.
1 Regional Innovation Strategies RIS. 2 About Regional Innovation Strategies The RIS projects aimed to support regions to develop regional innovation.
Mysoltani.ir سایت فیلم روشهای مشارکتی Technology Foresight Foresight is about preparing for the future. It is about deploying resources in the best.
©2003 Southwestern Publishing Company 1 The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, and Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis Michael A.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Concepts in ﴀ Strategic Management, Canadian Edition Wheelen, Hunger, Wicks 3-1 Chapter 3 Environmental.
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
(14/12/2015) Funding of Public Research Development and Innovation Policies Session 2 Funding of Public Research Development and Innovation Policies Session.
Istanbul Forum Country Exercise: Republic of Macedonia.
The Lisbon Strategy Liceo Scientifico A. Einstein Classe 5B A. s. 2006/2007.
HRD IN GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND PUBLIC SECTOR SUBMITTED TO: Ms. KAMALPREET KAUR SUBMITTED BY: PRABHJOT KAUR M.COM FINAL(3001)
Progressing Priorities for Structural Reform; A case of Japan February 26 th, 2007 Naohiro Yashiro International Christian University and Council for Economic.
Europe Youth Unemployment Portugal Youth Unemployment.
1 Trends in Science, Technology and Industry: An OECD Perspective Jerry Sheehan OECD Science & Technology Policy Division Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest,
Skills Development and Korea’s Experiences October, 2006 Korea University of Technology and Education.
Utilization of knowledge for economic growth in the Czech Republic Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR Knowledge Economy Forum V.
BELARUS: THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATIONS OF TRADE POLICY United Nations Development Programme.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE UNIT – II. EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT Any organization before they begin the work of strategy formulations, it must scan the external.
Economic Systems Chapter 2 Section 4 Modern Economies.
GREECE: Meeting of the National Councils for S&T policy of the EU Member Countries Prague,25-26 May 2006 National Research Council General Secretariat.
Chaebol Expansion in Post-War Korea:
Measuring the Innovation Potential of the Bulgarian Economy Establishing an IRC in Macedonia, Skopje, March 29, 2006 Ruslan Stefanov Economic Program Center.
Miracle on the Han What are the reasons for Korea’s Economic Rise?
“ Global Summit of Innovation Economy Creator ” Prof. Se-Jung Oh
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
Comparison of South Korea & Taiwan
Korea University of Technology and Education
한성대 ODA 컨설팅 (2010년 2학기) 한국의 경제개발경험과 대외원조의 역할 (토) 엄성용 1.
Development of the Korean Shipbuilding Industry
Presentation transcript:

Objectives  To review the roles of the government research institutes (GRIs) as facilitator of industrial technology adaptation  To evaluate the performance of GRIs and derive implications for latecomers

How far Korea has come since 1960s?  Economic and S&T development  GNP p. c.: from $ 87(’61) to $20,000(07)  Exports : from $55 M(’61) to $300 B (2006)  Unemployment rate : 22.3%(’61) to 3% (2006)  From one of the poorest countries in the world to one of the most dynamic industrial economies  From a barren land to a new S&T power (7 th largest spender in R&D, 4 th largest producer of patents, etc)

 Growth of R&D investment  6 th largest R&D investor among OECD countries Note: Upper portion of the bar refers to industry contribution, and the lower parts that of the government. Billion Won R&D Expenditures in Korea 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0

 Trend of Korea’s R&D structure  Private industries account for over 75% of the GERD Source: Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea

Factors behind the growth

 Demand side : Outward looking development  export- orientation  pressure from international market for technological competitiveness  increased demand for technology adaptation and/or RDI  Supply side o Financial resources : Large-firm-oriented industrial development  chaebol system  increased abilities of private industries to finance long-term, risky R&D projects o Human resource : Korea prepared itself well for R&D by investing heavily in education and HRD o Various policy programs to promote private RDI o GRIs to help industries adapt new technologies

 As Korea lacked in technological capability required for industrial development in the early stage of development, the government created the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) in 1966 and the Korea S&T Information Center (KORSTIC) in 1962 in order to make up for the technological weakness of the private industries and help them adapt new technologies  Legal entity: Non-government special corp (To provide better job terms for research scientists and engineers)  Financial sources: Government budget and industries  Key personnel: Korean S&E from abroad  Operation: Independent (But under the control of sponsoring ministries) Government Research Institutes

 Expansion of GRIs  In the 1970s, Korea pursued the development of heavy chemical industries, with strategic focus on steel, shipbuilding, machineries, chemicals, electronics, and so on.  In order support the development of the HCI, the government created GRI for each of the strategic areas, such as: (1) Korea Institute of Machineries and Metals (KIMM) (2) Korea Research Institute of Standard Science (KRISS) (3) Electronic Technology Research Institute (ETRI) (4) Korea Research Institute for Chemical Technology (KRICT) (5) Korea Research Institute of Shipbuilding and Oceans (KRISO) (6) Systems Engineering Research Institute (SERI), etc

 Changes in the roles of GRIs  Entering into the 1980s, the environment surrounding GRIs has changed rapidly - R&D capabilities of private industries grew remarkably - Universities also began to reorient their systems toward research  In response, the functions of the GRIs were readjusted such that they not only assist the industries but also conduct national R&D projects which were designed to develop industrial technologies as well as generic technologies(GRIs today account for about 40% of the government-funded R&D)

GRIs’ contributions to industrial technology adaptation [Case 1: D RAM technology] To avoid duplicate research and investment, the government intervened and established a national project for D-RAM research. ETRI played the coordinating role with three large enterprises participating. Samsung was the first among the three that announced the completion of designing 4M D RAM in 1989 and 16M D RAM in 1990, only a few months after Japan.

[Case 2: Electronic switching system] In 1981, the government(sole buyer) decided to shift the public telephone switching system from an electrical direct dialing (EDD) system to an ESS. In 1986, ETRI organized a consortium with four local companies to develop Korea’s own ESS – Time Division Exchange(TDX) system. The project was completed and the technology was transferred to the participating companies for production. The new system not only replaced the old ones but also was exported to foreign countries.

[Case 3: Optical fibre] When Corning Glass refused to transfer optical fibre production technology to Korea in 1977, two Chaebol companies entered into a joint project with KIST to develop the technology. After 7 years of research, the locally produced optical cable was tested successfully on a 35 km route in Although the local effort was terminated due to slow progress, it helped local firms to gain bargaining power in acquiring foreign technologies on a far more favorable term.

[Case 4: Development of strategic industries] Korean government’s plan to launch the then ambitious plans to build the Pohang Steel Mill and shipyards were based on the technical feasibility studies by KIST. KIST not only provided the basic project concepts but also identified technologies required for the construction of the steel mill and shipyard.

[Case 5: Polyester film technology] When Japanese companies refused to transfer polyester film production technology to Korea for fear of losing market, a Korean chemical company, in collaboration with KIST, successfully reverse-engineered the technology and Korea became one the major suppliers of audio- and video-cassette tape in the world market.

[Case 6: Aerospace industry] To develop aerospace industry, the government legislated the Aerospace Industry Development Law in 1987, and established the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) in a way to help the private sectors to adapt aerospace technologies. KARI has been providing satellite technologies for local communication companies and is leading national project on space technology. It is also working with local aircraft companies for the development of various types of aircraft for civilian and military uses.

Recent changes in GRIs  Reorganization of GRIs  GRIs were restructuring in 1999 because of two criticisms against the GRI system  * Inefficiency in GRI operation because of the inter- institutional barriers to mobility  * GRIs tended to work for the interests of their patrons (ministries) rather than national interests  So, GRIs were regrouped and put under three research councils which are under the control of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC)

 Current roles of GRIs  R&D: GRIs are still the major players in public R&D, accounting for about 40% of government R&D  Assistance for industries - Technology transfer, technology consultancy, technology identification, technology evaluation, etc - Operation of regional TLO - Technology information

GRIs’ performance: an evaluation  GRIs have contributed to industrial development by helping private industries adapt new technologies, in particular, in the early stage of development when Korea lacked in technological capabilities. - In the 60s and 70s, technical assistance, such as what GRIs provided was far more effectivce than other government support programs, including financial, tax and other subsidies.  They also contributed to the laying of a foundation for S&T development by attracting top talents into S&T and nurturing a culture for research. - GRIs’ research S&E have spread out to various sectors, playing leading roles in S&T development in the Korean society - S&E at KIST and other GRIs offered a very attractive role model for young talents back in the 60s and 70s who are now leading research community in Korea.

 But as the names of GRIs suggest, they are too much linked to specific industries and lack agility to cope with rapid changes in technology and industry.  In the 60s and 70s, there existed fairly large gaps between what GRIs could offer and what industries could accommodate – GRIs were not familiar with the technical needs at the shop-floor level.  Due to organizational rigidity, GRIs have not been able to adapt to the changing environments and therefore have been subject to external restructuring and reorganization. (Forced by the government)

Implications for latecomers?  For catch-up economies that lack S&T capabilities, Korean GRI can be an effective model as an instrument to promote and facilitate technology adaptation in the early stage of industrial development - But, for GRIs to perform better, they need be staffed with S&E who are familiar with both technologies and shop-floor needs.  GRIs should be organized in a very flexible way so that they can adapt themselves to the changing needs as the economies go through different stages of development