Converting Your Lab from Verification to Inquiry Faculty Development Workshop November 6, 2012 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Edith Leticia Cerda
Advertisements

WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT WE HAVE LEARNED ABOUT QUALITY AND COST? The factors that lead to increased student learning and increased student.
Clinical Skills Verification Rater Training MODULE 4 Strategies for Clinical Skills Assessment: Models and Best Practices Michael Jibson, M.D., Ph.D. David.
IDEA Course Evaluations New Faculty Academy Spring,
Pre and Post Assessments A quick and easy way to assess your Student Learning Outcomes.
November 2, 2011 Professional Learning. Reminders The Focus Walk will be next Thursday, Nov. 10 th We begin typically around 8:30 and try to finish before.
My problem is students don't read graphs and tables effectively. Research Question Does continued practice producing and interpreting graphs increase students’
Rajlakshmi Ghosh Cadey Korson Being a TA in a Science Lab.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
RSMAS TA Training: Assessment and Grading Lead by Johnna Infanti August 20, 2012 – August
Janet Bond-Robinson Arizona State University Chemistry & Biochemistry Dept. Redesign GENERAL CHEMISTRY Non-science Majors Science Majors Sem I and II Engineering.
Technology as a solution to implementing active-learning pedagogies... Ann C. Smith University of Maryland College Park MD PKAL 2003 Boulder Colorado.
Teaching Guided-Inquiry Organic Chemistry Labs Jerry Mohrig Carleton College Northfield, MN Workshop Objectives Summer 2005.
Teaching Inquiry-Driven Organic Chemistry Labs Jerry Mohrig Carleton College Northfield, MN Introduction and Workshop Objectives Summer 2007.
Teaching Inquiry-Driven Organic Chemistry Labs Jerry Mohrig Carleton College Northfield, MN Introduction and Workshop Objectives Summer 2006.
Using Peer Tutors to Support Learning Focus on Teaching and Technology Conference November 1-2, 2007 Co-presenters: Keith Stine, Department of Chemistry.
STUDY GROUPS MOVE TEACHING AND LEARNING PLANS FORWARD.
Writing the Syllabus Teaching Skills Purpose of Syllabus Communicates what the course is about Communicates what students need to know in the beginning.
Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences.
Establishing corrective norms Session III TEAM WORKSHOP team3.ppt - 1 Team Workshop - Session III  Summary of Brainstorming/Affinity grouping exercise.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Portfolios Definitions Advantages and Disadvantages Specific Steps Examples Try it!
Math TLC Tutor Lab Overview: All sections of Math 010 and 110 are taught in a single, dedicated, technology-enhanced classroom that is adjacent to a.
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
Please CLOSE YOUR LAPTOPS, and turn off and put away your cell phones, and get out your note-taking materials. Today’s daily quiz will be given at the.
Brandon Horvath, Ph.D. Associate Professor Turfgrass Pathology University of Tennessee Teaching Documentation.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Raouf Boules, Ph.D. January 17, DVMT 101- Developmental Mathematics (4 contact hours) DVMT Intermediate Algebra (3 contact hours)
Pedagogical Strategies to Strengthen Learning in Introductory STEM Courses Thomas Tretter (CEHD) & Christine Rich (A&S Chemistry) Partnership for Retention.
ADAPTED FROM: EPSTEIN, J. L., ET AL., (2002). SCHOOL, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS: YOUR HANDBOOK FOR ACTION, SECOND EDITION. Interactive Homework.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.
Rubric Design Faculty Development Workshop Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology & Biochemistry.
Technology-Enriched Learning Environments Faculty Development Workshop February 21, 2013 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology.
Research in Education Faculty Development Workshop March 8, 2013 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology & Biochemistry.
The role of course evals in faculty reviews: One perspective John Petraitis CAFE March 25, 2011.
Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom Peer Facilitator Workshop Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology & Biochemistry.
Evaluating Information on the Internet Faculty Development Workshop March 8, 2013 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology.
Interactive Notebooks and Portfolios What? Why? How?
Scientific Literacy: K-12 Benchmarks and Standards and You Faculty Development Workshop April 19, 2013 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department.
Standards of Good Practice For Teaching Online Christina Sax University of Maryland University College.
Cohort 9 Coach Meeting October 21 or October 23 Maplewood or Eagan
Teacher Professional Development When Using the SWH as Student-Oriented Teaching Approach Murat Gunel, Sozan Omar, Recai Akkus Center for Excellence in.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Teaching Students How to Take Exams and Evaluate Their Own Performance Faculty Development Workshop December 13, 2013 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional.
EGED: Elementary General Engineering & Design EGED III Overview.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio Jaclyn Mueller OCN750 Spring 2013.
Marchetta Atkins, Mathematics Instructor Alcorn State University Alcorn State, Mississippi College Algebra 16 sections Fall Semester Sections/Number.
School-Wide Rubrics An Overview. Our Expectations NEASC required for accreditation Developed by a 20+ member leadership team with representation of many.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Peer Instruction: Making Science Engaging Faculty Development Workshop September 4, 2012 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology.
WELCOME TO BUS 302 The Gateway Experience For more information visit:
SI, SLA, and YOU Your guide to CSU’s two new services for students.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Awareness of Gender Differences Creating a better Climate.
Educational Methods The bag of tricks Direct Instruction/Lecture ä Advantages ä Teacher controlled ä Many objectives can be mastered in a short amount.
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation’s Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM program within the Directorate for Education and.
Dissemination within and between Institutions Faculty Need to Change Workshops Team Structure Faculty Recognition and Rewards Abstract Faculty Institutes.
ED 557 August 6, Amount of homework should increase as students get older. Minimal parent involvement. Identify purpose of homework Provide.
INQUIRY-BASED LAB INSTRUCTION. In inquiry-based labs, students “engage in many of the same activities and thinking processes as scientists.” National.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Advanced Lab Topical Conference 2009 Session III: Curricular Roles for Advanced Labs Presented by: Gabe Spalding, Illinois Wesleyan University
KEEP CALM AND STUDY ON How are you doing?. HOW STRONG ARE YOUR STUDY SKILLS?  I set a positive mood for my studies, schedule a productive time to study,
Discussion Skills and Quality Questions Peer Facilitator Workshop Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology & Biochemistry.
Student Employment: Supervisor Training
Learn. Engage. Grow Student Affairs Professional Development Day 2017
Benchmarks of Quality (BOQ) Training
Teaching Assistant Orientation Lucas Bang Fall 2014
Measuring Teaching Practices
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Presentation transcript:

Converting Your Lab from Verification to Inquiry Faculty Development Workshop November 6, 2012 Donna L. Pattison, PhD Instructional Professor Department of Biology & Biochemistry

Cookbook Lab Guided Inquiry Open Inquiry Purpose: Advantages: Disadvantages:

Does it Work? Luckie et al (2004): 78% of comments from students in inquiry-based labs were positive vs 20% in traditional labs Myers and Burgess (2003): Students completing inquiry- based labs critiques and designed experiments better then those who did not Suits (2004) found SEM majors taught chemistry via inquiry scored higher in tests evaluating their ability to design, conduct, interpret, and report results for experiments Handbook of College Science Teaching (2006) NSTA Press. Chapter 21: Converting Your Lab from Verification to Inquiry by French and Russell

Things to Consider: 1)Building student lab skills and enthusiasm prior to implementation 2)Guiding students through the process 3)Resources and space 4)Time management 5)Evaluation 6)TA Training

The Project Flow Guided Exercises Independent Inquiry

Generating Enthusiasm for the Project Make it a competition

Guiding Students Through the Research Process I. Generate an idea to pursue a. Provide a few examples b. Homework: Generate ideas (3 possible research ideas per student) c. Small group discussion (professor, TA, lab group); chose 1 or 2 ideas to pursue II.Write a research protocol a.Team homework b.Protocol reviewed by professor and TA; returned with comments III. Open lab time: Supervision is the key! a.Regularly scheduled lab time cancelled b.Lab staffed by the teaching TAs during their regular class times c.Lab staffed by prep TAs during their regular hours d.Professor in lab as much as possible e.Previous undergraduates when possible

Resources and Space Space: Stake out territories (tape); pre-marking spaces eliminates territorial arguments Resources: 1)Clearly define limits on product use (example: each group gets 6 mls of protein ONLY). 2)Supervise any reagent mixing. Check calculations. 3)Limit projects to those that can be done with items students supply or common supplies stocked routinely in the lab. 4) Be sure supplies are well-stocked ahead of time.

Time Management 1)Limit the duration of the project. Help students chose projects that can reasonably be completed in the given block of time. 2)Remind students there are many of them and not so many instructors. 3)Help the students with time management a) Keep your expectations and theirs reasonable b) Remind them (and remember) they have other classes c) Review the time schedule for their project with them when reviewing their protocols

Evaluation 1)Student evaluation is rubric based 2)Includes points for creativity and effort a) Team feedback on the productivity of group members (filled out outside of class) b) If you’ve spent much time in the lab, you often know which groups put a lot of effort in and which did the minimum before they present