Helping Our Clients Identify and Measure Outcomes Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant ESC Brown Bag # 2, April 17 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Explanation of slide: Logos, to show while the audience arrive.
Advertisements

Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Goals, Outcomes and Program Evaluation Community Memorial Foundation March 5, 2014.
Fundamentals of Foundation Grant Research and Writing Linda Holliday, Vice President for Organizational Development.
Basic Logic Model Workshop Dawn Martz Senior Program Officer, Foellinger Foundation Mike Stone Evaluation Consultant, Impact Strategies, Inc. Community.
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Kathy Keeley Northland Foundation Strengthening Communities April 14, 2011 Writing Result Measures and Program Evaluation.
Chapter 6 Funding the Program ©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Budgeting for Results Outcomes Based Budgeting
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
Action Writing Action Statements Writing action statements is the first step in the second (action) stage of the public health nutrition (PHN) intervention.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
Key Terms for Monitoring and Evaluation. Objectives Explain the difference between monitoring and evaluation. Introduce the most common M&E terms. Review.
+ Monitoring, Learning & Evaluation Questions or problems during the webinar?
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TRAINING Logic Models OBJECTIVES FOR TODAY: n Recognize and understand components of a logic model n Learn how to create a logic.
TOOLS FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS Goals and Objectives.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Logic Model Workshop Community Interests Dawn Martz, Foellinger Foundation Mike Stone, Evaluation Consultant December 2013.
LOGIC MODELS AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENT United Way Community Investment Process Training.
Molly Chamberlin, Ph.D. Indiana Youth Institute
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Logic Models Ron Hale Office of Health Promotion & Community Health Improvement April 7, 2008 Las Vegas, NM.
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. By the end of the session you will be able to help your nonprofit clients:  develop and begin to use a logic model,
Focusing on Issues and Strategies for RESULTS United Way of America.
OKLAHOMA QUALITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INTERIM TRAINING Marlene Mason MCPP Healthcare Consulting, Inc. October 28, 2010.
Nine steps of a good project planning
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. III. Recommendations for Applying Outcomes Planning to ESC  I. Introduction to Outcomes Planning II. A Sample ESC.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Ionia County Great Start Collaborative Strategic Planning Reviewing trends from new information & data Setting Priorities for Goals & Strategies.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!
The Evaluation Plan.
Health Planning and Implementation in post-conflict Afghanistan by Laurence Laumonier-Ickx, MD November 8, 2006.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
The Logic Model An Introduction. Slide 2 Innovation Network, Inc. Who We Are National nonprofit organization Committed to evaluation as a tool for empowerment.
Measure What Matters Karen MacDonald, BGCA Midwest Leadership Conference October 16, 2009.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
Return on Investment An Introduction to Establishing Value and Using ROI for Managing and Marketing Jane M. Conroy.
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
GET READY 1 Task 1: Assemble and Orient an Outcome Measurement Workgroup Workgroup: Task 3: Develop Timeline Task 4: Distribute your game plan to Key Players.
1 CIL-NET, a project of ILRU – Independent Living Research Utilization CIL-NET Presents… 1 Outcome Measures for CILs A National Onsite Training Pulling.
Strategic Planning Crossing the ICT Bridge Project Trainers: Lynne Gibb Sally Dusting-Laird.
1 An introductory workshop for new governors 2005 Becoming a governor.
PowerParent Amanda Krato Sheila Mahaney Jessica Ruthig Diana Van Rhee.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Using Logic Models to Create Effective Programs
TCRF Strategic Planning Process A Stakeholders’ Consultative Retreat- Morogoro 26 th -27 April 2013.
Outcome-based Planning and Evaluation Gloria Latimer, Ed.S, Director of Community Programs Jason Vahling, M.P.H., Community Program Specialist.
Getting to Outcomes: How to do strategic planning with your CRP Theresa Costello National Resource Center for Child Protective Services May 25, 2007.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Homeless Management Information Systems The Calgary HMIS - A joint initiative between the CHF and the Homeless Serving Sector in Calgary Date: April 21,
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
GETTING 100% BUY-IN FOR YOUR NONPROFIT TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION Presenter: Kathryn Engelhardt-Cronk Founder/CEO/President Community TechKnowledge, Inc.
Dr. Anubha Rajesh, Early Education Services, ICF January 13, 2016 Invest in Young Children: National Conference on Mother- tongue Based Multilingual Early.
ADRCs Do What? Using Logic Models to Document and Improve ADRC Outcomes Glenn M. Landers.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Module 2 Basic Concepts.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
MANAGEMENT, STAFF, NATIONAL COALITION, FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
MANAGEMENT, STAFF, NATIONAL COALITION, FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
monitoring & evaluation THD Unit, Stop TB department WHO Geneva
Assessment of Service Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Helping Our Clients Identify and Measure Outcomes Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant ESC Brown Bag # 2, April

Introduction By the end of this session: Define outcomes Differentiate outcomes from outputs Define the logic model Describe several uses of a logic model Develop a logic model Define “indicators” Develop a logical framework

Impact You will love or at least tolerate outcome- based planning You will be able to discuss outcomes based planning, monitoring and evaluation with your ESC clients

What is an outcome Outcomes are benefits or changes for individuals or populations during or after participating in a program:

Outcomes Often expressed as verbs in past tense – Improved (nutrition, morale) – Increased (in employment) – Reduced (HIV transmission) – Enhanced (knowledge) – Maintained (vaccination coverage)

Outcomes  Reduced smoking among teenagers  Changed attitudes towards smoking (by non-smoking teenagers  School readiness among children attending preschool program

Other examples  Improved board performance after an ESC engagement  Improved strategic focus after an ESC engagement  Employment after attending a dress-for- success program

Improving the Delivery of Prenatal Care and Outcomes of Pregnancy: A Randomized Trial of Nurse Home Visitation

Outcomes of Nurse Visit Program Became aware of more community services Attended birth classes more frequently Made more extensive use of the nutrition supplementation program for women, infants and children Made greater dietary improvements,

Outcomes of Nurse Visit Program Reported that their babies’ fathers became more interested in their pregnancies Were accompanied to the hospital by a support person during labor more frequently Reported talking more frequently to family members, friends and service providers about their pregnancies and personal problems Had fewer kidney problems

Outcome Indicators Outcomes sometimes confused with outcome indicators – Outcome - girls participating in a training program obtain formal employment – Outcome indicators – the # and % of participants employed within 3 months of completing the program

Importance of Focusing on Outcomes Outcomes are what matter to stakeholders Focusing on outcomes promotes accountability Government, and funders demanding real tangible results on the ground Measuring outcomes helps us know if we are we really getting value for our money

Outcomes help us Strengthen existing services Target effective services for expansion Identify staff and training needs Develop and justify budgets Prepare long-range plans Focus board on programmatic issues

Funder Asked ESC the Following: What are your measurable outcomes, i.e. number of communities impacted, number of children served? Mark each category that applies to your grant measures. Increased visibility/awareness of issue Effected policy change Engaged constituents & beneficiaries and participation Increased resources for issue Educated constituents Improved condition/ quality of life in community Influenced stakeholders

Outcomes vs. Outputs Outcomes are the results Outputs are the tangible products produced by an intervention – Usually expressed as nouns – Can be counted

Outputs Classes taught Brochures distributed Clients served Contracts completed Board retreats completed Strategic plans prepared

Many Nonprofits Report Outputs Rather than Outcomes Main Street Homeless Shelter provided 2,903 nights of safe shelter for 173 men. 23,661 hot, nutritious meals were served at the Maple Avenue Kitchen. 100 residents received free health care and 168 residents received free mental health care.

What Wrong with Using Outputs Mosquito bed nets might be used for wedding dresses or fishing nets Loans repaid might not mean income generated Job training might not lead to jobs

So Why Don’t We Focus on Outcomes Outputs are tangible Outcomes are intangible Its easier to count tangibles than to describe intangibles Outcomes take longer to produce Measuring outcomes is challenging Measuring outcomes can be expensive and time consuming

But Tracking Outcomes will Not…… Explain why an outcome is or is not being achieved – Still need to track inputs, activities, outputs Prove that the outcome is the result of your program

Outcome Model Logic Model Inputs Processes Outputs Outcomes Impact

Logic Model Definitions Inputs are the resources required to undertake activities Activities (or processes) are what the agency, program or strategy does to fulfill its mission Outputs – tangible products Outcomes – changes, benefits Impact - a longer-term outcome

Inputs Processes Outputs Short-term Outcomes M edium- term Outcome Money Staff time Facilities Equipment Laws Regulations Funders requirements Educate consumers Educate providers Distribute vaccines Establish data base Establish reminder systems Monitor Coverage Brochures Vaccine supplies Doses of vaccines delivered Data bases established Providers monitoring Parents aware of vaccine benefits Provider awareness Changed attitudes Children immu nized Reduced incidence of HPV Reduced number of girls who are infected with HPM Long-term Reduced incidence of cervical cancer Reduced mortality for cervical cancer A logic model for a program to distribute HPV Vaccine Impact Reduced premature death

InputsActivities Outcomes Outputs Impact It is important to note the broad environmental context of the intervention: Political environment Macroeconomic picture Political environment Other “players” in field Political environment Public attitudes Environment Policy context Source: Imas and Rist (2009)

How can we use the logic model ESC Project planning Strategic Planning Program Monitoring Program Evaluation

Inputs Processes Outputs Short-term Outcomes Medium- term Outcome Staff time CRM Time Lead time Consultant time Materials Car and gasoline Knowledge Experience Place to meet Contracting Analysis Study Meetings w client Meetings with stakeholders Consultant meetings Progress reports Draft report Final report Board presentation ?? Impact ? Logic model for an ESC Engagement Deliverables

Inputs Process Outputs Short-term Outcomes Medium-term Outcome Strategic Plan Approved Impact Example of a logic model for an ESC Strategic Planning Engagement Strategic Plan in regular Use Longer- term Outcome Strategic Plan improves agency performance Community benefits from agency’s improved performance

Inputs Programs Output s Short-term Outcomes Money Staff time Facilities Equipment Laws Regulations Funders requirements Program A Impact Non-profit Logic Model Program B Program C Program D Output A Output C Output B Output D Outcome 1 Outcome 2 Outcome 3

Outcome 1: Improved Financial Position Outcome 5: New Training Program Developed Outcome 2: New Facility Developed Outcome 3: Strengthened Volunteer force Outcome 4: Improved Public Recognition Improved Ability to Fulfill Mission

Outcome 1: Improved Financial Position Improved Ability to Fulfill Mission Strategy 1: Capital Campaign Completed Strategy 2: Increased donor base Strategy 3: Client Fees Increased

Indicators Measure the quantity or quality of the outcome

Indicators Outcome: Participants in a job training program obtain a job in a timely manner # (%) of participants employed within 6 weeks # (%) of participants still employed 3 months after completing the program

Indicators Outcome: Homeless people obtain secure housing # (%) of homeless moved into temporary quarters and stayed for 6 weeks # (%) of homeless who obtained a job and were still employed after 3 months

Indicators Targets # (%) of participants employed within 6 weeks # (%) of participants still employed 3 months after completing the program 60% of participants will gain employment within 6 weeks 95% of participants who obtained employment will still be employed in 3 months

Logical Framework ComponentIndicatorBaselineTarget Outcome Output Program/ Activity/ Process Input

1. Choose the Outcomes to Measure 2. Specify the Indicators for the Outcomes 3. Prepare to collect data on the Indicators 4. Try out the Measurement System 5. Analyze and Report Findings 6. Improve the System What Can Our Clients Do to Measure Outcomes 7. Use the Findings

Two Great Resources Measuring Outcomes, A Practical Approach, The United Way Foundation Logic Model Development Guide, WK Kellogg Foundation

Thank you for participating in ESC Brownbag No. 2. Look for more Brownbags to come