“Enhanced Plant Performance via Effective SO 3 Control” Sterling Gray, URS Corporation Mick Harpenau, Duke Energy EUEC Conference Phoenix, AZ February.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clean Smokestacks Act Benefits Update Division of Air Quality March 17, /17/2010.
Advertisements

Estimated Mercury Emission Reductions in NC from Co- control as a Result of CSA 2004 NC DENR/DAQ Hg & CO2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 20, 2004 Steve Schliesser.
Duke Power Clean Smokestacks & Mercury Efforts April, 2004.
Steve Moorman Mgr Business Development, Advanced Technologies Babcock & Wilcox CO2 Emission Reduction from Coal Fired Plants FutureGen 2.0 CO2 Capture.
MEASURES TO REDUCE NO x EMISSIONS M. Sc. Engineering Policy and Technology ManagementEnergy Management and Policy Por: Miguel Leocádio João Meyer MEASURES.
CAIR & MATS 2012 Southern Sectional AWMA Annual Meeting & Technical Conference September 12, 2012 Chris Goodman, P.E. Environmental Strategy.
Triple Effect of Reject to Power on Joburg’s Waste Vision
Welcome to the Presentation of Plasma Based Industrial Desulphurisation & Denitrification Plant from flue Gas.
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Cogeneration Facility The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cogeneration Systems Energy Services Department Phil Barner- Cogeneration Systems.
Oilheat Air Emissions and the Advantages of Low Sulfur Fuel A Presentation to NYS Dept of Environmental Conservation Presented by: John E. Batey, PE, President.
NOx Sources and Control Methods CE/AE 524B Air Pollution J. (Hans) van Leeuwen.
TMTS NOx CONTROL for STATIONARY SOURCES Copyright TMTS Associates, Inc. and J.J. Santoleri, 2001, all rights reserved.
NOx Control.
The Wastewater Spray Dryer
State of Practice for SNCR Robert J. Schreiber, Jr. Schreiber, Yonley & Associates Research Conducted for the Portland Cement Association.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level »Fifth level Fuel Lean Gas Reburn in Mineral.
Bachelor Degree in Maritime Operations (BMO)
Previous MACT Sub Categories EPA has recognized differences in other industry rules by using sub-categorization: – Differences in processes – Differences.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gas Quality Stakeholders’ Technical Committee Meeting September 20, 2005 Natural Gas Quality: Power Turbine Performance During.
Retrofit Emission Controls for On-Road Diesel Engines OCA Air Quality Summit Fresno, CA October 27, 2005 Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association.
FGD, SCR, & Other Retrofit NOx Controls FGD, SCR, & Other Retrofit NOx Controls Presented by: Joe Ennis, Director Project Engineering APP Site Visit October.
Lewis Benson Carmeuse Technology
Pressurized Oxy-Combustion An Advancement in in Thermal and Operating Efficiency for Clean Coal Power Plants June 20, 2012.
The ProRak™ Advantage An introduction to Hg Process Monitoring and Feedback Control.
CLIMATE CHANGE – WASTE MINIMISATION IN THERMAL POWER GENERATION By Dr V S S BHASKARA MURTY Former Director & Advisor (Env Mgt) NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY COUNCIL.
R Pharmaceuticals Waste Incineration & Heat Recovery at Roche Ireland Ltd. Andrew Carden.
CALPINE March 2, 2004 HARVARD ELECTRICITY POLICY GROUP Natural Gas and Electricity Ron Walter Executive Vice President.
CONTROL OF SULFUR DIOXIDE AND SULFUR TRIOXIDE USING MAGNESIUM-ENHANCED LIME Joseph Potts and Erich Loch Cinergy Corporation Lewis Benson, Robert Roden.
Performance and Benefits of Flue Gas Treatment Using Thiosorbic Lime
Neeharika Naik-Dhungel, EPA CHP Partnership Program Central Pennsylvania AEE Meeting January 26, 2012 Combined Heat and Power: CHP Partnership and the.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
Presentation to Utility MACT Working Group May 13, 2002 EPA, RTP, NC
Community Energy Independence Initiative Demonstration Project March 14, 2006.
AEP’s Emission Reduction Strategy AEP’s Emission Reduction Strategy Presented by: John McManus, Vice President Environmental Services APP Site Visit October.
Mirant Mid-Atlantic MWAQC Technical Advisory Committee Briefing January 21, 2005.
Star Symposium 2013 The Changing Reality of Energy Development Jeffery LaFleur, Vice President Generation Assets APCO/KYPCO October 22, 2013.
Jeremy Harris Simultaneous Reduction of PM, NOx, HC & CO From Large Stationary Diesel Engines March 21, 2006.
Mississippi Power Kemper County IGCC Plant
HIGH-DUST SCR DESIGN TO LIMIT IMPACT OF HIGH SULFUR OPERATION ON AIR PREHEATER OPERATION Volker Rummenhohl, Tackticks, LLC 2300 Englert Avenue, Suite C,
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Gas Quality Stakeholders’ Technical Committee Meeting August 9, 2005 Natural Gas Quality: Power Turbine Performance During.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
MOLTEN CARBONATE FUEL CELLS ANSALDO FUEL CELLS: Experience & Experimental results Filippo Parodi /Paolo Capobianco (Ansaldo Fuel Cells S.p.A.) Roma, 14th.
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
Hardware Analyser vs Software Analyser
Environmental Technology ChimH409 (2-0-1) Michel Verbanck 2012 Universite Libre de Bruxelles Bruface Dept Water Pollution.
Xmile today Xmile has been applied successfully in many countries all over the world since 1995 Used by, several (energy) industries, road and shipping.
Mercury Control for Power Plants Arun Mehta, George Offen, Ramsay Chang, Richard Rhudy Presented to the 2003 Annual ACERC Conference Salt Lake City, UT.
Facts about: NOX = NO + NO2
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Compressed Natural Gas Workshop August 3, 2005 Natural Gas Quality: Power Turbine Performance During Heat Content Surge William.
Green vs. Green By: Carla Torres, Yaquelin Cervantes.
Can Coal be used for Power Generation by an Environmentally Responsible Society? An Overview of “Clean Coal” Technologies Ben Bayer November 20, 2006 ChE.
Novel Post Combustion CO2 Capture (PCC) Process - MU Static Spiral Perforated Wings (MU-SSPW) Mixing Element - December 11, 2015 Mu Company Ltd. & K-Coal.
Copyright © 2006 Babcock Power Inc.All rights reserved Turbosorp ® Circulating Fluidized Bed Scrubber Technology Rich Abrams Director.
1 Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Delivering Results for Over a Decade 3) Fuel Cell Repowering Results.
AAPCA 2016 Spring Meeting Panel: NOx Controls Updates
NAME :- ARUP RAY CLASS :- B.CHE (IV) ROLL : SEC :- A1
Ministry for Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and Sea in charge of Green Technologies and Climate Negotiations
March 28, 2013 Office of Research and Development 1 National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division. Oak Ridge.
Sorbent Polymer Composite Mercury and SO2 Control Installation and Full Scale Performance Update John Knotts - W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
1 Clean Air Act Regulation, Technologies, and Costs NARUC/BPC/NESCAUM Power Sector Environmental Regulations Workshop David C. Foerter Executive Director.
First in Service First in Value
Pulverized Coal Combustion
UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
R. B. Vilim Argonne National Laboratory
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Presentation transcript:

“Enhanced Plant Performance via Effective SO 3 Control” Sterling Gray, URS Corporation Mick Harpenau, Duke Energy EUEC Conference Phoenix, AZ February 3, 2010

2 SO 3 Adversely Impacts … Heat Rate Air Heater Reliability NOx Removal Mercury Capture CO 2 Emissions Equipmen t Corrosion

3 Impact on Corrosion Potential

4 Air Heater Fouling Ash Sulfuric Acid Ammonium Bisulfate Source: Alstom Airpreheater Company

5 Impact on Heat Rate

6 Impact on CO 2 Emissions

7 Impact on NOx Control Increase SCR NOx Removal –limit ABS formation via SO 3 reduction –permit operation at elevated NH 3 slip Extend Useful Life of Catalyst –elevated slip permits lower reactor potential Extend Low-Load Operation of SCR –reduce SO 3 level at SCR inlet –lower Min Op Temp (min load) Strategy can be Applied to SNCR

8 Impact on NOx Removal

9 Impact of SO3 on ACI Performance Source: EPRI

10 Impact on Hg Capture in Ash

11 Impact on Hg Removal with ACI Source: EPRI, Mercury Research Center, March 2007

12 Comparison of SO 3 Controls

13 SBS Injection™ Technology Features Patented Technology Simple Solution Injection Sodium-Based Reagent Dual-Fluid Atomization Selective Reactions High SO 3 Removal Low Injection Rate Product Collected with Ash Benefits Opacity Elimination Corrosion Reduction ESP Enhancement HCl and Se Removal Potential Heat Recovery SCR/SNCR Flexibility Hg Capture Enhancement CO 2 Reduction Maximum Benefits with “Upstream” Injection

14 Simplified SBS Flow Diagram

15 SBS Injection Locations SCR Outlet Air Heater Outlet SCR Inlet

16 SBS Injection Installations 12,500 MW Installed on 20 Boilers

17 SCR First Catalyst Layer SBS Injection Lances (Par Mixers removed) Ammonia Injection Grid Economizer Outlet TurboMixers Gibson “Pre-SCR” Injection

18

19 Gibson SO 3 Test Results Baseline SBS Injection

20 SCR Min Op Temp vs SO 3 Δ MOT ~ 80°F Baseline – 615°F With SBS – 635°F Composite Range of MOT Information Provided by Catalyst Suppliers

21 Summary SO 3 Adversely Impacts Plant Performance –Corrosion –AH Fouling –Heat Rate –CO 2 Emissions –NOx Removal –Mercury Capture SO 3 Removal can Generate Millions $ in Benefits –Avoided Forced Outages –Fuel Savings –Lower Environmental Compliance Costs SBS Injection Offers Cost-Effective SO 3 Control –Treats upstream of SCR / AH –Very high SO 3 removal (~98%) –Proven - 20 units - 12,500 MW – 7 yrs SO 3 Removal: It’s not just for “Blue Plume” anymore SO 3 Removal: It’s not just for “Blue Plume” anymore

22 Questions?