DEDUCTIVE REASONING SYLLOGISM FALSE PREMISE INDUCTIVE REASONING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-- in other words, logic is
Advertisements

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength and Cogency Goal: Learn the terms used to evaluate inductive and deductive arguments.
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
Deductive and Inductive Arguments. All bats are mammals. All mammals are warm-blooded. So, all bats are warm-blooded. All arguments are deductive or.
Logos Formal Logic.
 Monty Python – Argument Clinic video  Monty Python Monty Python.
Reasoning
Basic Argumentation.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Thinking Mathematically Arguments and Truth Tables.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. PROBLEM SOLVING Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
Deductive and induction reasoning
Holt Geometry 2-4 Biconditional Statements and Definitions Write and analyze biconditional statements. Objective.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
SYLLOGISMS: Ideas set out in logical patterns. EXAMPLE #1 MAJOR PREMISE: All men are mortal. MINOR PREMISE: Brad Pitt is a man. CONCLUSION: Brad Pitt.
 Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.  You consider evidence you have seen or heard to draw a conclusion.
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Deductive reasoning.
Logic Part 2 A Mr. C Production.
Deductive and Inductive REASONING
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
Argumentation and Persuasion
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
MAT 142 Lecture Video Series
Validity and Soundness
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
DEDUCTIVE REASONING Forensic Science.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING Section 1.1. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Logical Fallacies.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Syllogisms.
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

DEDUCTIVE REASONING SYLLOGISM FALSE PREMISE INDUCTIVE REASONING

DEFINITIONS DEDUCTIVE REASONING— begins with a general/ universal statement and moves to a specific, more limited statement. I remember it by using this acronym: D. O. G. S. = deductive OR general to specific SYLLOGISM— a form of deductive reasoning which is made up of three parts: a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion.

MORE DEFINITIONS PREMISE— A general or universal statement which is said to be true. MAJOR PREMISE— must make a universal statement. This means that it must be true of all, every, no, or none of the objects, people, or events. It can never contain such limiting words as some, most, or many. MINOR PREMISE -- Fact or truth stated must be related to the major premise.

EXAMPLES Deductive Reasoning: All men are mortal. (Major Premise) Joe is a man. (Minor Premise) Therefore, Joe is mortal. (Conclusion) John is in the 7 th grade. (Minor P.) All 7 th graders must take math. (Major Premise) John must take math.(Conclusion)

DETERMINE MAJOR PREMISE/ MINOR PREMISE/ CONCLUSION HOLES IS A BOOK. ALL BOOKS HAVE PAGES. HOLES HAS PAGES. ALL PENS ARE FOR WRITING. THIS IS A PILOT PEN. THIS IS FOR WRITING. (Answers will appear on the next slide)

DETERMINE MAJOR PREMISE/ MINOR PREMISE/ CONCLUSION HOLES IS A BOOK. - Minor Premise ALL BOOKS HAVE PAGES.-Major P. HOLES HAS PAGES.-Conclusion ( ANSWERS ARE ON THE NEXT SLIDE.) ALL PENS ARE FOR WRITING.-Major THIS IS A PILOT PEN.-Minor THIS IS FOR WRITING.-Conclusion

VALID DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT THREE CONDITIONS MUST BE TRUE *The major premise must make a universal statement. *Both of the premises must be true. *The argument must be valid (follow rules of reasoning).

VALID DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT? NO REPTILES HAVE FUR. (universal?/true?) ALL SNAKES ARE REPTILES. (true?) NO SNAKES HAVE FUR. (reasonable?) NO HEALTHY FOOD IS FATTENING. ALL CAKES ARE FATTENING. NO CAKES ARE HEALTHY. (Answers will appear on the next slide.)

VALID DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENT? NO REPTILES HAVE FUR. -Universal ALL SNAKES ARE REPTILES.-True NO SNAKES HAVE FUR.-Reasonable NO HEALTHY FOOD IS FATTENING.-No (depends how much you eat.) ALL CAKES ARE FATTENING.-No (Angel Food Cake Is only fattening if you eat too much.) NO CAKES ARE HEALTHY.-- Not valid Since premises not true)

SYLLOGISMS VALID ARGUMENT? NO LAZY PEOPLE PASS EXAMS. SOME STUDENTS PASS EXAMS. SOME STUDENTS ARE NOT LAZY. ALL HORSES HAVE HOOVES. SAMBO IS A HORSE. SAMBO HAS HOOVES. (Answers will appear on next slide.)

SYLLOGISMS VALID ARGUMENT? NO LAZY PEOPLE PASS EXAMS.- False Major Premise-Universal though SOME STUDENTS PASS EXAMS.— True minor premise SOME STUDENTS ARE NOT LAZY.- Not valid since based on false premise ALL HORSES HAVE HOOVES.-True Major Premise, Universal SAMBO IS A HORSE.-True, minor premise SAMBO HAS HOOVES.-Valid argument

DEFINITION INDUCTIVE REASONING— BEGINS WITH SPECIFIC AND GOES TO GENERAL. (IF NOT D.O.G.S., THEN INDUCTIVE) EXAMPLE: THE WORD, HOT HAS LETTERS. THE WORD, A HAS A LETTER IN IT. ALL WORDS HAVE ONE OR MORE LETTERS.

SUPPLY INDUCTIVE CONCLUSIONS Phaethon, A GREEK MYTH, HAS THE GOD APOLLO IN IT. Narcissus and Echo, A GREEK MYTH, HAS THE GODDESS APHRODITE IN IT. THEREFORE, ___________________________. *THIS RED MARBLE IS ROUND. THAT BLUE MARBLE IS ROUND. THEREFORE, _____________________ (Answers will appear on next slide.)

SUPPLY INDUCTIVE CONCLUSIONS Phaethon, A GREEK MYTH, HAS THE GOD APOLLO IN IT. Narcissus and Echo, A GREEK MYTH, HAS THE GODDESS APHRODITE IN IT. THEREFORE, GREEK MYTHS HAVE GODS OR GODDESSES. *THIS RED MARBLE IS ROUND. THAT BLUE MARBLE IS ROUND. THEREFORE, ALL MARBLES ARE ROUND.

VALID INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS? 1 ST PERIOD IS 50 MINUTES LONG. 2 ND PERIOD IS 50 MINUTES LONG. ALL CLASSES ARE 50 MINUTES LONG. *THERE ARE 5 PENNIES IN A NICKEL. THERE ARE 5 NICKELS IN A QUARTER. THEREFORE, ALL DOLLARS HAVE 5 QUARTERS. (Answers will appear on next slide.)

VALID INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS? 1 ST PERIOD IS 50 MINUTES LONG.-True 2 ND PERIOD IS 50 MINUTES LONG.-True ALL CLASSES ARE 50 MINUTES LONG.--Valid * THERE ARE 5 PENNIES IN A NICKEL.--True THERE ARE 5 NICKELS IN A QUARTER.-True THEREFORE, ALL DOLLARS HAVE 5 QUARTERS. ----Invalid—4 quarters in a dollar

MORE VALID INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS? THE NUMBER 10 HAS ONE ZERO. THE NUMBER 200 HAS TWO ZEROES. ALL MULTIPLES OF 10 HAVE ONE OR MORE ZEROES. *SEPTEMBER HAS 30 DAYS. OCTOBER HAS 30 DAYS. ALL MONTHS HAVE 30 DAYS. (Answers will appear on next slide.)

MORE VALID INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS? THE NUMBER 10 HAS ONE ZERO.-True THE NUMBER 200 HAS TWO ZEROES.-True ALL MULTIPLES OF 10 HAVE ONE OR MORE ZEROES.—Valid Inductive Argument *SEPTEMBER HAS 30 DAYS.--True OCTOBER HAS 30 DAYS.—False Premise ALL MONTHS HAVE 30 DAYS.-Invalid Inductive Argument ---

INDUCTIVE OR DEDUCTIVE? NO HOMEWORK IS FUN. HUNTER HAS HOMEWORK HIS HOMEWORK IS NOT FUN. *THIS CAT HAS NO TAIL. THAT CAT HAS A TAIL. CATS CAN BE WITH/WITHOUT TAILS. (Answers will appear on next slide.)

INDUCTIVE OR DEDUCTIVE? NO HOMEWORK IS FUN. HUNTER HAS HOMEWORK HIS HOMEWORK IS NOT FUN.- Deductive ( Hint: D.O.G.S.) *THIS CAT HAS NO TAIL. THAT CAT HAS A TAIL. CATS CAN BE WITH/WITHOUT TAILS. -Inductive

MORE INDUCTIVE OR DEDUCTIVE? THE PECAN TREE IS NOT EDIBLE. THE ELM TREE IS NOT EDIBLE. NO TREES ARE EDIBLE. *NO CUPS IN THE CUPBOARD ARE NEW. THIS PURPLE CUP IS IN MY CUPBOARD. THIS CUP IS NOT NEW. (Answers will appear on next slide.)

MORE INDUCTIVE OR DEDUCTIVE? THE PECAN TREE IS NOT EDIBLE. THE ELM TREE IS NOT EDIBLE. NO TREES ARE EDIBLE.-Inductive *NO CUPS IN THE CUPBOARD ARE NEW. THIS PURPLE CUP IS IN MY CUPBOARD. THIS CUP IS NOT NEW.-Deductive (Hint: D.O.G.S.)

THE END