Practicalities of QIS3 - Life Michael Culligan FSAI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantitative Challenges of Solvency 2. Bruce Porteous, Standard Life. Challenges in Quantitative Risk Management for Insurance, ICMS, 14 India Street,
Advertisements

Risk Management Practices in Solvency II
Solvency II Reporting & Disclosure
1 PROVISIONS FOR PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (MIS-35) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
Building a Simplified Stochastic Asset Liability Model (ALM) for a Malaysian Participating Annuity Fund 14th EAST ASIAN ACTUARIAL CONFERENCE Prepared by.
Risk Assessment in Life Insurance Tel Aviv, November 23rd, 2010 Thorsten Keil.
Emerging European Issues Accounting and Solvency September 21, 2007 Susan Witcraft, St. Paul, Minnesota.
SFRS FOR SMALL ENTITIES
CFA® Level I - Financial Reporting and Analysis Financial Statement Analysis: Applications 1.
22nd November 2012 Alex Summers
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
EU Solvency II – a non-life perspective CAS Spring Meeting Orlando, Florida, 19 June 2007 Arne Sandström, Swedish Insurance Federation
COMITE EUROPEEN DES ASSURANCES 1 Calculating Market Value Margins with a Cost of Capital Approach (“CoC”) under the QIS 2 framework Comité Européen des.
Solvency 2 – What the Irish industry is doing Michael Culligan DIMA/IIF Solvency 2 Seminar 17 November 2006.
Overview of Solvency II Moscow, 25 March CEA’s Member Associations Source CEA 33 national member associations: 27 EU Member States + 6 Non-EU Markets.
Ab Economic Value Management (EVM) CIA General Meeting - Quebec City June 20, 2008 Mayur Shah.
Risk & Capital Management A Regulator’s Perspective Stuart Wason Senior Director Actuarial Division, OSFI June 16, 2008.
*connectedthinking  Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts Sabine Wuiame.
Solvency II Alberto Corinti
1 Solvency II Part 2: Pillar 1 (quantitative requirements) Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Irish Industry Submissions for QIS5. Agenda Background Participation Valuation Technical Provisions Own Funds SCR MCR Internal Models Overall Financial.
1 Solvency II Part 1: Background Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
ICP 14 Valuation Christina Urias Managing Director, International Insurance Regulatory Affairs National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
GOOD PRACTICE IN REGULATING ANNUITY PROVIDERS Chris Daykin UK Government Actuary.
Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test
1 Solvency II Part 3: Other pillars Vesa Ronkainen Insurance Supervisory Authority, Finland
Icelandic experience of QIS3 – What to be expected in QIS4 and nearest future? credit market securities market pension- market insurance market Solvency.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
Chapter 2 Financial Statements and the Annual Report.
Local knowledge. Global power Where we are in Solvency II – key milestones CEIOPS – implementing measures: End October: final advice wave 1 & 2.
EnCom Corporation The Analysis of Earnings Quality
Solvency Regulation in Iceland – Future Environment credit market securities market pension- market insurance market Willis Re’s Nordic Seminar 20th June.
FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORTING Ioana Abrahams 13 November 2009.
Spring OBJECTIVES:  Generating financial forecasts (a fundamental element of any business plan)  To better understand the economics and drivers.
Use of Statistical Models on the Supervisory Process of
Practical aspects of realistic valuations using a market consistent asset model Richard Waller & Michel Abbink.
Agenda General background
A market consistent framework requires a “risk-free” yield curve to assess the technical provisions The swap and bond curves have been identified as potential.
 CAS Spring Meeting Solvency Models Compared June 19, 2007.
Solvency II Open Forum 4 th March 2008 Michael Aitchison.
Business Valuations. Reasons for wanting to know about value:  Market transactions  Scorecards  Estate planning  Family transfers  ESOP  Litigation.
PD - 16 Developments on International Accounting Standards From a P & C and Life Perspective Canadian Institute of Actuaries Annual Meeting David Oakden.
Global Life Actuarial INTERNAL USE ONLY ASSAL-IAIS Training Seminar: Risk Margin in the Swiss Solvency Test 22nd November 2012 Alex Summers.
Click to edit Master title style Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar – San Diego, CA September 10 – 11, INSURANCE AND ACTUARIAL.
INSURANCE Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance Sector: Local (“Prudential) GAAP versus IFRS and Solvency II Georg Weinberger, KPMG REPARIS Workshop Vienna,
J. K. Dietrich - GSBA 548 – MBA.PM Spring 2007 Valuation of Fixed Incomes Corporate Finance Class 5: March 19 (LA) and March 8 (OCC)
The Application Of Fundamental Valuation Principles To Property/Casualty Insurance Companies Derek A. Jones, FCAS Joy A. Schwartzman, FCAS.
Solvency II Update Christopher Critchlow BSc FIA Chief Executive 10 November 2010.
Risk-Based Capital: So Many Models CAS Annual Meeting 2007 Matthew Carrier, Principal Deloitte Consulting LLP November 12, 2007.
PD-34: Capital Models OSFI Guidance Canadian Institute of Actuaries General Meeting Ottawa November 2009.
The Dynamics of New Zealand’s Solvency Reforms Presented by Jeremy Weight New Zealand Society of Actuaries Conference Blenheim November 2010.
Solvency II Andrew Mawdsley. Overview The challenges in preparing for Solvency II Adequate financial resources Supervisory Review Process Disclosure Timeline.
LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL Market and Credit Risk QIS Sylvain St-Georges, FSA, FCIA November 19, 2009.
Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Agenda Property and Casualty Insurers Life.
Andreas Rauter, UNIQA REPARIS Workshop, Vienna March 15, 2006 Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance Sector.
F9 Financial Management. 2 Section F: Cost of Capital Designed to give you the knowledge and application of: F1. Sources of finance and their short-term.
Aggregate margins in the context of level premium term life insurance Results of a study sponsored by the Kansas Insurance Department Slides prepared by.
Page 1 Own Solvency and Risk Assessment Jarl Kure Malta 9 April 2010.
Consultation on Guidance for (Re)Insurance undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role (CP 103) Presentation to Society of Actuaries in Ireland.
Introduction to Market Consistent Embedded Values
SOLVENCY II - PILLAR I Grey areas
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, December 1, 2016 Eric Lu
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, August 3, 2015 Eric Lu Session 18
24th India Fellowship Seminar
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Chris Hancorn Session 32
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
Bermuda Economic Balance Sheet (EBS) Technical Provisions
Presentation Workshop
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 17
University of Antwerp 26/04/2018
Presentation transcript:

Practicalities of QIS3 - Life Michael Culligan FSAI

Agenda  QIS3 background & objectives  Contents of QIS3 “pack”  QIS3 framework  What’s involved?

Background & objectives  This is the third Quantitative Impact Study for Solvency II –“Participation in QIS1 or QIS2 is not a prerequisite for participating in QIS3” –This is really the first full-blown QIS  “The goals of QIS3 are fourfold” –Better understanding of practicality and suitability of calculations –Understanding impact on balance sheets (calibration) –Feedback on suitability of SCR and MCR calculations –Looking for information on effect on insurance groups

QIS3 “pack”  Available from CEIOPS website –Follow links “Consultations” -> “QIS” –Or  Page may be updated from time to time with further clarifications etc. –e.g. Errata sheet and Q&A sheet recently added

Technical spec.SpreadsheetQuestionnaire

Where to start?  Download the following: –QIS3 Guidance Paper (no. 11) - 8 pages –QIS3 Technical Specifications - Part 1 (no. 2) – 119 pages But, strip out non-life and group sections and it falls to 70 pages –QIS3 Spreadsheet (no. 7) –QIS3 Spreadsheet Instructions  Other items on list are useful… –… but not strictly necessary

QIS3 Framework  Components of QIS3 balance sheet –Assets –Eligible capital –Technical Provisions Best estimate Risk margin –Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) Standard Formula –Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)  Graph on following slide illustrates interaction….

QIS3 Framework Assets Solvency capital requirement SCR Minimum capital requirement MCR Risk margin Best estimate Technical provisions Market-consistent valuation Assets covering technical provisions, the MCR and the SCR MCR Tech. Provisions RM BE

Assets  Valued at market value –If market value not available then valuation should be “consistent with any relevant market information” –Illiquid/non-tradable assets should “be valued on prudent basis” Not higher than historic cost (depreciated) –Certain assets (intangibles, fixtures & fittings, computers etc.) to be given nil value

Eligible capital  Capital classified into three Tiers  Tier 1 –Excess of assets over technical provisions and other liabilities –Subordinated liabilities with certain characteristics  Tier 2 –Other subordinated liabilities meeting certain criteria –Certain forms of contingent capital  Tier 3 –Subordinated liabilities which do not meet the criteria for inclusion in Tiers 1 or 2 –Contingent capital which does not meet the criteria for inclusion in Tier 2  Only Tier 1 likely to be relevant for vast majority of Irish life companies

Technical Provisions  Technical Provisions –(Perfectly) Hedgeable risks valued at replicating value –Non-hedgeable at best estimate + risk margin  Best estimate –Cashflow projection (market consistent) –Discount at risk free rate  Risk margin –Determined using “Cost of Capital” approach  No artificial rules/constraints –(e.g. SV floor, zeroising of negatives, net premium etc.) –For unit-linked: unit liability plus additional provision (likely to be negative)

Risk margin  “Cost of capital” approach –The entity taking on the liabilities has to be compensated for the cost of providing the capital required during the run-off of the transferred portfolio  Calculated by –1. Projecting the run-off of required capital (simplified projection of future SCRs) –2. Multiplying SCR t by (Risk-free rate + 6%) –3. Discounting (risk-free rate) and summing

Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)  SCR is a modular calculation  Calculate various SCR components –Such as Market risk, Underwriting risk  Each component can be further broken down into sub- components –E.g. Market risk includes sub-components for interest rate risk, equity market risk, f/x risk…..  Bottom-up calculation –Stress tests on various factors –Alternative of simpler ‘factor-based’ formulae  Combine components into overall SCR –Using (prescribed) correlation matrix

Individual SCR components  First calculate BSCR based on SCR mkt, SCR def and SCR life  Then, SCR = BSCR + SCR op

Calculation of SCR mkt  Net change in assets and liabilities  Sub-components include: –Interest rate –Equity –Property –F/x  Prescribed stress tests –E.g. upward/downward shift in yield curve, equity market shock (32% for most equities)  Brought together into overall SCR mkt using (prescribed) correlation matrix

Calculation of SCR life  Net change in assets & liabilities  Sub-components include –Mortality: 10% increase in mortality rates –Longevity: 25% decrease in mortality rates –Lapse: 150% of central rates / +3 percent points –Expenses: 10% increase; inflation +1 pp  Brought together into overall SCR life using (prescribed) correlation matrix

Calculation of BSCR

Calculation of SCR op  SCR op calculated as greater of –3% of gross premium income, and –0.3% of gross technical provisions  But then limited to 30% of BSCR  However –“…this formula should not be viewed as the final proposal” –“CEIOPS considers that the suggested formula needs to be developed further to adequately reflect operational risk where an insurer writes unit-linked business”

Calculation of MCR  MCR should be less than SCR  Detailed formulae for calculating MCR  Calculated automatically by QIS3 spreadsheet –But requires lots of inputs

Recap & summary  Basic participation in QIS3 requires –Valuation of assets –Classification of eligible capital items –Calculation of best-estimate provisions –Calculation of risk margin for non-hedgeable risks Involves projection of (simplified) SCR into the future –Calculation of SCR –Calculation of MCR –Completion of spreadsheet  Further (optional) participation –Qualitative questionnaire –Info on internal model –Group information

Practical issues  Completion of QIS3 spreadsheet –Looks daunting, but actually very well put together and well documented Accompanying instruction book Helper tabs Colour coding etc. –Fill in the blanks and it takes care of the rest  Calculations –Need cash flow projection software –Options and guarantees – choice of 4 approaches –Multiple runs (best estimate, various SCR stress tests) –Term structure of interest rates –Contract classification/segmentation

Why participate?  First chance to get some understanding of –practicality and suitability of calculations –impact on balance sheets  Will allow early identification of any potentially serious problems  There will be further QISs –Refinement of calibration etc.  But much easier to participate in later QISs if you participate in QIS3

Questions?