Environmental Protection Indicators for California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency SRWP Watershed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EPAs 2008 Report on the Environment Denice M. Shaw, PhD U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Center for Environmental.
Advertisements

Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
A GIS Lesson. What is a Watershed? +15 Million People.
Slide1 Managing Flood Risk U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Steven L. Stockton, P.E. Director of Civil Works U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14 July 2009 Presentation.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Environmental Integrity and the Incidence of Cancer Pooja Mehra Thomas Shahady.
The relationship between riparian areas and biological diversity A comparison of streams in eastern Colorado and southwestern Virginia By Ann Widmer
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
EEP Watershed Planning Overview August 12, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Nationally recognized, innovative, non-regulatory program formed in July.
Developing Biodiversity Indicators Measuring Conservation Impact at Global and Project Scales Valerie Kapos.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Integrated thematic assessments: outlook on water, data and.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
What does the SALCC do? Mission: Create a shared blueprint for landscape conservation actions that sustain natural and cultural resources.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
SWRR on the Potomac Rhonda Kranz and John Wells Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable April 25, 2006 Measuring the Sustainability of Water Management.
Estuary Productivity & Complexity Evaluating Human Impacts.
Activities, Results and Preliminary Report ACWI Meeting September 14, 2005 The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable (SWRR)
Currents of Change Workshop Currents of Change Environmental Status & Trends of the Narragansett Bay Region May 1, 2009.
EPA Region 3 People Current Mid-Atlantic Land Cover 70% Forest Cover 25% Agriculture 2% Urban/Disturbed Areas 3% Other.
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION, AND ADAPTATION ASPECTS IN NATIONAL STRATEGIES ON POVERTY REDUCTION (NS- PR), SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SEDP)
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A unique framework for improved management of shared waters.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Information and international biodiversity conventions Eliezer Frankenberg Nature and Parks Authority.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Ecosystem task and GEO BON Carlos Padovani, Brazil Georgios Sarantakos, GEO Secretariat Beijing, China April 21, 2013 GEO Ecosystem.
Coastal development impacts on biological communities in the Chesapeake Bay Examples from the Atlantic Slope Consortium R
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George Gray, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator EPA Office of Research.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invertebrate Communities as Tools for Establishing Minimum Flows and Levels in Florida Streams.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
Minnesota Water 2005 John R. Wells Minnesota Environmental Quality Board & Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable October 26, 2005 Measuring the Sustainability.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
Criterion 1: Conservation of Biological Diversity Indicator Refinement: What is the state of Indicator Science? 1. Overview of the Criterion 2. Review.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies Istanbul, 29 June 2007 BIODIVERSITY.
Urban Water Research Todd Rasmussen Associate Professor of Hydrology The University of Georgia, Athens and Pending Director, Urban Water Research Institute.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
Establishing the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management On the Upper Mississippi River Dr. Ken Lubinski, USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center.
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
Watersheds and Wetlands CHAPTER 1. Lesson 1.5 Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds Human Activities Watershed Quality Health of U.S. Watersheds.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Challenges, results and experience with cross-border cooperation - local and national level impacts - DRIMON and Transboundary Prespa Lake Basin Crossing.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
EPA Global Change Research Program A TEN YEAR PLAN Presentation to 13 th Symposium on Global Change Studies Janet L. Gamble, Ph.D. National Center for.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
3rd EIONET workshop on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation EEA, 30 June 2009 SEBI 2010, climate change and connectivity Katarzyna Biała.
PNAMP Monitoring Terminology Data Dictionary The meta data file provides a better explanation of the project’s intent. The estuary work group is still.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
STATUS OF LAKE VICTORIA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECT II
Streamlining European Biodiversity Indicators 2010 – update May 2007
UNESCO-IHP Contribution to SDG 6 on Water and Sanitation
Ecological and Environmental Stability
Presentation transcript:

Environmental Protection Indicators for California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment California Environmental Protection Agency SRWP Watershed Indicators Workshop March 30, 2005 The EPIC Project Developing Indicators of Watershed Health

Environmental indicators can be used to… Track changes in the environment Communicate environmental information Provide early warning signals What is happening? Identify or validate cause and effect Why is it happening? Evaluate performance Are our strategies working? Support “results-based management” How can we better accomplish our goals?

What is an environmental indicator ? Objective, scientifically based measure that presents information on the status of, and trends in environmental releases, conditions, or effects.

US EPA definition An indicator is a sign or signal that relays a complex message, potentially from numerous sources, in a simplified and useful manner. An ecological indicator is defined here as a measure, an index of measures, or a model that characterizes an ecosystem or one of its critical components. An indicator may reflect biological, chemical or physical attributes of ecological condition.

Primary Data Analyzed Data Index Indicator Amount of information Degree of synthesis The Information Pyramid

Conceptual model: Pressure-State-Response Pressure Stresses placed on the environment by human activity or natural causes Response Government or societal actions Source: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Condition of the environment, human or ecological health StateEffects

LEVEL 1 Actions by EPA/State Regulatory Agencies Environmental LEVEL 3 Changes in Discharge/ Emission Quantities Administrative LEVEL 2 Responses of the Regulated & Nonregulated Community LEVEL 4 Changes in Ambient Conditions LEVEL 5 Changes in Uptake and/or Assimilation LEVEL 6 Changes in Health, Ecology, or Other Effects TOTAL PHOSPHORUS BLUE CRAB Hierarchy of Indicators Source: Chesapeake Bay Program, Environmental Indicators: Measuring our Progress ( This is how we measure environmental change

Performance Measures A quantitative or qualitative indicator for assessing the achievement of an objective or organizational goal. Can be used as a metric for administrative or environmental indicator

EPIC….how we got the ball rolling Two day conference to solicit ideas on key issues and sub-issues (day 1) and indicators to represent the issues (day 2). Sub-committees formed for major topics: air quality, pesticides, human health, eco health, etc.

EPIC ……getting the ball rolling Drawing on expertise of sub-committee members, winnowed down list to key issues and indicators Filtered indicators using criteria Final indicator set selected Never had time for a good peer-review

What are the environmental issues? Adequate data available (Type I) EPIC Indicator Selection Process Further data collection or analysis needed (Type II) No data; conceptual (Type III) Are criteria met? How can these be measured? Air quality Water Land/Waste/Materials Management Human Health Ecosystem Health Pesticides Transboundary

Indicator Selection: Primary criteria Data quality based on scientifically valid data collection Representativeness reflects the environmental issue for which it was selected Sensitivity detects meaningful differences in environmental conditions (signal:noise) Decision support supplies information that can support decision-making

Indicator Selection: Secondary criteria Anticipatory can provide an “early warning” Data comparability can be compared to indicators in other systems Cost-effective reasonable cost to collect data required to support the indicator Benchmark value point of reference enables users to assess the indicator’s significance

Ecosystem Health Indicators Key issues Habitat quantity Habitat quality Biodiversity Aquatic ecosystems indicators Land use/land cover Central valley chinook Least tern Lake Tahoe clarity Benthic macroinvert index Endocrine disruptors POPs in marine mammals

Human Health Indicators Concentrations of toxic chemicals in blood & other tissues is key issue –POPS, lead, mercury Extremely difficult to identify indicators of the effects of environmental exposures and human health –Numerous variable contribute to ‘health’ –State biomonitoring program’s goal is to determine exposure and possible effects

US EPA Aquatic Habitat Indicators Stream size – channel dimensions Channel gradient Channel substrate size and type Habitat complexity and cover –Riffles, pools, rocks, fallen trees, undercut banks Riparian vegetation cover and structure Anthropogenic alterations in stream channel and riparian zone Channel-riparian interactions Posted at:

2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development Indicators for Biodiversity Trends in abundance & distribution of selected species Extent of wetlands & large water bodies Catchment condition – extent of riparian vegetation Management effectiveness of protected areas Investment in protected areas Change in status of threatened species Area of forest, ag, aquaculture under sustainable management

2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development Indicators for Biodiversity Number and cost of alien invasions Water quality Freshwater trophic index Number of dams Sediment load in rivers Pesticide use/unit agricultural harvest Hit rates for biodiversity websites Balmford et al., The Convention on Biological Diversity’s 2010 Target, Science, 307:

Examples of indicators of community response Measure of extent of use of BMPs in ag Number of watershed groups – or a measure of activities of watershed groups – or watershed plans Existence of HCCP in region % of communities with ordinances requiring use of low impact development technologies Municipalities with integrated water management plans % of river miles covered by multi-purpose flood control projects

LEVEL 1 Actions by EPA/State Regulatory Agencies Environmental LEVEL 3 Changes in Discharge or environ. alterations Administrative LEVEL 2 Responses of the Regulated & Nonregulated Community LEVEL 4 Changes in Ambient Conditions LEVEL 5 Changes in Uptake and/or Assimilation LEVEL 6 Changes in Health, Ecology, or Other Effects Hierarchy of Indicators This is how we measure environmental change Acres riparian area/mi waterway % bank with armor Population of young fish SRWP Educational programs Collaborative efforts to establish multi-purpose flood projects Miles of greenway/mi waterway OR

Administrative Indicators Environmental Indicators Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 6 SWRP Actions & Program Response of env., ag, local govt. comm. Discharges alterations to environ. Conditions in watershed Assimila- tion or uptake Effects on human uses or ecology Educatn. & Outreach Existence of watershed plans Non-point source discharges Ground water supply Fish tissue conta- mination Change in popln. of key species MonitorAcres urban land in ‘green’ developmt. Acres land in irrigated ag Condition of instream habitat Ability of safely consume fish

Two issues to consider in developing an indicator system for the SRWP Value of including both environmental and administrative indicators Consider effects of environment conditions on human uses and needs (not just health) as well as effects on the ecosystem.