Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Jessica Briefer French, MHSA Assistant Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Organizational Governance
The Individual Health Plan Essential to achieve educational equality for students with health management needs Ensures access to an education for students.
The Individual Health Plan Essential to achieve educational equality for students with health management needs Ensures access to an education for students.
Oregon Health Authority Patient-Centered Primary Care Home Program Quality & Health Outcomes Committee August 2013.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
Core principles in the ASX CGC document. Which one do you think is the most important and least important? Presented by Casey Chan Ethics Governance &
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Canadian Disclosure Guidelines. Disclosure - Background Process began: May 2006 Background research and document prepared First working draft created.
The Standards of Practice for a Tobacco Treatment Specialist (TTS) Gaylene Mooney, M.Ed., RRT-NPS, CTTS Program Director, Respiratory Therapy San Joaquin.
It’s Time to Talk About Risk and Control
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
Supervised by: Dr- Fatmah Baddar. 2 Health Care Service Accreditation Accreditation Accreditation is the process of assessing health institutions against.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION NUR 781, SPECIAL TOPICS IN NURSING PRESENTED BY: HUSNI ROUSAN SUPERVISED BY DR. ARWA OWIES JUST, 2002 / 2003.
Overview of AAHRPP Accreditation Process for NYU SoM (August 2007) Elan Czeisler IRB Director NYU School of Medicine INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
External Quality Assessments
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
Developing and Implementing an Effective Compliance Program Mary Sacilotto,BA,CHC Chief Compliance Officer Alliance, Inc.
Primary Care and Community Outreach Research VCOM Institutional Review Board Jim Mahaney, PhD Associate Dean for Biomedical Affairs, Virginia Campus Past.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
How to Get Started with JCI Accreditation. 2 The Accreditation Journey: General Suggestions The importance of leadership commitment: Board, CEO, and clinical.
Ethics in Quality Improvement Quality Academy Cohort 6 Melanie Rathgeber MERGE Consulting.
Effectiveness in Review & Oversight of Human Subjects Research Steven Joffe, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Pediatrics.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
6/7/041 Seeking To Improve Human Research Protections through Accreditation John H. Mather MD Director, ORCR, OVPR.
Improving Human Research Protections At MMC through Accreditation.
OBSERVED IN ORO REVIEWS COMPLIANCE ISSUES: OBSERVED IN ORO REVIEWS David A. Weber, Ph.D., FACNP Acting Chief Officer Office of Research.
Board Leadership Seminar: The Corporation & Its Board September 15, 2015.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
IRB Perspective: Concept of the Community-Wide IRB David C. Clark, PhD Assistant Dean for Clinical Research Medical College of Wisconsin.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
2009 SUMA Convention Education Session E - 7. Introductions Direction and Focus of this session Format – two parts.
Improving the Health Literacy Environment of Wisconsin Hospitals – A Collaborative Model Sue Gaard, RN, MS Wisconsin Primary Care Research & Quality Improvement.
Conflicts of Interest in Research : Perspective of the IRB Human Subject Protections Monika S. Markowitz, PhD Director, Office of Research Compliance and.
Linking the learning to the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare Joan Heffernan Inspector Manager Regulation – Healthcare Health Information.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research: Does Your Research Need One? Merle Rosenzweig Michael Unsworth.
1 Usability Analysis n Why Analyze n Types of Usability Analysis n Human Subjects Research n Project 3: Heuristic Evaluation.
Department of Health and Human Services1 Update: October 2006 Public Meeting on Emergency Research Diane Maloney, J.D. Associate Director for Policy FDA.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Quality Metrics of Performance of Research Ethics Committees Cristina E. Torres, PhD FERCAP Coordinator.
Christine Yalda, J.D., Ph.D. Chair, Human Research Review Committee Grand Valley State University.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Accreditation Readiness Team (ART) Orientation Office of Quality Performance.
Principles of Good Governance
Lisa Hoebelheinrich, JD, CHRC Associate Vice Chancellor, Compliance
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Clinical Research: Introduction to LMC’s Research Program
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.
The Revised Common Rule
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Jessica Briefer French, MHSA Assistant Vice President

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. PHRP Principles and Goals Generate environment in which HRPP receives sufficient focus and attention to carry out functions Guide provision of essential protections and complete disclosure of potential risks Provide information useful for quality improvement Set achievable requirements, and encourage excellence Publicly report results (after phase-in period)

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Benefits of Participation Improve systems and processes designed to protect research subjects Build trust among public, study candidates Help prevent failures, negative media coverage Reassure funders of institutional integrity Dissuade unnecessary regulation and/or facilitate compliance

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. PHRP’s Long Range Objectives for Accreditation Increase the confidence of the public in the research enterprise Establish public accountability for human research protections through disclosure of accreditation results Support the research community in embracing a culture of ethics and continuous improvement

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. PHRP Approaches to Ensuring Integrity of Accreditation Outside Board of Directors comprised of experts Standards Committee made up of experts representing a variety of stakeholders Open, public process for development, refinement of accreditation standards Federal regulations as “floor,” or starting point, for standards

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. PHRP Approaches to Ensuring Integrity of Accreditation Precisely defined requirements, clear scoring guidelines Continuous quality improvement applied to the accreditation process itself

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Members of the Board of Directors Mark Barnes, J.D., LL.M., Ropes & Gray Norman Fost, M.D., MPH, University of Wisconsin Hospital Paul Gelsinger, Citizens for Responsible Care & Research Dale Hammerschmidt, M.D., University of Minnesota Melinda Hurst, M.S., LAC/USC Medical Center Mary Faith Marshall, Ph.D. (Chair), University of Kansas Medical Center Margaret E. O’Kane, NCQA Dennis S. O’Leary, M.D., JCAHO Thomas R. Reardon, M.D. Richard B. Tompkins, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Accreditation Committee IRB chairs Investigators Clinical research coordinators Ethicists Research directors Research compliance officers HRP educators Academic institutions Independent IRBs Community health care systems

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Program Features Web-based Interactive Survey System features an easy-to-use Survey Tool Decisions include detailed reports on performance with improvement recommendations Carefully selected and trained expert surveyors Zealous guarding against conflict of interest Introductory Option for first timers

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. The Accreditation Process –bird’s eye view Organizations first use the web-based Survey Tool to conduct a readiness evaluation Survey begins when the organization submits the Survey Tool and includes dialogue between surveyors and the organization Trained, expert peer surveyors perform survey both off-site and on-site Off-site survey involves document review, conference calls

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. The Accreditation Process –bird’s eye view On-site survey includes interviews, document review, informal and formal feedback Preliminary results presented for review and comment Accreditation decisions rendered by peer committee, appointed by PHRP Board Final results include accreditation status, scores, detailed findings and recommendations for quality improvement

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. The Accreditation Process –bird’s eye view Introductory surveys offer first-time organizations low risk options Appeal available

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Four Standards Categories Organizational Responsibilities (ONR) IRB Structure and Operation (IRB) Consideration of Risks and Benefits (CRB) Informed Consent (ICS)

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Standards Take Three Views Written process (intentions, SOPs) Performance (actions taken) Measurement, evaluation and improvement of performance

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc.

Must-Pass Elements ONR1A (HRP, IRB) Organizational Leadership Accountability IRB1A IRB Membership IRB2A Materials for IRB Review ICS1C Approved Consent Forms: Basic Elements

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Accreditation Committee Role Finalize and validate accreditation outcome Use expert judgment to apply decision rules Ensure each decision is fair and process is reliable Provide advice to Standards Committee and Board of Directors

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. After the Survey Possible outcomes: –Accredited –Not Accredited Decisions will be publicly reported Organizations receive detailed results, recommendations Accredited organizations receive PHRP seal Maintain a state of continuous readiness and improvement using the web-based tool and its document library feature

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Getting the Most out of PHRP Accreditation Use the Readiness Evaluation –Do an honest evaluation of performance –Improve performance, where warranted –Organize documentation

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Getting the Most out of PHRP Accreditation Get policy guidance during the readiness evaluation: questions to Engage with the survey team –Ask questions –If surveyors can’t find evidence of compliance, they will ask you to locate it Welcome the feedback

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Getting the Most out of PHRP Accreditation Use the recommendations to guide improvements Continue to use the Survey Tool to maintain ongoing readiness and to track improvements

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Contact PHRP for More Information To purchase publications, sign up for audio conferences, obtain an application for accreditation, visit or call www.phrp.org For general inquiries, call or For questions about the standards,

Partnership for Human Research Protection, Inc. Summary Accreditation will: Drive continuous quality improvement Align with regulation, facilitate compliance Help restore public trust in research involving human subjects Recognize and facilitate best practices in human research protections