THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL (LG-SAT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Process and mechanics of HFA progress monitoring and Review Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR The Hyogo Framework for Action Progress Review and Reporting.
Advertisements

Consultation Process Towards the Post-2015 Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction Youcef Ait Chellouche UNISDR AFRICA.
Do we need a GN of NGOs? Yes! (as far as participation in the GN does not reduce/affect involvement in the GP/DRR) The GN should build on existing networks.
UNV is administered by the UN Development Programme Volunteerism and Disaster Risk Reduction & Management Oliver Wittershagen Portfolio Manager East Asia.
A Guide to Localizing the Hyogo Framework for Action
Strengthening capacities at local level to build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels ILO International Training Centre At the UN/ISDR Global.
Disaster Risk Reduction in Education Sector Lessons Learned 15 years experience of ADPC in Asia Presentation at the Special Event on DRR in Education.
MDG based national development strategies and plans in Africa: the role of the Integrated Package of Services Presentation by BDP/BRSP at RBA Workshop.
1 Disaster Risk Reduction as means of Climate Change Adaptation -The Africa Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction -The Hyogo Framework for Action
1 The AU-ECA-AfDB Land Policy Initiative Progress Made & Way Forward Joan Kagwanja UNECA Land Governance in Support of the MDGs: Responding to New Challenges.
1 Bishkek November 17, Goulsara Pulatova RegionalCoordinator UNISDR Secretariat Office in Central Asia 2nd Regional Consultative.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE. 2 Implemented in 12 countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, through IUCN regional.
High Level Sub-regional Consultation on Advancing Action on Short Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCP) in Southeast and Northeast Asia 19 August 2014, Bangkok,
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
Stocktaking review: The status of PPPs for DRR in East Asia Helen Roeth
Approach to 6AMCDRR Background Studies: Contribution of HFA1 learning and HFA2 consultations Madhavi Ariyabandu Programme Officer UNISDR Asia Pacific Meeting.
Disaster Law Programme Law and disaster risk reduction Sanne Boswijk Disaster Law Coordinator for MENA \Disasters and Law Consultation Kuwait, 11 June.
Participatory Governance Assessment for REDD+: The pilot process in Nigeria Oslo Governance Forum 3-5 October, 2011 By Salisu Dahiru National Coordinator.
Lebanon Introduction Based on studies of its past disasters, Lebanon can be considered as a country vulnerable to earthquakes because of some.
Fostering an enabling policy environment for youth development: UNESCO’s response Section for Youth, Sport and Physical Education Division for Social Science.
Working Group 4: Urban Governance for Risk Reduction: Mainstreaming Adaptation into Urban Planning and Development Chair: Prof. Shabbir Cheema Rapporteurs:
1 UNISDR Secretariat Asia and Pacific IAP meeting 25 March Learning from the HFA progress review.
Quantifying Disaster Risk and optimizing investment Sujit Mohanty UNISDR – Asia Pacific Protecting development gains: A path towards resilience.
IAP Day 2 AM: Private sector engagement in DRR – Global and Regional update.
Regional Task Force Hospitals and Health Facilities Safe from Disasters IAP meeting 13 August 2009 Incheon.
Saving lives, changing minds. Disaster Management HFA 2 Consultations Update: Key Area 1 Report Building Community Resilience January.
Special Session II Increasing Investment for Disaster Risk Reduction.
1 Metagora: Current Progress and the Way Forward PARIS21 Steering Committee Paris, 13 November 2007.
REGIONAL ANALYSIS ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION EDUCATION IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION IN THE CONTEXT OF HFA PRIORITY 3 IMPLEMENTATION Bangkok, March 2009 Prepared.
Structure of the HFA2 Input Paper. Outline Introduction and Rationale Process of consultation in the Asia Pacific region Synthesis of the AP experience.
9th Dealing with Disasters International Conference (DwD 2015) Health Centered Disaster Risk Reduction: A New Agenda for a New Era Current Progress in.
Building More Effective and Inclusive Partnerships for Development 45 partners (38 Governments and 7 International Organisations) 21 donors Global partnerships.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
Civil society participation in the Universal Periodic Review.
Planned Commission Communication on the role of the Private Sector in Development A contribution to the reflexion on How to Innovate International Cooperation.
Delegation of the European Commission to Thailand 17 September 2009 EC Funding Mechanisms for coastal and climate hazards in ASIA: Priorities and opportunities.
1 Briefing on the 3 rd session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction “Invest Today for a Safer Tomorrow – Increased Investment in Local Action,”
Science and Technology for the Post-2015 DRR framework - EFDRR discussion Professor Virginia Murray. Vice-chair UNISDR Science and Technical Advisory Group.
Africa Health Workforce Platform & Observatory Presentation to the 1st conference of the Asia-Pacific Action Alliance on HRH (AAAH): October 2006.
Making Historic Cities Resilient Jerry Velasquez Chief of Section, Advocacy and Outreach.
Session Overview Introduction course structure Introduction participants Declarations and guidelines on (support to) DLG Decentralisation and aid effectivenss.
Technical Cooperation for Risk Reduction South-South Cooperation: Replicating the Risk Reduction Management Centre, a Cuban model UNDP - CRMI Jacinda Fairholm.
Who we are Leading independent child rights organisation creating lasting change for children in need in India and around the world Non sectarian organization.
HFA Progress and Updates Consultative Meeting of National Disaster Platform on Feb 17, 2013 Jishnu Subedi Institute of Engineering Tribhuvan University.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
HFA progress monitoring and Review Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership 29 – 31 March 2011 Jakarta.
Technical session (TS), High Level Round Table (HLRT) leads and Stakeholder groups in 6 AMCDRR Meeting of the Executive Committee and Development Support.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Process and mechanics of HFA progress monitoring and Review Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership 24 – 26 March 2010 Bangkok.
Global Assessment Report and need for Regional Assessment Report Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership, September September 2011 Pattaya, Thailand.
What APEC Task Force for Emergency Preparedness (TFEP) has progressed in the implementation of HFA Presented by Vincent Liu Program Director APEC Secretariat.
Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership March 2010 A Presentation by David Verboom and Thearat Touch EUROPEAN UNION AND DISASTER RISK REDUCTION (Photo.
The Resilient Cities Campaign – Ways Forward (plus) Participating Cities in over 94 countries seeking and committed to building resilience 40 Role.
Yuki Matsuoka The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction th CEOS Plenary 5 November 2015.
NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE TECHNOLOGY-NEPAL (NSET) ISDR Asia Partnership Meeting March 2011 Jakarta Indonesia Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop.
Observatories for the Health Workforce in Africa VIII REGIONAL MEETING OF THE OBSERVATORIES OF HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH IN THE AMERICAS LIMA, PERU
“Clouds but little rain…” Views from the Frontline A local perspective of progress towards implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action
Country Partnership Strategy FY12-16 Consultations with Civil Society The World Bank Group June 2, 2011.
IASC Task Force on Meeting Humanitarian Challenges in Urban Areas (MHCUA) Draft Strategic Framework TF meeting GVA Roger Zetter.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
CDP-GIZ research project – Paris Workshop Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH André Lammerding, Head of Programme International Water Stewardship.
International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) Jennifer Thomson Director OPSPF & Chief Financial Management Officer World Bank.
Assessments ASSESSMENTS. Assessments The Rationale and Purpose for Assessments.
Regional preparatory process for Rio+20
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
- Sustainable energy in urban areas -
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Taking Stock of Community Driven Development in Fragile and Conflict Situations: Lessons Learned from the First Generation 5 December 2016.
Presentation transcript:

THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL (LG-SAT)

Some known facts By 2020, it is projected that there will be 527 cities with a population of more than 1 million, while the average size of the world’s 100 largest cities will have reached 8.5 million Urban areas, with their high concentration of population, industries and infrastructure, are likely to face the most severe impacts of Disaster. When a disaster strikes not just it affects poor but too the economy of State & Nation. Sustainable development can not be achieved without taking into account the risk of natural hazards Impacts of disaster are most immediately and intensely felt at the local level

Natural and human-made disasters have been on the rise worldwide since the 1950s, coinciding with the rise in world urban population, today worlds majority are living in Cities Governs by Local Government Urbanization : Disaster Source: UNHABITAT, 2011

Why a local government review? Provides a feedback mechanism for local governments and facilitate the understanding of gaps and challenges in disaster risk reduction at the local level which is currently missing. Complements the national HFA monitoring and multi-stakeholder engagement process by providing information and an assessment of the situation from the local level. To establish a continuous feedback mechanism for development planning processes both at national and local level. Present a “baseline” and a status report for cities and municipalities that have committed to the Making Cities Resilient Campaign – and share this information with other cities participating ( or planning to) in the campaign.

Who does the local HFA review? Governments at local level The local HFA review process is intended to be a multi- stakeholder review process led by the local governments4 at the local level. The main actors of this multi- stakeholder local HFA review process are local government authorities, civil society organizations, community based organizations and so forth. The involvement of civil society organizations and community based organizations is essential to the success of the review process and thus all local authorities are highly encouraged to ensure adequate participation of civil society and community based organizations in the consultations. The local government sub-sector consists of local governments that are separate institutional units plus those which are controlled and mainly financed by local governments. In principle, local government units are institutional units whose fiscal, legislative and executive authority extends over the smallest geographical areas distinguished for administrative and political purposes.

Local feedback loop Local Government Self Assessment Tool (LG-SAT)

National, Regional and global level Sub/ regional HFA review process Regional/ sub regional synthesis and review of trans-boundary issues Global analysis and synthesis process Contributing to the larger process National HFA progress review process Self- assessment of countries to review their own progress, gaps and challenges in Disaster Risk Reduction efforts Local Government Self Assessment Tool Local level

What is the LG -SAT Alike the National process, the local HFA review is not a monitoring process of UNISDR. The purpose is to provide tools and guidelines to local governments that will assist them in initiating discussion on risk reduction issues and presumably enhance understanding of gaps and challenges in reducing risk. The review process and participation of the local governments is purely voluntary in nature.

Local HFA review - Indicators 43 key questions aligned to 5 HFA priority of action 5 level of progress Prepared in consultation with local government representatives, civil society network and partners Derived from the ‘HFA Indicators of Progress’ Complements the “ Making Cities Resilient Campaign”

A few indicators… Are financial services (e.g. saving and credit schemes, macro and micro-insurance) available to vulnerable and marginalised households for pre- and/or post-disaster times? Does the local government have access to adequate financial resources to carry out risk reduction activities in your city/municipality? Has the city / municipality conducted thorough disaster risk assessments for various development sectors in your city/municipality? Does the local government have emergency plans in place to deal with possible mass casualty needs? and so on…

Suggestive Timeframe: HFA Monitoring and Progress Review Global Global Analysis Sub- Regional Sub-Regional HFA review National National HFA review Local Local HFA review OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun BeginInterim Mar – Aug 2012 Interim Jul 2012 – Nov 2012 Oct 2011 – May 2012 Interim Dec 2012 – Mar2013 Final

HOW would the review take place Review process will be carried out through a web based on-line system as well as a paper based template LGs call for multi-stakeholder consultation Self assessment to assess the progress/status through local context specific indicators Share the status with all local departments and entities and report the progress on the online tool (LG-SAT)

Roll out and status of the Local HFA review process The Local HFA review process as a pilot was rolled out by December 2010 for selected local authorities globally. In order to demonstrate the complementarity between the local, national and city monitoring process, UNISDR in partnership with DG ECHO and the Global Network of Civil Societies for Disaster Risk Reduction conducted five pilot in Armenia, Indonesia, Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. The main aim of the pilot initiative will be to facilitate the multi-stakeholder engagement process involving local authorities, civil society organizations and the national government; and to draw lessons and gather feedback on the indicators, tools and methodology at the same time. Following the pilots 26 LGs were identified (also part of the Making Cities Resilient Campaign) namely to conduct the first From the above 26 LGs 16 ( from the region) are currently conducting their local review and a consultation has been organized based on the review at UNISDR – GETI in October 2011; Starting October 2011 the Local Government Self Assessment Tool would be made available for all globally.

Thank you