Industrial User Permits: Monitoring Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SW101 The NPDES Industrial Storm Water Program. What Does the Industrial Program Cover? F Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity l.
Advertisements

LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
Permitting Industrial Users
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
PRETREATMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Draft) 24 th EPA REGION 6 ANNUAL PRETREATMENT WORKSHOP OKLAHOMA CITY 8/14/08 Allen Gilliam ADEQ State Pretreatment Coordinator.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
25th Annual U.S. EPA Region VI Pretreatment Association Workshop Liquid Waste Transporter Enforcement Stories August 5, 2009 Ms. Erin La Rue Pretreatment.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
Spring Training 2008 IPP INSPECTION. PURPOSE OF INSPECTION The main purpose of an industrial waste pretreatment program is to protect the environment,
NPDES Primer for Executive Officers of Wastewater Facilities Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality Compliance Branch.
NCMA Workshop March 19 and 24, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
1 Common Issues on Plans Recertification Training For Level II Introduction to Design Certified Plan Reviewers and Certified Design Professionals Issued.
Applying for the VT Multi-Sector General Permit
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Industrial Wastewater Compliance 1/61 © Copyright Training 4 Today 2001 Published by EnviroWin Software LLC WELCOME INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER COMPLIANCE CUSTOMIZED.
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
Inspection Records and Reports NC DWR, Raleigh Regional Office 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh NC (919)
CENTRALIZED WASTE TREATMENT 40 CFR 437 Lessons Learned.
403 Streamlining Specifics What’s Up with the Extra Industrial Classifications, General Permits & BMPs?
Industrial Inspections Making Good Inspections Better David Long EPA Region 6.
EDMR Electronic data submittal system Jeffrey A. Ewick, Section Chief Data and Information Services Section Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report.
Pretreatment Streamlining Rule
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
PERMITTING AND COMPLIANCE Wastewater Utility Council May 17, 2006.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
HOW TO DO Pollution Prevention & Good Housekeeping NC STATE UNIVERSITY.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Mercury Reduction Plan (MRP) Big Rapids Ordinance NO Chapter 53, Title 5, Section (B) Mercury Reduction Plans.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
Calculating Numerical Local Limits Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Pretreatment Program.
State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality Industrial/Construction Storm Water Unit.
The Foundation Developing and Implementing Your Storm Water Management Program.
California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) and Electronic Self Monitoring Reports (eSMR)
Presented to Georgia Airports Association Conference October 21, 2009 EPA Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures – Update Also – What’s Coming with.
Pretreatment 101 Training Course Sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, States of Region 6 And the Region VI Pretreatment Association.
Florida Industrial Pretreatment Association Workshop April 25, 2008 Dan Parnell JEA Industrial Pretreatment.
EPA REGION VI MINIMUM QUANTIFICATION LEVELS (MQLs) WHAT THE “L” IS GOING ON? 25 th EPA Annual Pretreatment Workshop Addison, TX 8/5/09 Allen Gilliam ADEQ.
Purpose of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWP3s) for Industries Richard Smith Resource Management Conference Tulsa Garden Center March 26, 2015.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Michael Darcy Owner M.A.R.S. Bio-Med Processes Inc.
Overview of Pretreatment Program Regulations 40 CFR Part 403 Pretreatment 101 Short Course 8/3/09 Addison, Texas David Hardgrave ODEQ State Pretreatment.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)  All dischargers over 1-acre must develop a SWPPP  6 major portions of every SWPPP Site Evaluation and.
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
Test Your Storm Water Knowledge!
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
International Security Management Standards. BS ISO/IEC 17799:2005 BS ISO/IEC 27001:2005 First edition – ISO/IEC 17799:2000 Second edition ISO/IEC 17799:2005.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
1 Industrial Waste Data Tracking: Surveys & Other Information Collection Presented by: Melissa Reboul LDEQ Pretreatment MODULE 3.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Streamlining Rules for Pretreatment Regulation Requested changes to Chapters 922 & 923 of the City of Zanesville Codified Ordinances Presentation to City.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY :FOR ALL YOUR ENVIRONMENTS Yvonne Baker Environmental Scientist Staff Sewage Sludge Hauling Rules and Regulations.
Commercial, Industrial, and High-Risk Runoff 6/13/20161 Commercial, Industrial and High Risk Runoff.
State Update including Streamlining Jeff Poupart PERCS Supervisor February 7, 2006.
Yvonne Baker Environmental Scientist Staff Rules for Receipt of Sewage Sludge for Disposal/Treatment.
Pollution Prevention & Management DentalBMPs. Overview Amalgam in POTW New EPA Guidelines City of Tulsa Dental BMPs.
Welcome to the Frog Environmental Winery Compliance Association
Urban Runoff Pollution Ordinance 2017 Proposed Update
Framework for CSO Control Planning
Van Wert, OH Water and Wastewater Element Training
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
“How To Ace an Inspection” Russell McLaren – Entergy ARES Water Lead
Overview of the Final Pretreatment Streamlining Rule
Bianca Cooper & David James May 17, 2017 Water Quality Division
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Industrial User Permits: Monitoring Requirements

Learning Objectives Describe purpose of monitoring conditions Describe purpose of monitoring conditions Discuss the considerations for establishing monitoring conditions Discuss the considerations for establishing monitoring conditions Explain analytical method requirements Explain analytical method requirements

Special Conditions Standard Conditions Reporting Req’s Monitoring Req’s Effluent Limits Permit Contents Cover Page

3. Monitoring Requirements Sampling location Sampling location Pollutants to be monitored Pollutants to be monitored Sample collection method Sample collection method Monitoring frequencies Monitoring frequencies Analytical methods Analytical methods

Sampling Location Must coincide with the point(s) at which the effluent limits apply Must coincide with the point(s) at which the effluent limits apply Must produce a sample “representative” of the nature and volume of the industrial user’s effluent Must produce a sample “representative” of the nature and volume of the industrial user’s effluent Must be safe, convenient, and accessible to industrial user and Control Authority personnel. Must be safe, convenient, and accessible to industrial user and Control Authority personnel. Photograph Photograph

Pollutants to be Monitored Include numerical limits Include numerical limits Include all categorical pretreatment standards Include all categorical pretreatment standards Include other parameters subject to local limits if justified Include other parameters subject to local limits if justified Include monitoring for unregulated pollutants of potential concern if justified Include monitoring for unregulated pollutants of potential concern if justified Include flow monitoring where required Include flow monitoring where required

Sample Collection Method Specify collection method. Specify collection method.  Grab sample  Composite sample  Time proportional  Flow proportional Specify sampling period (e.g. 24hour, 8 hour) Specify sampling period (e.g. 24hour, 8 hour) Specify minimum number of aliquots Specify minimum number of aliquots Specify minimum number of grab samples Specify minimum number of grab samples

Types of Samples Grab Sample: Taken from a wastestream on a one-time basis without consideration of the flow rate of the wastestream and without consideration of time Grab Sample: Taken from a wastestream on a one-time basis without consideration of the flow rate of the wastestream and without consideration of time  Must be used to monitor certain parameters (e.g., pH, volatile organics, cyanide)  On a case-by-case basis – may be used for monitoring batch discharges

Example Situation – Case #1 Slight daily fluctuation in pollutant concentration and flow Slight daily fluctuation in pollutant concentration and flow Recommendation: Grab Sample Recommendation: Grab Sample

Types of Samples (Continued) Composite: Sample composed of two or more discrete aliquots. The aggregate sample will reflect the average water quality over the sample period. Composite: Sample composed of two or more discrete aliquots. The aggregate sample will reflect the average water quality over the sample period.  More representative measure of the discharge of pollutants over a given period of time  Accounts for variability in pollutant concentration and discharge flow rate  May be sequential discrete samples or a single combined sample

Composite Sample is defined by the time interval between aliquots, and the volume of each aliquot (t, V). Composite Sample is defined by the time interval between aliquots, and the volume of each aliquot (t, V).  Time Proportional (t c, V c ): Interval time and sample volume are constant  Flow Proportional: Interval time or sample volume may vary  Constant volume (t v, V c )  Constant time (t c, V v ) Types of Samples (Continued) V t V t V t

Time Flow Time Pollutant Concentration Example Situation – Case #2 Regular fluctuations in pollutant loading over the course of the day Regular fluctuations in pollutant loading over the course of the day Very slight fluctuations in flow Very slight fluctuations in flow Recommendation: Time Proportional Composite Recommendation: Time Proportional Composite

Time Pollutant Concentration Time Flow Example Situation – Case #3 Irregular fluctuations in pollutant loading over the course of the day Irregular fluctuations in pollutant loading over the course of the day Erratic fluctuations in flow Erratic fluctuations in flow Recommendation: Flow Proportional Composite Recommendation: Flow Proportional Composite

Types of Samples (Continued) Continuous Sample: Automated collection and analysis of a parameter in a discharge Continuous Sample: Automated collection and analysis of a parameter in a discharge  Typically used for pH and flow  40 CFR § allows excursions for pH; ONLY for direct dischargers

Monitoring Frequencies Federal Regulations require a minimum of “twice” per year. Federal Regulations require a minimum of “twice” per year. Develop compliance monitoring requirement based on at least the following factors: Develop compliance monitoring requirement based on at least the following factors:  Representative data of users discharge  Potential impact of industry  History of user compliance  Costs

Analytical Methods Analytical methods must comply with 40 CFR Part 136 regulations. Analytical methods must comply with 40 CFR Part 136 regulations. May specify exact analytical method required May specify exact analytical method required May require analysis be performed by a State certified laboratory. May require analysis be performed by a State certified laboratory. Alternative methods Alternative methods

0 Concentration 1 2 Analytical Detection Level Considerations  Compliance with Limit #1  40 CFR Part 136  Compliance with Limit #2  ? ? ? Minimum Level (ML) Method Detection Limit (MDL) Effluent Limit #2 Effluent Limit #1

Module 5 Industrial User Permits: Reporting Requirements

Learning Objectives Describe purpose of reporting requirements Describe purpose of reporting requirements Discuss the considerations for establishing reporting requirements Discuss the considerations for establishing reporting requirements

Special Conditions Standard Conditions Reporting Req’s Monitoring Req’s Effluent Limits Permit Contents Cover Page

4. Reporting Requirements Continued Compliance Reports Continued Compliance Reports  What types of information are to be submitted (e.g. analytical, flow, production data)  Dates and frequency of submission  Signatory responsibilities  Submission location (address) and name of person responsible for receipt of the report  Electronic reporting  Violation identification  Penalties

Reporting Requirements Permit renewal Upset Compliance schedule progress report Bypass Toxic organic management plan Plans for pretreatment Periodic compliance reports Hazardous waste notification Notice of changed discharge Solvent management plan 24-hour notification & resampling reports Comments on permit Sludge management plans Baseline monitoring report Slug control plan Notice of potential problems 90-day compliance report

Reporting Requirements Who? Where? When? What?

Who? Depending on the industry, the permittee could be a Significant Industrial User (includes categorical industrial user) or a Non-Significant Industrial User (Ex. small laundry, restaurant, hospital, etc.) Depending on the industry, the permittee could be a Significant Industrial User (includes categorical industrial user) or a Non-Significant Industrial User (Ex. small laundry, restaurant, hospital, etc.) Previously, regulations did not officially include reporting requirements for Non-categorical SIUs Previously, regulations did not officially include reporting requirements for Non-categorical SIUs New Streamlining Rule: Non-categorical SIUs now officially required to report all monitoring data. New Streamlining Rule: Non-categorical SIUs now officially required to report all monitoring data.

Who Continued The new Rule expands the notification requirement: The new Rule expands the notification requirement:  The Industrial User must notify the “Control Authority” (CA) as opposed to the “POTW” and in cases where the CA and the POTW are different organizations, the IU would notify both the CA and the POTW of any substantial change in volume or character of pollutants in the IU’s Discharge to the POTW

Report what? CIU/SIU Self-Monitoring Reports [40 CFR § (e) & (h)] Nature and concentration of discharged pollutants Nature and concentration of discharged pollutants Flow/production data Flow/production data

Certification statement [40 CFR § 403.6(a)(2)(ii)] I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.

Signatory Requirements [40 CFR § (l)] Responsible corporate officer, Responsible corporate officer, General partner or proprietor, or General partner or proprietor, or Duly authorized representative Duly authorized representative

Streamlining Rule: Signatory Requirements IUs: New Rule revises the signatory requirements for IUs to adopt more flexible standards for determining who must sign reports on behalf of a corporation. IUs: New Rule revises the signatory requirements for IUs to adopt more flexible standards for determining who must sign reports on behalf of a corporation. Also, the New Rule makes similar changes to the signatory requirements for “duly authorized employees” of POTWs [403.12(m)] Also, the New Rule makes similar changes to the signatory requirements for “duly authorized employees” of POTWs [403.12(m)]  EPA clarifies that this authorization can be submitted to the AA “together with” the next annual report.

POTW may monitor in lieu of IU self-monitoring [40 CFR § (g) & (h)]

CIU Reports 40 CFR § (b) BMRs  required information [§ (b)(1-7)]  existing sources 180 days  new sources 90 days (c) Compliance schedule reports (d) 90 Day compliance reports 40 CFR § (c) Upset

CIU/SIU Reports 40 CFR § (f)Notice of potential problems (g)(2)Noncompliance notification and remonitoring (j)Notice of changed discharge (p)Notification of discharge of hazardous waste 40 CFR § (c)Bypass

General Control Mechanisms Before Streamlining – could use general permits to control non-SIUs Before Streamlining – could use general permits to control non-SIUs After Streamlining – can use general permits for SIUs (Optional) After Streamlining – can use general permits for SIUs (Optional)

General Permits At the discretion of the POTW, control may include use of general control mechanisms if all of the facilities to be covered: At the discretion of the POTW, control may include use of general control mechanisms if all of the facilities to be covered:  Involve the same or substantially similar types of operations;  Discharge the same types of wastes;  Require the same effluent limitations;  Require the same or similar monitoring; and  In the opinion of the POTW, are more appropriately controlled under general permit control mechanisms than under individual control mechanisms.

BMPs (Best Management Practice) Definition – Definition –  Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to implement the prohibitions listed in 40 CFR Part  BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw materials storage

Best Management Practices (BMPs) Streamlining Rule - Modifying/Adding: 40 CFR 403.5, 403.8(f), & (b), (e), and (h) Streamlining Rule - Modifying/Adding: 40 CFR 403.5, 403.8(f), & (b), (e), and (h) Previously – No definition of BMPs in 403; BMPs not specifically addressed Previously – No definition of BMPs in 403; BMPs not specifically addressed Streamlining Rule – BMPs may be used in lieu of local limits Streamlining Rule – BMPs may be used in lieu of local limits

BMPs BMPs vs. Local Limits BMPs vs. Local Limits  POTWs may choose BMPs instead of numeric local limits where determination of compliance with numeric limits is infeasible, or as a supplement to numeric limits  BMPs may be appropriate for regulating releases when the types of pollutants vary greatly over time, when chemical analyses are impracticable, and when other discharge control options are inappropriate.

BMPs Examples of appropriate BMP usage: Examples of appropriate BMP usage:  Photoprocessor BMPs – address Silver discharges through silver recovery systems and/or management practices  Dental BMPs – control Mercury discharges  Printing facilities BMPs and Maintenance Shop BMPs – address cleaning and spill control