Tutorial 4: Critical Reading 26 August, 2015. Inductive Argument Ernest Hemingway who is a prolific writer committed suicide. F. Scott Fitzgerald who.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argumentation.
Advertisements

Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Logic and Logical Fallacies A.P. English Language.
MODULE 3: RACIAL PROFILING
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 6 Preparing to Evaluate Arguments.
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
Preparing to Persuade: Reasoning and Logic. Aristotle’s “Proofs” “logos” to describe logical evidence “ethos” to describe speaker credibility “pathos”
2.13 Justice and Culture Analyze and synthesize details from three texts about justice. Create an argument on an issue of justice using valid reasoning,
Study vocabulary words. Unit 1 quiz on Thursday! Objective
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Critical Reading, Thinking, & Writing Analysis. Analysis: Reading Critically Analyze a text by identifying its significant parts and examining how those.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 9 Evaluating Analogical Arguments.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
Vocabulary Notebook.
--- Hephizibah Roskelly and David A. Jolliffee, Everyday Use
Tutorial 3 Understanding Arguments 24 August 2015.
Reading and Evaluating Arguments. Learning Objectives: To recognize the elements of an argument To recognize types of arguments To evaluate arguments.
Chapter 5: Reading and Evaluating Arguments
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
Logic and Logical Fallacies, Ch 6, and Visuals, Ch 5, RRW Ch. 6, Logic And Ch. 5, Use of Visuals, RRW.
 Graded papers and grade reports o Keep the MLA Argument Paper to refer to the annotation to help you revise and edit your paper on your own.  How to.
Responding Critically to Texts
The Analytical Summary Assignment. Getting started: 1. Read the ENTIRE essay once. 2. Read again to identify the thesis. a)The thesis is not some general.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
Response Essay Type: Rhetorical Analysis. Rhetoric “the art of speaking or writing effectively” www. merriam-webster.com.
Type of Rhetorical Appeals Logos, Ethos, and Pathos.
USING SOAPSTONE AND RHETORICAL APPEALS Persuasion and Argument.
AP English Language and Composition
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
Three Modes of Persuasion Qualitative/Quantitative September 2011 Rhetoric: Communication Techniques.
Toulmin Argument Format
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Art of Critical Reading Mather ● McCarthy Part 4 Reading Critically Chapter 12 Evaluating.
English 10 Honors Units 6, 8, and 12.  Choose a topic  This may be the most difficult part of the entire process.  Consider the following :  What.
Ethos, Pathos and Logos the art of rhetoric. Rhetoric 0 Rhetoric (n) - the art of speaking or writing effectively (Webster's Definition). 0 According.
Argument: Ethos, Pathos, Logos Mr. Eagan English 110.
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
+ Critical Thinking and Writing 31 August, 2015 Objectives: identify common logical fallacies More practice anaylsing arguments, inductive/deductive, main.
Argumentative Terms Complete your foldable with the following.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Arguments Analysis and Criticism Week 8. Learning Objectives Benefits Of Arguments Analysis An Approach For Analysis Understanding Fallacies.
Final Exam Preparation Tutorials Look at the instructions for the exam. How do you plan to spend your time? What questions do you have about the.
Unit 1- Critical Thinking Critical Thinking –Argument Three Characteristics of Argument Crtitical Thinking Skills for Identifying Fallacies –Ad Hominem.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Class 1 (Sept.6): “First steps …”.  You all are philosophers. You all are theologians.  Your Philosophy Should Evolve.  You are not required to have.
Rhetorical Proofs and Fallacies Week 10 – Wednesday, October 28.
A Change of Heart About Animals
Introduction to Argument Writing. Introduction Argument: Argument: is persuasive is persuasive has a strong thesis has a strong thesis includes support.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Tutorial 4: Critical Reading. Inductive Arguments White swan Therefore, all swans are white. Discuss Activity G (only first paragraph).
UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Assignment Argument Evaluation Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
Part 4 Reading Critically
Critical Reading: Reading to Learn (and Write!)
Logical Arguments an argument can be defined as a:
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
Philosophy.
Dialectical Journal: Rhetorical Analysis
Formulating a logical argument using Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Speeches/Argumentation
New Rhetoric Journal PDN: read the sentence below and identify what techniques the authors used to support their claim. Come up with as many techniques.
Logical Fallacies.
S.M.E.L.L. Method For argument analysis.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Tutorial 4: Critical Reading 26 August, 2015

Inductive Argument Ernest Hemingway who is a prolific writer committed suicide. F. Scott Fitzgerald who is another prolific writer was an alcoholic. Therefore, most prolific writers suffered from depression. Are the premises true? Are they “true examples”? Are they specific examples of the general conclusion? Is the conclusion true?

Diagram this argument! Research has shown that women who have a family history of breast cancer will likely inherit the disease. Angelina Jolie’s mother and aunt have breast cancer. Therefore, Angelina Jolie is likely to have breast cancer.

P1(C1): Research has shown that (IF) women who have a family history of breast cancer will likely (THEN) inherit the disease. (a claim based on inductive reasoning) P2: Angelina Jolie’s mother and aunt have breast cancer. (history of breast cancer) Therefore, Angelina Jolie is likely to have breast cancer.

Text Analysis In small groups discuss: sub-headings (if any), repeated key words, the author’s biography, source of article and any information that may help you understand the author’s purpose of writing the article. After you have scanned the article, answer the following questions: 1) What does the title tell you about the article? Can you guess the issue discussed in the article? 2) What is Peter Singer’s background? What is his purpose for writing the article?

Text Analysis Look at the first two paragraphs and the last two paragraphs. What do you think is the main claim? Discuss in a small group.

Text Analysis Read and annotate the text For each paragraph, write one sentence to summarize the purpose of the paragraph within the argument

Text Analysis Diagram the argument from the following paragraph from p. 2 I take these questions…values is important to me. The problem is how to do it. Deductive or Inductive? Is there any problem with the argument?

Text Analysis Diagram the argument from the following paragraph from p. 2 I take these questions…values is important to me. The problem is how to do it. Inductive Is there any problem with the argument? This establishes his ethos (he has a reliable character).

Inductive Reasoning Present the premises. Present the conclusion. Are there enough examples? Is the evidence reliable? Are they representative / typical? Are they true examples (secure)? Did the author overlook important counterexamples? Have all the significant characteristics been considered? (sex, age, economic level, marital status, etc.)

Text Analysis Diagram the argument from the following paragraph from p. 4 All the ethical…average Indian. Deductive or Inductive? Is there any problem with the argument?

Text Analysis Diagram the argument from the following paragraph from p. 4 All the ethical…average Indian. Deductive or Inductive? Is there any problem with the argument? Equivocation is the shifting of the meaning of a given term within a single argument. This fallacy stems from the often ambiguous nature of language. A term may be ambiguous because it has more than one meaning; for instance, the word "affair" may mean a party, a controversial incident, or an extramarital relationship.

Deductive Reasoning Present the premises. Present the conclusion. Explain the logic – how do the premises lead to the conclusion Is the logic valid? Evaluate the truth of the premises Valid + true premises =?

Text Analysis Analyze the logic Anthony’s speech Diagram the argument

Inductive Arguments Tom likes the food at Mr Prata. When I had an egg prata at Mr Prata yesterday, it was really good. The Straits Times printed a review of Mr Prata last week declaring it to be the best restaurant in the area. Therefore, the food at Mr Prata is good.

For next time Read about seven kinds of fallacies – appeal to authority, equivocation, false analogy, false cause, false dilemma, hasty generalization and straw man Before class you need to understand these fallacies Before class each student must find a new example (not in the course materials) of his assigned fallacy. Then the student must post the fallacy in the Google Community (do not identify which fallacy it is; only post the example).