Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is your FMEA performing for you? Measuring FMEA Effectiveness Kathleen Stillings – CPM, CQE, CQA, MBB Quality is not an act – it is a habit (Aristotle)
Advertisements

DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS (DFMEA) PURPOSE OF DFMEA Identify, quantify, and reduce design risk (especially for critical systems) Provide a traceable.
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Failure Effect Mode Analysis
FMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Failure Mode Effects Analysis Effects Analysis Risk Identification FMEA Risk Identification FMEA.
Does Anyone Remember Lawn Darts?. Yet Another Picture of Lawn Darts.
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis Tom Hannan & Kevin Kowalis Eastern Illinois University School of Technology Total Quality Systems INT 5133 (FMEA)
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
Popcorn Sample PFMEA: Process Flow
Six Sigma Quality Engineering
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA)
 Individually  Given your sample of M&Ms, build a Pareto diagram by color  Before you destroy the evidence, be sure you have an accurate count.
Tony Gould Quality Risk Management. 2 | PQ Workshop, Abu Dhabi | October 2010 Introduction Risk management is not new – we do it informally all the time.
This guideline is for training purposes only; Not ISO controlled FMEA Intelligent use of FMEA.
Process Failure Mode Effect Analysis
PTY (Ltd)Reg No: 2007/019351/07. FAILURE MODE & EFFECT ANALYSIS 4 th Edition (Including Control Plans) WHAT IS AN FMEA? FMEA is an analytical technique.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Lucas Phillips Anurag Nanajipuram FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS.
F.M.E.A (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Presented to: [Date] By (Insert Name) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis Adam Adgar School of Computing and Technology.
FMEA Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Risk Analysis for Engineering Design J. M. McCarthy Fall 2003 Definitions Hazard Analysis Hazard Analysis Report Example for Mini Baja Nationally Recognized.
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 7 Quality and Innovation in Product and Process Design.
Analyze Opportunity Part 1
IDM 355 F2009Dr. Joan Burtner - FMEASlide 1 An Introduction to Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Implementation at a Middle Georgia Manufacturing.
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA). 2 Definition of FMEA Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to: Predict failures and prevent.
Pre-DMAIC Tools SWOT PDCA 5 S Model.
Lecture: Reliability & FMECA Lecturer: Dr. Dave Olwell Dr. Cliff Whitcomb, CSEP System Suitability.
© ABSL Power Solutions 2007 © STM Quality Limited STM Quality Limited Failure Mode and Effect Analysis TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT F.M.E.A.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Joan Burtner Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
ME 4054W: Design Projects RISK MANAGEMENT. 2 Lecture Topics What is risk? Types of risk Risk assessment and management techniques.
1 Criteria for a Successful FMEA Design & Process.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Quality Improvement Tools for Intervention Determination Presenters: Kris Hartmann, MS Healthcare Analyst, Performance Improvement Projects Don Grostic,
Effectiveness of risk management process towards error reduction in the laboratory at Sakra World Hospital AUTHORS: Dr. Shabnam Roohi Mr. Deepak Agarkhed.
What is a software? Computer Software, or just Software, is the collection of computer programs and related data that provide the instructions telling.
FMEA 1. Definition 2. Process FMEA 3. When to create FMEA
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Concept Selection and DFMEA Heidi Ploeg Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering.
March 16, 2016 CanadianClinicalDiagnostics.com ©Canadian Clinical Diagnostics.
FMEA Training.
Six Sigma Greenbelt Training
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS - FMEA
Fault Trees.
HEATING, COOLING & WATER HEATING PRODUCTS
IAEA E-learning Program
FMEA.
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Causes/ failure mechanisms Product definition
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Determine Causes/ mechanisms failure
Quality Risk Management
Intelligent use of FMEA
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The Certified Quality Process Handbook Chapter 22: Preventive Action
Process Failure Mode Effect Analysis
The benefits to perform FMEA
RISK REDUCTION PROCESS
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Potential Failure Mode Analysis 4th Edition
Definitions Cumulative time to failure (T): Mean life:
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
PFMEA Summary Process Steps
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Additional material to execute FMEA exercise

Definitions Failure Mode: is the way in which the failure is manifested. Failure effect: is the consequence of the failure. Failure cause: is what induces the failure. Escalante (2003)

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Abbreviated Approach O c u r S C D Actions Results e l Potential Causes/ Mechanisms(s) Failure Current e R Item Potential Potential v a t P Responsibility s Controls e N Failure Effect(s) of Recommended & Target s Actions S e v O c D e t R P N Function Mode Failure c Action(s) Completion Date Prevention/Detection Taken What can be done? What How bad is it? - Design changes are the Effect(s)? What did they do and what are the outcomes - Process changes How often does it happen? What are the functions, features or requirements? - Special controls - Changes to standards, procedures, or guides What can go wrong? What are the Cause(s)? - No Function How good is this method at detecting it? - Partial/ Over/ Developed by: Edgardo J. Escalante, Auburn University-ITESM What are the functions? - Land landing of the CEV What can go wrong? - Airbags partially deploy What are the effects? - Impact loads significant How bad is it? - Structural damage to the CEV Degraded Function Who is going to do it and when? - Intermittent How can this Function be prevented and detected? - Unintended Function

(9) Name of the item and its intended function (purpose/objective). FMEA (cont.) Item/Function Potential Potential S C Potential Cause(s)/ Failure Effect(s) e l Mechanism(s) of Mode of failure v a failure s (9) (10) (11) (14) (12) (13) (9) Name of the item and its intended function (purpose/objective). (10) Include specific problems, failures, defects (anti-functions) of the analyzed system(*) and its functions. Use physical terms. (11) The effect of failures in the function of the analyzed system, as they would be perceived by the customer (internal/external). (12) Evaluation of the severity of the effect of the failure to the next system or to the internal/external customer. Sometimes large values of severity can be reduced by means of design reviews that compensate or mitigate the resulting severity. (*) subsystem or component

FMEA SEVERITY EVALUATION CRITERIA EFFECT CRITERIA: Severity of Effect RANK Hazardous- without warning Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects safe vehicle operation and/or involves noncompliance with government regulation without warning 10 Hazardous- with warning Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects safe vehicle operation and/or involves noncompliance with government regulation with warning 9 Very High Vehicle/item inoperable (loss of primary function). 8 Vehicle/item operable but at a reduced level of performance. Customer very dissatisfied. High 7 Vehicle/item operable but Comfort/Convenience item(s) inoperable. Customer dissatisfied. Moderate 6 Vehicle/item operable but Comfort/Convenience item(s) operable at a reduced level of performance. Customer somewhat dissatisfied. Low 5 Fit & Finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by most customers (greater than 75%). Very Low 4 Fit & Finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by 50% of customers. (D,F,GM. FMEA, 2001) Minor 3 Fit & Finish/Squeak & Rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by discriminating customers (less than 25%). Very Minor 2 None No discernible effect. 1

(D,F,GM. FMEA, 2001) Effect PROCESS   Effect   PROCESS ------------------------------------------------------ Criteria: SEVERITY of Effect   Ranking   Hazardous- without warning  Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects safe operation and/or involves noncompliance with regulations without warning. Or may endanger operator without warning.   10   Hazardous- with warning  Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode affects safe operation and/or involves noncompliance with regulations with warning. Or may endanger operator with warning.   9 In the third edition this table is presented in two columns but the information is the same (customer effect and manufacturing/assembly effect).   Very high  Product/item inoperable, with loss of primary function. Or 100% of product may have to be scrapped or repair time >1h.   8   High  Product/item operable, but at reduced level of performance. Customer dissatisfied. Or product may have to be sorted and less than 100% scrapped. Repair time between 0.5 and 1h.   7 (D,F,GM. FMEA, 2001)   Moderate Product/item operable, but comfort/convenience inoperable. Customer dissatisfied. Or a portion (less than 100%) of the product may have to be scrapped with no sorting. Repair time less than 0.5h   6

  Low Product/item operable, but comfort/convenience operable at a reduced level. Or than 100% of the product may have to be reworked with no sorting. Repairing off-line. 5 Very Low Fit and finish/squeak and rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by most customers (greater than 75%). Or product may have to be sorted with no scrap, and a portion (less than 100% reworked. 4 Minor Fit and finish/squeak and rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by 50% of the customers. Or a portion (less than 100%) of the product may have to be reworked with no scrap. On-line but out-of-station. 3 Very Minor Fit and finish/squeak and rattle item does not conform. Defect noticed by discriminating customers (less than 25%). Or a portion (less than 100%) of the product may have to be reworked with no scrap. On-line but in-station. 2 None No discernible effect. Or slight inconvenience to operation or operator, or no effect. 1 (D,F,GM. FMEA, 2001)

(13) Indicates any special characteristic (critical, key, major) FMEA (cont.) Item/Function Potential Potential S C Potential Cause(s)/ Failure Effect(s) e l Mechanism(s) of Mode of failure v a failure s (9) (10) (11) (14) (12) (13) (13) Indicates any special characteristic (critical, key, major) that will require special controls. Some of the D, F, GM special symbols can be used. (An indication of criticality is when severity is 9 or 10, being the occurrence and detection geater than 3. (Stamatis, 1995)). (14) Describe what causes the failure modes. Discover the root causes.

Summary of FMEA S C Potential causes/ mechanism of failures Product/ function Potential failure mode Potential failure effects e l v a s Name of the item and its intended function (purpose/objective). Include specific problems, failures, defects (anti- functions) of the analyzed system(*) and its functions. Use physical terms The effect of failures in the function of the analyzed system, as they would be perceived by the customer (internal/external) Describe what causes the failure modes. Find the root cause. Typical causes: Use field data, previous FMEAs, warranties, etc. Incorrect material spe- cified, Inadequate design life assumption, Over-stressing Insufficient lubrication capability Begin with previous FMEAs, brainstorming. Use technical terms. Examples: Cracked, loosened, fractured, leaking... Examples: Noise, erratic operation, unstable, inoperative... Typical mechanisms: Wear, fatigue, corrosion Summary of FMEA

FMEA (cont) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (15) Frecuency of the cause from 1 to 10. Statistically assigned if having information about similar components, systems or sub-systems. Otherwise use the following table. (16) List the verification/validation design activities or others related activities. The prevention controls are preferred. It’s recommended to use two columns to define the two types of controls: (P) for prevention, (D) for detection.

DESIGN OCCURRENCE EVALUATION Probability of Likely Failure Rates Over Design Ranking Failure Life Very High: ³ 100 per thousand vehicles/items 10 Persistent failures 50 per thousand vehicles/items 9 High: 20 per thousand vehicles/items 8 Frequent failures 10 per thousand veh icles/items 7 DESIGN OCCURRENCE EVALUATION Moderate: 5 per thousand vehicles/items 6 Occasional failures 2 per thousand vehicles/items 5 1 per thousand vehicles/items 4 Low: Relatively 0.5 per thousand vehicles/items 3 (D,F,GM. FMEA, 2001) few failures 0.1 per thousand vehicles/items 2 Remote : £ 0.01 per thousand vehicles/items 1 Failure is unlikely

FMEA (cont) There are 2 type of controls according to its importance: (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) There are 2 type of controls according to its importance: i) Prevention. To prevent the cause/mechanism or the effect/failure mode, or reduce its occurrence. ii) Detection. To detect the cause/mechanism or the effect/failure mode by either analytic of physical methods. Preventive controls are related to the reduction of OCCURRENCE and not to the evaluation of DETECTION

DFMEA (cont) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (17) Is the evaluation associated to the best detection control listed in the design control (relative evaluation for every individual FMEA). A scale from 1 to 10 is used. The suggested evaluation criteria is shown in the following table. (18) (Risk Priority Number). Evaluation of the design’s risk. Varies between 1 and 1000: RPN= (S)x(O)x(D)

(D,F,GM. FMEA, 2001)

FMEA (cont) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (19) Attention should be focused on high values of severity, and high RPN, and in general, independently of the RPN when the severity is 9 or 10. The goal is first to reduce severity, then reduce ocurrence, and last to reduce detection. It is desirable that the recommended actions reduce the risk and increase customer satisfaction by means of an improved design.

FMEA (cont) -Only the design reviews can reduce severity. (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) -Only the design reviews can reduce severity. -To reduce occurrence the causes or failure mechanisms must be eliminated or controlled through design reviews. -To improve detection, the design verification and validations actions should be increased. If there are no actions, write “none”. (20) Define the responsible person and the completion date.

(prevention/detection) Current design controls (prevention/detection) R P N Responsibility & target completion date c e Recommended actions u t r e r c List the design verification and validation activities. Include current control like field tests, laboratory studies and prototype testing applied to this or to similar designs. There are 2 type of controls according to its importance: i) Prevention. To prevent the cause/mechanism or the effect/ failure mode, or reduce its occurrence. ii) Detection. To detect the failure mode by either analytic of physical methods. Determine and apply improvement actions. If they are not necessary write the word “none” To reduce occurrence the causes or failure mechanisms must be eliminated or controlled through design reviews. To improve detection, the design verification and validations actions should be increased. If there are no actions, write “none”. It’s preferable to reduce -in that order, severity, occurrence and detection Define the responsible person and the completion date Summary of FMEA (cont.)

FMEA (21) (22) (21) Register the implementation date and a brief description of the action taken. (22) After the implementation of the corrective actions, re-evaluate the severity, occurrence and detection. If necessary repeat steps 19-22. Don´t forget the follow up actions.

Register the implementation date and a ACTION RESULTS S O D R e c e P Actions taken v u t N r c Register the implementation date and a brief description of the action taken. Re-evaluate RPN.