How to conduct an Academic Misconduct investigation in the FOA New policies and procedures effective September 2007 (Adapted for use in the FOA by Michael.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Refreshing institutional policies around academic integrity: a focus on student training Dr Neil Morris Faculty of Biological Sciences.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
WBS PLAGIARISM PROCEDURE
ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager.
NDSU's New and Improved Code of Academic Responsibility and Conduct Pedagogical Luncheon, March 22, 2011 Presenters: Jim Council, Professor of Psychology,
Student Discipline Guide Faculty Edition
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY University of Arkansas at Little Rock Presented by: Darryl K. McGee, M.S. Office of the Dean of Students.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Student Integrity and Misconduct October 2011 Student Integrity and Misconduct Training for Administrative Staff supporting the Misconduct Process.
The Disciplinary Procedure Presented by Paula Fisher Practical HR Ltd.
Superintendent Hearings David V. Cirillo, Esq. Assistant Director Personnel & Labor Relations July 30, 2009.
Anti-Discrimination & Harassment Policy
ESOS COMPLIANCE PROCESS 26 FEBRUARY REGULATORY APPROACH.
Academic Integrity at Griffith. 2 Definitions of Academic Integrity and Misconduct Perceptions and definitions vary between cultures and academic disciplines.
WU Research Integrity Policy 2010 Revision Presentation for the Committee on Research Integrity for the School of Medicine December 1, 2010 Attachment.
School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011.
Honesty Policy. 1. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES 1.1. The Department enforces the general university policies on academic honesty, as described in the University's.
Dean of Students Office a part of the Division of Student Affairs University of Florida 202 Peabody Hall
UNEMPLOYMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. SPECIALISTS IN CONTROLLING EMPLOYER'S UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES UNEMPLOYMENT PROGRAM SHRM Tuesday, February 12, 2013.
Academic Integrity. Academic Integrity LaGuardia Academic Integrity Policy: Website (
1 Pre-Hearing Conference November 6-10, 2011 Submissions of BIM on Process Issues.
Haverford Honor Council Trial Procedure Flow Chart Written by: Zach Rosenthal ‘14 Honor Council Involvement 1.Honor Council is notified of a potential.
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Spring Quarter Department Chair Forum May 25, 2007.
College of Engineering & Architecture Honor System Honesty Self- Governance Integrity Ethics.
Submitting and reviewing promotion applications in Vibe.
Stages of the verification process Information for panellists.
Responding to Student Behavioral Concerns Christine Reed Davis, Dean of Students Thursday, August 11, 2014 New Faculty Orientation.
Grade Change & Incompletes Policy/ Procedure Auburn University Office of the Provost.
Fall 2015 Provost & Academic Affairs Human Resources Office of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Accounting/Accounts Payable.
 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
Confronting and Reporting a Violation Assistance for this presentation was provided by: Camilla J. Roberts, Associate Director, Provost Office.
Stages of monitoring Information for panellists. Monitoring Occurs mid-way through the course of study Review panels consider how schools have implemented.
Sexual Misconduct Information Presented by Office of Equity & Inclusion Sue Groff, Ed. D. September 8, 2015.
Graduate School Orientation for New TA’s August 13, 2012 Sonja Feist-Price, Ph.D. Academic Ombud.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Equity and Access Plans and ANU Student Support.
Department name (edit in View > Header and Footer...) Academic Integrity and Academic Misconduct Presenter’s name Presenter’s title.
Academic HONESTY IBO. Academic Honesty Set of values and skills that promote personal integrity and good practice in teaching, learning, and assessment.
Student Responsibilities. Advising  To consult their advisors on all matters pertaining to their academic careers, including changes in their programs.
TEACHING ASSISTANTS STUDENT- FACULTY POLICY ISSUES, RIGHTS, PROCESSES.
Medical Students: Addressing Concerns and Complaints of Mistreatment Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary.
Academic Misonduct 1. Definition: Any act that compromises the academic integrity of the University or the educational process. 2.
The Ontario Human Rights Commission Complaints Process CLN4U.
Using the Disciplinary Procedure Human Resources.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Training for Faculty
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Academic Integrity, Student Misconduct, Deferred Exams and Special Consideration, Student Appeals Procedures, Education Access Plans and ANU Student Support.
Submitting and reviewing promotion applications in Vibe
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Late hand-in of assignments
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Academic Policy Highlights
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Training for Faculty
Syllabus Guidelines and Other Instructor/Student Policies
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Stages of the monitoring process
Faculty Evaluation Plan
Stages of the verification process
The Departmental Performance Review (PR)
Faculty Promotions Information Meeting
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
University of Brighton
CIM Cooperative Work Program (COOP)
University of Brighton
Presentation transcript:

How to conduct an Academic Misconduct investigation in the FOA New policies and procedures effective September 2007 (Adapted for use in the FOA by Michael Imort, based on a presentation developed by Mark Baetz)

Goals Clarify and standardize process and penalties Respect rights of those involved Track outcomes Reduce exposure to liability

Resources Familiarize yourself with the policies Undergraduate and Graduate Calendars Academic Integrity Website: Michael Imort, Associate Dean: Student Affairs (Faculty of Arts) Mark Baetz, Chair, Academic Integrity Committee

Step 1: Suspicion of Misconduct Begin process by documenting how you formed the suspicion: –Personal observation –Documentary evidence e.g., Turnitin –Other witnesses – written statement required It may only be a suspicion – you don’t have to be sure at this point Make notes immediately (save them) Begin to keep track of the time spent on the entire investigation

Step 2: Consult Chair Discuss your suspicions with the Chair/Program Coordinate Come to a consensus on whether or not an investigation should proceed If proceeding, complete top half of Form 1 Allegation of Academic Misconduct (in duplicate, available as form- fillable.pdf file on FOA web page under Academic Integrity) Contact student at official WLU Be brief – only indicate suspicion of academic misconduct with respect to particular assignment and request meeting within a week, (refer student to graduate or undergraduate calendar for information on process)

Step 3 – Meet Student Task # 1- Fact Finding: Don’t meet alone (include an uninterested witness) Meet each involved student individually (witnesses, co-conspirators etc; maintain integrity of the evidence) In order to encourage student candor –Use neutral language (non-accusatory) –Avoid emotion – anger… –Allow student time to speak

Step 3 (cont’d) Task # 2 - Make a Decision: Decide whether to proceed with investigation –Misconduct occurred - investigation continues –Not sure or more information required - investigation continues –Allegation unfounded – discontinue investigation –If discontinued – end of process Form 1 is securely filed in instructor’s files, destroyed at end of term

Step 3: (cont’d) If proceeding: Advise student of decision to proceed and what the next steps will be: –Case will be sent to Associate Dean for further processing –Student has one week to make a written submission to and/or meet with the Assoc Dean to discuss the allegations Complete bottom half of Form 1 (both copies) and recommend appropriate penalty (see Penalty Guidelines) –Suggested language for the section “Student responded as follows”: “Denied the allegation (entirely or partially)” “Admitted the allegation” “Admitted the allegation with the following explanation” (Possible explanations: didn’t know the rules, overwhelmed, fear, everyone does it…) Give student a copy of completed Form 1 and copies of the evidence Make notes after the meeting (witness as well)

Step 4: Follow up after meeting Advise the Chair of outcome of meeting Send second copy of Form 1 (including evidence) to the Associate Dean: Student Affairs (Faculty of Arts) At this point, the Associate Dean takes over

Step 5: Determination of Offence & Penalty The Assoc Dean determines whether it is a first or subsequent offence In the meantime, the student has one week to submit a written statement or request a meeting with the Associate Dean If first offence: –Assoc Dean confirms penalty with instructor and notifies student with Letter 1 of official penalty to be imposed If subsequent offence: –Assoc Dean meets with student, reviews the evidence, and determines penalty –Assoc Dean notifies student with Letter 1 of official penalty to be imposed –Assoc Dean offers student opportunity to submit a written statement within one week If applicable, Assoc Dean responds to the submission before proceeding

Step 6: Appeal Rights Students have a right to appeal so records must be kept Confidentiality must be respected Instructor may be involved in appeal through written submissions or (rarely) as witness Once all appeal periods have ended, the Assoc Dean files a Final Incident Report with Central Registry

Any Questions: Dr Michael Imort, Associate Dean: Student Affairs (FOA) –Ext. 2785