PFMRP Phase IV Brief Overview  PEFA, other diagnostic reports along with the CAG and PAC reports provided the frame of reference for development of PHASE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC, May 1, 2008 Bill Dorotinsky IMF.
Advertisements

Governance for REDD+ Crystal Davis Governance of Forests Initiative World Resources Institute REDD Civil Society Coordination Seminar CIFOR campus, Bogor.
Project Overview 2010 Programme FA: 14 June 2007 Start: 2 Sept 2007 Completion: 31 June 2011 Budget: €10,155,000 (EU), €155,000 (National)
Presentation by Ms. Siona Koti DAD Community of Practice, Yerevan, Armenia June 2011 DAD Solomon Islands: Channelling Donor Resources to the Country’s.
Development Cooperation Framework DPG Main, 4 th March
Module 5.3 Measuring the performance of PFM systems.
Liberia – Duke University Program PFM reform strategy Duncan Last Public Financial Management Division March 4, 2011.
Resource Allocation in Canada Evaluation, Accountability and Control Brian Pagan Expenditure Operations and Estimates Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
What has changed in 5 years ? Strengthening Accountability to Achieve the Health MDGs Nairobi, 12 th December 2012 Overview of progress in implementing.
Public Financial Accountability at the Local Level : The role of PFM in Service Delivery and Accountability Rama Krishnan, Senior Financial Management.
MAF’s M & E System Development Achievements and Ways Forward SWG-ARD, September 30, 2014 DoPC, MAF By: Somphathay Liengsone Deputy Director of Project.
PEFA Performance Measurement Framework A Tool For Budget Reforms THE GEORGIA EXPERIENCE.
The Issues of Budgetary Reform Unit 3. PFM Reform – Change Management Module 3.2. Preparing and managing a reform programme.
Tanzania: PEFAR 2008 Building PFM systems and Reducing Fiduciary Risk Presentation to the General Budget Support Annual Review 2008 Ubungo Plaza, Dar es.
1 Action Planning to Address Corruption in Water Supply and Sanitation (WSS) Dr. Donal O’Leary Senior Advisor, TI Secretariat.
MKUKUTA/PER Consultations 2007 DPG session MKUKUTA/PEFAR 22 May.
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach PEM reforms in PRSP countries from Europe and Central Asia Warsaw, February 6-9, 2005 David Biggs DFID.
1 “APPROACHES TO MAXIMIZE ACCOUNTABILITY,MINIMIZE RISKS, IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY AND REDUCE FRAUD” THE TANZANIAN EXPERIENCE.
Strengthening Financial Scrutiny Les Kojima Senior Financial Management Specialist The World Bank 53 rd Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference New Delhi.
EXPERIENCE SHARING ON LOCAL PFM & CURRENT REFORM INITIATIVES Babu Ram Shrestha, MOFALD.
Enhancing Aid Effectiveness-Joint Assistance Strategy DPG Orientation Seminar 12 September 2006.
1 BUDGET PREPARATION AND PROCESSES: Budget Division Ministry of Finance.
Slide 1 GAC HOB Training Course - Essentials of Budget execution Addis Ababa, June
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT (PFM) Module 1.1 Definitions, objectives of PFM and its context.
1 ANNUAL NATIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW MEDIUM TERM STRATEGY AND CROSS CLUSTER MTEF November 20, 2009.
1 Joint Donor Staff Training Activity Tanzania, June 2002 Partnership for Poverty Reduction Module 4 - Links between PRSP, Sector Programmes and.
Module 1.2 Introduction to the Budget Cycle
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms Applying the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington, D.C., January 17-18, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Supporting country institution building: reform successes and monitoring progress Odo Tevi Governor Reserve Bank of Vanuatu.
OBS / Broader PFM Reform in Myanmar :– Update from civil society perspective. David Allan, Spectrum -
Page 1 Budget Execution and Financial Accountability Course January 10-12, 2005 Country PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Nicola Smithers PEFA.
PUBLIC FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY – MULTI STAKEHOLDER APPROACHES
Aid Information Management Systems Progress and challenges with the Aid Management Platform 1.
Page 1 The PFM Performance Measurement Framework A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Workshop on Applying the PFM Performance Measurement.
Tanzania: Improving Public Financial Management – Central and Local Governments General Budget Support Annual Review Meeting November 25, 2009.
Financial Management Resource and Research Society November, 2014 Cash Management Reform The Way Forward in Central Government.
PFM reform – change management Module 3.2 Preparing and managing a PFM reform programme 1.
The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008.
TREASURY OF GEORGIA – MISSION AND FUNCTIONS Nino Tchelishvili June, 2016 Chisinau, Moldova.
PUBLIC FINANCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA: REFORMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY PLENARY SESSION OF THE TREASURY COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE JUNE 1-3, 2015, KISHINEV,
1 Public Finance Management Reform The Georgian Experience 2008 ICGFM Winter Conference December, 2008.
Kishinev 2016 MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN.
Good Financial Governance in Budget Preparation, Execution and Reporting Stakeholder Conference Tunisia 3 November 2010.
Improving public financial management. Supporting sustainable development. PEFA and fiscal transparency OECD CESEE SBO Ljubljana, Slovenia July 8, 2016.
Are Public Financial Management Reforms Yielding Results in the Region? Duncan Last Regional PFM Advisor for South East Europe Fiscal Affairs Department,
Treasury of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Country Level Programs
strengthening the elements of governance in Tajikistan
Introduction/Background Aim of the assessment was to assess the impact of the 3 institutions MOHCDGEC, PO-RALG and MOFP in the flow of funds from national.
Liberia: An Early Reformer Perspective
A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring
Basic PFM Training Program The World Bank Group
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
OF ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT TRANSACTIONS ACCOUNTING
ZAMBIA PEFA EXPERIENCE
Financial Management and Accountability
Somaliland PFM Reform Programme
Developments And Achievements In Implementing Public Internal Financial Control (PIFC) Reform In Armenia EDGAR MKRTCHYAN, PhD Chairman of Executive Committee.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Public Financial Management: Concept and Importance
Finding A Common Scale: An Overview of PFM Performance Indicators
Budget Management and Financial Accountability: Overview
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms
Public Sector Financial Accounting in the Kyrgyz Republic
PEFA Assessments - Analytics to Action
2018 National PEFA Assessment Budget Community of Practice of PEMPAL
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS BOARD
Presentation transcript:

PFMRP Phase IV Brief Overview  PEFA, other diagnostic reports along with the CAG and PAC reports provided the frame of reference for development of PHASE IV of PFM reform program.  The strategy and the supporting M&E framework has been organized under five KEY RESULTS AREAs each of which target specific PFM challenges and/or areas of weakness.  The M&E framework has been developed with milestones under each KRA that monitor the results produced.  DPs have organized their participation with DP leads established for each of the 5 KRAs. This is expected to enhance collaboration between DPs and GoT counter parts.

PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 1 Revenue Management  policy development, projection, collection and administration  Output 1.1: Improved quality of forecasting of fiscal aggregates for three years on a rolling basis  Output 1.2: The Government improves efficiency in domestic revenue mobilization both at the policy and the administration levels by updating legal instruments towards international best practices  Output 1.3: Strengthened capacity of local government authorities to collect revenue by 2015  Output 1.4: Increase of donor funding that flows through the exchequer system by 2016

KRA 1 Output 1.1

PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 2- Budgeting and Planning  capacity development and systems enhancements.  Output 2.1: Strengthened capacity of MDAs, RSs and LGAs in implementing program based budgeting by June  Output 2.2: Increased effective utilization of Planning and budgeting tools by 2016  Output 2.3: Strengthened capacity of LGAs for MTEF preparation by 2015

PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 3 Budget Execution, Accountability and Transparency  cash management, debt management, transition to full accrual accounting, fixed asset management, procurement policy, management, and financial reporting.  Output 3.1: Improved public procurement performance by PEs by 2015  Output 3.2: Strengthened public sector procurement by June 2015  Output 3.3: Strengthened capacity of MDAs, RSs and LGAs in Cash management by 2015  Output 3.4: Strengthened public debt management capacity by 2015  Output 3.5: Improved integrity and content of government financial statements and the migration from IPSAS cash to IPSAS accrual accounting for all government accounts is progressing in accordance with plans.  Output 3.6: Improved accountability in management of Government Assets for supporting migration to IPSAS Accrual

PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 4 Budget Control and Oversight.  Focus on Internal Audit Department, PPRA, CAG / NAO and the TRA.  Output 4.1: Increased coverage and quality of the internal audit functions by 2016  Output 4.2: Strengthened External audit functions by 2016  Output 4.3: Improved transparency on audit reports (central, local and parastatal levels) to strengthen scrutiny and accountability.  Output 4.4: Improved performance of parastatals by June  Output 4.5: Strengthened capacity of oversight functions of Parliamentary Accounts Committee in Tanzania Mainland

PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 5 Change Management  Utilization and Coordination of ICT systems, improved access to public information, management capacity, coordination and collaboration between PFM actors.  Output 5.1: Coordinate Integration, interfacing and rationalization of Government financial systems.  Output 5.2: Utilization of EPICOR modules Increased from seven to ten  Output 5.3: All software development and module upgrades are coordinated with the overarching plans for ICT integration.  Output 5.4: Improved communication and public access to key fiscal information to stakeholders  Output 5.5: Coordination and Standardization of PFM Training Achieved.  Output 5.6: PFMRP component Managers are being guided by detailed multi-year operating plans.

PFMRP Phase IV Key Results Areas  KRA 5 Change Management  Utilization and Coordination of ICT systems, improved access to public information, management capacity, coordination and collaboration between PFM actors.  Output 5.7: PFM activities are effectively planned and implemented  Output 5.8: Effective coordination of activities and support provided to the program implementers  Output 5.9: PFM Program oversight and review is being guided by clearly defined Milestones derived from an agreed M&E framework,  Output 5.10: All major PFM reforms have been coordinated with and informed by the relevant government and DP stakeholder groups  Output 5.11: PFMRP implemented efficiently and effectively through result based management approach.  Output 5.12: National systems and processes for intergovernmental transfers to LGAs Streamlined and rationalized

KRA 5 Output 1.1

PFMRP Phase IV Overview  High Impact Initiatives  Revenue forecasting and mobilization  ICT Systems integration with continued roll out of automation.  Transition to IPSAS Accrual Accounting.  Creation of an effective Debt Management Unit and Systems  Improved Government Cash Management Systems  Development of the Internal Auditor General Division and function at all levels of Gov’t  LGA Fund Flow architecture