T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 1 Supplement to the Report on the Replenishment of the Multilateral Fund for the Period.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 HCFC Phase –out in Air Conditioning Sector Background, Challenges and Progress Sidi Menad SI AHMED 17 TH October 2012.
Advertisements

Workshop on ODS Bank Management (OEWG-30) Geneva, Switzerland Monday 14 June 2010 Timing, Size and Cost of ODS Bank Management Opportunities Paul Ashford.
T E A P a n d T O C s - A s s e s s m e n t , M O P - 20, D o h a 1 The TEAP and TOC 2010 Assessment Reports Timelines and issues that will be dealt.
Work and Activities of the Executive Committee Relating to the Establishment of a Special Funding Facility to Support ODS Destruction and the Achievement.
Decisions of the Parties Related to Essential Use Nominations (EUNs) Ozone Secretariat 6 July 2008 Bangkok.
HFC Phasedown Under the Montreal Protocol OZONACTION NETWORK FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN OCTOBER Mexico, D.F. Canada, Mexico and The United.
INTERNATIONAL SCENARIO HPMP APPROVALS AND TECHNOLOGY.
19 October 2009Atmosphere 2009 – Natural Refrigerants : A NEW DECADE OF CHANGES IN REFRIGERATION AND AC Lambert Kuijpers Technical University,
1 HFC demand Lambert Kuijpers TEAP co-chair Workshop on HFC Management Paris, 11 July 2014.
Current and Future HFC Demand
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Region and sector specific HFC scenarios and effects of MP proposals
1 Current and Future HFC Demand by Sectors Bella Maranion TEAP co-chair OEWG-35, Bangkok, 22 April 2015.
H F C M a n a g e m e n t W o r k s h o p, J u l y , P a r i sRoberto Peixoto - IMT Roberto A. Peixoto Maua Institute of Technology - IMT.
UNEP Ozone Secretariat Workshop on HFC management: technical issues Overview of HFC Market Sectors Presentation by Lambert Kuijpers, Ray Gluckman and Sukumar.
WMO UNEP INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE NATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORIES PROGRAMME WMO UNEP IPCC Good Practice Guidance Simon Eggleston Technical.
ROADMAP FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF HCFC PHASE-OUT IN INDIA OZONE CELL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS.
1 UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME HCFC PHASEOUT PROGRAM INTERDEPENDENCY A COMPLICATION IN HCFC PHASEOUT IN FOAMS.
Environmental Coordinating Unit Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources, Physical Planning and Fisheries.
1 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES TO CFCs AND HCFCs OZONE CELL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS.
Montreal Protocol Implementation in Sri Lanka- Current Situation and HCFC Phase out challenges Dr W L Sumathipala Senior Technical Advisor Ministry of.
Overview of the CFC MDI essential use process Prof Ashley Woodcock MD FRCP FMedSci University of Manchester.
Update on alternative technologies and international developments in the Polyurethane Foams Sector.
Overview of EU Regulations affecting the use of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases Tim G.A. Vink Director Regulatory Affairs, Compliance & QA Honeywell Fluorine.
1 POLICIES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR ODS PHASE-OUT OZONE CELL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS.
Presentation by UNDP Kasper Koefoed Portfolio Manager Montreal Protocol Unit - UNDP United Nations Development Programme.
Institutional Arrangements for HCFC Phase-out G.M.J.K Gunawardana G.M.J.K GunawardanaDirector Promotion, Environmental Education & National Ozone Unit.
INDIAN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE ON PHASE DOWN OF HFC S REFRIGERANT GAS MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (REGMA) INDO-US WORKSHOP ON HFCs 18 th February, 2011.
Financing POPs waste disposal Identifying resources for actions under the Stockholm Convention David Piper Task Manager (POPs enabling activities) UNEP.
Mahendra Senevirathne Project Coordinator National Ozone Unit Sri Lanka 17 September
36th OEWG UNEP SIDE EVENT 22 J u l y , P a r i sRoberto Peixoto - IMT Roberto A. Peixoto Maua Institute of Technology – IMT Brazil Disclaimer: The.
Availability of Low-GWP Alternatives Options for Near Term & Longer Term Transitions OZONACTION NETWORK FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN OCTOBER 6-8.
INDIA HCFC Production Sector: Key Issues
Modelling Long Term Hydrofluorocarbon Emissions Contribution to India's Global Warming Impact Mohit Sharma Junior Research Associate Council on Energy,
Some background to letter from Exec. Secretary of Montreal Protocol Christiana Figueres March 2007.
HCFC management and strategy in Hungary and Europe Róbert Tóth Ministry of Environment and Water Budapest, Hungary.
Using Montreal Protocol to Protect the Climate Kristen N. Taddonio U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Stephen O. Andersen Co-Chair, Technology & Economic.
The new EU F-Gas Rules and their impact in Europe and globally By Andrea Voigt, EPEE Workshop on Hydrofluorocarbon Management Bangkok – 20 & 21 April 2015.
M o n t r e a l P r o t o c o l O E W G m e e t i n g, J u l y , P a r i s 1 TEAP Replenishment Task Force Report Assessment of.
UNEP DTIE OzonAction Branch Compliance Assistance Programme HPMP issues Jim Curlin UNEP DTIE OzonAction Programme Annual Joint Meeting of the OzonAction.
1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT European Climate Change Programme: legislative action fluorinated gases Phil Callaghan European Commission DG.
1 Addressing HFC Consumption Under the Montreal Protocol Dr. John E. Thompson Deputy Director Office of Environmental Policy U.S. Department of State.
INDIA HPMP STAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOP OCTOBER 2011, NEW DELHI HPMP OVERARCHING STRATEGY.
UNFCCC secretariat Ruta Bubniene, Programme officer, Reporting and Review unit, Mitigation and Data Analysis programme Overview of the synthesis report.
Review of decisions of the 64th meeting of the Executive Committee of the Multilateral Fund Presentation by the Fund Secretariat Main Meeting of the National.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Maximising the climate benefits of the HCFC phase-out European Commission 36th OEWG, Paris, 20 July 2015 Lunch time Meeting: The EU amendment proposal:
1May 14, 2014 Uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
1 OZONE CELL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS INDIA’S PERSPECTIVE ON PHASE DOWN OF HYDROFLUOROCARBONS (HFCs) UNDER THE AMBIT OF VIENNA.
Overview of current and projected atmospheric HFC abundances A.R. Ravishankara On behalf of co-Chairs of SAP Ayité-Lo Ajavon Paul Newman John Pyle A.R.
M o n t r e a l P r o t o c o l M O P - 2 6, N o v e m b e r , P a r i s 1 TEAP XXV/8 Task Force Report SUPPLEMENT to the Assessment of.
Update on decisions from the 62 nd Meeting of the Executive Committee with special reference to decisions regarding HCFC phase-out for LVC countries A.
The information contained in this report largely derives from the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2014 From CFCs to HCFCs to HFCs World Meteorological.
T E A P, R e p l e n i s h m e n t T F, P r e s e n t a t i o n a t O E W G TEAP Replenishment Task Force Report Assessment of the Funding Requirement.
John E. Thompson Deputy Director Office of Environmental Quality U.S. Department of State.
HPMP PREPARATION EXCOM POLICY AND ELIGIBILITY ISSUES AND INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS.
1 Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer/Montreal Protocol: lessons learned from the phase-out of ozone-depleting substances process and.
Update on HPMP preparation Art. 5 and CEIT ECA Network meeting - May 18-22, 2009 Yerevan, Armenia.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
INTRODUCTION TO THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL Liana Ghahramanyan NOU of Armenia October 2009 Budapest, Hungary.
Decisions of the 46 th to 48 th Meetings of the Executive Committee A presentation at the Meeting of the Regional Network in Europe and Central Asia Stephan.
Seite MOP and ExCom Decisions on HCFCs Paul Krajnik Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Chemicals Policy.
Opportunities to Leapfrog High-GWP HFCs when Phasing out HCFCs
TEAP XXV/8 Task Force Report
Overview of Technical and Policy Challenges in meeting 2020 phase-out targets Annual 2017 Network Meeting of National Ozone officers of South Asia Countries.
ON ALTERNATIVES TO HCFC-141b IN PU FOAM MANUFACTURING SECTOR
CHALLENGES IN MEETING 2020 HCFC PHASE OUT TARGETS
Introduction to HPMP.
South Asia Ozone Officers Network Meeting
Surveys on ODS alternatives
Presentation transcript:

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 1 Supplement to the Report on the Replenishment of the Multilateral Fund for the Period (and beyond) TEAP - Replenishment Task Force

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 2 Funding requirement summary The total funding requirement for the triennium is likely to be in the range of US $339 to US $630 million If based on two HCFC consumption funding and two cost effectiveness scenarios for all Article 5 Parties This is a slight (updated) change compared to the values published May 2008, and does not take into account the possible impact of various parameters investigated

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 3 Two reports published in 2008 This presentation is a summary of the results published in The Supplement to the Assessment report, October 2008 which report contains some more detailed investigations of various aspects dealt with in the report The Assessment of the Funding requirement for the Multilateral Fund for the period , May 2008

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 4 Decision XIX/10 Mentions for the study: “…while taking further into account: The need to allocate resources…. Maintain compliance Rules and guidelines by the Executive Committee Financial commitments in Approved country programmes The provision of funds for accelerating phase-out and maintaining momentum… Experience to date The impact of the international market on supply and demand………”

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 5 Decision XIX/6 Decision XIX/10 is related to XIX/6, which mentions specifically: To agree that the funding available through the Multilateral Fund in the upcoming replenishments shall be stable and sufficient to meet all agreed incremental costs to enable….. To agree that the Executive Committee …. give priority to cost effective projects and programmes which focus on, inter alia: Phasing out first HCFCs with higher ODP,....national circumstances Substitutes and alternatives that minimize other impacts on the environment, including on the climate…GWP, energy use and other..

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 6 Additional requests at OEWG Bangkok Additional requests were made for study at OEWG-28: Destruction Inflation Institutional Strengthening Cut-off dates and impact of second conversion funding Cost effectiveness factor composition Climate benefits Other issues, exports and multinational rule Demonstration projects Risk analysis in case of high growth through 2012

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 7 Additional requests at OEWG Bangkok TEAP considered all elements requested for further study regarding their impact on the funding requirement; this with a focus on the next triennium In the case of the investigation of cut off dates and the funding of second conversions the impact on the funding requirement during the three trienniums was considered

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 8 Destruction (1) The Montreal Protocol has not yet financed emissions reduction measures Funding of destruction - disposal needs to be considered in the triennium , because the banks of unwanted CFCs and halons will largely “leak” away soon Certain sources report 9-12,000 (metric) tonnes as available for destruction in 2008 ExCom 48/42 report indicates 1500 tonnes available every year Impossible to accurately estimate the amounts concerned Costs mentioned (US $6/kg) not related to carbon credits

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 9 Destruction (2) Destruction activities were estimated to cost US $27 million; this estimate was based upon assumptions for quantities and the cost for the destruction (including logistics) (a quantity of 4500 tonnes was assumed for 3 years) Further investigation was done on the basis of (28) submissions of quantities by Article 5 Parties On the basis of the submissions extrapolations were made, the estimate could not be refined; it has been assumed that the amount of US $27 million will still be enough to cover all possible destruction costs in the next triennium

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 10 Funding requirement (non-HCFC) ODS consumption (NPP, TPMPs) (MDIs)45.0 million CTC, process agents 6.4 million MB consumption13.2 million Production phase-out (CFC, MB, accelerated)19.1 million Destruction27.0 million Supporting activities (CAP, IS, Treasurer, Core, MLFS, ExCom) 92.0 million TOTAL million

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 11 HCFCs in Article 5 Parties before 2007 HCFC consumption considered in four Groups: (1) very large (China), consumption > 12,000 ODP tonnes (2) larger size (17 Parties), consumption ODP tonnes (3) smaller size (34 Parties), and consumption ODP tonnes (4) small (83 Parties) consumption < 6 ODP tonnes

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 12 HCFCs in Article 5 Parties before 2007 Small size Article 5 Parties have only HCFC-22 servicing consumption Total China HCFC consumption was 17,000 ODP tonnes in totals for Groups 2/3/4: Group ODP t Group ODP t Group ODP t Total Article 5 HCFC consumption in 2006 was larger than 300,000 metric tonnes (± 25,000 ODP tonnes)

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 13 HCFC Article 5 Consumption (ODP t)

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 14 Baseline or 2012 funding In case only baseline funding is assumed, there will be no funding needed to achieve the 2013 freeze For the 10% reduction , funding needs to start in when the baseline has not yet been established In case of funding the 2012 consumption level, funding needs to start in the year 2009; 2012 consumption will not be known at that stage; question is how realistic this will be The eventual funding requirement will be “somewhere in between” (the two funding scenarios)

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 15 Inflation Parties requested TEAP to look at the impact of inflation Task Force determined the elements subject to inflation agreed projects cannot be inflated new projects estimated can be subject to inflation; this includes all new activities (non-HCFC and HCFC) supporting activities not corrected for inflation; some already have an annual adjustment mechanism No references for global inflation numbers, normally split for developed and developing (emerging) economies Conclusion: funding would increase by US $4-9 million per % inflation dependent on which HCFC funding scenario

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 16 Servicing for HCFCs Servicing important for all Article 5 countries for achieving compliance, but particularly for small consuming Parties Cost estimates have been made for addressing servicing (using the MLF experience in funding RMPs, NPPs, TPMPs, via set-up of legal and technical frameworks, R&R etc.); in cost estimate several IS components implicitly considered Cost estimates made on the basis of HCFC consumption Funding of the servicing (HCFC-22) sector is considered for all Article 5 Parties US $63 million assumed to be required for the triennium to realise the first 10% reduction level in 2015

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 17 Institutional Strengthening Parties requested TEAP to study IS funding scenarios considering the needs likely to be encountered in The Panel reviewed the body of the work by the ExCom, as well as cases made by some Parties It is difficult to find good arguments to justify either a level of decrease or increase in IS funding Funding suggested for HCFC servicing includes elements that are normally included as IS (at US $13.3 million) May 08 funding scenario could be seen as an implicit IS funding increase, even if direct IS funding is kept constant

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 18 Cut-off dates (1) The Multilateral Fund has a cut-off date of July 1995 for ODS (CFCs, halons etc.); capacities built after that date are non-eligible This is valid for both production and manufacturing (consumption facilities) In the Supplement Report the production has not been considered, because the May 2008 report assumes that production phase-out funding will not apply to the replenishment

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 19 Cut-off dates (2) Cut-off dates for HCFCs considered in the Supplement report : 2000, 2004, 2007 (past); 2010 (future) has been requested but was not really considered since no differences with 2007 are expected The eligible HCFC consumption is smaller the further the cut-off date is in the past (with HCFC consumption increasing after cut-off) HCFC consumption consists of foams, refrigeration and AC, of which the latter has a large servicing component One would expect the funding to decrease with earlier cut- off dates, and smaller consumption levels

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 20 HCFC Consumption China

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 21 HCFC Consumption Group 2 Parties

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 22 HCFC Consumption Group 3 Parties

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 23 Cut-off dates (3) The major assumption in calculating the funding requirement dependent on the cut-off date is that the Multilateral Fund will fund all consumption for compliance A cut-off date of 2007 has a majority of reductions in the (HCFC-141b) foam sector; with earlier cut-off dates the eligible foam consumption decreases In case of earlier cut-off dates, more reductions have to be found in the eligible (more expensive) R/AC sub-sector Compared to 2007 funding for 2000 cut-off is higher: US $16 million - 0 years IOC, US$ 115 million - 2 years IOC

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 24 Cut-off dates (4) Early cut-off dates have their impacts on the funding for the first but also for the subsequent trienniums The impact on the funding depends on the consumption pattern of Parties (or Groups of Parties) in the cut-off year Several Parties may have no difficulty identifying eligible consumption for up to 30% of HCFC consumption reduction Other Parties may have already difficulties to find enough eligible consumption to be used for the funding of reductions in the second or the third triennium ( ) In the long term, early cut-off dates: lower funding, but…..

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 25 Second conversions (1) Second conversions (conversions of equipment that already was converted from CFC-11 to HCFC-141b -- with Multilateral Fund assistance) can be funded at a chosen level incorporating Capital costs Operating costs Technical assistance costs, or any combination thereof The percentage of second conversions (related to the cut-off date) can be determined from MLF Project Completion Reports and from UNEP Article 7 data It is difficult to derive consistent data sets; reporting deficiencies in -141b may be related to pre-blended polyols

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 26 Second conversions (2) Two scenarios can be considered for the funding of second conversions (to the mix of alternatives mentioned): (1) Second conversions gradually (2) Second conversions first (no other conversions) Reality will be “in the middle” and will depend on a Party’s choice in a HPMP to be developed TEAP Task Force has calculated a large number of cases for the next trienniums For , funding requirement may be decreased by (1) US $5-10 million (2) US $25-50 million

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 27 Cost effectiveness factors (1) Foams (both HCFC-141b and -142b) 2006 HCFC consumption take as starting point Plants of sizes 5, 25 and 75 tonnes were distributed over all relevant Article 5 Parties, leading to an estimate of the total number of plants Different alternatives were assumed in different size plants (HFC-245fa-mixes, methyl formate, water blown, and hydrocarbons (40% share)) with each the specific capital and operating costs (IOC) Using the total consumption in all plants, cost effective- ness with and without IOC can be determined per kg

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 28 Cost effectiveness factors (2) Refrigeration and AC (HCFC-22) Split room air conditioning and commercial ducted AC For split units HFCs (both R-410A and R-407C) and propane considered; for commercial ducted AC only HFCs Based on 80% split and 20% ducted systems --and equal shares of all alternatives--, cost effectiveness factors (based on capital costs and operating costs) were determined For commercial refrigeration R-404A and HFC-134a considered with a larger part of the conversions to HFC- 134a; based on this, cost effectiveness factors determined R/AC CE factors based on 2/3 AC, 1/3 comm. refrigeration

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 29 Climate benefits (1) A number of scenarios have been elaborated upon: the Replenishment Scenario, the current pragmatic approach with some implicit climate considerations the Baseline Scenario (least cost solutions only) the Functional Unit Scenario, where climate benefits are maximised allowing additional funding according to a cost-effective limit based climate criteria (i.e. $/tonne CO 2 saved) the Technical Potential Scenario, aimed at maximising climate benefit on the basis of technical options irrespective of the costs associated with those options

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 30 Climate benefits (2) TEAP Response to XVIII/12 Report provided a comprehensive overview of technology options for the HCFC phase-out both by sector and sub-sector Most significant development since 2007 is the emergence of low GWP HFC (HFO) options for both refrigeration and foam blowing At present the scope of applications is unclear It reminds Parties that the technological landscape is continuously changing and these changes need to be factored into future transition strategies (reducing leakage, while postponing transition in R/AC ?)

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 31 Climate benefits (3) The TEAP response to the request for climate (cost-related) considerations has been targeted at identifying methods for evaluating costs and benefits It is still premature to make reliable cost abatement curves in a rapidly changing technological landscape Timing of transitions will also impact potential climate gains It needs to be mentioned in this context that: Priorities under XIX/6 will be set first by ozone compliance Every transition should be fully evaluated for climate impact More innovative funding mechanisms are emerging but these need to be governed by appropriate methodologies Potential climate benefit will depend on choices under the MLF

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 32 Exports and multinational ownership The original TEAP report considered 20% exports in the determination of the cost effectiveness factor for refrigeration and AC; this was done on a global basis Exports could be larger; no reliable information available Each 10% more yields a reduction of US $6 million (IOC 2Y) Especially the multinational component in foam enterprises was not considered in the May 2008 report This may introduce an extra US $6 million reduction in the funding requirement for per 10% “multinational” This issue can be further dealt once HPMP info is known

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 33 Demonstration projects TEAP was requested to reconsider the funding for demonstration projects; Parties mentioned that these projects normally contribute to compliance and should therefore be considered under “non-servicing HCFC” TEAP and its RTF believe that demo-projects are needed and will be twice as expensive as normal projects The US $5.4 million (May 2008 report) was therefore split into two equal parts, one specifically for the demonstration aspect and one part brought to normal HCFC projects This will slightly reduce the funding requirement for the triennium

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 34 China resubmission of (2005)-06 data UNEP originally considered the Chinese (2005) 2006 HCFC data without export and import data for specific HCFC chemicals (due to transmission or interpretation problem) This resulted in incorrect values for the net consumption of the different HCFCs; May 08 report based on these values China resubmitted data for production, im- and exports This resulted in slightly lower estimates for the baseline of HCFC-141b and -142b, higher estimates for HCFC-22 The impact on the HCFC funding (for China) is a decrease of about 3%; the change has been considered for both funding scenarios in the Supplement report

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 35 Funding requirement (US $million) ODS (non HCFC cons.) 83.7 Destruction27 Supporting activities92 HCFCs (baseline funding) (2012 funding) HPMP preparation 3.9 HCFC demo-projects2.7 HCFC, servicing63 HCFC, non-servicing (CE var.) TOTAL

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 36 Summary Estimated funding requirement For : US $ million Indicative funding requirements For : US $ million For : US $ million (the last two trienniums include production phase-out)

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 37 High growth until 2012; risk analysis (1) TEAP had extrapolated the growth for the period and used decrease in growth during % growth mentioned for by Group 1 Party at OEWG Bangkok; Parties requested a risk analysis by TEAP : 5% reduction in total consumption per year Servicing will be about 1% of this 5%; efforts for reductions will start after the approvals of HPMPs (even when baseline can only be estimated), incl. service plans If, as of 2010, 9% growth will occur, the 2012 consumption will be 25% higher than the baseline

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 38 High growth until 2012; risk analysis (2) Approvals occur based on baseline consumption; this can be estimated in 2010, but will not be known until end 2011 It implies that a 5-7 times higher reduction has to be realised in one year (2012/2013) compared to the strict reduction from the baseline in 2013 Independent of the consumption which will occur in 2012, approvals have to be done in 2009 (implementation delay) when baseline and 2012 consumption are not yet known Phasing out amounts in the order of 25% of the baseline (versus 5% in 2013) implies an enormous increase in workload for all entities involved

T E A P R T F S u p p l e m e n t R e p o r t, M O P - 2 0, D o h a 39 High growth until 2012; risk analysis (3) This in particular if the 25% reduction applies to the largest consuming Party, and could well be 80,000 tonnes This will directly impact the funding requirement to be agreed upon at MOP-20, which would then even be larger than following the “high” 2012 funding scenario The risk that this reduction cannot be addressed via projects in time to reach the 2013 freeze level (even when sufficient funding would theoretically be available) is very probable, is likely to result in non-compliance in 2013, and could continue for much more than one year