Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Advertisements

Proposal on Ancillary Service Deliverability Requirements QMWG January 6, 2012.
ERCOT Draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC RATF July 8, ERCOT draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC Draft NPRR will include the following clarifications or additions: Updates.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.
NPRR 209 Presentation Adrian Pieniazek – NRG Texas Technical Advisory Committee May 6, 2010.
NSRS deployment April John Adams ROS – May 12, 2005.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
1 Compliance Update May Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6.1 EDS 3 Release 6 LFC Workshop October 10, 2007.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Demand Side Working Group Chairman Slides June 27, 2008 Mary Anne Brelinsky Vice President 1.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC November 4 th, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
October Project Release (NPRRs 710, 706, 698 and 595) ERCOT Operations & Market Operations WebEx Training October XX, 2015.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
QMWG Report to WMS S. Looney April 9, NPRRs Assigned to QMWG NPRR595, RRS Load Treatment in ORDC – Provides ORDC payment for non-controllable Load.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Scheduling and Operating Transmission Devices in the Nodal Environment.
14 Minute Ramp Period Testing Workshop June 30, 2009.
PRR525 SCE Method Comparison ERCOT Compliance December 3, 2004.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Frequency Control Task Force Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
© CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. THE OFFERING DESCRIBED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS SOLD AND CONTRACTED BY CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC., A SUBSIDIARY.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Analysis for the Determination of X, Y, and Z for Compliance Monitoring NATF.
PRR 525 Update Prepared by ERCOT Compliance December 2005.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
1 Compliance Update April Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance Performance further declined in March  March performance comparison.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Ancillary Service Qualification Self-Certification approach ROS Discussion March 16,
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
Compliance Report to ERCOT TAC February 2007
Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher
Presentation transcript:

Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America

1 LaaR Zonal Market versus Nodal Market ProvisionZonal MarketNodal Market Provisional Qualification Allowed for 90 days. (6.10.1)Allowed for 90 days. ( (4)) Revocation of Provisional Qualification Provisional qualification as described herein may be revoked by ERCOT at any time for any non-compliance with provisional qualification requirements. (6.10.1) Provisional qualification as described herein may be revoked by ERCOT at any time for any non-compliance with provisional qualification requirements. ( (5)) Qual. TestActual load shed test required (PRR 714)Actual load shed test required ( (12)) Net Dependable Capability Testing NoneGeneral capacity testing must be used to verify a Resource’s Net Dependable Capability. Net Dependable Capability is the maximum sustained capability of a Resource as demonstrated by performance testing. Each QSE for the Load Resources that it represents may not provide ERCOT a Maximum Power Consumption (MPC) greater than that Resource’s Net Dependable Capability without a text description indicating the reason for the increase. Qualification tests allow the Resource and QSE to demonstrate the minimum capabilities necessary to deploy an Ancillary Service. ( (2)) Unannounced Testing by ERCOT Unannounced load shed test conducted by ERCOT if not deployed or successfully tested in previous 365 days None Performance monitoring/ evaluation Portfolio-based. If a QSE portfolio deploys % of its obligation within 10 minutes, all LaaRs that deployed successfully are deemed to have passed (thus, not subject to annual test for 365 days). LaaRs within the portfolio that did not deploy are not credited with a successful deployment (thus, still subject to annual testing). If a QSE portfolio does not achieve its % deployment within 10 minutes, all LaaRs that failed to deploy are considered to have failed the deployment (a strike, and still subject to annual test). LaaRs within the portfolio that did deploy their obligation within 10 minutes are considered to have deployed successfully (thus, not subject to annual test for 365 days). Resource-specific.

2 LaaR Zonal Market versus Nodal Market (cont.) ProvisionZonal MarketNodal Market Penalty for non- performance (QSE) ERCOT may revoke any or all Ancillary Service qualifications of any QSE providing an Ancillary Service (s) for continued failure to comply with required performance standards. ( ) ERCOT may require a Market Participant to develop and implement a corrective action plan to address its failure to meet performance criteria in this Section. The Market Participant must deliver a copy of this plan to ERCOT and must report to ERCOT periodically on the status of the implementation of the corrective action plan. (8.4(1)) Continued qualification as a QSE is contingent upon compliance with all applicable requirements in these Protocols. ERCOT may suspend a QSE’s rights as a Market Participant when ERCOT reasonably determines that it is an appropriate remedy for the Entity’s failure to satisfy any applicable requirement. (16.2.1(6)) Penalty for non- performance (LaaR/LR) ERCOT may revoke the Ancillary Service qualification of any LaaR for failure to comply with the required performance standards. Specifically, if a LaaR that is providing Responsive Reserve Service fails to respond with at least 95% of its scheduled capacity within ten (10) minutes of an ERCOT Dispatch Instruction, that response shall be considered a failure. Two LaaR performance failures within any rolling one-year period shall result in disqualification of that LaaR. After six (6) months of disqualification, the LaaR may reapply for qualification provided it submits a corrective action plan to ERCOT that identifies actions taken to correct performance deficiencies and the disqualified LaaR successfully passes a new actual deployment qualification test as specified in Section , General Capacity Testing Requirements. ( ) ERCOT may revoke any or all Ancillary Service qualifications of any Generation Resource or Load Resource for continued material non- performance in providing Ancillary Service capacity or energy. (8.4(2)) POTENTIAL AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE SUBGROUP:  Produce recommendation to DSWG on whether to sponsor PRR and NPRR, or NPRR only.  Consider implications of proration on resource-specific RRS offers.  Add unannounced testing provisions for Load Resources.  Provide more detailed definition of a performance failure.  Determine appropriate penalties for LR performance failures.  Determine appropriate penalties for QSE performance failures.

3 Increasing Consumptio n Decreasing Consumption HASL LASL Current Load Telemetry LSL = LPC = 0 5 – 30 Minutes Normal Load Fluctuations Expected Load Resource Scheduling HSL = MPC Decreasing Consumption HASL LASL Current Load Telemetry LSL = LPC = LPC Limit 5 – 30 Minutes A Load Resource is currently consuming 22 MWs and has a RRS schedule of 20 MWs. The Load Resource telemeters the following: Current Load = 22 MW RRS Schedule = 20 MW LPC = 0 MW LPC Limit = 0 MW ERCOT calculated LASL = 20 MW (LPC + RRS Schedule) Net Dependable Capability = 22 MW (Current Load – LPC) 22 MW 20 MW 0 MW RRS Schedule 20 MW Regulation Down Regulation Up Responsive Reserve Non Spinning Reserve Load Resource Limit Calculator As depicted in Section Of the Nodal Protocols

4 Expected Load Resource Event Decreasing Consumption HASL LASL Current Load Telemetry LSL = LPC = LPC Limit Minutes A Load Resource is currently consuming 22 MWs and has a RRS schedule of 20 MWs. The Load Resource telemeters the following: Current Load = 22 MW RRS Schedule = 20 MW LPC = 0 MW LPC Limit = 0 MW ERCOT calculated LASL = 20 MW (LPC + RRS Schedule) Net Dependable Capability = 22 MW (Current Load – LPC) 22 MW 20 MW 0 MW RRS Schedule 20 MW HASL LASL Current Load Telemetry LSL = LPC = LPC Limit 10 Minutes 22 MW 20 MW 0 MW RRS Schedule 20 MW What happens during a deployment? 0 Load Resource sheds 22 MWs in less than 10 mins (d) During periods when the Load level of a Load Resource (excluding Controllable Load Resources) has been affected by a Dispatch Instruction from ERCOT, the performance of a Load Resource in response to a Dispatch Instruction must be determined by subtracting the Load Resource’s actual Load response from its Baseline. “Baseline” capacity is calculated by measuring the average of the real power consumption for five minutes before the Dispatch Instruction if the Load level of a Load Resource had not been affected by a Dispatch Instruction from ERCOT. The actual Load response is the average of the real power consumption data being telemetered to ERCOT during the Settlement Interval indicated in the Dispatch Instruction. The load would pass the event.

5 Load Resource Failure and Remedy HASL LASL Current Load Telemetry LSL = LPC = LPC Limit 10 Minutes 22 MW 20 MW 0 MW RRS Schedule 20 MW What happens when a Load Resource fails to perform during a deployment? 0 Load Resource sheds 15 MWs in 10 minutes, 7 MWs shy of the LPC of 0 MWs. Load is at 7 MW ERCOT Raises the LPC Limit by 7 MWs. HASL LASL Current Load Telemetry LSL = LPC = LPC Limit 10 Minutes 22 MW 20 MW 7 MW RRS Schedule 13 MW 0 A Load Resource is currently consuming 22 MWs and has a RRS schedule of 13 MWs. The Load Resource telemeters the following: Current Load = 22 MW RRS Schedule = 13 MW LPC = 7 MW LPC Limit = 7 MW ERCOT calculated LASL = 20 MW (LPC + RRS Schedule) Net Dependable Capability = 15 MW (Expected Power Consumption – LPC Limit)