Rich Mason, Alison Eyth, Alexis Zubrow U.S. EPA OAQPS Zac Adelman Institute for the Environment, UNC-CH 11 th Annual CMAS Conference,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alexis Zubrow1 BH Baek2 Harvey Michaels3
Advertisements

October 29, 2013 Alison Eyth, Rich Mason, Alexis Zubrow Glacier Bay, Alaska, June 2013.
1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.
Status and Changes to the US National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Thompson G. Pace, PE U.S. EPA Research Triangle Park, NC.
Fire Modeling Protocol MeetingBoise, IDAugust 31 – September 1, 2010 Applying Fire Emission Inventories in Chemical Transport Models Zac Adelman
EPA’s 2007 and 2008 v5 Emissions Modeling Platforms Alison Eyth, Rich Mason, Alexis Zubrow U.S. EPA Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group Office of Air.
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Technical Scope of Work: Tom Moore, WESTAR/WRAP on behalf of University.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
Western States Air Quality Study Modeling and Analysis of Oil & Gas Emissions Data University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation.
B.H. Baek and Catherine Seppanen Institute for the Environment-UNC at Chapel Hill Allison DenBleyker, Chris Lindhjem and Michele Jimenez ENVIRON International.
West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study Modeling Results November 7, 2013 Technical Project Team ENVIRON, Alpine Geophysics, Univ. of North Carolina.
1 Overview of the Emissions Modeling Platform October 17, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Rich Mason EPA/OAQPS/AQAD/EIAG.
Recent Updates to SMOKE B. H. Baek, Alison M. Eyth, Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program (CEP), UNC-Chapel Hill Marc Houyoux, Rich Mason U.S. EPA.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Recent Developments in the Community Emissions Model CONCEPT 5 th Annual CMAS Model User Conference Tuesday October 17, 2006 Mark Janssen LADCO.
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 3:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Ag Burning – Integration of QC responses -- NIF Format -- Plume Characteristics Update -- Next Steps.
October 29, 2014 Alison Eyth, Alexis Zubrow, Rich Mason EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
1 EPA Plans/Projects Involving Projections Marc Houyoux, US EPA Presentation to the RPO National Workgroup November 4-6, 2004 St. Louis, Missouri.
NEI: National Emissions Inventory EMF: Emissions Modeling Framework Marc Houyoux Air Quality Data Summit 12 February 2008.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.
Alexis Zubrow 1, Chris Allen 2, and James Beidler EPA OAQPS and Region 1; 2. CSC.
Use of Photochemical Grid Modeling to Quantify Ozone Impacts from Fires in Support of Exceptional Event Demonstrations STI-5704 Kenneth Craig, Daniel Alrick,
WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,
George Pouliot, Christian Hogrefe, Ryan Cleary, Junhua Zhang, Mike Moran,Paul Makar, Shawn Roselle, Rohit Mathur Summary of the Emission Inventories compiled.
WRAP Fugitive Dust Emission Summary and Evaluation (AoH Phase II/TSS Task 7b) ENVIRON International Corporation 15 November 2005 Tempe, AZ.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
October 6, 2015 Alison Eyth, Rich Mason (EPA OAQPS EIAG*) Alexis Zubrow (Volpe, DOT) * Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.
Carolina Environmental Program 1 UNC Chapel Hill A New Control Strategy Tool within the Emissions Modeling Framework Alison M. Eyth Carolina Environmental.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
WRAP Emission Inventory EI’s traditionally consider 4 sectors : – Stationary Point Sources – Area Sources – Mobile Sources – Biogenic Sources.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Modeling Wildfire Emissions Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Technology and Satellite Data STI-3009 Presented by Neil J. M. Wheeler Sonoma Technology,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Phase II -- Task Source Apportionment Modeling Study Design University.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Pilot Project Modeling Overview University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON.
The Canadian Air Quality Modelling Platform for Policy Emission Reduction Scenarios: Year 2010 Configuration Presented by Sophie Cousineau on behalf of.
1 Emissions Modeling Survey Results Marc Houyoux, US EPA Presentation to the RPO National Workgroup November 4-6, 2004 St. Louis, Missouri.
1 Session IV: Onroad Mobile Sources Laurel Driver US EPA.
WRAP SCC Temporal and Speciation Profile Improvement Project Status WRAP Regional Modeling Center Carolina Environmental Program November 4, 2003.
2018 Emission Reductions from the Base 18b Emission Inventory Lee Gribovicz Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, California February 22-23, 2007.
Emission Inventory Input Format Eastern Canadian Premiers/New England Governors Conference Data Exchange Workgroup Gregory Stella U.S. Environmental Protection.
Overview of ARS Presentations and Review of EI Data Sets AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
EMISSIONS INVENTORY UPDATE Briefing for OTC Committees and Stakeholder Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, DC Julie McDill & Susan Wierman 1.
Overview of Future Year Emissions Processing for CMAQ Modeling Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department.
April 17, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
Attribution of Haze Project Update Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting September 8-9, 2004 Worley, ID.
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
2014 National Emissions Inventory
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
EPA Tools and Data Update
Update on 2016 Emissions Modeling Platform Development
B.H. Baek, Alejandro Valencia, and Michelle Snyder
A Collaborative Process to Develop a 2016 Emissions Modeling Platform
Development of 2016 Alpha Onroad Mobile Emissions
Development of the 2016 Collaborative Emissions Modeling Platform
University of North Carolina Institute for the Environment
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
EGU Workgroup: 2016 beta Approach: Status: Next Steps / Milestones:
WRAP Technical Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, UT December 5, 2018
Emissions Discussion Group November 6, 2003
Presentation transcript:

Rich Mason, Alison Eyth, Alexis Zubrow U.S. EPA OAQPS Zac Adelman Institute for the Environment, UNC-CH 11 th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill NC October 16, 2012

 “Platform” means the data and processing methods used to produce emissions inputs for AQ models  EPA has worked to improve both data and methods for its version 5 (v5) emissions modeling platform  The 2008 NEI v2 is the basis of the v5 platform Version 2 includes improved HAPs, lat-lon locations, control device information, and other updates such as RWC, railyards, MOVES, oil & gas  Both 2007 and 2008 versions of the platform are needed The choice of year is based on the purpose of the study and the ambient air quality concentrations for the issue of interest 2008 NEI stationary nonEGUs + nonpoint are used as the “starting point” for both years for most source categories 2

 Provides “starting point” emissions used in the platform Earlier versions of the NEI were vetted through emissions and AQ modeling Emissions are less than 2005 NEI for most pollutants New web interface provides data access and summaries  2008 NEI first to use the Emission Inventory System (EIS) supports merging data from various sources (e.g. state, local, EPA) improves transfer of data between inventories and emissions modelers provides greater transparency of data sources has an underlying relational database includes a sophisticated reporting system exports inventories into new SMOKE inventory format “FF10” 3

 PM NAAQS Final: ongoing 2020 Base Case w/ National Rules include all current rules (CSAPR, MATS, Boiler MACT reconsideration, RICE, ULSD, RFS2/LDGHG Phase 1, HDGHG)  Anti-backsliding Final Rule: this winter  NAPA 2008: possibly 2013 Direct full HAP/CAP use of most elements of 2008v3 NEI  CDC2009 & CDC2010: ongoing  Ozone NAAQS REA: ongoing  CMAQv5.0 evaluation 4

 Year-specific CEM data for EGUs  2007 meteorology and VMT  NONROAD model outputs  Onroad emission factors from MOVES  Class 3 CMV ECA-IMO projected from 2002  Biogenics  Select RPO source categories: some RWC and open burning fugitive dust monthly ag NH3 c1c2 CMV and rail  CARB onroad, nonroad and c1c2 CMV and rail 5

 RPO and CARB inventories  Older versions of state-submitted data  EPA default data where appropriate  Biogenics BEIS 3.14 for 2007, 2008  Canada: 2006 Inventory  Mexico: projected 2008 from 1999  Commercial Marine Class 3  Nonroad  Area fugitive dust updated with land-use and meteorological adjustments 6

NEI v2 EGU 2008 NEI v2 nonEGU Point 2008 NEI v2 Nonpoint 2007 EGUs/CEMS 2008 SMOKE- MOVES onroad 2007 SMOKE- MOVES w/ refueling separate 2008 NEI v2 fires 2007 nonroad (not incl. CA) 2007 Fires/avefire 2008 NEI v2 Alternative Data *Individual modeling projects may have a different mix of data, depending on the needs of the project Initial 2007 Platform* 2006 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase III 2007 California onroad, nonroad and loco-marine 2007 RPO (MARAMA, SESARM, MWRPO) select sources (e.g., RWC, c1c2rail, ag, dust, open burning) 2006 CAN & 2008 MEX 2008 NEI v2 nonroad

 WRAP Phase III 2006 base year for select basins in CO, NM, UT, WY and MT detailed inventories based on survey data includes drilling equipment, extraction and numerous other processes Basin-specific spatial allocation and speciation 2008, 2012 and 2015 estimates recently received but not yet evaluated/implemented  Barnett Shale (NE TX) Phase II year 2009 via TCEQ ongoing: ‐ source ‐ ei/psei.html#barnett  Other basins also ongoing and not currently used: Marcellus Shale inventories in northeast Permian (SE NM and west TX) year 2008 from WestJump (WRAP) project 8

MOVES:  “Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator”, replaces MOBILE6 Historically:  Run MOVES (previously MOBILE6) in inventory mode  Produce state estimates to create monthly inventories, allocate to counties via NMIM estimates  Process inventories through SMOKE as month-specific area/nonpoint sources Motivation for SMOKE-MOVES:  More closely integrate MOVES into the emissions modeling process Having the activity data has been very useful, emissions no longer “black box”  Emission factors for multiple pollutants are sensitive to temperature PM, VOC, NO X, etc. Want to include more temporally/spatially resolved temperatures  Computational considerations Keep computation demands “reasonable” Representative counties reduce the number of runs needed Use lookup tables for emission factors 9

 Developed meteorology-based temporal allocation methods for RWC  New SMOKE preprocessor (GenTPRO) creates daily temporal allocation factors generates a temporal cross-reference file uses regression equation relating ambient PM 2.5 and temperatures T threshold of 50 F: if ambient T > 50, emissions = 0 T threshold user-defined by FIPS –next version SMOKE. We changed T threshold to 60 in southern states  SMOKE applies day-specific temporal profiles to create daily emissions 10

11 Jan 1Jan 2 RWC 2008 NEIv2: “old method” – “new

PM 2.5 Outdoor Hydronic Heaters NEI (top left) RPO (bottom left) Difference RPO – NEI (above) 12 RPO vs NEI RWC Data Analysis

13

14 MN animal ag NH 3 daily temporalization ag NH 3 from animals (CAFO) GenTPRO uses Russell and Cass equation which relates emissions to temperatures and wind speed Create hour-of-month temporal profiles - previous annual to monthly allocation is retained

 SMARTFIRE 2.0  Integrate satellite fire detects with ground-based databases  Classifies fires as: wildfires prescribed wildland fire use (WFU) agriculture unclassified  v2.0 improvements: fire sizing algorithms Classified all “unclassified” fires Improving evaluation of cloud-cover interference  2008 and 2009 inventories SMARTFIRE v2.0 previous years SMARTFIRE v1.0 NEW: developed 2007 (draft) and 2010 using v2 15

AprilJuly ag fires based on SMARTFIRE v1.0 NEI team applied EF and crop harvesting patterns 2008 daily emissions aggregated to monthly nonpoint inventory for 2007 to minimize year-specific met-dependence PM

17

 Fire Averaging Tool (FAT)  Processes point daily fires to produce emissions at daily/county resolution  Purpose is for regulatory runs for base and future year  Leverages point daily fires  User controls: range of years grouping of SCCs averaging period – FAT uses a rolling average (e.g., 1 week)  We currently use 2008 (SF2) for Rx burning & for wildfires 18

19

 Includes PM emissions from paved* and unpaved road dust, agricultural tilling, construction, etc.  New adjustments developed by EPA ORD  Transport fraction Reduces PM based on land use via BELD3  Meteorological adjustment Snow and rain suppresses PM emissions Snow on the ground OR top 1cm layer of soil >= 50 % saturated -> afdust emissions = 0 20 * paved roads inventory does not match met-adjusted NEI

21 Jan unadjusted Jan transport fraction and met adj. Jan transport fraction adj. PM 2.5

 Allocate nonpoint and mobile sources to grid cells  Census 2010 based surrogates circa-2000 for old surrogates  FEMA HAZUS (circa 2010) based surrogates e.g. Industrial Land, Commercial + Industrial  National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD) 2011 based surrogates  Other updates developed but not yet implemented National Land Cover Database (crop and pasture land, residential density) Gas stations, TIGER-Line data (e.g. roads), etc.  WRAP Phase III Oil & Gas: basin specific spatial surrogates 22

 Speciation profiles are used to map inventory pollutants to AQ model species  PM AE6 speciation support for CMAQ v5.0 includes more specific speciation of PM (e.g. Al, Mg, etc.)  Onroad speciation updated profiles from OTAQ for VOC permeation mode specific profiles for VOC  WRAP Phase III Oil & Gas basin-specific VOC profiles  SPECIATE 4.3 process underway to systematically review new profiles 23

 Goal is to incorporate all “on the books” regulations work with RPOs and states to identify these controls  Updated non-EGU projections, controls and closures based on 2007/2008 platform  Reviewed consent decrees  Includes upstream impacts from EISA/RFS2  Updates to methodology for several sources RWC, ag NH 3, ULSD, RICE, Boiler MACT  Oil & Gas projections mostly unavailable outside of WRAP basins  Updated projection tools for FF10 and for monthly controls  Later: Evaluate alternative methods for projecting select non-EGU industrial source categories based on AEO data 24

 SMOKE-MOVES improved speed & temperatures out of range of EF support for: MOVES2010b, refueling and for more HAPS  Support for new inventory format: Flat File 10 (FF10) monthly, daily, and hourly emissions and controls for point and nonpoint monthly activity data (e.g. VMT) EIS can produce the FF10 files  New temporal profiles: GenTPro Support for monthly profiles Support for daily and hourly MET-derived profiles  SMOKE v3.1 currently available, v3.1 updates include: movesmrg optimization/bug fixes:  option fast/slow for high/low memory  use correct reference month lookup table for last few local hours each month  apply control factor by FIPS/SCC/pollutant/mode/month met4moves allow TEMP_BUFFER_BIN to cover wider temperature ranges in MOVES lookup tables fixes/enhancements of FF10 daily/hourly inventory files, allow processing w/ other PTDAY/PTHOUR inventories 25

 Continue to include 2007 model platform improvements CMAQ v5 testing (lightning NO X, ag NH 3 bidirectional flux) oil and gas Permian basin 2008 data CEMs clean-up RWC improvement via 2011 NEI project C3 marine reconciliation Latest spatial surrogates (e.g., crops, gas stations, dry cleaners) inventory controls QA and validation MEGAN v2.10 biogenics SF2 fires  Future year projections updated consent decrees/settlements available SIP control measures Local RWC controls/burn bans oil and gas WRAP basin projections to 2010, 2012 or 2015 Begin construction of 2017/2030 base cases for ABS FRM RPO inventory projections 26

 UNC-Institute for the Environment  ENVIRON  CSC  ERG  RPOs and EPA regions  CARB  EPA’s: OTAQ, ORD, AQM group, NEI team 27

28

 Factors considered in choosing base year Availability of year-specific emissions data Ability to use recent ambient data in design value projections Avoid years that are not conducive/representative regarding the formation of ozone and PM2.5 concentrations  2007 was selected because….. We can utilize/leverage the 2008 NEI 2007 AQ-related meteorology was more representative of average conditions than 2008 (2008 had generally “unconducive” met in most of the US) We can use 2005 thru 2009 ambient data as the starting point for future projections 29

30 Number of days with AQI >100 in 2008 appears to significantly depart from the long-term average for many cities.

31 Number of days with AQI >100 in 2008 appears to significantly depart from the long-term average for many cities.

32 VOC oil and gas difference WRAP Phase III minus NEI 2008

33 Meteorological Preprocessor (Met4Moves) MOVES SMOKE AQ model-ready files Driver Script Post-processing Script

34 Emissions respond to day-specific temperature variations