Review: Simultaneous Internal Diffusion & External Diffusion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fixed-Bed Reactor for studying the Kinetics of Methane Oxidation on Supported Palladium Objectives: 1.The general goal is to understand: a)the influence.
Advertisements

Conversion and Reactor sizing
ERT 316: REACTION ENGINEERING CHAPTER 2 CONVERSION & REACTOR SIZING
                                      제1장 Mole Balance Chemical Reaction Engineering 반응공학 I.
Conversion and Reactor Sizing
Momentum Heat Mass Transfer
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENCE TIMES FOR REACTORS PART I BY PUAN AZDUWIN BINTI KHASRI 10 DECEMBER 2012.
Mass Balances. Fundamental Principle of (Dynamic) Mass Balances The rate at which something accumulates in a region of interest (a “control volume”) equals.
SABIC Chair in Catalysis at KAU Chemical Reaction Engineering Dr. Yahia Alhamed.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 22.
A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering
L11-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Review: Nonelementary Reaction Kinetics.
Review: Nonideal Flow & Reactor Design
Review: Multiple Rxns & Selectivity
(PART B) By; Mrs Hafiza Binti Shukor ERT 208/4 REACTION ENGINEERING
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 23.
L5-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Relate all V(  ) to XA Put together.
L8-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Review: Pressure Drop in PBRs A →
© 2015 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 31.
Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. L21-1 Review: Heterogeneous Catalyst.
L9-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. L9-1 Review: Isothermal Reactor Design.
Mole balance for chemical reaction engineering (Design Equations for reactors) Lec 3 week 3.
L2b-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. L2b: Reactor Molar Balance Example.
CE 548 Introduction to Process Analysis and Selection
CHBE 424: Chemical Reaction Engineering
L3b-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ideal CSTR Design Eq with X A :
L20-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Review: Heterogeneous Catalyst.
L4-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ideal CSTR Design Eq with X A :
Review: Logic of Isothermal Reactor Design
© 2015 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 33.
L7-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Review: Liquid Phase Reaction in.
© 2015 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 31.
Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. L12-1 Review: Thermochemistry for Nonisothermal.
Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. L23-1 Dead Zone Review: Nonideal Flow.
Review: Steps in a Heterogeneous Catalytic Reaction
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 23.
L17-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Review: Unsteady State Nonisothermal.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 29.
Review: Heterogeneous Catalyst
Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. L21b-1 Review: Simultaneous Internal.
L15-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. L15: Nonisothermal Reactor Example.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 25.
1 Blend Times in Stirred Tanks Reacting Flows - Lecture 9 Instructor: André Bakker © André Bakker (2006)
Review: Nonideal Flow in a CSTR
Review: Multiple Steady States in CSTR
Reactors.
L13-1 Slides courtesy of Prof M L Kraft, Chemical & Biomolecular Engr Dept, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Review: Nonisothermal Reactor Design.
© 2015 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 33.
Kinetics and Reactor Design Kinetics and Reactor Design CHE-402 INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Nabeel Salim Abo-Ghander Chemical Reactions and Rate of Reactions Chapter.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 25.
CSTR Ideality November 29, 2006 By Taryn Herrera.
© 2014 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 24.
ERT 208/4 REACTION ENGINEERING: Distribution of Residence Times for Reactors (PART A) By; Mrs Hafiza Binti Shukor ERT 208/4 REACTION ENGINEERING SEM 2.
In  Out  Generation or Removal  Accumulation
© 2016 Carl Lund, all rights reserved A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering Class 40.
Chemical Reaction Engineering II Notes 5 1Dr. A. Okullo.
Lecture 32 Chemical Reaction Engineering (CRE) is the field that studies the rates and mechanisms of chemical reactions and the design of the reactors.
CHE 354 Chemical Reactor Design
Review: What size reactor(s) to use?
L2b: Reactor Molar Balance Example Problems
Chemical Reaction Engineering II Note 1
Steady-state Nonisothermal reactor Design Part I
Mustafa Nasser, PhD, MSc, BSc Chemical Engineering
Residence Times Distribution for Reactors
Review: Steps in a Heterogeneous Catalytic Reaction
Kinetics Patrick Cable, Dat Huynh, Greg Kalinyak, Ryan Leech, Wright Makambi, Ronak Ujla.
Chapter One: Mole Balances
Chapter One: Mole Balances
Distribution of Residence Times for Reactors
13. Reactor Engineering: Reactor Design
Presentation transcript:

Review: Simultaneous Internal Diffusion & External Diffusion Goal: Derive a new rate eq that accounts for internal & external diffusion -r’A is a function of reactant concentration Reactant conc is affected by internal & external diffusion Express reactant conc in terms of diffusion-related constants & variables →Use mole balance At steady-state: transport of reactants from bulk fluid to external catalyst surface is equal to net rate of reactant consumption in/on the pellet CAb CAs C(r) Extn diff Intern diff Molar rate of mass transfer from bulk fluid to external surface: reactor volume molar flux external surface area per unit reactor volume This molar rate of mass transfer to surface is equal to net rxn rate on & in pellet!

Review: Basic Molar Balance at Spherical Pellet Surface Flux: bulk to external surface Actual rxn rate per unit total S.A. External S.A. external + internal S.A. x = x ac: external surface area per reactor volume (m2/m3) DV: reactor volume (m3) f: porosity of bed (void fraction) -r’’A: rate of reaction per unit surface area (mol/m2·s) -r’A: mol/g cat∙s -rA: mol/volume∙s Sa: surface area of catalyst per unit mass of catalyst (m2/g cat) rb: bulk density, catalyst mass/ reactor volume rb=rc(1-f) per volume per surface area per mass cat→ For a 1st order reaction, simplifies to:

Review: Effectiveness Factors Remember, the internal effectiveness factor is based on CAs The overall effectiveness factor is based on CAb: Omega Put into design eq to account for internal & external diffusion

Review: Reaction Rate Variation vs Reactor Conditions External diffusion Internal diffusion Surface reaction -r’A=kCA Type of Limitation Variation of Reaction Rate with: Superficial velocity Particle size Temperature External U1/2 dp-3/2 Linear Internal Independent dp-1 Exponential Surface reaction

L22: Nonideal Flow & Reactor Design So far, the reactors we have considered ideal flow patterns Residence time of all molecules are identical Perfectly mixed CSTRs & batch reactors No radial diffusion in a PFR/PBR Goal: mathematically describe non-ideal flow and solve design problems for reactors with nonideal flow Identify possible deviations Measurement of residence time distribution Models for mixing Calculation of exit conversion in real reactors

Nonideal Flow in a CSTR Ideal CSTR: uniform reactant concentration throughout the vessel Real stirred tank Relatively high reactant concentration at the feed entrance Relatively low concentration in the stagnant regions, called dead zones (usually corners and behind baffles) Short Circuiting Dead Zone Dead Zone

Nonideal Flow in a PBR Ideal plug flow reactor: all reactant and product molecules at any given axial position move at same rate in the direction of the bulk fluid flow Real plug flow reactor: fluid velocity profiles, turbulent mixing, & molecular diffusion cause molecules to move with changing speeds and in different directions channeling Dead zones

Residence Time Distribution (RTD) Flow through a reactor is characterized by: The amount of time molecules spend in the reactor, called the RTD Quality of mixing RTD ≡ E(t) ≡ “residence time distribution” function RTD is measured experimentally by injecting an inert “tracer” at t=0 and measuring the tracer concentration C(t) at the exit as a function of time Tracer should be easy to detect & have physical properties similar to the reactant Measurement of RTD (PBR or PFR) This plot would have the same shape as the pulse injection if the reactor had perfect plug flow Pulse injection Detection

RTD Profiles & Cum RTD Function F(t) Tracer Conc t Tracer Conc t Tracer Conc t Tracer Conc   Nearly ideal PFR Nearly ideal CSTR PBR w/ channeling & dead zones CSTR with dead zones

Calculation of RTD The C curve C(t) The C curve t RTD ≡ E(t) ≡ “residence time distribution” function RTD describes the amount of time molecules have spent in the reactor Fraction of material leaving the reactor that has resided in the reactor for a time between t1 & t2 E(t)=0 for t<0 since no fluid can exit before it enters E(t)≥0 for t>0 since mass fractions are always positive Fraction of fluid element in the exit stream with age less than t1 is:

A pulse of tracer was injected into a reactor, and the effluent concentration as a function of time is in the graph below. Construct a figure of C(t) & E(t) and calculate the fraction of material that spent between 3 & 6 min in the reactor t min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 C g/m3 2.2 1.5 0.6 Tabulate E(t): divide C(t) by the total area under the C(t) curve, which must be numerically evaluated Plot C vs time:

A pulse of tracer was injected into a reactor, and the effluent concentration as a function of time is in the graph below. Construct a figure of C(t) & E(t) and calculate the fraction of material that spent between 3 & 6 min in the reactor t min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 C g/m3 2.2 1.5 0.6 Tabulate E(t): divide C(t) by the total area under the C(t) curve, which must be numerically evaluated Plot C vs time:

Tabulate E(t): divide C(t) by the total area under the C(t) curve: A pulse of tracer was injected into a reactor, and the effluent concentration as a function of time is in the graph below. Construct a figure of C(t) & E(t) and calculate the fraction of material that spent between 3 & 6 min in the reactor t min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 C g/m3 2.2 1.5 0.6 E(t) 0.02 0.1 0.16 0.2 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.044 0.03 0.012 t min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 C g/m3 2.2 1.5 0.6 Plot E vs time: Tabulate E(t): divide C(t) by the total area under the C(t) curve:

A pulse of tracer was injected into a reactor, and the effluent concentration as a function of time is in the graph below. Construct a figure of C(t) & E(t) and calculate the fraction of material that spent between 3 & 6 min in the reactor t min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 C g/m3 2.2 1.5 0.6 t min 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 C g/m3 2.2 1.5 0.6 E(t) 0.02 0.1 0.16 0.2 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.044 0.03 0.012 Fraction of material that spent between 3 & 6 min in reactor = area under E(t) curve between 3 & 6 min E vs time: Evaluate numerically:

Step-Input to Determine E(t) Disadvantages of pulse input: Injection must be done in a very short time Can be inaccurate when the c-curve has a long tail Amount of tracer used must be known Alternatively, E(t) can be determined using a step input: Conc. of tracer is kept constant until outlet conc. = inlet conc. injection detection t Cin t Cout C0 C0 The C curve

Questions 1. Which of the following graphs would you expect to see if a pulse tracer test were performed on an ideal CSTR? t Tracer Conc  A B C D 2. Which of the following graphs would you expect to see if a pulse tracer test were performed on a PBR that had dead zones? t Tracer Conc  A B C D

Cumulative RTD Function F(t) F(t) = fraction of effluent that has been in the reactor for less than time t t F(t) 80% of the molecules spend 40 min or less in the reactor 40 0.8

Relationship between E & F Curves F(t) = fraction of effluent that has been in the reactor for less than time t E(t)= Fraction of material leaving reactor that was inside for a time between t1 & t2

Boundary Conditions for the Cum RTD Function F(t)   Nearly ideal PFR Nearly ideal CSTR PBR with channeling & dead zones CSTR with dead zones 40 t (min) F(t) 0.8 80% of the molecules spend 40 min or less in the reactor F(t)=fraction of effluent in the reactor less for than time t

Mean Residence Time, tm For an ideal reactor, the space time  is defined as V/u0 The mean residence time tm is equal to  in either ideal or nonideal reactors By calculating tm, the reactor V can be determined from a tracer experiment The spread of the distribution (variance): Space time t and mean residence time tm would be equal if the following two conditions are satisfied: No density change No backmixing In practical reactors the above two may not be valid, hence there will be a difference between them

RTD in Ideal Reactors All the molecules leaving a PFR have spent ~ the same amount of time in the PFR, so the residence time distribution function is: The Dirac delta function satisfies: …but =1 over the entire interval Zero everywhere but one point