Purposes of Evaluation Why evaluate? Accountability: Justify trust of stakeholders (funders, parents, citizens) by showing program results (Summative)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focusing an Evaluation Ben Silliman, Youth Development Specialist NC 4-H Youth Development.
Advertisements

Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
What can outcomes based planning and evaluation do for you? Elizabeth Kryder-Reid, Director, Museum Studies, IUPUI and Principal Investigator, Shaping.
Attendance Turnaround Team Coaching Model Supporting schools and community to improve low student attendance.
Developing a Logic Model
Getting on the same page… Creating a common language to use today.
Dennis McBride, Ph.D. The Washington Institute (253) Goal Driven Logic Models.
Organizational Design, Diagnosis, and Development Session 11 Organizational Diagnosis, I.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
What should be the basis of
How’s it Working? Evaluating Your Program MAAPS Conference, 7 May 2010 Debra Smith & Judah Leblang Program Evaluation & Research Group School of Education,
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Customer Focus Module Preview
HOW VOLUNTEERS MAKE A DIFFERENCE: Identifying and Measuring Volunteer Outcomes Montgomery County May 2015 Pam Saussy and Barry Seltser, Pro Bono Consultants.
Focusing Your Evaluation A Planning Template. Discerning Readiness Evaluate no program before its time Internal Chemistry Objectives Target program selected.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
4-H Science Evaluation Learning Circle Webinar September 2011-February 2012 Course Plan.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Standard V: Teacher.
Evaluation Basics Purpose of Evaluation As adults and youth design and implement their evaluation, there are several important principles that will help.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
The Evaluation Plan.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
Evaluation Basics Principles of Evaluation Keeping in mind the basic principles for program and evaluation success, leaders of youth programs can begin.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
WRITING EFFECTIVE GRANT PROPOSALS With an Eye toward Performance and Evaluation Issues.
Preparing for the Main Event Using Logic Models as a Tool for Collaboratives Brenda M. Joly Leslie M. Beitsch August 6, 2008.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
District Results Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Results Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 59 slides.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Cathy Burack and Alan Melchior The Center for Youth and Communities The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University Your Program.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Evaluation as Positive Youth Development Ben Silliman, Barbara Swanson, Bill Stone North Carolina 4-H Webinar website:
Boston Geneva San Francisco Seattle Beginning the Evaluation Journey with FSG KCIC Boot Camp March 24, 2010 Prepared for:
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Strategic Planning A Tool for “Charting our Future” Strategic Planning Team May 24-25, 2012.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
Alliance for Nonprofit Management Conference August 3, 2:15-5:15 Collaboration Track Emil W. Angelica
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
Situation Analysis Determining Critical Issues for Virginia Cooperative Extension.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Evaluation Basics Defining Evaluation Evaluation is an important strategy in achieving program quality and impact Evaluation means weighing the value of…
Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
 People with goals succeed because they know where they are going. ~ Earl Nightingale.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Blueprint for GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. The Minister’s reform agenda is based on the following belief: “All students are entitled to an excellent education.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Planning Evaluation Setting the Course Source: Thompson & McClintock (1998) Demonstrating your program’s worth. Atlanta: CDC/National Center for Injury.
Readings n Text: Riddick & Russell –Ch1 stakeholders – p10 –Ch 2 an evaluation system –Proposal p25-36 – Ch 4 – Lit Review n Coursepack –GAO report Ch.
Organizational Effectiveness, Change, and Innovation Tamara Norris, Instructor SOWO 804 Organizational and Community Behavior School of Social Work University.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT A process – not an event. Summative assessment “Information is used by the teacher to summarize learning at a given point in time.
Developing Monitoring & Evaluation Frameworks: Process or Product? Anne Markiewicz.
Talk about the assignment! April 27th 2015 #TOOC15 Webinar.
Introduction Social ecological approach to behavior change
Logic Models Performance Framework for Evaluating Programs in Extension.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Presentation transcript:

Purposes of Evaluation Why evaluate? Accountability: Justify trust of stakeholders (funders, parents, citizens) by showing program results (Summative) Program Improvement: Demonstrate how things are working and where it needs to be improved (Formative)

Purposes of Evaluation Why evaluate? Strengthening Relationships: Evaluators/Leaders better understand audience by planning, listening to needs, experiences, outcomes; Youth better understand evaluators/ leaders/program by building trust and understanding Building Capacity: Program organization, leaders, and participants gain skills and insights by reflecting on program quality and impact

Purposes of Evaluation Why evaluate? Innovation: Program leaders and participants generate new ideas about or beyond the program through reflecting on it

Purposes of Evaluation When programs begin by… Strengthening Relationships…building trust and understanding…they initiate a listening process for… Improving Programs…learning from what we experience in programs…that leads to organizations and individuals… Building Capacity…growing deeper skills and broader perspectives needed for higher quality programs… Demonstrating Accountability (Outcomes)…achieving goals targeted by program designs, expected by stakeholders, and… Spawning Innovation…inspiring leaders and participants to go beyond current programs and results and create new opportunities

Planning Logic Begin with the end in mind… Inputs: curriculum, materials, equipment, expertise Activities: events, experiences Outputs: completed missions, projects, tools Outcomes: results of programming –Short-term: Knowledge-Attitudes-Skills-Attitudes –Mid-term: Practices, Behavior (Performance criteria) –Long-term: Educational goals and achievements; vocational and community involvement goals and achievements

Program Evaluation Steps Following through on scanning and planning… (Environmental Scanning and Needs Assessment) Planning: understanding the process and setting priorities for supporting and conducting short- and long-term evaluations Focusing: identifying purposes and types of evaluations and general questions or outcome indicators for a given program

Program Evaluation Steps Following through on planning… Designing: organizing the approaches and developing specific questions and indicators for a given program Selecting Methods: choosing appropriate and adequate tools and procedures to answer evaluation questions

Program Evaluation Steps Following through on planning… (Program Implementation) Collecting and Maintaining Data: systematically gathering, organizing, and securely storing data Analyzing and Interpreting: testing data and explaining results based on target questions to be answered Communicating Results: reporting and interpreting program quality and outcomes to a variety of interested people

Review on Evaluation Skills Evaluation Purposes –Product and process –People and Program Planning Logic –Where to begin…what to plan for –Steps to prepare…how to build quality Evaluation Steps –Sequencing and synchronizing –Intentional, not accidental

Key Qs on Evaluation Skills Training (input on E-Basics) What key concepts or skills are important for understanding and implementing evaluations of informal science programs? What strategies are most effective for teaching evaluation skills (and how do they sequence together)?

Key Qs on Evaluation Skills Training (input on E-Basics) What is the relationship between programming and evaluation and how should our learning of evaluation skills reflect that connection? What can we expect to accomplish in this webinar (relative to E-Basics) and what can we expect to accomplish in our state teams?

Key Qs on the Community of Practice How is this learning circle influencing your capacity as an individual and as a state team? What are individuals or your state teams doing between webinar meetings that strengthen your state science initiative? What resources or activities of the learning circle are/could be helpful in building and implementing your state plan?

Key Qs on the 4-H Sci E-LC Webinar (Conveners) How do you understand the purposes and process of the webinar after this session? Does the webinar focus fit with your state team’s needs and readiness? What actions do you recommend for the next session? How can each segment be improved? What do you plan to do with your state team before the next session?