Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Organizational Governance
A Health and Wellbeing Board for Leicestershire Cheryl Davenport Programme Director.
Building blocks for adopting Performance Budgeting in Canada Bruce Stacey – Executive Director Results Based Management Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada.
Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.
Joint Evaluation on Joint Programmes on Gender Equality in the UN System Executive Board Meeting June 2014 New York, NY Marco Segone Director, UN Women.
How to use this Presentation
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
World Bank Financial Management Sector September 2010.
Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking.
Child Safeguarding Standards
1 Professionalising Programme & Project Management Developing programme & project management capacities for UNDP and national counterparts External Briefing.
Representing Central Government in the South East Monday, 27 April 2015 Vivien Lines DCSF Safeguarding Adviser VCS Safeguarding Seminar 17 December 2009.
Strategy 2022: A Holistic View Tony Hayes International President ISACA © 2012, ISACA. All rights reserved.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Report of the Global Evaluation Advisory Committee (GEAC) Caroline Heider Chair, GEAC.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Disaster Law Programme Law and disaster risk reduction Sanne Boswijk Disaster Law Coordinator for MENA \Disasters and Law Consultation Kuwait, 11 June.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Management Response to the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function in UN Women in 2014.
Session 4: Good Governance: How SAIs influence Good Governance in Public Administration Zahira Ravat 27 & 28 May 2014.
Evaluation of OCHA’s Role in Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination Findings and Recommendations Seminar on Evaluation of UN Support for Conflict Affected.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
System-wide Action Plan for implementation of the CEB Policy on gender equality and the empowerment of women: briefing UN Women Coordination Division.
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
Capacity building activities of the OIE STDF WORKSHOP on Capacity Building Tools Geneva, 31 March 2008 Dr Sarah Kahn Director, International Trade Department.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
Principles and Practices For Nonprofit Excellence.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Page 1 Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Tourism Fundamentals of effective Internal Control 21 July 2010.
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
GHANA Developing CSA within the National Agriculture Sector Investment Plan while reinforcing inter-sectoral consistency: progress, bottlenecks and support.
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
Formative Evaluation of UNGEI Findings and Selected Recommendations Presentation to UNGEI GAC 14 February 2012.
June 5, Use of the district’s financial resources is key to the ongoing operations : Facilities Transportation Food Service Staff Development.
SECTOR-WIDE APPROACH – a Planning Tool for Samoa Ms. Makerita Luatimu – Tiotio (Public Administration Sector Coordinator) Mr. Talatalaga Matau – (ACEO:
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Strategic Plan th October Management and Governance “GeSCI’s corporate structures and management arrangements were appropriate for.
0 United Nations Capital Development Fund Summary of Strategic Partnership Between UNDP and UNCDF Moving Closer Together in the Context of the UNDP Strategic.
Operational Plan for UNAIDS Action Framework: Addressing Women, Girls, Gender Equality and HIV February 3, 2010.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT FOR POLICE SERVICE ACT 2 OF 2011 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE.
Corporate Evaluation Plan Joint informal Executive Board Meeting May 2014 New York, NY Marco Segone Director, UN Women independent Evaluation.
Divisional Chief Executives Supported by Divisional Risk Committees Executive Committee Group Chief Executive Group Functions Group Finance Director Group.
INTOSAI's Capacity Building Committee Annual Meeting High-level Update on the ‎INTOSAI's Strategic Planning Process By: H.E Mr. Osama Faquih Stockholm.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PAC, THE SAIS AND THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OFFICE IN IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY PROCESS PRESENTATION TO SADCOPAC.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
GENDER MAINSTREAMING AT THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE Presentation by the BUREAU FOR GENDER EQUALITY International Labour Office.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
2013 Report on the Evaluation Function of UN-Women Informal Executive Board Meeting June 2014 New York, NY Marco Segone Director, UN Women independent.
1.1.Recovery strategic planning capacities are strengthened. 1.2.Local capacity for ER planning and implementation strengthened in areas of expertise where.
Expanded “Delivering as one” funding window for achievement of MDGs Francesco Galtieri UN Development Operations Coordination Office (DOCO), New York JPO.
The process of building a national eHealth strategy for Ukraine “ How do we get to where we want to be?” Clayton Hamilton Unit leader, eHealth and Innovation,
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) Jennifer Thomson Director OPSPF & Chief Financial Management Officer World Bank.
"Learning and achievements of SWA Global platform and its relevance to achieving Hygiene and Sanitation Development in India" India WASH Summit 17 th February.
Internal Oversight Service UNESCO’s Decentralized Evaluation System Evaluation Office Internal Oversight Service UNESCO.
Messay Tassew, Evaluation Specialist UN Women Independent Evaluation Office New York March 11, 2015 UNEG EPE - Strengthening decentralized evaluation functions.
Country Level Programs
Road map and outline of the revised evaluation policy of UNICEF
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Somaliland PFM Reform Programme
Presentation transcript:

Report on the Evaluation Function Evaluation Office

Two Sections of the report In keeping with the Board decisions this report comprises two major sections A review of the implementation of the Evaluation Policy A summary of major evaluations UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

The Evaluation Policy Policy approved January 2008 Executive Directive issued March 2009 We are at an early stage of policy implementation UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Executive Directive Executive Directive issued in March 2009: Clarified accountabilities at different levels Emphasized a strong leadership role for the Evaluation Office Emphasized the importance of management attention to evaluation UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Executive Directive ctd The Evaluation Office: Conducts a programme of independent evaluations Provides leadership and oversight to the evaluation function

Executive Directive ctd Country Representatives, Regional Directors and headquarters Divisional Directors, will ensure that: New programmes are designed in a way that permits evaluation at a later stage Evaluations are strategically selected and adequate human and financial resources are allocated; Appropriate management arrangements are in place; Evaluations are fully considered and management responses are prepared.

Focus of the review The focus of the internal review is on decentralized evaluations As emphasized in the policy, most evaluative work in the organization takes place at the decentralized level Decentralization is a key characteristic of the UNICEF evaluation system UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Timing of review No holistic external review carried out since the policy was adopted. The last external review was the Peer Review of the evaluation function in Global Accountability Report reviewed the evaluation function and gave a very positive rating A comprehensive review could be considered in the future, carrying out such a review once every five years would be in line with good practice UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Internal review of policy Sources include: Evaluation Office reporting Submissions from Regional Offices Management information systems reporting A report by the Office of Internal Audit

Active dissemination and training Considerable efforts have taken place at Regional and Country level to ensure that the Evaluation Policy and Executive Directive are properly disseminated; High visibility of evaluation at key regional and country meetings; Accountabilities have been clearly understood In a large organization such as UNICEF, dissemination and training needs to be ongoing. UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Strengthening links with Regional Offices A major development in the Evaluation Office has been the creation of a new post to strengthen the link with Regional Offices and to promote sharing of best practice between the regions. The monitoring and evaluation functions have been strengthened at Regional Offices. UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Capacity building through Knowledge Management Considerable effort at building the skills of monitoring and evaluation staff and programme staff; Development of intranet to support knowledge management and capacity development; Use of webcasts; Dissemination of good practice; Community of Practice on evaluation initiated, this should help provide support to those interested in evaluation throughout the organization. UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Ongoing challenges Need to develop guidance on human resource requirements in different contexts Need to develop strategies to ensure that evaluation plans are adequately funded To address these issues senior management (through the Evaluation Committee) should continue to monitor investment in evaluation and provide appropriate guidance UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Ensuring excellence Strengthened oversight of evaluation planning: Ensuring strategic choices for evaluation- stronger oversight of evaluation planning at country level There have been major developments in quality assurance but there is still a need to ensure that all regions have appropriate mechanisms in place UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Management response It is widely recognized that greater attention needs to be given to the development of management responses to evaluations. Draft guidance has been developed and an IT system has been successfully piloted and will be rolled out globally by the end of the year. UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Developing National Capacities UNICEF is active within UNEG on this issue Aim to ensure a coordinated approach to national capacity development with other actors Continued work with Regional Offices on developing strategies for national capacity development UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Conclusion of review Considerable progress has been made after 18 months of policy implementation. Strengthening an evaluation function requires continued management attention UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION

Summary of major evaluations A cross-section of evaluations has been included in the report; A number are cross-country studies that promote learning at a regional level or globally; In general there is evidence that these evaluations have been used effectively to improve programmes and influence policy. UNICEFREPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD ON THE EVALUATION FUNCTION